COTA Major Initiatives Ohio Planning Conference July 16, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mid Ohio Development Exchange (MODE) Presentation January 16, 2014.
Advertisements

Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority THE HEATHLINE EUCLID CORRIDOR BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT Michael J. Schipper, P.E DGM- Engineering & Project.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
Building Innovative Facilities for a Multimodal Future 2014 BICYCLE MASTER PLAN UPDATE FINAL PUBLIC REVIEW Baltimore City Department of Transportation.
I-35W and 46 th Street Station Concept Service Plan and Construction John Dillery & Mac Sweidan Kingfield Neighborhood Association June 2010.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
Goal: 10,000 interactions in 2015 –Extensive civic engagement Goal: To develop a great regional transit system –Update every five years –All options considered.
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGHPOINT Sounding Board Meeting Service Recommendations September 9, 2014.
1 Example of How Bus Stop Inventory is Used and Issues are Addressed.
RapidRide Briefing Growing Transit Communities East Corridor Task Force January 31 th, 2012 Ron Posthuma, Assistant Director King County Dept. of Transportation.
1 Welcome! West Valley-Taylorsville Transit Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement Public Open House/Hearing July 19, 2006.
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
Schools Jobs Revenues Services Recreation Environment Transportation Transportation Connectivity Housing Public Safety Pontiac’s.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
1 Item 11: Review of Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
Mark Phillips BSDA/Metro Long-Range Planner. The Foundation: Moving Transit Forward.
Metrobus 30s Line Study Improving Your Customer’s Transit Experience Virginia Transit Association May 20,
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements PRIMO & ENHANCED AMENITIES PLANNING PHASE September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee August 11,
Imagine the Possibilities… Vision from the 2002 Rail Plan.
All within 5 square miles and at the doorstep of ARTIC Study Area Approximately 73,000 employees Home for 25,000 residents Approximately 20 million visitors.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Interstate 95 Corridor Improvement Program June 20, 2012.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 15, 2009.
A New TOD Policy for Regional Transit Expansions Steve Heminger Executive Director March 11, 2005.
1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM.
DC Circulator Transit Development Plan TPB Access for All Advisory Committee October 28, 2010.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Comprehensive Operations Analysis LYNX 2013 Comprehensive Operational Analysis John Lewis, CEO.
Who Rides the Bus? Connecting Transit Demographics and Transit Service.
Minnesota’s Urban Partnership Agreement UPA Timeline The UPA agreement with the US DOT requires that the project be operational by September 30, 2009,
Express/Rapid Bus Opportunities for Priority Bus Transit in the Washington Region Sponsored by National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Chun.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements ZARZAMORA AND MILITARY PRIMO BRT PROJECTS ENVIRONMENTAL AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE September 9, 2014 VIA Community.
Transit is Smart Growth Matt Ryan Coconino County Supervisor Chair, NAIPTA April 24, 2012 Arizona Transit Association Annual Conference.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
The CTA Gray Line A Benefit for Chicago. Overall Plan Create New CTA Gray Line –On in-city Metra Electric ROW Use Existing Infrastructure Purchase of.
Northern Lights Express Minneapolis/Duluth-Superior Passenger Rail Alliance February 24, Northern Lights Express Minneapolis/Duluth-Superior Passenger.
Regional Transportation Plan Draft Hybrid Scenario Transportation Policy Committee 7/22/03.
ULI Symposium: Central City Commercial Development 1988.
Multi Agency Exchange May 16, 2017.
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board October 26, 2016.
Comprehensive Route Network Analysis
APTA Sustainability and Public Transportation Workshop Benjamin Smith
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO BPAC November 9, 2016.
River to Sea TPO - CAC/TCC
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ACEC Presentation May 25, 2017
Propose March 2018 Service Improvements
Propose March 2018 Service Improvements
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Update
D-LINK Overview Hans-Michael Ruthe April 19, 2018.
D Line Project Overview
Sacramento Historic City Hall
M14A/D Select Bus Service
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
WELCOMES YOU TO THE COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE OCTOBER 2018.
RTC RIDE Service Improvement Recommendations
Presentation transcript:

COTA Major Initiatives Ohio Planning Conference July 16, 2014

Overview Presentation  CBUS Circulator  Transit System Review  Cleveland Bus Rapid Transit System 2

CBUS Circulator 3

4 CBUS Circulator Alignment  4.1 mile loop  Serves  Arena District  Brewery District  German Village  Italian Village  River South  Short North  Uptown  Victorian Village New Alignment Map

5 CBUS Branding

6 Improved Connections to Attractions and Events  Attractions and festivals generated nearly 8 million visitors in 2012 including:  Arena District  Arnold Fitness Expo  Arts Festival  Brewery District  CAPA (Ohio, Palace, Southern, Capitol theaters)  Columbus Commons  Columbus Convention Center  ComFest  COSI  First Night Columbus  German Village  Greek Festival  Huntington Park (Clippers/concerts)  Jazz & Rib Fest  LC Pavilion  Nationwide Arena (Blue Jackets/concerts)  North Market  Red, White, & Boom  Scioto Mile  Shadowbox Live  The Short North Arts District (Gallery Hop)  And many more! Columbus Commons EventNationwide ArenaScioto Mile

7 Meeting Downtown Employee Transportation Needs  Downtown area continues to be the largest employment center in the region with approximately 85,000 employees. More than 7,000 added since Major employment sectors include:  Banking  Education  Government  Healthcare  Hospitality  Insurance  Legal  Utilities

8 Enhancing Downtown Livability  Residential growth: approximately 4,500 existing units, with another 2,400 under construction or planned including:  Atlas Building  250 S. High  570 Lofts  Annex at River South  Arena Crossing  Flats on Vine I & II  Highpoint at Columbus Commons  The Hubbard Park Place  Julian Building Apartments  LC Apartments at High & Rich  Liberty Place Apartments  Leveque Tower  Neighborhood Launch  Parkside on Pearl  The Wood Company  Yankee on High LC Apartments Arena Crossing HighPoint

Performance 9  Service began May 5 th  Ridership continues to build  Over 100,000 rides to date

Transit System Review 10

Timeline 11  January – TAC and Focus Group Meetings (3), Core Planning – COTA Staff (developed three scenarios)  February – briefed Board on study progress  March – Public meetings – Round 1  April 30/May 2-3 – Board workshop/Core Planning II  May – develop draft proposed service network and downtown plan  May 27 – June 4: TAC, Focus Group, Public meetings (9)  July 23 – Final Bus Network and Downtown Operations plans and implementation strategy to COTA Board  September – Final report (Bus Network Plan, Downtown Operations Plan, Implementation Plan, Technology Plan)  Implementation of Service Plan: 2015 – 2017 Core Planning Workshop

Existing Network – 70/30 12

Draft Proposed Network – 70/30 13

Existing High Frequency Network 14

Draft Proposed High Frequency Network Midday 15

Residents within ¼ mile of service 16 EXISTING PROPOSED More than twice as many residents get frequent service – that’s part of why ridership will grow. PROPOSED EXISTING +2% +103%

Jobs within ¼ mile of service 17 PROPOSED EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING The Frequent Network goes to 63% more jobs, another reason ridership will grow. +4.2% +63.7%

Effect on Existing Riders 18 PROPOSED EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING -1.7% +33.3%

Benefits and Ease of Use  Ridership increase up to 10% two years after full implementation  Expanded high frequency network, especially on crosstown services  Many more transfers outside of Downtown  Predictable frequencies, such as every 15, 30, or 60 minutes, make remembering the schedule easier  Service on local lines seven days a week with most operating the same span (improved weekend service)  New connections to suburbs and regionally significant areas  Connections to strategic employment locations in suburbs 19

Cleveland Avenue Bus Rapid Transit 20

21 A mix of characteristics:  Reduced travel times  Fewer stops  Signal priority (reducing stops at traffic lights)  Dedicated lanes at peak times (High Street only)  Frequent service  10 min. peak/15 min. off-peak  Span of Service  16 hours (Monday-Saturday)  14 hours (Sunday)  Unique and distinctive branding  Enhanced passenger amenities  Real-time information  Enhanced stations Kansas City Max Line What is Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)?

22 Station Locations 22 Draft Summary - Project Development  Total # of Stations both directions (Downtown to Polaris/Africa Road)  62 stations (BRT/Enhanced Bus)  BRT Stations (to SR-161)  25 northbound/24 southbound  Enhanced local service stops (north of SR-161)  7 northbound/6 southbound  Average Stop Distances  Within Downtown – 0.20 miles  Columbus State to Northern Lights – 0.43 miles  Northern Lights to SR 161 – 0.58 miles  SR 161 to Africa Rd. – 0.75 miles

23 Project Highlights Summary of LPA  Total # of Stations (to Polaris/Africa Road)  74 stations (BRT/Enhanced Bus)  BRT Stations (to SR-161)  32 northbound/29 southbound  Enhanced local service stops (north of SR-161)  7 northbound/6 southbound  Estimated travel time (one-way)  20% travel time savings  minutes to SR-161  minutes to Polaris/Africa Rd. Local Line 1 continues to operate Serves all stops 30-minute frequency Draft Summary (Project Development)  Total # of Stations (to Polaris/Africa Road)  62 stations (BRT/Enhanced Bus)  BRT Stations (to SR-161)  25 northbound/24 southbound  Enhanced local service stops (north of SR-161)  7 northbound/6 southbound  Preliminary project cost LPA: $39.4 million  80% Federal & 20% Local

24 Project Benefits  Improved transit service  Improved mobility and reliability in a congested corridor  Travel times savings of up to 20 percent  More travel options for growing transit-dependent populations  Improved pedestrian access and safety  Create opportunities for economic development within the corridor  A projected 15 – 20 percent increase in ridership in the first five years Note: These benefits are being refined in the current project development.

25 Perspective View Type A Station Concept Design

26 Station Concept Design – Type B Night View

27 Project History

Discussion 28