Marco Velicogna Research Institute on Judicial Systems Italian National Research Council IRSIG-CNR The Challenge of Going Digital: From Paper-Based Registers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Judicial Systems 2002 Facts and figures on the basis of a survey conducted in 40 Council of Europe Member States.
Advertisements

The European Activities of BR Communication e-CODEX e-Justice Communication via Online Data Exchange Bucharest, June 14 th 2013.
Courts and the Quest for Justice. In Theory: Courtroom Ideals  Courts have extensive powers in our criminal justice system.  The courts legitimacy is.
February Sign Language Interpreting in legal settings A European overview European Forum of Sign Language Interpreters (efsli) Marinella.
Ensuring respect of international anti-corruption standards Laura Sanz-Levia Council of Europe.
Central Database for Justice – E-File.  Central Information System  Criminal, Civil, Administrative & Misdemeanor procedures  Procedural acts & decisions.
Starter What is an appeal? Describe the adversarial nature of the judicial process.
The European Public Prosecutor: Coming soon to a country near you? An EPP working with UK authorities Practical issues Mike Kennedy President of Eurojust.
The fundamentals of EC competition law
Government of the Republic of Serbia Presentation of the Work Programme for the year 2008 Dušan Petrović, Minister of Justice Ministry of Justice December.
Bosnia Statistical Training Prosecution/Courts Session 8, November 23, 2010 European Commission on Efficiency of Justice.
Calculating the Cost for Language Services 24 November 2011 Evert van der Vlis Ministry of Security and Justice The Hague.
History of the Court System. Give Quiz 6 Collect first set of case analyses Remember must be submitted electronically as well.
EPOC: Empowering Judicial Cooperation through Eurojust Matthias Ruckdäschel, ICT Project Officer, Eurojust (ICT4Justice, Thessaloniki, 24 October 2008)
“MEZAN” Case Management Program At Palestinian Courts.
United Nations Workshop on Principles and Recommendations for a Vital Statistics System, Revision 3, for African English-speaking countries Addis Ababa,
Probation in Romania Change. Challenge. Progress Bugibba, Malta, 24th October 2014.
THE EUROPEAN UNION Lesson 5
Workshop 24 Input by ILGA-Europe (policy and coalition opportunities) Joël Le Déroff – Senior Policy & Programmes Officer – 19 October.
THE EUROPEAN UNION Lesson 5
European developments in judicial systems Pim Albers Special advisor of the CEPEJ Council of Europe.
The Spanish Public Prosecution Service. INDEX 1.Functions Objetive functions: defence of legality Constitutional legality Ordinary.
National Antimafia Bureau - Italy UNDP-POGAR National Workshop “Human Rights during Trial, Arrest and Imprisonment” Protecting and Safeguarding Human Rights.
1 FP6 into perspective. 2 Understanding the context and exploiting the opportunities FP6 into Perspective The European Union.
European arrest warrant and equality of treatment of EU citizens: Croatian example Elizabeta Ivičević Karas University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law.
M O D U L O IV M O D U L E IV. THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION.
Indicators for Criminal Cases Management in Bulgaria Public Hearing: Improving Criminal Justice Systems in Europe: The Role of E-Tools and Performance.
Croatia Statistical Training Courts Session 8, January 18 th, – An Electronic Case Management System – Advanced use With funding from the European.
Paris Project Meeting January 2012 Item – Statistics Objective 5 B. Proia With financial support from Criminal Justice Programme 2008 European Commission.
AGIS 2004 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June The European Arrest Warrant Project A short overview of Project JAI/2004/AGIS/043.
Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA Cooperation between Romania, Ireland and Italy to support the implementation of the Council Framework Decision.
Bosnia Statistical Training Prosecution / Courts Session 9, November Overview of the Criminal Justice System and Statistics – Publication of results,
Best practices in combating hate crime on the ground osce.org/odihr.
PRISON HEALTH IN EUROPE: MISSIONS, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS Strasbourg, France 27 th May 2014.
1 Launch of Project for Information and Communication Technology Enablement of Indian Judiciary by Dr. Manmohan Singh Hon’ble Prime Minister of India October.
The European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice and evaluation of legal systems (Council of Europe) Dr. Pim Albers Ministry of Justice of the Netherlands.
Piotr Karlik Criminal Proceedings Chamber Adam Mickiewicz University.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Update Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission November 7, 2012.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Class 39 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer April 24, 2002 ENGLISH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
Montenegro Statistical Training Courts / Prosecution Session 7, February 4, 9.00 – An Electronic Case Management System With funding from the European.
The Hemispheric Network for Legal Cooperation in Criminal Matters of the OAS/REMJA "CRIMINAL MATTERS NETWORK"
Chapter 6: Administrative Agencies
REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA The Reform of the Judicial System in the Republic of Macedonia Warsaw, June 2005.
Aim: How are federal judges appointed?. Appointment of Federal Judges The US Constitution authorizes the President to appoint anyone that the Senate will.
Principle of availability: investigation of crime vs. data protection Julio Pérez Gil University of Burgos. Spain.
PROGRAMMING OF INTERNATIOAL ASSISTANCE Donor Sectoral Meeting Ministry of Justice 25 th September, 2007.
DATA AND CRIMINAL RECORDS KEEPING UNDER THE ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2015 A PAPER PRESENTED TO THE COMMISSION BY E. C. OTTI ESQ. PROSECUTION.
JUDICIAL REFORMS IN TANZANIA: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
European judicial systems: 2008 findings Commission Européenne pour l’efficacité de la Justice European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice Dr. Pim.
Session III: IMRPOVING COMPLIANCE & ENFORCEMENT OF WATER LEGISLATION IN SWIM-SM COUNTRIES October 2012, Brussels 1.
Unit One Topics What is Criminal Justice? Chapter One Reading.
ICT4Judiciary current challanges Research Institute on Judicial Systems National Research Council of Italy IRSIG-CNR
Prosecution and investigative authorities in Romania Current status and future reforms Monica Otava Prosecutor Prosecutor’s Office Attached to the High.
The Role of Probation in the Pre-trial and Penitentiary Stages in The Netherlands in International Perspective Leo Tigges Former Secretary General CEP.
European judicial systems: 2008 findings and regional analysis
THE EUROPEAN UNION How does the structure of government within the EU compare with the structure of government in the United States?
Croatia Statistical Training
ECLI IN ROMANIA BO-ECLI Conference Athens, /06/2017
Implementation of ECLI in Latvia
PHASE 3 – PROSECUTION AND COURTS TRAINING
The OHIM Sabina Rusconi, institutional affairs and external relations department, OHIM Roving Seminar on the Conmunity Trade Mark System in China,
MDTFJSS RESULTS IN 2016 Ministry of Justice.
Calculating the Cost for Language Services
Annelies Balcaen & Tom Vander Beken 20 February 2009
The European Anti-Corruption Report
Matching Evidence into e-Codex CNR / e-Codex core team
CEPEJ Guidelines, Studies and Evaluation Tools
Women’s Access to Justice: A Guide for Legal Practitioners
Albanian Situation Marsida Xhaferllari and Brunilda Kadi
Presentation transcript:

Marco Velicogna Research Institute on Judicial Systems Italian National Research Council IRSIG-CNR The Challenge of Going Digital: From Paper-Based Registers and Statistics to Electronic Databases and ICT Management Systems for the Governance of Public Prosecutor Offices World Summit Of Prosecutors General, Attorneys General and Chief Prosecutors Third edition, Bucharest, Romania, March 23-25,

IRSIG-CNR –How are the justice systems changing? –How can we (the research) help judiciaries in addressing and governing change?

IRSIG Research Areas  ICT for justice systems  Quality of justice  Justice organisation Description and analysis of the processes of deployment and use of ICT in courts and prosecutors offices Description and analysis of the policies implemented to improve the quality of justice The functioning of courts and public prosecutor’s offices

The focus of today’s presentation is on opportunities, challenges and risks of “going digital”, developing, implementing and adopting ICT tools for the management of the PPOs

Quantitative data from CEPEJ Evaluation of European Judicial Systems Evaluation of European Judicial Systems Data Sources

–Research Institute on Judicial Systems – Italian National Research Council (IRSIG- CNR) –Institute of Constitutional and Administrative Law, Utrecht University, the Netherlands –London School of Economics, UK –Ministry of Justice of Finland –University of Aarhus, Denmark –University of Nanterre, France –AGIS programme JLS/2005/AGIS/175 ICT for PPO –6 in-depth national case studies –15 additional national reports + Eurojust Data Sources More qualitative data from several IRSIG research projects

 Not limited to technologies – European Arrest Warrant THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT IN LAW AND IN PRACTICE: A comparative study for the consolidation of the European law- enforcement area –Italy, IRSIG-CNR – The Netherlands, Utrecht University - Faculty of Law –Portugal, Coimbra University - Center for Social Studies, School of Economics and the ASJP – Association of the Portuguese Judges –Spain, the Judges for Democracy –Financed by the European Commission JLS/2007/JPEN/245 Data Sources

 Not limited to Europe –Australia –Nigeria –Singapore –USA –…–…–…–… Data Sources

The Challenge of Going Digital

Some core elements of the Public Prosecutor Office

Press Charges Drop a case Present the case in court Propose a sentence to the judge Impose/negotiate a penalty without judicial decision Appeal Prosecution Supervise Police Investigation Supervise enforcement procedure Conduct Investigation Request invest. measures from the judge InvestigationEnforcement PPO PPO’s Competences

Press Charges Drop a case Present the case in court Propose a sentence to the judge Impose/negotiate a penalty without judicial decision Appeal Prosecution Supervise Police Investigation Supervise enforcement procedure Conduct Investigation Request invest. measures from the judge InvestigationEnforcement PPO Places and activities

Press Charges Drop a case Present the case in court Propose a sentence to the judge Impose/negotiate a penalty without judicial decision Appeal Prosecution Supervise Police Investigation Supervise enforcement procedure Conduct Investigation Request invest. measures from the judge InvestigationEnforcement PPO Tools

Press Charges Drop a case Present the case in court Propose a sentence to the judge Impose/negotiate a penalty without judicial decision Appeal Prosecution Supervise Police Investigation Supervise enforcement procedure Conduct Investigation Request invest. measures from the judge InvestigationEnforcement PPO Symbols and values

Press Charges Drop a case Present the case in court Propose a sentence to the judge Impose/negotiate a penalty without judicial decision Appeal Prosecution Supervise Police Investigation Supervise enforcement procedure Conduct Investigation Request invest. measures from the judge InvestigationEnforcement PPO Investigation support tools Wiretapping Structured information systems Semantic technologies Criminal records Video conference recording Prosecution support tools Legal databases Document Management Courtroom technologies Enforcement support tools Prison records Surveillance databases Tagging technology Information and Communication Technology ICT to support PPs’ work

Press Charges Drop a case Present the case in court Propose a sentence to the judge Impose/negotiate a penalty without judicial decision Appeal Prosecution Supervise Police Investigation Supervise enforcement procedure Conduct Investigation Request invest. measures from the judge InvestigationEnforcement PPO Investigation support tools Wiretapping Structured information systems Semantic technologies Criminal records Video conference recording Prosecution support tools Legal databases Document Management Courtroom technologies Enforcement support tools Prison records Surveillance databases Tagging technology ICT examples

Press Charges Drop a case Present the case in court Propose a sentence to the judge Impose/negotiate a penalty without judicial decision Appeal Prosecution Supervise Police Investigation Supervise enforcement procedure Conduct Investigation Request invest. measures from the judge InvestigationEnforcement PPO Investigation support tools Wiretapping Structured information systems Semantic technologies Criminal records Video conference recording Prosecution support tools Legal databases Document Management Courtroom technologies Enforcement support tools Prison records Surveillance databases Tagging technology ICT for admin. and management Case tracking Case management systems Management info systems Full Business PPO Systems

Structured Hand-filed databases PPO recordsActivities Documents, case files, recordings Data analysis TRADITIONAL SYSTEM PPO’s PICTURE Use of data for management

Structured Hand-filed databases PPO recordsActivities Documents, case files, recordings Data analysis TRADITIONAL SYSTEM PPO’s PICTURE Digital shadow Automatic extraction GOING DIGITAL Structured databases PPO recordsActivities Documents, case files, recordings Data analysis PPO’s PICTURE Use of data for management

PPO’s PICTURE PPO’s PICTURE Data quality Focus Control Technical issues

Actions PPOs Other Institutional Actors PPO’s PICTURE Reactions Digital Tools Use Perceptions … But not only

Path dependency Institutional components Norms Values Political context Local elements Technological installed base In itinere events

Concluding Remarks (1/2) –Technology is becoming a constitutive element of the Criminal Justice Service Provision –This provides opportunities to improve the management of PPOs but also challenges –Technical –Organizational –Political –Use of ICT for management implies not only functional changes, but has much deeper implications –Change is not limited to what PPOs and PPs do but affects what they are –May sometime rebound in directions difficult to forecast

Concluding Remarks (2/2) Suggestions from the PPOs’ experiences: Move from top down technology driven innovation to design and experimentation arenas Keep in mind that ICT innovation is always more complex and challenging than initially foreseen Always remember that the technical component is the “easy” one… even though it may not be that easy… Think ICT as a plant and not as an element of the office furniture. It needs constant nurturing even after it has been installed, it grows and changes with time, and it may do so in unforeseeable ways.

Marco Velicogna Research Institute on Judicial Systems Italian National Research Council IRSIG-CNR Thank you! World Summit Of Prosecutors General, Attorneys General and Chief Prosecutors Third edition, Bucharest, Romania, March 23-25,