Implementing the “New” ADA and DOJ Regulations A Policy Tele-Institute for Higher Education 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board Governance: A Key to Quality Organizations
Advertisements

UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
The Changing Face of Higher Ed and the Role of IT as a Strategic Enabler Dave Wallace Chief Information Officer University of Waterloo December 4, 2012.
Establishing an Existing and Emerging Technologies Committee on your Campus AHEAD 2014 Presented by UAB Disability Support Services and UAB Legal Counsel:
Presentation for the Management Study of the Code Enforcement Process City of Little Rock, Arkansas August 3, 2006.
Salome Heyward & Associates Conference Services Program Accessibility And Emerging Technology April , 2014 Presented by Salome Heyward, JD Program.
Florida Atlantic University Overview of Operating Budget Process Presentation to the Florida Atlantic University Foundation, Inc. Board of Directors February.
IT Governance and Management
Requirements under Title II of the ADA November 18, 2010.
University Council Shared Leadership for Integrated Planning and Consultative Decision-Making.
OTHER LEGISLATION AND RULEMAKING 1. Congress & the Executive Branch Living the ADA The Higher Education Opportunity Act – Commission on Alternative Media.
ECM Project Roles and Responsibilities
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
UW Web Council Thursday, January 9 Topics in Web Accessibility.
Executive Sponsor Session October 31, 2006 ATI Technical Assistance Workshop.
What are the major challenges and issues today in accessible technology for higher education? Approaches towards solutions… Kirk D. Behnke, M.Ed., ATP.
Procurement Transformation State of North Carolina
Compliance and its Cast of Characters ~ Introductory Compliance Concepts for those with Auxiliary Roles Kimberli E. Bowman NCAA Membership Services.
Peer Information Security Policies: A Sampling Summer 2015.
Orlando, FL April 7 – 10, 2013 Document Lifecycle Strategies Delivering savings & efficiencies across your campus.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
Presented by: BoardSource Building Effective Nonprofit Boards.
Re-organizing Information Technology University at Buffalo.
Technology Access In Post-Secondary Education Ron Stewart Managing Consultant AltFormat Solutions LLC.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
PROJECT OBJECTIVES Identify, procure, and implement software that provided a common system for students, faculty, and staff to enter and measure.
Betsy L. Sirk Section 508 Coordinator NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Ensuring Web Accessibility for ALL Students A Campus-wide Initiative NACADA – Southeast Regional Conference April 14, 2012 Margaret Turner, Director Jorja.
Accessible Technology DTF. Overview: The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 require that.
Establishing A Compliance Program: It Makes Sense
Roles and Responsibilities
The Role of an ADA Coordinator in Post-Secondary Education Presented by L. Scott Lissner Friday, March 11, 2011.
1 Strategic Thinking for IT Leaders View from the CFO Seminars in Academic Computing Executive Leadership Institute.
EMPOWERING LOCAL SENATES Kevin Bontenbal, South Representative Stephanie Dumont, Area D Representative.
Engaging Student Affairs Professionals in Division-Wide Assessment Lisa Garcia-Hanson,University of Washington Tacoma Charlotte Tullos, Central Washington.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Top Issues Facing Information Technology at UAB Sheila M. Sanders UAB Vice President Information Technology February 8, 2007.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Building Our Virtual Campus with Universal Design in Mind All resources are available here:
Accessible Technology Enforcement by the United States Department of Justice September 17, 2015 Amanda Maisels, Deputy Chief Disability Rights Section.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Dallas Independent School District Technology Plan Ronald R. Pugh ET8011 May 15, 2011.
A Manager’s Guide To ADA Title II RICHARD RAY DONNA PLATT.
DATA IT Senate Data Governance Membership IT Senate Data Governance Committee Membership Annie Burgad, Senior Programmer, Central IT Julie Cannon, Director.
School Site Council (SSC) Essentials in brief An overview of SSC roles and responsibilities Prepared and Presented by Wanda Chang Shironaka San Juan Unified.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
2011 NASPA Annual Conference  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  March 12–16, 2011 Ensuring Web Accessibility Through Collaboration and Innovation Presented.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
OVERVIEW of the ISTE NETS for Administrators Presented by Kevin Brady and Alison Fricke.
INFORMATION ASSURANCE POLICY. Information Assurance Information operations that protect and defend information and information systems by ensuring their.
©2015, Region One Education Service Center Curriculum Advisory Council Meeting March 26, 2015 EDGAR Uniform Grants Guidance Office of School Improvement,
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
What One School Learned from DOJ/OCR Rulings at Other Institutions
University Career Services Committee
The NEW Distance Education Guidelines
IT Governance at the SCO
Procuring Accessible IT at the University of Washington: Background, Policy, Guidelines, Checklist, Resources Sheryl Burgstahler, Director Accessible Technology.
Auditing Cloud Services
Clinical Engineering Lecture (3).
Wyoming association of sheriffs and chiefs of police
Teaching Excellence Development Fund
Executive Committee Meeting May 18, 2018
The landscape of web accessibility in higher education: What you need to know now Cyndi Rowland, Ph.D.
“We don’t have enough staff assigned to making IT accessible!”
George Mason University
“We don’t have enough staff assigned to making IT accessible!”
Sam Catherine Johnston, Senior TA Specialist National AEM Center
Cynthia Curry, Director National AEM Center
Presentation transcript:

Implementing the “New” ADA and DOJ Regulations A Policy Tele-Institute for Higher Education 1

Session 4: Establishing Policy, Practice and Resources for Virtual Environments: Technology, Web Access, and Access to Print Materials Presenters Irene Bowen, ADA One, LLC Deborah Kaplan, Social Security Administration L. Scott Lissner, The Ohio State University November 30,

Presenters Irene Bowen, J.D. President of ADA One, LLC AHEAD presenter and trainer (national, state) Board member, National Association of ADA Coordinators Part-time senior policy advisor with LCM Architects City of Chicago title II plan Higher education: reviews and plans Former Deputy Chief, Disability Rights Section, DOJ Former Deputy General Counsel, US Access Board Co-founder, National Center for Law and Deafness 3

Presenters Deborah Kaplan Senior Advisor on Technology Accessibility, Social Security Adminstration Director, Accessibility Technology Initiative, California State University, Office of the Chancellor Executive Director of the World Institute on Disability Clinton Administration’s National Information Infrastructure Advisory Council Steering Committee of the Web Accessibility Initiative of the World Wide Web Consortium 4

Presenters L. Scott Lissner The Ohio State University University ADA Coordinator & 504 Compliance Officer Associate, John Glenn School of Public Policy Lecturer at the Knowlton School of Architecture, Moritz College of Law & Disability Studies AHEAD President Elect Co-Chair, Public Policy & Government Relations Committee OTHER Appointed, Ohio Governor's Council For People With Disabilities Chair, ADA-OHIO Appointed, State HAVA Committee Appointed, Columbus Advisory Council on Disability 5

Overview: A brief overview of the current enforcement and compliance context for Electronic and Information Technology (E&IT) followed by a discussion of the development and implementation of policies for the California State University campuses as a case study to model the process of building comprehensive E&IT policies on your campus. 6

Agenda: Compliance & Enforcement Environment E&IT Policy Development – Scope – Goals – Implementation Approach – Responsibilities – Principles – Priority Setting – Governance and Authority Questions ? 7

Compliance Environment The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 require that qualified individuals with disabilities be provided equal access to programs, services, or activities. Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act applies only to purchasing by Federal Agencies but sets a “benchmark” for access. 8

Compliance Environment 9 “There is no doubt that the internet sites of State and local government entities are covered by Title II of the ADA. Similarly, there is no doubt that the websites of recipients of Federal financial assistance are covered by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.”

Compliance Environment Public statements from DOJ –From “Can be an effective communication tool” the ADA Tool Kit – ANPRM Section III B Legal foundation for Web accessibility “Today the Internet, most notably the sites of the Web, plays a critical role in the daily personal, professional, civic, and business life of Americans.” 10

Compliance Environment Kindle complaints – Comparable time, effort and expense DOE and DOJ joint “Dear Colleague Letter” June 2010 – Interpret broadly 11

Compliance Environment Penn. State Complaint Library web site with library catalog is not fully accessible to blind students Many departmental web sites are not fully accessible to the blind, including, the Web site for the Office of Disability Services. Penn State utilizes a course management system integral to the learning and teaching experience allowing students and professors to interact with each other online and perform various course-related functions that is almost completely inaccessible to blind users 12

Compliance Environment Penn. State Complaint “Smart” podiums, allow instructors to connect his/her laptop but must use an inaccessible touchscreen Clickers/Personal Response Systems not able to independently read either the screen at the front of the room or the LCD display on the “clicker PNC Bank contract enables students to use identification cards as debit cards. The PNC Web site is nearly inaccessible &there is only one ATM on the entire campus with audio output 13

Compliance Environment Penn. State Complaint Requested Solutions Penn State should conduct an accessibility audit and make a plan of corrective action available for comment to students and faculty for comment. It should then develop guidelines for maintaining accessibility and procuring accessible software and hardware Penn State should hire trained full-time personnel responsible for accessibility on campus for each of its campuses who will have direct reporting authority to the Penn State System CIO 14

Compliance Environment Penn. State Complaint Requested Solutions Penn State should write, with input from the print disabled and blind students and faculty, a clear and meaningful policy statement on accessibility and make provisions for accountability for policy violations 15 Penn State should require PNC to make its websites and campus ATMs accessible if it is to continue in a relationship with the bank Penn State should develop a manual and provide training to all personnel who are authorized to code on its websites

Compliance Environment 21 st Century Communications & Video Accessibility Act 16 Accessibility of advanced communications equipment and services Requires devices capable of displaying closed captioning, to deliver available video description, and to make emergency information accessible. Captioning of internet delivered television

Scope of E&IT Policies Policies for access should cover academic programs and services, student services, auxiliary programs and services, information resources and technologies, and the procurement of goods and services 17 E& IT includes, but is not limited to computer and network access and services, computer‐delivered or enhanced instruction, instructional technologies such as clickers, library electronic information resources, library online catalogs and homepages, campus informational web sites, computer‐delivered or assisted administrative services, and voice and video programs and services

Goals Provide students, faculty and the general public with disabilities access to technology that is timely and as seamless as possible. Reduce the need for and costs associated with the provision of individual accommodations for technology access. Foster ownership of accessibility amongst all stakeholders to ensure that accessibility is designed into operations, rather than addressed retroactively as individualized accommodations 18

Goals Improve the usability of technology for all technology users through Universal Design as an underlying approach. Address accessibility challenges consistently over time. Foster collaboration on accessibility issues among campuses. 19

Implementation Approach Flexible enterprise level solutions & resources with unit level accountability best reflect the institutional obligation. ADA& 504 E&IT compliance efforts should be on par with Security and intellectual property rights efforts Continuous campus wide activity Integrated into the local culture(s) and system of E&IT use Informed by usability, universal design and emerging trends in E&IT 20

Implementation Approach Established baselines, priorities, benchmarks and goals for hardware, software & procedures reviewed and revised every three years Clear assignment at campus division & unit levels Self‐assessment linked to strategic planning Collaboration on common accessibility challenges, solutions and resources Identify and initiate statewide and national collaborations including the use of standards, tools and strategies 21

Implementation Approach Implementation needs to be continuous, planned, measured and documented Resources allocated based on priorities that relate to the highest impact allowing for individual accommodations when necessary. Decisions that achieving accessibility is either not possible or would constitute an undue burden should be made centrally and result in the development of plans to provide equally effective alternative access that are documented, and communicated. 22

Priority Setting 23

Priority Setting In setting priorities and allocating resources the following factors should be considered: How many people are expected to make use of the technology? Is it likely to be used again in the future, or repeatedly? Is it available publicly, or only to a pre‐determined audience? Is it required to be used for academic or institutional purposes? 24

Priority Setting Is it a time sensitive process? Is it the sole means for achieving its purpose? – If alternatives are available, are they accessible? Will it be used by a program or service with a primary audience of persons with disabilities? 25

Governance & Authority 26 While each project, policy element and procedure should identify roles and responsibilities for start up, ongoing implementation, and evaluation ensuring the accessibility of electronic and information technology is a shared institutional responsibility requiring ongoing, institutional attention and commitment for sustainable success.

Leadership, Governance Authority Clear central leadership expressed as: Defining excellence, success & failure Advance enterprise accessibility in strategic and capital planning Inform and monitor the development of implementation plans and resource allocation Foster collaborations across budget & planning lines Support working with vendors and publishers to address the accessibility of services and materials 27

Typical Governance Responsibilities Campus Executive Sponsors: Selected from senior leadership – Based on local culture & engagement typically CIO, Vice Provost or Legal Affairs – Charged by President/Chancellor/Provost Convene campus‐wide Steering Committee Channel communication to appropriate parties on campus Direct Campus ATI planning and monitoring efforts 28

Typical Governance Responsibilities Campus Administration: President, Provost, CIO, Legal Counsel, Guide vision and goals Incorporate priorities into campus planning Establish risk appetite and resource allocations Review progress on an annual basis and sign off on the campus plan Communicate the importance or E&IT access to the campus 29

Typical Governance Responsibilities Vice Presidents, Vice Provosts Deans: Provide leadership with respect to policy implementation priorities Incorporate E&IT access into strategic & budget planning Actively communicate the importance of E&IT within their divisions/colleges 30

Typical Governance Responsibilities ADA Compliance Officers: Representation on Steering Committee Participate in decisions concerning infeasibility, undue burden and providing equally effective alternatives. Monitor ADA compliance with respect to technology 31

Typical Governance Responsibilities Faculty Governance: Representation on the Steering Committee Promulgation to Faculty Centers for Faculty Development & Instructional Design: Promote standards & best practices Provide training for faculty & staff 32

Typical Governance Responsibilities Disability Services/Disability Resource Centers: Representation on Steering Committee Participate in development of processes and solutions for providing equally effective alternatives, when necessary 33

RESOURCES CSU Accessible Technology Initiative Accessibility and the Law: How good UX can keep you out of court and-the-lawhttp://uxmag.com/strategy/accessibility- and-the-law Departments of Justice & Education Joint Dear Colleague letter on access to instructional technologies

RESOURCES Kindle Settlements – – – – – – Legal Foundations for E&IT Access – files/ files/ 35

Irene Bowen, J.D. President, ADA One, LLC 9 Montvale Court Silver Spring, MD Web site: (O) (F) CONTACT 36

Deborah Kaplan Senior Advisor on Technology Accessibility Office of the Chief Information Officer Social Security Administration 400 Virginia Ave. SW, Suite 700 Washington D.C. (202) CONTACT 37

CONTACT L. Scott Lissner, ADA Coordinator, The Ohio State University 1849 Cannon Drive Columbus, OH (614) (v); (614) (tty) (614) (fax) 38

Other opportunities NAADAC webinars December 1: ADA Standards - Specialized Rooms, Spaces & Elements Incl. Residential & Rec. All seven sessions available on CD and for MP3, etc. To register and for more information: (direct registration) or (NAADAC website) Next NAADAC conference (four days of training): April 11-14, 2011, Miami, FL Information available in mid-December at NAADAC’s website:

Next webinar session Session 5 – Documentation Policies under the ADAAA Tuesday, December 14,