The New Teaching Institute Program Evaluation Report Lin Chengyan Eric Whitmer Anastasia Kalmykova.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing and writing learning objectives
Advertisements

Academic Quality How do you measure up? Rubrics. Levels Basic Effective Exemplary.
What is it? What is it? Quality Matters (QM) is a nationally recognized, faculty- centered, peer review process designed to certify the quality of online.
A Quality Matters “Quickie”
Question Do students report a better learning experience from faculty that participated in the 2009 Teaching Institute than faculty who did not participate.
Assessment Assessment should be an integral part of a unit of work and should support student learning. Assessment is the process of identifying, gathering.
Team 6 Lesson 3 Gary J Brumbelow Matt DeMonbrun Elias Lopez Rita Martin.
An Introduction to Instructional Design Online Learning Institute Mary Ellen Bornak Instructional Designer Bucks County Community College.
Bill Zannini Business Programs Coordinator October 27, 2008.
PBL Post-Project Review. 1. Student Engagement2. Project Idea3. Student Learning4. Authenticity of Project Tasks and Products5. Quality and Use of Driving.
Designing Instructionally Sound Courses Kristina Leonardo, Senior Consultant Blackboard, Inc. April 14, 2005.
Integrating Technology into the Classroom Design Team: The Design Divas Kristen Sabo, Kelly Neville, Candi Chandler, Leigh Davis Instructional Design EDIT.
Formative and Summative Evaluations
Facilitator Training Program
Course 'Evaluations': A Strategic Approach TLC Session January 26, 2006.
Phillips Andover Academy 2/23/2006 – 4:00-5:00 Darek Sady Blackboard Learning System (Release 6.3) e-Portfolios.
Employing e-Portfolios in Instructional and Co-Curricular Settings Jennifer Matthews, Senior Consultant Blackboard Inc April 13, 2005.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Uncovering the Promise of Faculty Success Online Lawrence C. Ragan, Ph.D. Penn State’s World Campus NERCOMP Boston 2005.
HOW TO DESIGN A SIMPLE ONLINE COURSE April 28, 2009 ED 641 STEPHEN CHESKIEWICZ, MS.ED AND IMPROVE STUDENT SUCCESS.
LISA HOLMES INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN. The process of creating an effective learning experience that takes into consideration: what needs to be learned what.
Instructional Design Eyad Hakami. Instructional Design Instructional design is a systematic process by which educational materials are created, developed,
CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University November 2013.
Help or Hindrance: A Blended Approach to Learner Engagement A presentation to The Ako Aotearoa ‘Research in Progress’ Colloquium.
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
© 2014 Blackboard Inc. All rights reserved.. Explain the overall steps for creating a test. Select question and test settings based on your needs. Deploy.
GSU Online Degree and Certificate Programs Preparation for North Central Association Accreditation Visit.
Instructor Course U.S. Soccer Federation Referee Program
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Online and Hybrid Course Design. Define Terms Traditional course Web Enhanced course Hybrid course Online course.
Cleo Sgouropoulou * Educational Technology & Didactics of Informatics Educational Technology & Didactics of Informatics Instructional.
CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University Spring 2015.
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
LANSING, MI APRIL 11, 2011 Title IIA(3) Technical Assistance #2.
Instructional Design Strategies for Online Course Dr. Alisa Cooper Instructional Technologist & English Faculty Glendale Community College Online Course.
Strategies for Managing the Online Workload CADE 2003 St. John’s Newfoundland June, 2003.
MAKING THE SHIFT: FROM CLASSROOM TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN
Welcome Module 25. Aim To provide the knowledge, skills and attitudes to effectively support adults through the Scout Association’s Adult Training Scheme.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
© 2010 Blackboard Inc. All rights reserved. Blackboard Learn 9.1 Getting Started.
4Faculty.org Online Professional Development Resources.
© Blackboard Inc. All rights reserved. Blackboard Learn 9.1 Getting Started.
Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.
November 5, 2000ATMI Conference, Toronto1 Technology as an Integral Part of the Music Classroom Incorporating Group Activities & Online Discussion Lists.
Dances with Faculty: Empowering Success in the Online Environment Lawrence C. Ragan, Ph.D. & Marilynne Stout, Ph.D. Penn State’s World Campus.
Instructional Design Course Evaluation Phase. Agenda The Evaluation Process Expert Review Small Group Review The Pilot Feedback and Revision Evaluation.
Storyboard UNIV 101 – The online student Carla Oñate Instructional Designer.
Development of an Interactive Online Masters of Public Health in Nutrition Degree Program NANCY L. COHEN, PhD, RD, LDN and PATRICIA BEFFA-NEGRINI, PhD,
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
Monitor and Revise Teaching. ObjectivesObjectives Describe how to monitor teaching List ways to contribute to broader evaluations Explain how to review.
Information Retention in e-Learning De Leon Kimberly Obonyo Carolyne Penn John Yang Xiaoyan.
Success in the Online Environment Lawrence C. Ragan, Ph.D., Penn State’s World Campus Mount St. Vincent University April 12th 2005.
Train the Trainer Inland Navigation Simulators. Welcome Please tell us: Who you are Where your from What your experiences are as instructor Why you are.
Orientation Classroom Teaching and Learning Theory Course Introduction and Overview.
Set Sail on a Three-Course Tour: Three examples of a QM Reviewed Course Krista MacDonald Doña Anna Community College Sharon Lalla New Mexico State University.
No Instructional Designer! Now What?
Online Driver Education and Virtual Classroom
Creating an E-Portfolio Using Google Sites
INSTRUCTOR COURSE U.S. SOCCER FEDERATION REFEREE PROGRAMGRADE 7 INSTRUCTOR COURSE PEACE AND INSTRUCTIONAL PHASES.
Preparing to Teach and Overview of Teaching Assignments
Instructional Design Strategies for Online Courses
Online Driver Education and Virtual Classroom
Preparing to Teach and Overview of Teaching Assignments
Crafting Online Course Standards while Maintaining Academic Freedom
Create engaging content using effective Instructional Design practices​ Ana Maria Zurita  Instructional Designer​ | CCOL Mariana Fernandez ​ Professor | Media.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Presentation transcript:

The New Teaching Institute Program Evaluation Report Lin Chengyan Eric Whitmer Anastasia Kalmykova

Agenda Introduction Evaluation plan description Description of Materials Evaluated Data collection tools Results

Introduction Name of the Program: The New Teaching Institute. Time range: November, March,2015. Purpose of the course: Incorporate the new technology into their teaching methods. Participants: 11 Faculty & Professors. Motivation for participants: – Upgrade Teaching Skills and Methods – Additional Reward.

Evaluation plan description The objectives of the course: Generate a fully functional hybrid course shell including a variety of course materials designed to engage students in achieving the course goals Generate concise learning goals and objectives appropriate for a hybrid course Generate assessments appropriate for evaluating the stated course outcomes Explain the ADDIE model of instructional design and its applicability in a hybrid course Evaluate the effectiveness of other instructors’ hybrid courses

Evaluation plan description Effectiveness of Course Efficiency of Course Usability of Course Appeal of Course Four main factors to evaluate the module

Description of Materials Evaluated Accessed via Blackboard  Start Here page Blocks provide sense of community and social presence for learners Blocks provide important information of the course Contact Information of the Course Facilitator Introductions Cyber Café Navigating the Course Syllabus Course Overview Netiquette UT Hybrid Course Rubric

Description of Materials Evaluated The module is organized in hierarchical structure represented in a form of tree. There are main sections menu of the module available on each page. Each section contains a set of topics with specific contents.

Data collection tools Entry Skills survey Usability survey Attitudes and Acceptance survey Course Review Rubric data Tool Administration Surveymonkey Data collection tools

Results of Evaluation of New Teaching Institute Course

How Effectiveness of NTI Module was Evaluated? Conducted a paired samples t-test MeanN Entry skills test Course review data Course review dataEntry skills test Developed questions of the entry skills test based on the course objectives and course review rubrics.

What is the Result of NTI Module Effectiveness? The course achieved its objectives with the intended audience The objective “Evaluate the effectiveness of other instructors’ hybrid courses” was measured by indirect observation of work performance

How Efficiency of NTI Module was Evaluated? Course review data Calendar

What is the Result of NTI Module Efficiency?

How Usability of NTI Module was Evaluated? Developed survey questions Conduct the survey Analyze the results

What is the Result of NTI Module Usability ? QuestionUnsatisfactoryAcceptableExcellent 1. Comfortable to UseXXXX 2. Navigation works, easy to use, & consistent XXXX 3. Clear OrganizationXXXX 4. Practice Opportunities AppropriateXXXX 5. Expected Functions & CapabilitiesXXXX 6. Easily Accessible in the event accidental termination XXX 7. Overall SatisfactionXXXX

How Appeal of NTI Module was Evaluated? Developed survey questions Conduct the survey Analyze the results NTI Attitudes & Acceptance Welcome to the NTI Attitudes & Acceptance Survey

What is the Result of NTI Module Appeal? QuestionStrongly Disagree DisagreeUndecidedAgreeStrongly Agree 1. Maintains InterestXXXX 2. Helps Generate Fully Functional Hybrid Course XX 3. Assignments Effective & Assist in Learning XXXX 4. Course Follows Objectives XXXX 5. Helps to Evaluate Other Instructors' Hybrid Courses XXXX Part1

What is the Result of NTI Module Appeal? QuestionStrongly Disagree DisagreeUndecidedAgreeStrongly Agree 6. Provided Proper Tools to Generate Assessments for Evaluating Course Outcomes XX 7. Learner was able to Generate Concise Learning Goals & Objectives for a Hybrid Course XXXX 8. ADDIE Model Effective in Delivering Content XXXX 9. Course has been BeneficialXXXX 10. Course is ChallengingXXXX Part2

Pattern of Like or Dislike Expert experience Boring Entry skills survey Appeal survey No experienceInteresting

Recommendations Conduct the regular and systematic evaluation – Develop and conduct pre/post tests – Conduct entry skills survey – Conduct usability survey – Conduct attitudes and acceptance survey Make subsequent changes based on the results if following evaluation will indicate that the majority of learners have high level of entry skills we recommend: – Add more challenging practice items – Reduce time to complete course if following evaluation will indicate that the majority of learners have problem finding information we recommended: – Make navigation simpler

Thank you. Questions?