Molecular Laboratory Design, QA/QC Considerations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CAP/POCT 2003 Carol Riley-Hunte, RRT Senior Education Specialist Bayer HealthCare.
Advertisements

1 HIV Drug Resistance Training Module 7: HIV Genotyping Assay Validation.
HIV Drug Resistance Training
QUALITY CONTROL IN HEMATOLOGY
A friendly clinician has asked you to go about setting up a test for a genetic disorder previously characterised by a research laboratory. Discuss how.
Stacey Sandell 22 nd October 2009 – Laboratory Management.
Christopher N. Greene, PhD Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences NCEH, CDC Tuesday, 9th July 2013 Assay Quality.
Utilizing a Non-Commercial Real- Time PCR to Detect HIV-1 RNA in HIV Antibody Negative Diagnostic Sera Submitted to The Maryland Public Health Laboratory.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR TROPICAL MEDICINE LABORATORY DECONTAMINATION and WASTE MANAGEMENT.
1 HIV Drug Resistance Training Module 13: Equipment and Supplies.
Molecular Laboratory Design
Assay Quality Considerations
REAL TIME PCR ………A step forward in medicine
This teaching material has been made freely available by the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust (Kilifi, Kenya). You can freely download, adapt, and distribute this.
National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention DBS DNA Extraction, Validation & Quantitation NBS Molecular Training.
Molecular LDT in Newborn Screening Laboratories
 Molecular Laboratory must have an ongoing Bio-safety SOP and also quality improvement program to monitor and evaluate objectively and systematically.
Forensic Biology Screening Workshop
Amplification and Detection of Nucleic Acid by the Real-Time RT-PCR Procedure Janice C. Pedersen, Microbiologist Avian Section Diagnostic Virology Laboratory.
World Health Organization
Identification and Elimination of Contaminations in Cell Culture and Polymerase Chain Reaction Laboratories Yih-Horng Shiao, Ph.D. Laboratory of Comparative.
Dr Samah Kotb Lecturer of Biochemistry 1 CLS 432 Dr. Samah Kotb Nasr El-deen Biochemistry Clinical practice CLS 432 Dr. Samah Kotb Nasr.
Overview of Newborn Screening Laboratory Processes and Quality Management Scott M. Shone, PhD Program Manager New Jersey NBS Laboratory SACHDNC May 11,
Quality Assurance and Quality Control in the Molecular Laboratory
General Laboratory Procedures and Safety Considerations Dr.Abdel Hady Dr.Hany.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN BLOOD BANKING
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
Genomic DNA purification
College of American Pathologists Copyright © 2002 College of American Pathologists (CAP) These materials by the CAP are copyrighted works. All rights are.
HIV Drug Resistance Training
Standard Operating Procedures.  To understand: › The purpose of having SOP’s and how they affect the daily workings of laboratories.  To discuss: ›
Principles and Important Considerations
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Validation of Analytical Methods Used For Bioequivalence.
QUALITY ASSURANCE Shree Baboolal 12 th February, 2005.
HIV Testing Quality Assurance and Quality Control
COBAS AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 Test
Laboratory: Unit 3: PCR (pages 54-55) Lecture: PCR & primer stock preparation In-Class Writing: abstract for AEM 63: , 1997 (page 68) Hand In: abstract.
Chelex ® Extraction. Learning Objectives Competence in extraction of different biological stains. Knowledge of the theory of DNA Isolation using Chelex.
Module 5: Assuring the Quality of HIV Rapid Testing
Analytical considerations
CAP Accreditation of Genetics Testing Laboratories Genetic Alliance May 16, 2007 Gail Vance, MD, FCAP College of American Pathologists.
7. EMERGENCY RESPONSE RYERSON UNIVERSITY.
Investigating the use of Multiple Displacement Amplification (MDA) to amplify nanogram quantities of DNA to use for downstream mutation screening by sequencing.
Amplification of Genomic DNA Fragments OrR. Amplification To get particular DNA in large amount Fragment size shouldn’t be too long The nucleotide sequence.
Julia Robbins August 11, Objectives Clinical Significance of MRSA in Healthcare Setting Principle of assay Assay Procedure Assay Perfomance.
Christopher N. Greene, PhD Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences NCEH, CDC Tuesday, 28th June 2011 Molecular.
All Rights Reserved AEIC Response Concentration 5% CV 20% CV Error bars for concentrations determined by the.
National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention DNA Quantitation NBS Molecular Training Class June 28 – 30, 2011 Suzanne.
HCV PCR By Henrietta Orji July 31 st, 2010 Hepatitis C Virus by Polymerase Chain Reaction.
Laboratory QA/QC An Overview.
Leukocyte-Reduced Blood Components Lore Fields MT(ASCP)SBB Consumer Safety Officer, DBA, OBRR, CBER September 16, 2009.
 DNA (gene mutations, paternity, organs compatibility for transplantations)  RNA  Proteins (gene expression)
Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Chapter 27 Introduction to the Medical Laboratory.
Quality Assurance How do you know your results are correct? How confident are you?
Laboratory Results and Operations in WHO Phase 6 Dr. Attaporn Taweetungtragoon CYBELES Phnom Penh, Cambodia October 12-15, 2009.
Molecular Testing and Clinical Diagnosis
Biochemistry Clinical practice CLS 432 Dr. Samah Kotb Lecturer of Biochemistry 2015 Introduction to Quality Control.
The Polymerase Chain Reaction (DNA Amplification)
QC/QA.
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
Regulatory Issues in Laboratory Management
LECTURE 13 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHOD VALIDATION
 Routine viral diagnostics: indirect and direct detection of viruses. ◦ Indirect detection: serological tests; ◦ Direct detection:  Viral antigens;
Published Standards for Molecular Laboratories Alexis B. Carter, MD, FCAP Director of Pathology Informatics Diplomate, American Board of Pathology, Molecular.
Introduction to Quality Assurance. Quality assurance vs. Quality control.
Quality Assurance Procedure Manuals.
Validation of HLA Typing by NGS
Complying With CLIA Competency Requirements
Practical clinical chemistry
Introduction to the Medical Laboratory
Presentation transcript:

Molecular Laboratory Design, QA/QC Considerations Rachel Lee, Ph.D. Texas Department of State Health Services NBS Molecular Training Workshop July 9, 2013

Overview Regulations and Guidelines Molecular Laboratory Design Monitor and Prevent Cross Contamination Assay Validation Quality of Reagents and Controls Use of Controls Specimen Acceptance Criteria Proficiency Testing Standardized Nomenclature

Laboratory Regulatory and Accreditation Guidelines US Food and Drug Administration (FDA): approves kits and reagents for use in clinical testing Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA): Regulations passed by Congress1988 to establish quality standards for all laboratory testing to ensure the accuracy, reliability and timeliness of patient test results regardless of where the test was performed College of American Pathologists (CAP): Molecular Pathology checklist State Specific Regulations NY Clinical Laboratory Evaluation Program (CLEP)

Professional Guidelines American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) MM01-A2: Molecular Diagnostic Methods for Genetic Diseases MM05-A2: Nucleic acid amplification assays for molecular hemathpathology MM09-A: Nucleic acid sequencing methods in diagnostic laboratory medicine MM13-A: Collection, Transport, Preparation, and Storage of Specimens for Molecular Methods MM14-A: Proficiency Testing (External Quality Assessment) for Molecular Methods MM17-A: Verification and Validation of Multiplex Nucleic Acid Assays MM19-P: Establishing Molecular Testing in Clinical Lab Environments MM20-A: Quality Management for Molecular Genetic Testing NBS06-A: Newborn Blood Spot Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency by Measurement of T-cell Receptor Excision Circles

Contamination Introduction of unwanted nucleic acids into specimen - the sensitivity of PCR techniques makes them vulnerable to contamination Repeated amplification of the same target sequence leads to accumulation of amplification products in the laboratory environment A typical PCR generates as many as 109 copies of target sequence Aerosols from pipettes will contain as many as 106 amplification products Buildup of aerosolized amplification products will contaminate laboratory reagents, equipment, and ventilation systems

Potential Sources of Contamination Cross contamination between specimens Amplification product contamination Laboratory surfaces Ventilation ducts Reagents/supplies Hair, skin, saliva, and clothes of lab personnel 6

Setting Up a Molecular Laboratory Mechanical barriers to prevent contamination Spatial separation of pre- and post-amplification work areas Area 1 – Reagent preparation Area 2 – Specimen preparation, PCR set-up Area 3 – Amplification/product detection, plasmid preparation Physically separated and, preferably, at a substantial distance from each other 7

Unidirectional Flow Both personnel and specimens Amplification product-free to product-rich Remove PPE before leaving one area Avoid or limit reverse direction Reusable supplies in the reverse direction need to be bleached. 8

Features of the 3 Areas Each area has separate sets of equipment and supplies Refrigerator/freezer (manual defrost) Pipettes, tips, tubes, and racks Centrifuge, timers, vortex Lab coat (color-coded), disposable gloves, safety glasses, and other PPE Cleaning supplies Office supplies Ventilation system Dead air box with UV light – serves as a clean bench area

Features of the 3 Areas Air pressure Reagent Prep and Specimen Prep – Positive Postamplification - Negative Reagent Prep – Single entrance, reagents used for amplification should not be exposed to other areas Specimen Prep – Specimens should not be exposed to post-amplification work areas

Laboratory Design Example Mitchell P. S. et al Laboratory Design Example Mitchell P. S. et al. Nucleic Acid Amplification Methods: Laboratory Design and Operations, 2004, In “Molecular Microbiology: Diagnostic Principles and Practice, edited by D. H. Persing et al” 99. 85-93.

Two Areas Only Area 1 – Reagent prep, specimen prep, and target loading – use of laminar-flow hoods Area 2 – Amplification/product detection

Alternative to Spatial Separation Class II biological safety cabinet Dedicated areas for each work phase Unidirectional Automated specimen processing station/closed-tube amplification and detection system 13

Chemical and Enzymatic Barriers Work stations should all be cleaned with 10% sodium hypochlorite solution (bleach), followed by removal of the bleach with ethanol. Ultra-violet light irradiation UV light induces thymidine dimers and other modifications that render nucleic acid inactive as a template for amplification Enzymatic inactivation with uracil-N-glycosylase Substitution of uracil (dUTP) for thymine (dTTP) during PCR amplification New PCR sample reactions pre-treated with Uracil-N- glycosylase (UNG) – contaminating PCR amplicons are degraded leaving only genomic DNA available for PCR

Important Details Use of positive displacement pipettes and disposable filtertip pipette tips Avoid production of aerosols when pipetting Use of sterilized single-use plasticware Use of cleanroom floor mats Minimizes the risk of amplicon carry-over on clothing, hair and skin Hairnet Dedicated safety glasses Disposable labcoat/gown Gloves Shoe covers

16

More Important Details Use of nuclease free or autoclaved water Aliquot oligonucleotides – multiple freeze thaws will cause degradation Always include a blank (no template) control to check for contamination Wipe test Monthly Detect and localize the contamination Identify the source of the contamination

Decontamination Approaches Clean the work area & equipments routinely Clean the PCR workstation at the start and end of each work day/run (UV light, 70% ethanol, fresh 10% sodium hypochlorite, DNA Away) Clean the exterior and interior parts of the pipette Clean the equipment Clean the doorknobs, handle of freezers

Other Considerations Temperature and humidity requirements Exhaust ventilation Water quality Back-up power system Eye wash

When is a Validation/Verification Study Required? Introduce a new testing system New analyte Analyte previously measured/detected on an alternate system An analyte added to a test system A modification to a test system Applies to Unmodified, FDA-cleared or approved method Modified, FDA-cleared or approved method In-house method Standardize method such as textbook procedure Determine analytic performance of an assay The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) standards require laboratories to verify or establish the performance specifications for any non-waived test system introduced into the laboratory. Prior to reporting patient results, the laboratory must validate the system and ensure that the system produces accurate and reliable test results in accordance with manufacturer’s and/or the laboratory’s specifications. Change of incubation time and temp, change or elimination a step, use a different sample matrix

Assay Validation Accuracy: Verify the method produces the correct results Test reference materials (known positive and negative specimens) Compare test results vs. reference method Compare split sample results Compare results to clinical diagnosis Sample for accuracy study Patient samples with known results QC materials PT materials Use the reference material. The laboratory compares the results they receive from the new test to the expected reference value. Take 20 patient specimens that cover the range of the test system, split the specimens, run them using the new test system, and then run the specimens by a comparative method.

Assay Validation (cont.) Precision: Measure of the reproducibility Day-to-day variance Run-to-run variance Within-a-run variance Operator variance Repeat testing of samples, e.g. known patient or QC samples, over time Can the lab get the same results time after time? Tests should be performed over the span of 3-4 days, in 3-5 different runs by different testing personnel. 20 specimens, change the order of the test specimens and controls.

Assay Validation (cont.) Analytical Sensitivity: Minimum detection limit Quantitate amount of RNA or DNA extracted Control material of known concentration or copy number LOD, LOQ, LOB Required only for in-house, modified FDA approved/cleared, standardize method. Measure the small amount of the analyte that can be consistently measured.

Assay Validation (cont.) Analytical Specificity: Detect only the analyte intended to be measured Interfering Substances: Document from product information, literature, or own testing Anticoagulant Specimen type (DBS) Reportable Range: Upper and lower limits of the testing system, presence and absence of mutations Reference Interval: Document the normal values Carryover study Stability Study Analytical specificity - Required only for in-house, modified FDA approved/cleared, standardize method. The reference intervals must be appropriate for the laboratory patient population. For qualative test, the results are reported as negative/positive or absent/present.

Conducting a Validation Study Planning Determine the number and type of specimens Study duration Establish acceptance criteria Method limitation State the methods to resolve discrepancies Testing Data Collection and Analysis Resolving Discrepancies Sequence amplicon Test sample by another laboratory We submit a validation study protocol, including backgroud info, intended use, objectives, study design with description of samplepopulation, sample size, duration, testing procedure, data collection and analysis, evaluation criteria, quality assurance, method limitation, reference

Conducting a Validation Study (cont.) Implementation Review and Approval by Lab Director SOP Assure ongoing QA PT

Reagents Labeling Reagents: Content, quantity, concentration Lot # Storage requirements (temperature etc.) Expiration date Date of use/disposal Know your critical reagents (enzymes, probes, digestion and electrophoresis buffers) and perform QC checks as appropriate

Critical Molecular Assay Components Nucleic Acids: Prepare aliquots appropriate to workflow to limit freeze-thaw cycles Primers and probes dNTPs Genomic DNA 4-8°C -15 to -25°C Enzymes Benchtop coolers recommended Fluorescent reporters Limit exposure to light Amber storage tubes or wrap in shielding (foil)

Controls for Each Run Appropriate positive, negative and no template controls (extraction blank) should be included for each run of specimens being tested

Molecular Assay Controls Positive and negative controls: Inhibitors Component failure Interpretation of results Sources: Residual positive DBS PT samples QC materials through purchase or exchange No template controls: Nucleic acid contamination

Positive Controls Ideally should represent each target allele used in each run May not be feasible when: Highly multiplex genotypes possible Systematic rotation of different alleles as positives Rare alleles Heterozygous or compound heterozygous specimens

Positive Controls Assays based on presence or absence of product Internal positive amplification controls to distinguish true negative from false due to failure of DNA extraction or PCR amplification PCR amplification product of varying length Specimens representing short and long amplification products to control for differential amplification Quantitative PCR Controls should represent more than one concentration Control copy levels should be set to analytic cut-offs

In Newborn Screening How can you control for presence of sufficient amount/quality of DNA for a PCR based test in a NBS lab?

PCR with Internal Controls Tetra-primer ARMS-PCR Simultaneous amplification of: Positive amplification control Mutation allele Reference allele Alternative to tetra-primer ARMS is to include an additional primer set to amplify a different control sequence

False Negative: ADO Potential causes: Allele drop-out (ADO): the failure of a molecular test to amplify or detect one or more alleles Potential causes: DNA template concentration Incomplete cell lysis DNA degradation Non-optimized assay conditions Unknown polymorphisms in target sites Reagent component failure Major concern for screening laboratories Confirmation of mutation inheritance in families may not an option

False Positives Potential causes: Non-optimized assay conditions Unknown polymorphisms in target sites Gene duplications Oligonucleotide mis-priming at related sequences Psuedogenes or gene families Oligonucleotide concentrations too high Nucleic acid cross-contamination

Sample Acceptance and Tracking Special specimen acceptance criteria? Assign a unique code to each patient Use two patient-identifiers at every step of the procedure Develop worksheets and document every step Positive ID

Proficiency Testing Assessment of the Competence in Testing Required for all CLIA/CAP certified laboratories Performed twice a year If specimens are not commercially available alternative proficiency testing program has to be established (specimen exchange etc.)

Molecular Assay Proficiency Testing Material Sources CDC NSQAP UKNEQS EuroGentest CAP Maine Molecular SeraCare Corielle ECACC In-house samples Round-robin with other NBS laboratories

Mutation Nomenclature Uniform mutation nomenclature Den Dunnen & Antonarakis (2001) Hum Genet 109:121-124 Den Dunnen & Paalman (2003) Hum Mutat 22:181-82 Human Genome Variation Society (http://www.hgvs.org/mutnomen/) Conventional notation should be retained for “established” clinical alleles

STANDARD NOMENCLATURE FOR GENES AND MUTATIONS Nucleotide numbering based on a coding DNA sequence Standard mutation nomenclature based on a coding DNA sequence Source: Ogino, et al (2007) J Mol Diagn 9:1-6

Examples of Mutation Nomenclature: CFTR Commonly used colloquial nomenclature DNA sequence change: NM_000492.3 Amino acid change (three-letter code) Site of mutation (exon/intron)* Type of mutation 5T/7T/9T polymorphism - 5T c.1210−12[5]   Intron 8 (no. 9) Splice site 1717−1G>A c.1585−1G>A Intron 10 (no. 11) Delta F508 c.1521_1523delCTT p.Phe508del Exon 10 (no. 11) In-frame deletion R553X c.1657C>T p.Arg553X Exon 11 (no. 12) Nonsense 3569delC c.3437delC p.Ala1146ValfsX2 Exon 18 (no. 21) Frameshift N1303K c.3909C>G p.Asn1303Lys Exon 21 (no. 24) Missense *Conventional CFTR exon/intron numbering includes exons 6a and 6b, exons 14a and 14b, and exons 17a and 17b; for exon/intron numbers in parentheses, these exon pairs are numbered sequentially without modifiers such as ′6a′ and ′6b.′

Other QA/QC Considerations Laboratory Cleanliness and Waste Disposal Instrument Maintenance and Calibration Instrument/Method Comparison Document Management Turnaround Time or Other QA Monitors Personnel Training and Competency Periodic Review of QA/QC COOP Plan