US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Community As A Whole: Prepare, Respond & Recover My Favorite Flood – Starring My Community 6 Steps To Success.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GP-DRR Parallel Meeting Disaster Preparedness M C. Oxley 4 th June 2007 Purpose: To stimulate substantive discussion on disaster preparedness in support.
Advertisements

Museum Presentation Intermuseum Conservation Association.
Disability Inclusive Disaster Risk Reduction Recommendations for Integrating the Preparedness, Response, Recovery and Mitigation Needs of the Whole Community.
Lesson 4 Minimizing Health Implications. For additional information or questions please contact Toledo-Lucas County Health Department APC:
Practical Preparations Planning for Safety and Emergencies.
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Sandy: Building Back Stronger, Safer & More Resilient Tim Crowley, Director, Mitigation Division, FEMA Region II December 2012.
Jon Keeling, PE, CFM Carey Johnson, CFM ASFPM 2012 Conference May 22, 2012 The Mission of Dam Safety Hazard Mitigation – Kentucky’s Experience.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 1—Community Preparedness
Using Mitigation Planning to Reduce Disaster Losses Karen Helbrecht and Kathleen W. Smith United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May.
FEMA Overview. FEMA overview Federal disaster contracting Emergency Preparedness 2.
Preservation and Disaster Management. Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA’s mission is to support our citizens and first responders to ensure that.
Flood Risk Management Program Ed Hecker, Chief, Office of Homeland Security National Levee Summit February 2008 St Louis, MO.
Resilience Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
Update Training Meeting
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
1 Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan – Advisory Committee August 16, 2007.
Conference Report – part 1.  Total number of selected abstracts – 19  Total Number Presented – 6.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Overview of Public Law (PL) Advanced Measures Contingency Operations Directorate.
PPA 573 – Emergency Management and Homeland Security Lecture 9b - Department of Homeland Security Strategic Plan.
PART TWO EMPLOYMENT Chapters 5-7.
Crisis Management Planning Employee Health Safety and Security Expertise Panel · Presenter Name · 2008.
Flood Risk Management Program Rolf Olsen Institute for Water Resources U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Assessment for Dam Failure Simulations Kurt Buchanan, CFM Economist Mapping, Modeling, and Consequences.
Session 16: Distribution of Geospatial Data 1 Distribution of Geospatial Data in the Public Environment Hazard Mapping and Modeling.
Organizational Tabletop Exercise 1 Hurricane Scenario (Community-Based Organizations) Date | Location.
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
An update from the National Committee on Levee Safety Presented to the TWCA by Karin M. Jacoby, PE, Esq. June 17, of 14An Involved Public and Reliable.
Mitigation can include structural and nonstructural efforts.
Oconee County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Kickoff Meeting Brian Laughlin Hazard Mitigation Planner Georgia Emergency.
Citizen Corps Mission To have everyone in America participate in making themselves, our communities, and our nation safer We all have a role in hometown.
Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable 1 Addressing the Flood Risk Challenge.
Preparing for Disasters General Liability. Introduction  The one coverage that provides you and your business the most protection is General Liability.
1 Slide1 THINGS WE NEED TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT LEVEES: CURRENT INITIATIVES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS Presentation to Association of State Flood Plain Managers.
Dr. Charles W. Beadling Central Asia Regional Health Security Conference April 2012 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
ADM 677 Crisis Management in Educational Settings Karen McCuiston Kentucky Center For School Safety.
1 The DNA of Emergency Management. 2 Approaches to Disaster Planning Two types of planning u Emergency 0perations Plan u Emergency Support Function.
1 Floodplain Management SESSION 20 Risks to Human Settlements Mitigation Programs Prepared By Rod Emmer CFM, PhD Larry Larson, CFM, PE.
Resilience Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
Homeland Security Grant Program 2015 Process Michelle Hanneken Illinois Emergency Management Agency.
Survivor Centric Emergency Management Integrating the Access and Functional Needs of the Whole Community Before, During and After Disasters August 2015.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Our Mission MITIGATIONS. MEANING OF MITIGATION MITIGATION IS THE PERMANENT REDUCTION OF THE RISK OF DISASTER MITIGATION IS THE PERMANENT REDUCTION OF.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Silver Jackets Innovative Collaboration to Maximize Solutions.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Texoma and Missouri Region JETS Training Symposium Resiliency Planning Through Hazard Vulnerability Analysis.
COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.
BUILDING STRONG SM Portland District Flood Damage Reduction Making Stormwater Management Systems Reduce Flood Damages D. Leslie Miller, P.E. Flood Preparedness.
THE COUNTY OF YUBA OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000.
International Recovery Forum 2014 ~ The Role of Private Sector in Disaster Recovery ~ 21 January 2014 Kobe, Japan Dr Janet L. Asherson THE LINK BETWEEN.
Community Planning 101 Disability Preparedness Summit Nebraska Volunteer Service Commission Laurie Barger Sutter November 5, 2007.
This course, Essential Records Seminar, is part of
1 An Approach to Levee Assessment and Contingency Planning Presentation to the National Waterways Conference 7 September 2006 Portland, Oregon By Rob Vining.
Japan International Cooperation Agency Role of stakeholders Priorities for Action Summary of the SFDRR Priority 1: Understanding disaster risk.
Life-Cycle Flood Risk Management
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Emergency Response Policy Revision Update ( ER & EP ) Jeffrey Jensen CECW-HS USACE Flood Risk Management.
USACE Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets Workshop Sandra K. Knight, PhD, PE, D.WRE Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, FEMA August.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Levee Safety Program US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® December 2013 Update for the NAFSMA Annual Meeting.
Business Continuity Disaster Planning
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Risk Management Center Silver Jackets Program Overview Jennifer Dunn USACE, Institute for Water Resources Silver Jackets Program Manager.
Disaster Preparedness Are you prepared?. Effective Disaster Plans  Your plan should outline the basic preparedness steps needed to handle the anticipated.
What Elected Officials Should Know Presented by Brenda Hunemiller Area D Office of Disaster Management.
97 th Annual Purdue Road School Presented by: Katie Zimmerman, P.E. Applied Pavement Technology Transportation Asset Management.
International Levee Handbook Overview of the handbook Chapter 6 – Emergency Management and Operations.
All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Susquehanna County Kick-Off Meeting April 28, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Flood Fighting and Planning US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Joel Ames Tribal Liaison.
Bringing CSB resources to the table during disasters
Community Health Centers of Arkansas Hazard Vulnerability Assessment Workshop August 11, 2017 Mark Fuller.
THE COUNTY OF YUBA OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
Presentation transcript:

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Community As A Whole: Prepare, Respond & Recover My Favorite Flood – Starring My Community 6 Steps To Success D. Leslie Miller, P.E. (Les) Flood Preparedness Program Manager Portland District 26 September 2012

BUILDING STRONG ® Begin with the End in Mind…. The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People Close your eyes, picture the following … Your Family & Friends Home Personal Places Place of Employment Community….

BUILDING STRONG ® 6 Steps to Flood Fight Success Develop and sustain your community’s best flood damage reduction practices using the following 6 steps and your “Whole Community” will experience their “Favorite Flood” because the headlines will proclaim… “We Win Flood Fight” “Starring Our Whole Community”

BUILDING STRONG ® Inclusive Process Includes anyone who wants to contribute, strives to have everyone contributes, even if it is only taxes…. Life Home Culture Economy Community

BUILDING STRONG ® Identify Flood Hazards This is primarily a technical process, utilizing engineering studies and National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) maps. The extent of research in a watershed, below and above ground water table, naturally and from the human environment will be determined by policy. It is local observations, especially those documented, which help confirm the engineer/scientist flood hazard models….

BUILDING STRONG ® Analyze Threats This is a technical process, which includes anecdotal input from citizens, media, businesses and government agencies. Flood Inundation Maps can be misinterpreted, so it is important to have the Whole Community check maps for “their” understanding and accuracy before beginning the following steps.

BUILDING STRONG ® Communicate Risk Risk assessment is frequently updated for economic and insurance purposes. Communicating “Tolerable” risk to the Whole Community, essentially informs everyone, they are needed….

BUILDING STRONG ® Develop Policy This probably is the most important step in the entire process, because signed laws, regulations and policy can cover all flood damage reduction priorities, schedules, funding and processes required to develop and sustain the Whole Community “opening night” performance capability….

BUILDING STRONG ® Culturize This is a process through which flood damage prevention & reduction process are incorporated into the “Whole Community” eventually becoming routine policy and practice….. ► Living process ► Inclusive – individual to agency ► Uses existing community culture – schools to fairs ► Rewards healthy competition to reduce risk

BUILDING STRONG ® Prevent-Mitigate Risk The flood hazard section of the community’s Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan should list all known flood risks (individual to economic) and at least one currently available temporary mitigation action which is carried out through emergency operations....

BUILDING STRONG ® Prepare Effectively Effective preparation is stimulated by two expectations: “all emergencies are local” and “failure to prepare does not constitute an emergency by potential resource providers”, especially those outside the local area…. A rigidly-flexible approach is required to sustain rehearsals for an “opening night” performance, with the flexibility to move the performance to another facility…the night before….

BUILDING STRONG ® Respond as Rehearsed Executing planned and rehearsed actions is essential if the “push verses the pull principle” of an “opening night performance” can be used effectively. Response success has 4 critical steps…. Site-By-Site Rehearsals Readiness & Forecast Aligned Advance Measures Triggered by Forecast Choreographed Response Operations & Support

BUILDING STRONG ® Recover as Rehearsed Recovery is integrated into State and Federal recovery programs. Local policy is most important because it addresses local priorities and resources for assistance…. Prepare Clean-up Repair and restore Replace Mitigate 

BUILDING STRONG ® Evaluate & Repeat This is extremely important for developing and sustaining “best practices”. Everyone is focused on returning to their routine, so confirm…. Firm policy to complete this effort Inclusive Pre-arranged trusted unbiased agent Rewarding – not penalizing

BUILDING STRONG ® Summary Sustain improvement until every citizen, resident, business, cultural entity and community agency successfully sustains their expected level of flood damage reduction, by: ___ Identifying Hazards ___ Analyzing Threats ___ Communicating Risk ___ Developing Policy for a continuously risk reducing culture ___ Mitigating Risk Permanently ___ Planning and rehearsing an “opening night” performance ___ Responding as Rehearsed ___ Recovering as Rehearsed ___ Evaluating and improving the process

BUILDING STRONG ® Keys To Success Each Step  Inclusive – Whole Community  Leadership – Champions with “hand-offs”  Vision – Realistic & Attainable  Strategy – Culture & Patience  Tactics – Specific & Accountable  Proactive – Push, Pull & Persistent  Fun – Award & Reward

BUILDING STRONG ® Feed Back!  Questions  Information  Suggestions  Recommendations  Way forward….

BUILDING STRONG ® Corps of Engineer’s Contacts  Portland District: Les Miller /4402  Seattle District Cathy Desjardin /3406  Walla Walla District Jeff Stidham /7146