Defense Trade Regulatory Requirements & National Security Reviews of Foreign Investment in the United States Presentation to IACC Aerospace, Defense &

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19 April 2012 The Office Agents Society Changes of Use from Commercial To Residential Michael Gallimore Hogan Lovells International LLP.
Advertisements

U.S.-India Dual-Use Export Policies and Procedures November 2004.
Regulatory Environment
Art. 6 – 8 of the draft Unitary Patent Regulation Prof. Dr. Winfried Tilmann.
Baker & McKenzie LLP is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the.
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls Yolanda Gantlin.
October 18, 2011 Device Development in Obesity and Metabolic Disease (DDOMD) Workshop Regulatory Considerations in Device Development Jonathan S. Kahan,
Wireless Access Code: Download the agenda PDF at:
16 July 2011 The Business Case for Mediation (for “ICC Arbitration & Amicable Dispute Resolution – Focus on India”) Jonathan Leach, partner, Hogan Lovells.
Copyright © 2009 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. CHAPTER 13 The Regulation of Exports.
April 8, 2013 NPE litigation in Japan Activities and impact of FRAND commitments Eiichiro Kubota, Hogan Lovells Tokyo.
Understanding the GRAS Process Martin J. Hahn Hogan Lovells US LLP Date: July 16, 2013 Food and Agriculture Group.
© Allen & Overy 2013 Global reach and local depth – your perfect match Luxembourg-Russia Desk Jacques Wantz In charge of the Luxembourg-Russia Desk Allen.
Legal Issues and Export Controls Career-Ending Opportunities and Ways to Get Fitted for an Orange Jumpsuit David Lombard Harrison, Associate Vice President.
NCL License Processing Overview Bernard Kritzer Director, Office of National Security and Technology Transfer Controls Bureau of Industry and Security.
January 2012 Workshop on competition law aspects International Legal Expert Meeting, January 2012 Leiden University, The Netherlands Jacques Derenne.
Recent developments in aviation liability & insurance: The 1973 Hague Convention on the law applicable to products liability: choice of law issues in aviation.
Responsible Person v. Safety Assessor Sylvie Gallage-Alwis Avocat à la Cour / Solicitor in England & Wales ECORE ERPA Seminar – Tel Aviv – 16 June 2014.
Do You Need an Export License? Purpose of Export Controls To serve the national security, foreign policy, nonproliferation, and short.
January 29-30, 2013 Tokyo, Japan Exportation of Knock-Down Kits: (Direct or Indirect) Infringement? AIPLA Mid-Winter 2013 Pre-Meeting Yusuke Inui, Attorney.
"The Role of Arbitration in the Dispensal of Justice" Does Arbitration Maintain the Advantages it Traditionally Enjoyed? Nathan Searle, Senior Associate.
Bureau of Industry and Security U.S. Department of Commerce Dual-Use Export Controls and the Commerce Control List.
Investing in Hotels in China: What You Need to Know The China Hotel Investment Summit 2005 April 2005 IMAGE HERE.
© 2009 Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Joseph A. Levitt Hogan & Hartson April 21, 2009 FDA Regulation of Bottled Water An Overview.
UCAR/NCAR/UCP Export Compliance EOL MAC FL
Unfulfilled Promises: Affordable Housing in Metropolitan Washington Presentation to the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Mary Anne Sullivan,
Food Safety Modernization Act: Are You Ready? March 27, 2012 Gary Jay Kushner NPA Annual Meeting La Playa, Florida.
Ethical Issues in Setting Litigation Reserves Clay James, Partner at Hogan Lovells Annie Kao, Senior Litigation Counsel at Vail Resorts December 8, 2010.
Nicolas Pourbaix, Senior Associate
Modernizing Export Controls ABA International Law Section Matthew S. Borman Acting Assistant Secretary for Export Administration Bureau of Industry and.
January 25, 2012 Regulatory Update Report to NCC Marketing Committee Robert O. Winters.
January 2012 Workshop on Radio Frequencies International Legal Expert Meeting, January 2012 Leiden University, The Netherlands Gerry Oberst.
Protection of Intellectual Property in the Customs Union of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan By Natalia Gulyaeva.
27 October 2011 Competitive dialogue in UK PFI PPP Forum Perspective Andrew Briggs, Partner.
December 8, 2014 Healthcare/Privacy Current Law Affecting Uses of Health Data Melissa Bianchi Partner.
Hogan Lovells The solicitor's role Gathering the evidence –Disclosure in most cases: –Disclosure in most fraud cases: 1.
27 September 2013 Promoting Russia as a Seat of Arbitration: What Are the Best Ways Forward? Peter Pettibone.
1 Brown Bag Luncheon Series Training 09/25/2008 EXPORT CONTROLS AT YALE.
PAMS Export Control Page UTHSC Campus –Wide Business Managers Meeting May 17, 2012.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Transatlantic merger enforcement Catriona Hatton November 28, 2007 Brussels.
Deemed Exports Overview and the Inspector General’s Report Presentation for : Office of National Security and Technology Transfer Controls Bureau of Industry.
ITAR/EAR The Short Overview The Security Summit Bob Ketts 22 March 2011.
Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security “EAR Regulatory Update” Arlington, Virginia June 10, 2008 Timothy Mooney Export.
Deemed Exports Overview and the Inspector General’s Report Presentation for : Alex Lopes Director, Deemed Exports and Electronics Division Office of National.
0 Office of Export Enforcement Bureau of Industry and Security U.S. Department of Commerce.
December 2010 The Emerging Basle III and its implications for Structured Trade Finance Banks Andrew Gamble – Afreximbank Seminar on Fundamentals of Structured.
EXPORT CONTROLS License Exclusions Eileen Nielsen Director of Sponsored Projects Compliance Office of Financial Services Harvard School of Public Health.
© 2013 Braumiller Schulz LLP Any copying or distribution is prohibited. Adrienne Braumiller, Partner Michelle Schulz, Partner
Mutuals' Forum 2010 Regulators & Legislators: Appreciating the Mutual Difference John Gilbert, Consultant 4 November 2010.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. National Pharma Audioconference Bristol-Myers Squibb 2007 Settlement Stephen J. Immelt, Esq. November 26, 2007.
Office of Nonproliferation Controls and Treaty Compliance Bureau of Industry and Security Nonproliferation & Export Control Update Briefing Steven Clagett.
Dealing with Commercial Entities: Selected Export Control Issues 2003 ECCO Training Seminar June 4, 2003 Peter L. FlanaganEric D. Brown
 U.S. laws and their implemented regulations that prohibit the unauthorized “export” of certain controlled ITEMS, INFORMATION OR SOFTWARE to foreign.
Russian response to US sanctions: what has been done and what to expect? 14 August 2014.
November 2015 Presentation to South African Diamond Producers Organisation on Legal Liability Awareness – Introduction to the Mine Health & Safety Act.
© Goulston & Storrs All rights reserved. MA Export Center Export Expo: Strategic Planning for Export Compliance Operations December 9, 2014 Kerry.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Cartels Fines, Leniency, Settlement John Pheasant November 28, 2007 Brussels.
NCMA Boston’s 3 rd Annual Int’l Contracting Forum Alan F. Lehman Chief, International Law 66 ABG/JA 9 December 2015 Foreign Military Sales Contracts &
Leobardo Tenorio and Ernesto Ocampo – Tijuana Office Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Catriona Hatton, Partner 26 May 2008 Medical Device Companies Antitrust Compliance Programmes.
Bureau of Industry and Security U.S. Department of Commerce: Dual Use Licensing Policy Issues and Regulatory Update Presented by: Steve Clagett Director,
Overview of Strategic Trade Control (STC) Concepts and Issues Jay P. Nash Research Fellow, Center for Policy Research (CPR) University at Albany, State.
Turnaround Management Association of Southern Africa - presentation Panamo Properties (Pty) Ltd v Nel and Another NNO NUMSA v Wilro Supplies CC & Companies.
Overview of Department of Commerce Export Controls for Chemical and Biological Items.
1 Export Control of Dual-Use Items and Arms: Industry Outreach Sofia, May, 2006 POLAND’S EXPERIENCES INDUSTRY OUTREACH and PERSONNEL TRAINING JACEK.
Export licensing of dual-use and military goods in the Russian Federation.
U.S. Export Controls Getting Started: Exporter, Manufacturer and
U.S. Export Controls U.S. Trade Sanctions Compliance May 11, 2016
FSMA Enforcement: Focus on Inspections
Presentation transcript:

Defense Trade Regulatory Requirements & National Security Reviews of Foreign Investment in the United States Presentation to IACC Aerospace, Defense & Homeland Security Session Ajay Kuntamukkala, Partner May 24, 2012 International Trade / Washington D.C.

Agenda Overview Export Controls History of U.S. Export Control Policy Towards India Export Administration Regulations International Traffic in Arms Regulations The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) Summary Matrix of Regulatory Issues Questions

Overview The aerospace, defense, and homeland security industries are highly regulated in the United States U.S. export controls apply to the transfer of technology, export and import of equipment, export of software and source code, and the employment of foreign persons in the United States Mergers, acquisitions, and joint ventures involving foreign entities may require national security reviews by CFIUS Indian companies, like other foreign companies, may be subject to these rules when they enter the U.S. market

U.S. Export Control Laws

History of U.S. Export Policy Towards India Export controls policy is a key issue in the U.S.-India commercial relationship Exports controls affect only a small fraction of overall bilateral trade However, export controls are viewed by India as a significant strategic and economic issue History of technology denial Need for technology as a developing country U.S. has gradually liberalized its export controls regulations with regard to India to reflect India’s role as a strategic partner India is in the process of integrating into international export controls and nonproliferation regimes

History of U.S. Export Control Policy Regarding India Post-Independence Era (1947-1970) 1950 - US-India Technology Cooperation Agreement 1963 - Early nuclear cooperation: purchase of GE nuclear reactor for Tarapur 1963 - Early space cooperation: India launches U.S. rocket at Thumba Era of Technology Denial (1970-2000) 1970 - NPT comes into force, India does not sign 1971 - Zangger Committee established 1974 - India’s first nuclear tests; nuclear cooperation with India ceases 1974 - Nuclear Suppliers Group formed in response to Indian nuclear tests 1998 - India’s second nuclear tests; range of sanctions imposed by U.S. Government Renaissance (2000-present) 2000 - President Clinton visit and removal of certain sanctions against India 2001 - President Bush waives remaining sanctions on India 2003 - U.S.-India High Technology Cooperation Group 2004 - Next Steps in Strategic Partnership 2005 - U.S.-India Civil Nuclear Deal announced 2005 - New Framework for US-India Defense Relationship signed 2009 - End-Use Monitoring Arrangement; increased defense trade 2010 - President Obama visit and subsequent removal of Indian firms from Entity List and agreement on other export control initiatives

U.S.-India Bilateral Understanding On November 8, 2010, President Obama and Prime Minister Singh committed to strengthen bilateral cooperation on export controls and nonproliferation U.S. to support India’s full membership in Nuclear Suppliers Group, Missile Technology Control Regime, Australia Group, and Wassenaar Arrangement India to implement additional controls and meet requirements of each regime U.S. to remove Indian space and defense entities from the Entity List U.S. to realign U.S. export control licensing policy to reflect India’s status as a strategic partner, including removing India from list of “countries of concern” Expanded export control cooperation through U.S.-India High Technology Cooperation Group

Structure of U.S. Nuclear Export Controls Nuclear Regulatory Commission Department of Energy Part 110 Regulations Part 810 Regulations Nuclear reactors, fuel cycle facilities, components and materials Nuclear technology and technical assistance Department of Commerce: Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) State Department: Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DTC) Additional U.S. Government agencies with possible jurisdiction over export activities include the Department of Energy (Nuclear Regulatory Commission), Food and Drug Administration, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Export Administration Regulations (EAR) International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) Commercial and “dual use” commodities and technology Military items, including nuclear weapons

Export Administration Regulations Administered by the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) The EAR’s Commerce Control List (CCL) controls the export and reexport of commercial and “dual-use” (i.e., both commercial and military applications) goods, software and technology EAR also controls the transfer of certain technology to foreign persons, including Indian nationals, in the United States (“deemed exports”) Only a small fraction of exports to India now require export licenses from BIS In CY 2000, 24% of U.S. exports to India required export licenses In CY 2009, 0.3% of U.S. exports to India required export licenses

ITAR: Controlled Activities Administered by State Department’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) Broad restrictions on exports, reexports, imports, and brokering of: Defense Articles Technical Data Defense Services Generally speaking, the ITAR are more restrictive than the EAR Manufacturers, exporters, and brokers are required to register with DDTC

ITAR: Controlled Activities With limited exceptions, prior U.S. Government authorization required for: Exports and reexports of Defense Articles Exports and reexports of Technical Data to foreign persons (wherever located) Provision of Defense Services to foreign persons (wherever located) Temporary imports of Defense Articles or Technical Data Proposal to sell or manufacture certain Defense Articles Brokering transactions involving Defense Articles or Services

ITAR: Who Must Comply? All individuals located in the United States U.S. citizens and permanent residents, wherever located Companies organized under U.S. laws and their employees, wherever located U.S. branches of non-U.S. companies Foreign entities and persons dealing in U.S.-origin Defense Articles (including Technical Data) or U.S.-origin Defense Services

ITAR: Licenses and Approvals Primary types of licenses and approvals under the ITAR Permanent Export License (DSP-5) Temporary Export License (DSP-73) Temporary Import License (DSP-61) Agreements Technical Assistance Agreement (TAA) Manufacturing Licensing Agreement (MLA) Distribution Agreement Export license and agreements generally now bust be filed via D-Trade

Relevant ITAR Reform Initiatives DDTC has not made any India-specific regulatory changes, but overall export control reform efforts should improve defense trade with India Ongoing reform of U.S. Munitions List (USML) Proposed rule on components (3/15/11) Proposed rule on defense services (4/13/11) Final rule on dual nationals and third-country nationals (5/16/11)

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States CFIUS created to conduct national security reviews of foreign investment and make recommendations to the President U.S. continues to maintain an open, non-discriminatory investment policy and to welcome foreign investment CFIUS mandated to conduct its reviews within context of overall investment policy; intended to ensure that foreign direct investment remains benign

Exon-Florio Amendment Authorizes the review of any acquisition of control of a US business by a non-US entity to determine if the acquisition poses a threat to national security Grants the President the authority to block, restrict or order divestment of any such acquisition if he determines that there is a national security threat and no other law is adequate to deal with it President’s authority only terminates if transaction is reviewed and found not to threaten national security

Covered Transactions Under CFIUS US Business Any entity engaged in US interstate commerce (even if foreign owned), but only to the extent of its activities in interstate commerce US business need not have separate legal identity; acquisition of a division that operates as a business meets the test. For Exon-Florio to apply, transaction must involve: A merger, acquisition or takeover By or with a foreign person Which could result in foreign control Of a US business Foreign government-controlled transactions Any covered transaction that could result in control of a US business, directly or indirectly, by a foreign government

CFIUS Procedures Process initiated by voluntary notice by parties to transaction Significant amount of information required from parties (target and acquirer) Submission of draft notice in advance of formal filing encouraged and often advisable CFIUS also might initiate its own review Review process has up to three formal stages Initial review – 30 days (CFIUS may request additional information from parties) CFIUS decides whether to proceed with an extended 45-day review (investigation) If CFIUS decides to pursue investigation, at end of 45 days CFIUS must present report to President President must make a decision within 15 days

Regulatory Issues Relevant to Indian Corporations in the U. S Regulatory Issues Relevant to Indian Corporations in the U.S. Aerospace, Defense, and Homeland Security Industry CFIUS ITAR EAR Acquisition of U.S. Company ITAR Registration 60-Day Notification Exports/Imports Technology Transfer Employment of Foreign Persons Exports Establishing Joint Ventures in the U.S. Establishing a U.S. Branch or Greenfield Operation Supplying Equipment or Services to U.S. Government or U.S. Company

www.hoganlovells.com Hogan Lovells has offices in: Abu Dhabi Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Berlin Brussels Budapest* Caracas Colorado Springs Denver Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston Jeddah* London Los Angeles Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New York Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Riyadh* Rome San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar* Warsaw Washington DC Zagreb* "Hogan Lovells" or the "firm" refers to the international legal practice comprising Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Hogan Lovells Worldwide Group (a Swiss Verein), and their affiliated businesses, each of which is a separate legal entity. Hogan Lovells International LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC323639. Registered office and principal place of business: Atlantic House, Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2FG. Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. The word "partner" is used to refer to a member of Hogan Lovells International LLP or a partner of Hogan Lovells US LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications, and to a partner, member, employee or consultant in any of their affiliated businesses who has equivalent standing. Rankings and quotes from legal directories and other sources may refer to the former firms of Hogan & Hartson LLP and Lovells LLP. Where case studies are included, results achieved do not guarantee similar outcomes for other clients. New York State Notice: Attorney Advertising. © Hogan Lovells 2011. All rights reserved. * Associated offices