Operations Management

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Waiting Line Management
Advertisements

Components of the Queuing System
Waiting Line Management
Chapter 5: Service Processes
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Where is There Waiting? Service Facility –Fast-food restaurants –Post office –Grocery store.
Waiting Lines and Queuing Theory Models
QUEUING MODELS Based on slides for Hilier, Hiller, and Lieberman, Introduction to Management Science, Irwin McGraw-Hill.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998 Irwin/McGraw-Hill 2 Chapter 7 TN Waiting Line Management u Waiting line characteristics u Some waiting line management.
1 Waiting Lines Also Known as Queuing Theory. 2 Have you ever been to the grocery store and had to wait in line? Or maybe you had to wait at the bank.
QMD: Waiting-line analysis
D Waiting-Line Models PowerPoint presentation to accompany
Model Antrian By : Render, ect. Outline  Characteristics of a Waiting-Line System.  Arrival characteristics.  Waiting-Line characteristics.  Service.
Waiting Lines and Queuing Theory Models
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Technical Note 6 Waiting Line Management.
Queuing Systems Chapter 17.
Waiting Line Models And Service Improvement
D – 1 Operations Management Module D – Waiting-Line Models © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render Principles of.
To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management, 8e by Render/Stair/Hanna 14-1 © 2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Chapter 14.
Waiting Lines Students should be able to:
Waiting Line Analysis OPIM 310-Lecture 3 Instructor: Jose Cruz.
Lecture 11 Queueing Models. 2 Queueing System  Queueing System:  A system in which items (or customers) arrive at a station, wait in a line (or queue),
Queuing. Elements of Waiting Lines  Population –Source of customers Infinite or finite.
To Accompany Russell and Taylor, Operations Management, 4th Edition,  2003 Prentice-Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Waiting Line Models and.
D – 1 Operations Management Module D – Waiting-Line Models © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render Principles of.
To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management, 9e by Render/Stair/Hanna 14-1 © 2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Chapter 14.
Operations Management Waiting-Line Models Module D
Chapter 9: Queuing Models
WAITING LINES The study of waiting lines, called queuing theory, is one of the most widely used and oldest management science techniques. The three basic.
Group members  Hamid Ullah Mian  Mirajuddin  Safi Ullah.
Queuing Models and Capacity Planning
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.D – 1 Operations Management Module D – Waiting-Line Models PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render Principles of Operations.
1 1 © 2003 Thomson  /South-Western Slide Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
D Waiting-Line Models PowerPoint presentation to accompany
Operations Management
Introduction to Management Science
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.D – 1 Operations Management Module D – Waiting-Line Models © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render.
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 12, Part A Waiting Line Models n Structure of a Waiting Line System n Queuing Systems n Queuing System Input.
D-1 © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J Operations Management Waiting-Line Models Module D.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Service Processes CHAPTER 5.
Management of Waiting Lines McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Advanced Waiting Line Theory and Simulation Modeling Chapter 6 - Supplement.
1 1 © 2003 Thomson  /South-Western Slide Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Queuing Models. © 2002 Prentice-Hall, IncCh 9-2 Stay in Queue: Short Video &feature=related
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 1.
Waiting Line and Queuing Theory Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University.
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Beni Asllani University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Waiting Line Analysis for Service Improvement Operations Management.
 One or more ‘customers’ waiting for a service.  ‘Customer’ can be: › People e.g. A person waiting in line to deposit cash in a bank. › Objects e.g.
1-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved 1 Chapter 8A Waiting Line Management.
Waiting Lines and Queuing Models. Queuing Theory  The study of the behavior of waiting lines Importance to business There is a tradeoff between faster.
1 Queuing Systems (2). Queueing Models (Henry C. Co)2 Queuing Analysis Cost of service capacity Cost of customers waiting Cost Service capacity Total.
Components of the Queuing System
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Beni Asllani University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Waiting Line Analysis for Service Improvement Operations Management.
Waiting Lines and Queuing Theory Models
1 1 Slide © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
1 1 Slide © 2009 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning Slides by John Loucks St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide Chapter 12 Waiting Line Models n The Structure of a Waiting Line System n Queuing Systems n Queuing System Input Characteristics n Queuing System.
Queuing Models.
Queueing Theory/Waiting Line: Models and Analysis Navneet Vidyarthi
Topic V. Multiple-Channel Queuing Model
Module D Waiting Line Models.
D - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall D D Waiting-Line Models PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and Render Operations.
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.D – 1 Operations Management Module D – Waiting-Line Models © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 11 Waiting Line Models
WAITING LINES AND SIMULATION
“QUEUING THEORY”.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved
Chapter 9: Queuing Models
Queuing Models J. Mercy Arokia Rani Assistant Professor
Presentation transcript:

Operations Management Module D – Waiting-Line Models PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render Principles of Operations Management, 6e Operations Management, 8e © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Common Queuing Situations Arrivals in Queue Service Process Supermarket Grocery shoppers Checkout clerks at cash register Highway toll booth Automobiles Collection of tolls at booth Doctor’s office Patients Treatment by doctors and nurses Computer system Programs to be run Computer processes jobs Telephone company Callers Switching equipment to forward calls Bank Customer Transactions handled by teller Machine maintenance Broken machines Repair people fix machines Harbor Ships and barges Dock workers load and unload Table D.1

Characteristics of Waiting-Line Systems Arrivals or inputs to the system Population size, behavior, statistical distribution Queue discipline, or the waiting line itself Limited or unlimited in length, discipline of people or items in it The service facility Design, statistical distribution of service times There are 3 parts of a waiting line, or queuing, system. See the next slide for a nice picture.

Parts of a Waiting Line Arrival Characteristics Size of the population Population of dirty cars Arrivals from the general population … Queue (waiting line) Service facility Exit the system Dave’s Car Wash enter exit Arrivals to the system In the system Picture of the three parts of the queue that we are interested in to help characterize it. Exit the system Arrival Characteristics Size of the population Behavior of arrivals Statistical distribution of arrivals Waiting Line Characteristics Limited vs. unlimited Queue discipline Service Characteristics Service design Statistical distribution of service Figure D.1

Arrival Characteristics Size of the population Unlimited (infinite) or limited (finite) Pattern of arrivals (statistical distribution) Scheduled or random, often a Poisson distribution Behavior of arrivals Wait in the queue and do not switch lines Balking or reneging First part is: Arrival Characteristics. Difference between balking and reneging: Balking – refusing to join the line (queue) because it is too long. Reneging – enter the queue, but become inpatient and leave without being served.

Poisson Distribution e-x P(x) = for x = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, … x! where P(x) = probability of x arrivals x = number of arrivals per unit of time  = average arrival rate e = 2.7183 (which is the base of the natural logarithms) This distribution is assumed and used in much of queuing theory. Why do you think this is the case?

Poisson Distribution e-x Probability = P(x) = x! 0.25 – 0.25 – 0.25 – 0.20 – 0.15 – 0.10 – 0.05 – – Probability 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Distribution for  = 2 x 0.25 – 0.20 – 0.15 – 0.10 – 0.05 – – Probability 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Distribution for  = 4 x 10 11 Arrivals are not always Poisson distributed. Therefore, historical data should be examined carefully before applying any of the models that assume an underlying Poisson arrival process. Figure D.2

Waiting-Line Characteristics Limited or unlimited queue length Queue discipline: first-in, first-out is most common Other priority rules may be used in special circumstances Second part is: Queue Characteristics For all of the models we study in this Module, we will assume unlimited queue length. First-in, first-out (abbreviated as FIFO) is very similar to the FCFS rule we studied in Chapter 15 for sequencing.

Service Characteristics Queuing system designs Single-channel system, multiple-channel system Single-phase system, multiphase system Service time distribution Constant service time Random service times, usually a negative exponential distribution Third part: Service Characteristics Two basic properties are important: (1) design of the service system and (2) the distribution of the service times. Service systems are often classified in terms of their number of channels and the number of phases.

Queuing System Designs Your family dentist’s office Queue Service facility Departures after service Arrivals Single-channel, single-phase system McDonald’s dual window drive-through We will look at four possible channel and phase configurations. Queue Phase 1 service facility Phase 2 service facility Departures after service Arrivals Single-channel, multiphase system Figure D.3

Queuing System Designs Most bank and post office service windows Service facility Channel 1 Channel 2 Channel 3 Departures after service Queue Arrivals Multi-channel, single-phase system Figure D.3

Queuing System Designs Some college registrations Phase 1 service facility Channel 1 Channel 2 Phase 2 service facility Channel 1 Channel 2 Queue Departures after service Arrivals Any other good examples? Multi-channel, multiphase system Figure D.3

Negative Exponential Distribution Probability that service time is greater than t = e-µt for t ≥ 1 µ = Average service rate e = 2.7183 1.0 – 0.9 – 0.8 – 0.7 – 0.6 – 0.5 – 0.4 – 0.3 – 0.2 – 0.1 – 0.0 – Probability that service time ≥ 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 Time t in hours Average service rate (µ) = 3 customers per hour  Average service time = 20 minutes per customer Service time distributions are similar to arrival time distributions: the can be constant (simplest case) or random. If we assume a negative exponential distribution with a service rate of 3 customers/hour, then it will be very, very rare that any one person takes longer than 1.5 hours to serve. Average service rate (µ) = 1 customer per hour Figure D.4

Measuring Queue Performance Average time that each customer or object spends in the queue Average queue length Average time in the system Average number of customers in the system Probability the service facility will be idle Utilization factor for the system Probability of a specified number of customers in the system Metrics, lots and lots of metrics!

Cost of providing service Queuing Costs Cost Low level of service High level Cost of waiting time Total expected cost Minimum Total cost Cost of providing service When operating any service where a queue may exist, you have to balance the benefits between two basic trade-offs: (1) the cost of providing good service and (2) the cost of the customer (or machine) waiting time. One way to look at the problem is by looking at the total expected cost. Optimal service level Figure D.5

Queuing Models Model Name Example A Single channel Information counter system at department store (M/M/1) Number Number Arrival Service of of Rate Time Population Queue Channels Phases Pattern Pattern Size Discipline Single Single Poisson Exponential Unlimited FIFO The four models presented in Module B have three characteristics in common: (1) Poisson arrivals, (2) FIFO discipline, and (3) Single-service phase. To describe this queuing model, the notation M/M/1 is used. The first letter refers to the arrival process (where M stands for Poisson). The second letter refers to the service (where M is again a Poisson distribution, which is the same as an exponential rate for service). The third symbol refers to the number of servers. Table D.2

Queuing Models Model Name Example B Multichannel Airline ticket (M/M/S) counter Number Number Arrival Service of of Rate Time Population Queue Channels Phases Pattern Pattern Size Discipline Multi- Single Poisson Exponential Unlimited FIFO channel Table D.2

Queuing Models Model Name Example C Constant Automated car service wash (M/D/1) Number Number Arrival Service of of Rate Time Population Queue Channels Phases Pattern Pattern Size Discipline Single Single Poisson Constant Unlimited FIFO Table D.2

Queuing Models Model Name Example D Limited Shop with only a population dozen machines (finite) that might break Number Number Arrival Service of of Rate Time Population Queue Channels Phases Pattern Pattern Size Discipline Single Single Poisson Exponential Limited FIFO Table D.2

Model A - Single Channel Arrivals are FIFO and every arrival waits to be served regardless of the length of the queue Arrivals are independent of preceding arrivals but the average number of arrivals does not change over time Arrivals are described by a Poisson probability distribution and come from an infinite population 6 major assumptions with this model – here are the first three.

Model A - Single Channel Service times vary from one customer to the next and are independent of one another, but their average rate is known Service times occur according to the negative exponential distribution The service rate is faster than the arrival rate 6 major assumptions with this model – here are the final three. Why is assumption 6 important?

Model A - Single Channel  = Mean number of arrivals per time period µ = Mean number of units served per time period Ls = Average number of units (customers) in the system (waiting and being served) = Ws = Average time a unit spends in the system (waiting time plus service time)  µ –  1 Of course, you have to put everything into the same time period to ensure the model makes sense. Table D.3

Model A - Single Channel Lq = Average number of units waiting in the queue = Wq = Average time a unit spends waiting in the queue ρ = Utilization factor for the system 2 µ(µ – )  µ Table D.3

Model A - Single Channel P0 = Probability of 0 units in the system (that is, the service unit is idle) = 1 – Pn > k = Probability of more than k units in the system, where n is the number of units in the system =  µ k + 1 Table D.3

Single Channel Example  = 2 cars arriving/hour µ = 3 cars serviced/hour Ls = = = 2 cars in the system on average Ws = = = 1 hour average waiting time in the system Lq = = = 1.33 cars waiting in line 2 µ(µ – )  µ –  1 2 3 - 2 22 3(3 - 2) Example from page 751 – Golden Muffler Shop.

Single Channel Example  = 2 cars arriving/hour µ = 3 cars serviced/hour Wq = = = 40 minute average waiting time ρ = /µ = 2/3 = 66.6% of time mechanic is busy  µ(µ – ) 2 3(3 - 2) µ P0 = 1 - = .33 probability there are 0 cars in the system

Single Channel Example Probability of More Than k Cars in the System k Pn > k = (2/3)k + 1 0 .667  Note that this is equal to 1 - P0 = 1 - .33 1 .444 2 .296 3 .198  Implies that there is a 19.8% chance that more than 3 cars are in the system 4 .132 5 .088 6 .058 7 .039 NOTE: The OM macro does NOT perform these calculations for you.

Single Channel Economics Customer dissatisfaction and lost goodwill = $10 per hour Wq = 2/3 hour Total arrivals = 16 per day Mechanic’s salary = $56 per day Total hours customers spend waiting per day = (16) = 10 hours 2 3 While having the characteristics of the queue is important, we may also want to talk in dollars and cents. Customer waiting-time cost = $10 10 = $106.67 2 3 Total expected costs = $106.67 + $56 = $162.67