G020060-00-R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Discussion of Statistical Methods, Tools, and Simulations  Review of tools and methods  (I am only familiar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Calibration of the gravitational wave signal in the LIGO detectors Gabriela Gonzalez (LSU), Mike Landry (LIGO-LHO), Patrick Sutton (PSU) with the calibration.
Advertisements

LIGO-G Z Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
LIGO-G Z Update on the Analysis of S2 Burst Hardware Injections L. Cadonati (MIT), A. Weinstein (CIT) for the Burst group Hannover LSC meeting,
GWDAW-8 (December 17-20, 2003, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) Search for burst gravitational waves with TAMA data Masaki Ando Department of Physics, University.
LIGO Reduced Data Sets E7 standard reduced data set RDS generation for future runs decimation examples LIGO-G Z Isabel Leonor (w/ Robert Schofield)
Burst detection efficiency  In order to interpret our observed detection rate (upper limit) we need to know our efficiency for detection by the IFO and.
LIGO- G R AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Simulation of Burst Waveforms and Burst Event Triggers Alan Weinstein Caltech Burst UL WG LSC meeting, 8/13/01.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Discussion of Statistical Methods, Tools, and Simulations  Review of tools and methods  (I am only familiar.
LIGO- G02XXXX-00-Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Zwerger Muller SN waveforms The 78 ZM waveforms differ in initial angular momentum they have (A parameter),
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Hardware Burst Injections in E9  S2 Alan Weinstein, Caltech Laura Cadonati, MIT Shourov Chatterjee, MIT.
G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Progress on Burst Simulation  t-f character of burst waveforms  Burst waveforms  Calibration  E7 data.
LSC Meeting, 17 March 2004 Shawhan, Marka, et al.LIGO-G E Summary of E10 / S3 Hardware Signal Injections Peter Shawhan, Szabolcs Márka, Bruce.
LIGO-G E ITR 2003 DMT Sub-Project John G. Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Argonne, May 10, 2004.
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Amaldi5 July 9, 2003 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory Monitoring LIGO Data During the S2 Science Run Michael.
Waveburst DSO: current state, testing on S2 hardware burst injections Sergei Klimenko Igor Yakushin LSC meeting, March 2003 LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
June 27, 2002 EK 1 Data Analysis Overview Erik Katsavounidis LIGO-MIT PAC12 – June 27, 2002 LIGO-G Z.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
21 June 2002E7 Burst Search Status Report1 Peter Saulson co-chair, LSC Burst Upper Limit Group LIGO-G Z.
Update on the LIGO Data Analysis System LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Hanford Observatory August 19 th, 2002 Kent Blackburn Albert Lazzarini.
LIGO NSF Rev LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 Upper Limits Groups: Status and Plans Alan Wiseman LSC Software.
Observing the Bursting Universe with LIGO: Status and Prospects Erik Katsavounidis LSC Burst Working Group 8 th GWDAW - UWM Dec 17-20, 2003.
LIGO PAC Meeting, 6 June 2003 Peter Shawhan (LIGO/Caltech)LIGO-G E First LIGO Search for Binary Inspirals Peter Shawhan (LIGO Lab / Caltech)
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
LIGO Z LIGO Scientific Collaboration -- UWM 1 LSC Data Analysis Alan G. Wiseman (LSC Software Coordinator) LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G M GWDAW, December LIGO Burst Search Analysis Laura Cadonati, Erik Katsavounidis LIGO-MIT.
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
G R LSC UL 13 Aug 011 Detector Characterization; Triggers, code infrastructure; Followup Analysis for the UL groups Nelson Christensen, Szabi.
LIGO- G D Burst Search Report Stan Whitcomb LIGO Caltech LSC Meeting LIGO1 Plenary Session 18 August 2003 Hannover.
LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Introduction to Hardware Signal Injections Peter Shawhan, Isabel Leonor, Szabi Márka.
A Waveform Consistency Test for Binary Inspirals using LIGO data LSC Inspiral Analysis Working Group LIGO-G Z LSC Meeting Andres C. Rodriguez.
LIGO-G Z 5 June 2001L.S.Finn/LIGO Scientific Collaboration1 LDAS Camp.
NSF Review, 18 Nov 2003 Peter Shawhan (LIGO/Caltech)1 How to Develop a LIGO Search Peter Shawhan (LIGO / Caltech) NSF Review November 18, 2003 LIGO-G E.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
S5 BNS Inspiral Update Duncan Brown Caltech LIGO-G Z.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory LIGO-G WLIGO-G WLIGO-G W LIGO S5 Reduced Data Set Generation March 2007.
Characterization of PEM Channels Chirpiness of the Test Mass motion due to “Noise” Anthony Rizzi Staff Scientist, LIGO LIGO-G D.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
LIGO-G Z Confidence Test for Waveform Consistency of LIGO Burst Candidate Events Laura Cadonati LIGO Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.
LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.
LSC Meeting, August 2002 P. Shawhan / Inspiral U.L. Working GroupLIGO-G Z Vetoes Used in the E7 Inspiral Upper Limit Analysis Part 2 Peter Shawhan,
LIGO-G W Use of Condor by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1 Alan Weinstein Caltech Burst UL WG LSC meeting, 8/21/02.
LSC Meeting, 10 Nov 2003 Peter Shawhan (LIGO/Caltech)1 Inspiral Waveform Consistency Tests Evan Ochsner and Peter Shawhan (U. of Chicago) (LIGO / Caltech)
LSC Z000.0 LSC at LHO LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 Software Committee Report Alan Wiseman University.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 A Coherence Function Statistic to Identify Coincident Bursts Surjeet Rajendran, Caltech SURF Alan Weinstein,
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M DMT Monitor Verification with Simulated Data John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
LIGO-G E Data Simulation for the DMT John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
LIGO-G Z 23 October 2002LIGO Laboratory NSF Review1 Searching for Gravitational Wave Bursts: An Overview Sam Finn, Erik Katsavounidis and Peter.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Hardware Burst Injections in Pre-S2  S2 Alan Weinstein, Caltech Laura Cadonati, MIT Shourov Chatterjee,
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LSC Burst Analysis Group LSC Observational Results Meeting November 4, 2006 The S4 LIGO All-Sky Burst Search.
LSC Z000.0 LSC at LLO LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 LSC Software Coordinator Report Alan Wiseman University.
Report on the FCT MDC Stuart Anderson, Kent Blackburn, Philip Charlton, Jeffrey Edlund, Rick Jenet, Albert Lazzarini, Tom Prince, Massimo Tinto, Linqing.
LIGO-G Z Introduction to QScan Shourov K. Chatterji SciMon Camp LIGO Livingston Observatory 2006 August 18.
SEARCH FOR INSPIRALING BINARIES S. V. Dhurandhar IUCAA Pune, India.
Discussion of Statistical Methods, Tools, and Simulations
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
LIGO Scientific Collaboration meeting
Overview of E10 / S3 Hardware Injections
Hardware Injections in S4
First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1
Environmental Monitoring: Coupling Function Calculator
Inspiral Waveform Consistency Tests
Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis
Presentation transcript:

G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Discussion of Statistical Methods, Tools, and Simulations  Review of tools and methods  (I am only familiar with) tools and methods in use in the burst working group »What are the special needs of other groups? »What tools and methods used by other groups would be of general use?  the simulation effort exercises and requires the entire analysis chain

G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Data analysis model (burst group)  Does the model used by burst WG fit the other WGs? » generate fake signals, scaled to absolute h_strain » filter fake signals through IFO response functions » add to real data, or to white or colored gaussian noise » run search DSOs on the resulting frames » perform statistical analysis on results of DSO runs » present results in a form suitable for publication(s).

G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Generating simulated signals  Generating simulated signals in units of strain is the easy and fun part!  I think that all WGs have mechanisms for doing this.  For burst WG: »Chirps »Ringdowns »Hermite-Gaussians and sine-Gaussians »Zwerger-Muller supernova GW simulations

G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Waveforms buried in E2 noise, including calibration/TF ZM supernova ringdown Hermite-gaussian chirp

G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Adding simulations to the data  How are fake signals added to the data, minimizing uncertainty associated with special handling of simulated data relative to real data? » Make fake frame files – c code, matlab, ROOT tools – can add to data or simulated noise before making frame, – or can add to noise in LDAS job, "on the fly" » add signals to real data or noise frames in datacondAPI or frameAPI (burst group) –need more sequence manipulation tools in datacondAPI, so that one could add a signal from a file, at a run-time-determined time, amplitude, duration –could actually generate the signal in datacondAPI –maybe even convert from strain -> volts there as well –This would facilitate the accumulation of high statistics simulation runs, without having to manage huge frame files padded with zeros. » add signals in wrapperAPI / LAL code (inspiral group)  How to ensure reliable IFO response functions? » Shall we standardize the filtering algorithm / mechanism? » I use matlab zpk to represent response function and lsim to filter the fake signal from strain -> volts. Better would be to use datacondAPI or LALWrapper.

G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Example DatacondAPI algorithm -framequery { { R $site {} $times Adc($channel) } { F $site /ldas_outgoing/jobs/ldasmdc_data/burst-stochastic/burstscan_e7h2.F {} Adc(0) } } -aliases { x = _ch0; s = _ch1; } -algorithms { zx = slice(x,0, ,1); zy = slice(s,0, ,1); zm = mul(zy,$mulsim); zs = add(zx,zm); zz = tseries(zs, , $stime, 0); stat = all(zz); intermediate(,stat.ilwd,stat,psd of ch0); pz = psd(zz,16384); intermediate(,pzs.ilwd,pz,psd of ch0); z = resample(zz,1,8); m = mean(z); y = sub(z,m); q = linfilt(b,y); r = slice(q,2047,737280,1); } Grab slice of data and simulated signal Multiply signal by a run-time-determined multiplier, Add to real data, make a time series Accumulate statistics and power spectrum Subtract mean; additional whitening

G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 statistical analysis For burst and inspiral:  output of DSOs are event triggers, deposited into database  further analysis is done at the event trigger level, although in the future, will want to look back at raw data » manipulate database entries » merge multiple entries » apply vetos from triggers on auxiliary channel (DMT?) » find coincidences » evaluate fake rates vs efficiencies at the same time  Here, the Event Tool is being used »Sigg and Ito. OO classes in the ROOT environment for manipulating database "event" entries.  Can also use matlab tools, including LIGOtools (Shawhan) for ingesting xml files obtained from DB queries.  Can also use the power of DB queries. How about the stochastic and pulsar analyses?

G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Other sources of fake signals  Use of simdata matlab package (Finn) to generate colored noise » steep seismic noise spectrum makes it difficult but not impossible to generate desired spectrum  Use of signals injected into interferometer using GDS system: »bursts and inspiral signals (chirps, wiggles, blips, sombrero; Gonzalez, Marka, Shawhan, during E7) »stochastic and line signals (Shawhan, Bose, Brown, during E7)  How best to handle "model dependence"? » The burst group must struggle with model dependence because we have no good models »The other groups DO have good models, but will have errors and variations in those models).

G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 LDAS and database  What demands will be made on which LDAS installations? » Shall we use the site installations? Or only LSC installations devoted to this task? » How shall we coordinate these resources? (The LIGO Software Users Group has been discussing this) » How/where should data streams from LHO and LLO be combined, for analyses that require cross-correlations, like stochastic? »Standardized job control/bookkeeping scripts? (LSUG is developing job bookkeeping and monitoring tools, based on Shawhan’s LDASJob.) »How to facilitate multiple passes through the data? (Large RDS’s at LDAS installations).  What demands will be made on which LDAS databases? » How best to avoid trashing the databases, » and how/whether to get entries from one installation to another? » (cf Peter Shawhan's proposals).

G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 LDAS job bookkeeping Run date filter channel times mul ldas job Tall Tdatac Tmpi Ntrig hrms h( ) h( ) h( ) power H2:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e+00 Trig691.xml power H2:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e+00 Trig693.xml power H2:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e+00 Trig695.xml power H2:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e+00 Trig697.xml power H2:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e+00 Trig699.xml power H2:LSC-AS_Q e1 mit NORMAL e e e+00 Trig766.xml power H2:LSC-AS_Q e1 mit NORMAL e e e+00 Trig768.xml power H2:LSC-AS_Q e1 mit NORMAL e e e+00 Trig770.xml power H2:LSC-AS_Q e1 mit NORMAL e e e+00 Trig772.xml power H2:LSC-AS_Q e1 mit NORMAL e e e+00 Trig774.xml Run date filter channel times mul ldas job Tall Tdatac Tmpi Ntrig hrms h( ) h( ) h( ) tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e e+05 Trig121.xml tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e e-01 Trig125.xml tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e e-01 Trig127.xml tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e e+05 Trig129.xml tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e e+05 Trig131.xml tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e e+00 Trig134.xml tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e e-01 Trig136.xml tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e e-01 Trig138.xml tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e e-01 Trig140.xml tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e e-01 Trig142.xml tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e e-01 Trig144.xml tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e e+05 Trig146.xml tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e e+05 Trig148.xml tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e e+00 Trig150.xml tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e e+01 Trig152.xml tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q e0 mit NORMAL e e e e+05 Trig154.xml

G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Modest proposal  Collect useful tools and pubs in a web page  Establish mailing list for people interested in developing or using these tools  Coordinate with LSUG (and LDAS, datacond, etc)