Reference: "Artificial Intelligence, a Modern Approach, 3rd ed." AI Overview Reference: "Artificial Intelligence, a Modern Approach, 3rd ed."

What is AI? Top Image: http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/119/ Second Image: http://john-likes-movies.blogspot.com/2010/05/ai-artificial-intelligence.html Thrid Image: http://engineeringyourfuture.wordpress.com/ Fourth Image: http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/11/07/social-media-is-like-the-matrix/ Fifth Image: http://blog.solutionary.com/blog/bid/34219/Security-Event-Detection-Man-vs-Machine Sixth Image: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_(Star_Trek)

4 Schools of thought (in AI academia) Thinking Humanly Thinking Rationally Acting Humanly Acting Rationally Top Row: Measure the success of an AI program by how well it "reasons" Bottom Row: Measure the success of an AI program by how convincing it is. Left Column: Measure the success of an AI program by how human-like it is. Right Column: Measure the success of an AI program by successful (rational) it is.

Acting Humanly Turing Test total Turing Test Alan Turing (1912-1954) Acting Humanly Turing Test Natural Language Processing Knowledge Rep. Automated Reasoning Machine Learning total Turing Test computer vision robotics Not much research being done here… Top Image: http://www.wired.com/thisdayintech/2010/06/0623alan-turing-born/ Bottom Image: http://withfriendship.com/user/kethan123/turing-test.php

Thinking Humanly Mimic the way a human thinks To mimic we have to understand it. For this branch, it's not enough to produce the correct input/output as a human. Cognitive Science: Linguistics Philosophy Anthropology CS Neuroscience Psychology etc. An active area of research, but not the main approach in AI Image: http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/research/33586

Thinking Rationally Logic e.g (a syllogism): Socrates is a man (a fact) All met are mortal (a rule) Therefore…Socrates is mortal (a new fact, deduced from the other two) We could theoretically solve any problem that could be expressed in this form With more than a few hundred facts, it's SLOWW Not easy to express some things in this fashion. Prolog (programming language) Image: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle

Acting Rationally Behaving "correctly" in the context the system is meant to work in The most general of all 4. We can (but don't have to) mimic human brain processes. We can (but don't have to) use classical logic (thinking rationally) We can (but don't have to) make this program act human. Or we can just mimic one part of acting humanly. This is the approach I'll use. We're trying to implement programs with behavior that appears to be involving thought / intelligence.

Which are you? Thinking Humanly Thinking Rationally Acting Humanly Acting Rationally Top Row: Measure the success of an AI program by how well it "reasons" Bottom Row: Measure the success of an AI program by how convincing it is. Left Column: Measure the success of an AI program by how human-like it is. Right Column: Measure the success of an AI program by successful (rational) it is.

AI foundations AI draws from a lot of different disciplines: Philosophy (rules of logic, esp) Mathematics (proofs, algorithm analysis, computability, etc) Economics (utility -- what's the best action considering their cost and outcomes?) Neuroscience / Biology / Psychology (many algorithms are based on these) Computer Engineering (we have to run the programs somewhere…and there are limitations) Linguistics (relationship between language and thought) …