Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2009) Measuring progress of e-Government Marc Holzer Rutgers University-Newark, USA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From e-Government to e-Governance: The OECD Experience Elizabeth Muller E-Government Project OECD SitExpo February 1004, Casablanca - Morocco.
Advertisements

International Telecommunication Union Committed to Connecting the World First Multi-stakeholder WSIS+10 Review Event February 2013 Measuring the.
E-P RAGUE AND THE P ROSPECTS OF E-G OVERNMENT : D ISCUSSION P ANELS James Melitski, PhD and Tony Carrizales, PhD E-governance Institute National Center.
E-Government and New Technologies: Towards better citizen engagement for development SESSION Four - New technologies & citizen engagement: Strategies and.
Open Government: WSIS +10 and Beyond Yuri Hohlov AL C7 e-Government Open Government Coordinator.
By ACRC (Anti-Corruption & Civil Rights Commission, Republic of Korea)
CYBER C3 – MODULE 1 CYBER ACCESS By Manju Raja. Cyber Access Cyber Access is about understanding the privilege of using electronic information as well.
E-GOVERNMENT READINESS THE PERFORMANCE OF THE OIC MEMBER COUNTRIES SESRIC Eng. Huseyin Hakan ERYETLI.
ECML: addressing key challenges in European language education.
Community of Science The Leading Internet Site for Researchers Worldwide
 Jennifer Blanke Director, Senior Economist World Economic Forum  Montenegro | 20 May, 2008 Assessing Southeast Europe’s Competitiveness in an International.
September 2001Chapter 17: Internet and Society1 Key questions consider in this chapter: Who is on the Internet, and what are they doing? What is the digital.
E-GOV Presentation July 17, 2008 Dr. Elaine Kamarck John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University.
ICT Technology being used to Communicate Information.
Federal Consulting Group August 2004 Department of Labor Civil Rights Center 2004 Satisfaction Study - Recipients.
Information and Communication Technologies in the field of general education in Armenia NATIONAL CENTER OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES.
Milwaukee Digital Inclusion Program Draft: January 26, 2007, Milwaukee Department of Administration.
CAPITALIZING ON TECHNOLOGY : CAPITALIZING ON TECHNOLOGY : GOVERNMENT 2.0 Dwane Brinson Lee County Tax Administrator Chair, Public Relations Committee.
Section 2.1 Compare the Internet and the Web Identify Web browser components Compare Web sites and Web pages Describe types of Web sites Section 2.2 Identify.
"E-government and e-participation: City web sites; the case of Croatia" Dr.sc. Domagoj Bebić Faculty of Political Science
Global Forum 2001 Newcastle, 19 October 2001 E-Society Applications for Citizens Innovative Applications: Best-practices in London-Lewisham Antoinette.
Ganesh Prasad Bhatta (M.Sc., Land Administration) Chief Survey Officer, Survey Department February 8, 2013, Friday Spatially enabled e-governance: in the.
United Nations Millennium Action Plan Health InterNetwork World Health Organization April 2001.
Introduction to E-commerce and Internet Marketing
Dao Dinh Kha National Centre of Digital Signature Authentication - Agency of Information Technology Application A vision on a national Electronic Authentication.
CSO engagement in policy process Hille Hinsberg State Chancellery Government Communication Officer
Atif Iqbal, R. K. Bagga.  Appropriate mechanism for good governance with the involvement of Information Technology in the system of the government and.
1 From E-Government to Connected Governance: Harnessing Information & Communication Technologies for Knowledge Acquisition and Sharing Michael G. Mimicopoulos.
Adesh Khadka IT Director, MOF
OECD RECOMMENDATION ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT STRATEGIES From citizen-centric to citizen-driven approaches Barbara Ubaldi Programme Manager– Reform of the.
1 Metagora: Current Progress and the Way Forward PARIS21 Steering Committee Paris, 13 November 2007.
Kim Andreasson Managing Director DAKA advisory AB Bahrain International eGovernment Forum Kingdom of Bahrain 8-10 April 2013 Measuring E-Government.
 Jennifer Blanke Director, Senior Economist World Economic Forum  Montenegro | 20 May, 2008 Assessing Southeast Europe’s Competitiveness in an International.
E-P RAGUE AND THE P ROSPECTS OF E-G OVERNMENT : D ISCUSSION P ANELS James Melitski, PhD and Tony Carrizales, PhD E-governance Institute National Center.
BRIDGING THE DIGITAL DIVIDE A Basic Understanding.
What is e-government? E-Government refers to the use by government agencies of information technologies (such as Wide Area Networks, the Internet, and.
Understanding & Use of the Internet E-government Spring 2011 G. F Khan, PhD.
Local Government Reform Project WA E - Government System.
Use of Electronic and Internet advertising options Standard 3.4.
Slide 1 Begix Online -Tool Bertelsmann Stiftung Begix Europe Carolin Welzel Bertelsmann Foundation Stefan Friedrichs Public Management Consultant.
Leeds Beckett University Jennifer Wilson and Eric Howard Talking Tablets: Piloting Skills Building through Collaboration.
The World of E-government
Basic issues of e-government within the EU Elitsa Lozanova-Belcheva, Senior assistant professor, Department of Library and Information Studies and Cultural.
9-1 Chapter 9 The Internet.
E-BUSINESS.
E-services
"We are going to relate with the world-wide economy competing with jobs qualified not with low wages”. Dr. Abel Pacheco. 8 de mayo del 2002 "We are going.
Government portals and Directgov March 2007
United Nations Statistics Division Work Programme on Economic Census Vladimir Markhonko, Chief Trade Statistics Branch, UNSD Youlia Antonova, Senior Statistician,
National Informatics Centre  A Government of India organization  Promoting usage of IT in India since 1975  Engaged in consultancy, network services.
E-Government Services Some Perspectives Randeep Sudan Global ICT Department.
National Information Communication Technologies Strategy Vasif Khalafov “National strategy” working group - Web -
E-Government Adesh Khadka Ministry of Finance. 2 At the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development held in Rio de Janeiro in June 2012, a global.
EGovernment for Efficient Public Services Parallel Session 2 Dana Bérová Minister of Informatics Czech Republic.
18/05/2014 Riyadh Eng. Suhail Al-Almaee Director Strategic Planning and Supporting Initiatives Smart Government.
Information Systems Education Conference - ISECON Ryerson University School of Information Technology Management The Use of Internet-based Tools.
CEC and its WWW Challenges for the New Year Results Web Survey December 2009 among CEC members Frits Hesselink, Andy Alm 31 December 2009.
Simplification of administrative procedures: the Administrative Effort Index (AEI - IEB) MINISTRY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS SPAIN 1 María Ángeles Martínez,
To inform and engage citizens in the governmental, civic, and cultural affairs of Seattle through compelling use of television, Internet, and other media.
E-Governance Readiness in Europe UN E-participation index 2008.
The Federal eGovernment of the United Arab Emirates the United Arab Emirates(20/06/2012) 1.
Canadian Citizens: At the Centre of a Modern Transformed Government Christine Desloges Chief Strategist (Transformation) Chief Information Officer Branch.
Welcome to November’s Inquiry Group, Bridging the Digital Divide.
Chief Accounting Officers Database List A chief accounting officer or a CAO plays a vital role in the organization as he/she is responsible for.
A presentation about the UAE ranking in the UN eGovernment Survey
E-Government in Latin America Roberto López Red GEALC Febrero 2006 (Draft presentation)
CARIBBEAN WORKSHOP ON E-GOVERNMENT BEST PRACTICES Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago, July 26-28, 2005.
E-Government and Social Networking ICT 41013: S. Sabraz Nawaz Senior Lecturer in MIT Department of MIT Faculty of Management and Commerce, SEUSL.
 Lecturer’s Name : Dr Norazila Bt. Mat  Group 12 :  M.Aswin HendrayadiA  Marwan PribadiA  Mohamad Azri AzharA  Wong Wai KitA
Milwaukee Digital Inclusion Program
Presentation transcript:

Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2009) Measuring progress of e-Government Marc Holzer Rutgers University-Newark, USA

Transformation to E-Government E-Government - the online delivery of public services and information to citizens and businesses E-government, the application of ICT within public administration to optimise its internal and external functions, provides government and business with a set of tools that can potentially transform the way in which interactions take place, services are delivered (UNDESA, 2003). E-government, the application of ICT within public administration to optimise its internal and external functions, provides government and business with a set of tools that can potentially transform the way in which interactions take place, services are delivered (UNDESA, 2003). E-government is the use of ICT in public administration combined with organizational change and new skills in order to improve public services and democratic processes and strengthen support for public policies (Liikaanen, 2003). E-government is the use of ICT in public administration combined with organizational change and new skills in order to improve public services and democratic processes and strengthen support for public policies (Liikaanen, 2003). Digital governance that includes both digital government (delivery of public service) and digital democracy (citizen participation in governance) (Holzer & Kim, 2005). Digital governance that includes both digital government (delivery of public service) and digital democracy (citizen participation in governance) (Holzer & Kim, 2005). ICTs, unlike televisions and radios, can enable citizens to demand and obtain information online. ICTs, unlike televisions and radios, can enable citizens to demand and obtain information online.

An international survey of municipal web portals that evaluates the practice of e-governance in large municipalities. An international survey of municipal web portals that evaluates the practice of e-governance in large municipalities. First such survey to be conducted on a global scale using a comprehensive set of criteria. First such survey to be conducted on a global scale using a comprehensive set of criteria. Jointly conducted by E-Governance Institute, National Center for Public Performance, Rutgers-Newark E-Governance Institute, National Center for Public Performance, Rutgers-Newark Global e-Policy e-Government Institute, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul Global e-Policy e-Government Institute, Sungkyunkwan University, SeoulCollaborators UN Division for Public Administration and Development Management UN Division for Public Administration and Development Management American Society for Public Administration American Society for Public Administration First survey in 2003, followed by 2005, 2007 and 2009 First survey in 2003, followed by 2005, 2007 and 2009 Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2009) A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites Worldwide

Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2009) A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites Worldwide The top 100 most wired nations were identified using data from the International Telecommunication Union. The largest city, by population in each of these 100 nations was selected. The largest city, by population used as a surrogate for all cities in the respective nation. Of the 100 cities selected, 87 cities were found to have official municipal websites, compared to 86 cities in 2007 and 81 in 2005.

Rutgers E-Governance Performance Index The instrument consisted of five components- Privacy and Security Usability Content Services Citizen Participation Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2009) A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites Worldwide

Privacy and Security Privacy and Security Privacy policies, authentication, encryption, data management, cookies Usability Usability User-friendly design, branding, length of homepage, targeted audience links or channels, and site search capabilities Content Content Access to current accurate information, public documents, reports, publications, and multimedia materials Service Service Transactional services involving purchase or register, interaction between citizens, businesses and government Citizen Participation Citizen Participation Online civic engagement, online policy deliberation, performance measures Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2009) A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites Worldwide

ScaleDescription 0 Information about a given topic does not exist on the website 1 Information about a given topic exists on the website (including links to other information and addresses) 2 Downloadable items are available on the website (forms, audio, video, and other one-way transactions, popup boxes) 3 Services, transactions, or interactions can take place completely online (credit card transactions, applications for permits, searchable databases, use of cookies, digital signatures, restricted access) For each of those five components, our research applied measures, and each measure was coded on a scale of four-points (0, 1, 2, 3) or a dichotomy of two-points (0, 3 or 0, 1). Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2009) A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites Worldwide

RankingCityNationScore 1 SeoulRepublic of Korea PragueCzech Republic Hong Kong New YorkUSA Singapore ShanghaiChina MadridSpain ViennaAustria AucklandNew Zealand TorontoCanada52.87 Overall Rankings of Municipalities Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2009) A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites Worldwide

CategoryKey Concepts Raw ScoreWeighted Score Keywords Privacy /Security Privacy policies, authentication, encryption, data management, and use of cookies Top 5 Cities in Privacy and Security Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2009) A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites Worldwide RankingCityCountryPrivacy 1SeoulRepublic of Korea PragueCzech Republic ViennaAustria Ho Chi MinhVietnam BratislavaSlovakia LondonUK DubaiUAE13.60

CategoryKey ConceptRaw Score Weighted Score Keywords Usability User-friendly design, branding, length of homepage, targeted audience links or channels, and site search capabilities Top 5 Cities in Usability Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2009) A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites Worldwide RankingCityCountryUsability 1PragueCzech Republic SeoulRepublic of Korea BratislavaSlovakia Singapore CairoEgypt16.88

CategoryKey Concepts Raw Score Weighted Score Keywords Content Access to public documents, reports, publications, and multimedia materials Top 5 Cities in Content Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2009) A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites Worldwide RankingCityCountryUsability 1SeoulRepublic of Korea AucklandNew Zealand TallinnEstonia Hong Kong New YorkUSA13.80

Top 5 Cities in Service Delivery CategoryKey Concepts Raw Score Weighted Score Keywords Service Transactional services involving purchase or register, interaction between citizens, businesses and government Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2009) A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites Worldwide RankingCityCountryUsability 1SeoulRepublic of Korea Singapore New YorkUSA ShanghaiChina MadridSpain13.90

Top 5 Cities in Citizen Participation CategoryKey Concepts Raw Score Weighted Score Keywords Citizen Participation Online civic engagement, internet based policy deliberation, citizen based performance measurement Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2009) A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites Worldwide RankingCityCountryUsability 1Mexico CityMexico PragueCzech Republic BangkokThailand SeoulRepublic of Korea ShanghaiChina10.55

Privacy & Security UsabilityContentService Citizen Participation Average Score by E-Governance Categories Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2009) A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites Worldwide

Average Score by Continent AverageOceaniaEuropeAsia North America South America Africa Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2009) A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites Worldwide

Digital Divide Digital gap between individuals, households, businesses and geographic areas with regard both to their opportunities to access information and communication technologies

Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2009) A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites Worldwide Privacy & Security UsabilityContentService Citizen Participation OECD Average Non-OECD Average Score of E-Governance Categories in OECD Member and Non-Member Countries (2009)

CityRankScoreRankScoreRankScore Overall Privacy Usability Content Services Citizen Participation Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2009) A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites Worldwide Longitudinal Evaluation of Prague

The city of Prague is ranked second overall, resulting from a significant effort to provide an efficient, effective and transparent government online. The city of Prague is ranked second overall, resulting from a significant effort to provide an efficient, effective and transparent government online. Prague is also ranked first in usability and second in the categories of privacy and citizen participation. Prague is also ranked first in usability and second in the categories of privacy and citizen participation. Enhancing the usability of websites and providing an accessible privacy policy improves citizens’ level of confidence in interacting and transacting with government online. Enhancing the usability of websites and providing an accessible privacy policy improves citizens’ level of confidence in interacting and transacting with government online. The website of Prague also offers users with online opportunities to provide their opinion and feedback to the administrative departments and elected officials. The website of Prague also offers users with online opportunities to provide their opinion and feedback to the administrative departments and elected officials. Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2009) A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites Worldwide

THANK YOU