WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Test procedure

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Worldwide Harmonised Test Procedure for Light Duty Vehicles WLTP EVE 2nd Session 13 of September Per Öhlund Co-chair Subgroup EV.
Advertisements

GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 Serge Dubuc, WLTP GTR 15 Drafting Coordinator WLTP-09-26e.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-094 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
Starting note for WLTP phase 2 working items WLTP-08-41e Kazuki KOBAYASHI Vice chair of WLTP.
Starting note for WLTP phase 2 working items WLTP rev1e Kazuki KOBAYASHI Vice chair of WLTP.
Progress report of e-Lab sub-group (WLTP rev1e)
Progress report of e-Lab sub-group (WLTP-10-12e) 1. Proposals for Adoption 2. Proposals for Discussions 3. Next Actions.
Status report of WLTP Sub Group EV EVE 14. At WLTP IWG 10 Adopted open issues.
Review of definitions -Mass /weight -VPSD WLTP-11-24e.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-053 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi WLTP-DTC
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Application of the development approach described in WLTP-DHC on ACEA’s EU database By H. Steven
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-11-19e) 1. Discussion points 2. Next Actions.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-066 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
Final??? Review of WLTP Definitions Bill Coleman – Tokyo Sept./Oct WLTP-12-20e.
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
1 WLTP-DTP- E-LabProc-005 Test Procedure for Electrified Vehicles presented by Japan 24&25 November 2010.
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) draft 1. Proposals for adoption 2. Discussion points.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-088 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
WLTP-DHC Current status of WLTP-DHC & Mode Construction Prepared by DHC Secretary the 18 th DHC meeting under GRPE/WLTP informal group 5 th Jun.
Renault statements and questions: Page Autor/Abt.: ACEA WLTP EV Group /Samarendra Tripathy 1] Phase specific calculation (appendix YYY of attached.
Assessment Criteria for the Acceptability of Cycle and Testing Procedure Informal working document DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Assessment Criteria.
National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory JAPAN NTSEL OIL#58: Shorten test procedure (validation test in phase 1a)
under GRPE/WLTP informal group
1 Discussion paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2 Prepared by Japan DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group November 2011 WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-108.
WLTC* methodology Proposed by Japan
WLTP 6th DTP Meeting Geneva DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Parameter Setting for Validation 2 DTP Subgroup Lab Process Internal Combustion Engines.
WLTP-DHC WLTC* Methodology ~ Initial Analysis Results & Modification on proposed methodology ~ Presented by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup 14.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-034 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
State of play WLTP Sub Group EV. Sub Group EV meeting 28 of September Last meeting of WLTP IWG 29 of September to 1 of October Final meeting for phase.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-012 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
WLTP Vehicle range and energy consumption EVE October 2014.
Nicolas HAREL Sam TRIPATHY 23/10/2014 CONFIDENTIEL PROPRIÉTÉ RENAULT WLTP PEV Range test procedure : End of test criteria.
WLTP validation test results for BEV(i-MiEV) & OVC-HEV (Prius PHV)
Proposed by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
1 Comparison of the worldwide weighted WLTP database and EU regional database with WLTC rev3 and further modifications performed by JARI, JRC and HS Heinz.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-081 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
WLTP-DHC Development of World-wide Light- duty Test Cycle -- Proposal for the threshold vehicle speed of Low/Middle/High(/extra-High) phase --
Summary of 3 rd Informal Group on WLTP 11 June 2009 Palais des Nations, Geneva Informal document No. GRPE (58th GRPE, 9-12 June 2009, agenda item.
2013 年 6 月 12 日 所内フォーラム nd half1 st half2 nd half1 st half2 nd half1 st half2 nd half1 st half2 nd half WLTP-gtr.
Progress Report of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
Study on Drive Trace Index of Electrified Vehicles
Position paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-043
Proposed by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-043
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 11/11/2018.
In-use Data Conversion Technique ( Re-Categorization of in-use data )
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-012
Confirmation on application to EVs unique cycle
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-077
WLTP Annex 8: OVC-HEV:
Annex8  ( ) CD-CS break-off criteria Proposal from Japan with ACEA Comments ( )
Development of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
WLTP DTP Lab Process EV sub group
OIL#58: Shorten test procedure (validation test in phase 1a)
Position paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2
Mode selectable switch
Vehicle classification for Electrified vehicle
ACEA Comments from ACEA welcomes the idea to develop a shortened range test procedure based on MCT However, ACEA does not support JP proposal.
Working Paper No. WLTP-05-11e
COP procedure for Europe
In-use Data Conversion Technique ( Re-Categorization of in-use data )
Discussion paper on Applicable Test Cycle and Mode Construction
Discussion paper on Applicable Test Cycle and Mode Construction
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) 1
Problem with Rcda and suggestions for them
Analysis for WLTP UF development
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-028
Discussion document on Mode Construction
Comparison of key parameters of EU WLTP database and WLTC version 5
Presentation transcript:

WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Test procedure Kazuki Kobayashi NTSEL Japan

Schedule of WLTP Phase II Phase I Phase III (2014 ~ 2018) (2009 ~ 2013) Phase II (2014 ~ 2018) Phase III (2019 ~ 2021) DHC (Worldwide Harmonized Light Duty Driving Cycle) Low ambient temperature / High Altitude test procedure Definition of Emission Limits Reference Fuel Specifications DTP (Test Procedure) decision made by WP29/AC3 before Phase II Correlation with existing regional cycles Durability Parallel Informal Groups OCE (Off-Cycle Requirement) In Service Conformity MAC (Mobile Air Conditioning) OBD Other gtr

Task of DHC Group Work Task of DTP Group Work Today! April 2013 WLTP: Worldwide harmonized Light duty driving Test Procedure Task of DHC Group Work Task of DTP Group Work Classification of Influencing Parameters PM/PN Collections of In-use driving data Collections of statistics on LD vehicles use ICE-Lab. process Internal Combustion Engine Determine weighting factor E-Lab. process Development of    Reference Database Re-categorization into L/M/H PCs / LDCVs Urban / Rural / Motorway Peak / Off peak / Weekend ↓ Low / Middle / High OVC-HEV/NOVC-HEV/PEV Gearshift analysis Additional pollutant Gearshift prescription NO2、NH3、N2O、Ethanol、Alde Hyde Development of initial WLTC Cold / Hot ratio Engine On -> Vehicle take-off time etc Validation tests 1 Reference fuel Modification Short trip & gearshift points input from DTP subgroup Today! April 2013 Validation tests 2 Confirmation tests Modification Short trip & gearshift points (*) Remark DHC : Development of worldwide Harmonized light duty driving Cycle DTP : Development of Test Procedure WLTC : Worldwide harmonized Light duty driving Test Cycle WLTC 3

WLTP road map

WLTC Ver5.3 & 5.1 Low (589秒) Middle (433秒) High (455秒) Ex-High (323秒)

Vehicle classification Low power vehicle(less than PMR34kW/t) Class 1 : PMR ≤ 22 kW/t Class 2 : 22 < PMR ≤ 34 kW/t L1 M1 L2 M2 H2 ExH2 Class 1 WLTC Class 2 WLTC 6

Electrified vehicle OVC-HEV off-vehicle charging hybrid electric vehicle NOVC-HEV not off-vehicle charging hybrid electric vehicle; Pure electric vehicle (PEV) a vehicle with a power train where all energy converters are electric machines and all storage systems are rechargeable storage systems (ReESS)

Vehicle Classification for Electrified vehicle To be same as ICE vehicle PMR Maximum speed A power of OVC-HEV should be considered. Motor power +ICE power Motor power or ICE power Hybrid system power? To move on Confirmation test, No classification=>Class 3 all vehicle Japan proposed to use Maximum speed in R68 . Maximum speed means: For electric vehicle, the highest average value of the speed, which the vehicle can maintain twice over distance of 1 km. To move on Confirmation test , Based on R68

Charge depleting test

Charge sustaining test

Battery charging and soak condition 5.2.5.4. Battery charging and measuring electric energy consumption The vehicle shall be connected to the mains within 120 minutes after the conclusion of the charge-sustaining Type I test. The energy measurement equipment placed between the mains socket and the vehicle charger shall measure the charge energy E and its duration. Charging stops when a fully charged battery is detected. Soak condition To be charged without forced cooling! Battery temperature within criteria

Break off criteria for Charge depleting Open issues concerning gtr text 5.2.4.5. Break-off criteria 5.2.4.5.1. The break-off criteria for the charge-depleting test is reached when the relative net energy change as shown in the equation below is less than X per cent. Relative net energy change [%] = ____________NEC_____________          Cycle energy demand of the test vehicle CS mode CD mode Break off criteria for Charge depleting

RCB Compensation Factor for CO2 RCB factor for each phase and whole test phases preconditioning Phase Compensation Factor Whole phases (L ~ Ex-H) measured Each phase (L or M or H or Ex-H) Apply whole phases factor (justification : ISO/TR 11955, also refer next page) Specific combined phases (L ~ H, or others ) LOW 589s MIDDLE 433s HIGH 455s Ex-HIGH 323s Set SOC at several level Overnight soak sampling LOW 589s MIDDLE 433s HIGH 455s Ex-HIGH 323s Sample CO2 and RCB CO2 これは、電気自動車やプラグインハイブリッド車について、初期充電量の影響を評価するための方法。 SOCをいくつかのレベルで設定して、それを各フェーズで走行してエミッションや燃費をとる。 本件、技術的に高度な内容になるので、DHCで専門家から説明させたい。 DHCより前に説明が必要なら、専門家を派遣することも考える。 SOC = State of Charge RESS = Rechargeable energy storage system Charge Balance Obtain RCB compensation factor for whole phases RCB (Ah/km) 13

RCB Compensation Factor (Validation2) Horizontal unit Ah  Ah/km

It is agreed to apply regional Ufs at least for Phase I. The harmonization of the methodology seems to be difficult. Discussions to reach for a globally harmonized methodology and a globally harmonized UF will go on.

All electric range test for PEV 2hr

5.4.2.4.1.3. The end of the test occurs when the break-off criteria is reached.  The break-off criteria shall have been reached when the vehicle cannot follow the driving trace for 4 seconds or more. The acceleration controller shall be deactivated. The vehicle shall be braked to a standstill within 60 seconds. Target cycle 4Seconds Vehicle speed Stop within 60Seconds

Japan proposed Shorten test procedure based on SAE1634.

Estimated Range with MCT Phase Measured Range (SCT) Estimated Range (MCT) Comparison SCT vs MCT Low 177.1km 183.2km 6.1km 3.6% Middle 170.1km 172.9km 2.8km 1.7% High 147.3km 146.1km 1.2km 0.8% Ex-High 98.5km 99.5km 1.0km 1.1% The results show that the error was small. Thus, it is considered that the shorten test procedure with MCT is usable. Time reduction effect with the shorten test procedure with MCT   The measurement of AER and AER city with SCT consumed 2days.   The measurement of four ranges with MCT consumed 3:30.

Thank you for your attention!