Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 15 © Christina Lehmann 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tips and Resources IASC Cluster/Sector Leadership Training
Advertisements

® ® Global Advisory Council (GAC) Outreach overview, Jan 2011 Mark Reichardt, President and CEO Open Geospatial Consortium © 2011 Open Geospatial Consortium.
2A. Develop a Formal Action Plan: Results Chains Conservation Coaches Network Workshop Presentation.
1 Chapter One The Nature and Importance of Leadership © 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted.
MSP course 2007 Phase 0 – Setting up Kumasi, Ghana 2008 Wageningen International.
Leadership: Understanding its Global Impact Chapter 11: Leading change.
Determine conservation objects: (biodiversity-dependent) human wellbeing objects Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 3 © Christina Lehmann.
Determine conservation objects: biodiversity objects Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 2 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Analysis of systemic activity and the strategic relevance of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis.
The TNA Process in Costa Rica Experiences and lessons learned Francisco Sancho Advisor TNA
Analysis of the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 12 © Pierre Ibisch.
Operational planning and implementation of measures Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 25 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Foundations of Business 3e
1D. Using a Conceptual Model to Document Your Situation Analysis Conservation Coaches Network Workshop Presentation.
Outcome of the African Regional Workshop on Transfer of Technology Arusha, Tanzania Dr. Peter P. Zhou EECG Consultants Pty Box GABORONE. Botswana.
Environmental Prosperity: Business and the Environment in the East of England A study by SQW Ltd and Land Use Consultants on behalf of 22 regional partners.
Community Driven Development in Natural Resource Management in Romania From biodiversity project to country- wide forestry sector reform.
Analysis of knowledge and manageability of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 16 © Pierre.
1 Todays Challenges for transport corridors The perspective of the Interreg IVC project PORT Integration Michael Stange.
Monitoring of results, impacts and research Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 26 © CEEM 2014.
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Key principles and effectiveness of EIA.
Contextual framework for research. Purpose of contextual framework To provide a shared language to underpin the PHEA E-learning proposals, initiatives.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
An Introduction to the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework
© 2001 Change Function Ltd USER ACCEPTANCE TESTING Is user acceptance testing of technology and / or processes a task within the project? If ‘Yes’: Will.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.
Revision and validation Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 16 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
STAKEHOLDERS – Involving all the players Module 2 of the SWITCH Training kit.
Overview of the SSNAPP Methodology Lwandle Mqadi.
Leonellha Barreto Dillon, seecon gmbh
NSDS DESIGN PROCESS: ROAD MAPS & OTHER PRELIMINARIES Prof. Ben Kiregyera NSDS Workshop, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 9 August 2005.
Identification of existing strategies and “strategy mapping” Phase III Evaluation, prioritisation and strategy formulation Step 17 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
Knowledge and non-knowledge management Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 27 © Pierre Ibisch 2013.
Climate Financing: Stakeholder Mapping. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F.
Results webs, goal and objective setting and monitoring design Phase III Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation Step 24 © Pierre.
Mbombela Climate Change Workshop 2 5 November 2015 Civic Centre Hall, Mbombela.
Analysis and filling of strategic gaps: the development of complementary strategies Phase III Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation.
Define the geographical scope of management Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 1 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Organise, revise and complete the systemic conceptual model Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 8 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
Evaluation and revision of the underlying concept Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 29 © Pierre Ibisch 2013.
Stakeholders and institutions. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F
Analysis of climate finance policy instruments. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T
Spatial analysis and priority setting Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 9 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch Incorporating Biodiversity into Trade-Related Integrated Assessments Presentation.
Analysis of private sector stakeholders. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F.
STAKEHOLDERS – Involving all the players Module 2 of the SWITCH Training kit.
Define the initial management vision Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 4 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
CDP-GIZ research project – Paris Workshop Gesellschaft für internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH André Lammerding, Head of Programme International Water Stewardship.
HRBA Project Planning Steps Understanding the Structure.
2A.Develop a Formal Action Plan: Results Chains. Copyright and Use Terms Under this license, you are free to share this presentation and adapt it for.
2A.Develop a Formal Action Plan: Goals & Strategies © Foundations of Success December 2008.
Assessment of the current status of the biodiversity objects Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 5 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Identifying contributing factors to threats
Assessment and prioritization of existing strategies
Module II.1 Stocktaking Trainer: [Name]
Phase II Systemic Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Step 6
Report of Asia and Pacific Regional Workshop
© Foundations of Success
Visualisation of systemic relationships
Assess criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Overview of this module
Module I.5 Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In Trainer: [Name] Country teams that want to realize key NAP tasks need to have a good.
Module 0.1 Participants introduction / Preliminary stocktaking Trainer: [Name] Note to trainer:   During the NAP country-level training, the participants.
Module V.2 NAP as a living document Trainer: [Name]
Visualisation of systemic relationships I
Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation
Rural Partnerships between Small Farmers and Private Sector
Presentation transcript:

Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 15 © Christina Lehmann 2015

Credits and conditions of use 15. Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders2 You are free to share this presentation and adapt it for your use under the following conditions: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). You may not use this work for commercial purposes. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you must remove the Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management logo, and you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar conditions to this one. © Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, 2014 The Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management strongly recommends that this presentation is given by experts familiar with the adaptive management process in general (especially as designed as the Conservation Measures Partnership’s Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation) as well as the MARISCO Method itself. This material was created under the leadership and responsibility of Prof. Dr. Pierre Ibisch and Dr. Peter Hobson, co- directors of the Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, which was jointly established by Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development and Writtle College. Compare: Ibisch, P.L. & P.R. Hobson (eds.) (2014): The MARISCO method: Adaptive MAnagement of vulnerability and RISk at COnservation sites. A guidebook for risk-robust, adaptive, and ecosystem-based conservation of biodiversity. Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Eberswalde (ISBN ). 195 pp. - The Powerpoint Presentation was conceived by Jamie Call, Christina Lehmann and Pierre Ibisch. Authors of graphs and photographs are indicated on the corresponding slides. Supported by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH on behalf of the Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ).

15. Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders 3

Learning objectives Participants have a strong understanding and are able to explain the use of the step to understand relevant actors and stakeholder in order to identify actors (individuals or organisations) and their relationship to the listed contributing factors, as it possibly makes a change taking them into account when developing strategies. Furthermore, participants have the skills to guide through the process of identifying these actors and making clear their relationship to threats and contributing factors within the conceptual model as situation analysis. 15. Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders4

? Table of Contents What does understanding the relevant actors and stakeholders mean? Why do we need to understand the relevant actors and stakeholders? How do we understand the relevant actors and stakeholders? Practical Tips 15. Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders5

? What does understanding the relevant actors and stakeholders mean? Actors are individuals or organizations which are the point source of factors that contribute to the generation of threats and stresses Identification of actors who are involved in causing a contributing factor or threat and their reasons for doing so, are significant Adequate mapping of actors shows where the sources of problems in relation to where the sources of funding and influence are Potential areas of overlap and conflict can be identified through actor mapping 15. Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders6

? Farmers Small Business Owners International Companies Governments Firewood Income Small-scale farming Game Plantations Large-scale wood export Building materials Management efforts Conservation efforts Construction of infrastructure Although different actors have varying motivations, they can lead to the same threats What does understanding the relevant actors and stakeholders mean? © Pierre Ibisch Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders7

? Why do we need to understand the relevant actors and stakeholders? Ecosystem perspectives work on a large scope and try to take all relevant underlying factors in the area into account This includes various actors and individuals who have an influence on the contributing factors, threats or stresses in the area 15. Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders8 © Pierre Ibisch 2011 © Pierre Ibisch 2014 © Pierre Ibisch 2013

? How do we understand the relevant actors and stakeholders? Using white cards, write down the actors who influence each contributing factor or direct threat o Sometimes, an actor will influence a whole group of contributing factors Mapping of actors: Place the cards next to the corresponding threat, contributing factor, or group box of contributing factors 15. Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders9 © Pierre Ibisch 2014

? How do we understand the relevant actors and stakeholders? Document the results in an Excel spreadsheet During the organizational phase, institutional weaknesses will be determined (e.g. resource shortages, technical support and consulting shortages, lack of information and conflict between actors) Actors who are related to generation of key threats in the area should be consulted and included in further planning and workshops 15. Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders10 © Pierre Ibisch 2014

? How do we understand the relevant actors and stakeholders? Guiding questions:  Who is responsible for the occurrence of the factor, threat or stress?  Who has an interest in the existence or occurrence of the factor, threat or stress?  Who has an interest in the mitigation of the factor, threat or stress? 15. Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders11

? Practical Tips Suggested Activity Empathetic stakeholder perspective change An activity where groups switch roles and consider the needs, motivations, perspectives and education of other relevant actors. This can help remove blind spots and result in more effective strategies. A team (part of the planning team or an extra team) follows all the steps for constructing a conceptual model. Rather than the traditional conservation objects, elements such as roads, mines, livelihoods or plantations are inserted as the conservation objects. The team goes through the model with their new, adopted perspective, identifying the reduced viability of these objects through threats and contributing factors. See also: Phase II, Step 11. Develop Future Scenarios 15. Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders12

? Take political situation and conflicts into account → Try to get a picture of reality regarding interrelations between for example industry, resource management and conservation → If the inter-exchangeability between actors is too close your conservation intention could be to much influenced → Take corruption into account 15. Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders13 Practical Tips