Semiconductor detectors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
of Single-Type-Column 3D silicon detectors
Advertisements

Semiconductor detectors
Radiation damage in silicon sensors
Silicon Technical Specifications Review General Properties Geometrical Specifications Technology Specifications –Mask –Test Structures –Mechanical –Electrical.
Solid State Detectors- 3 T. Bowcock 2 Schedule 1Position Sensors 2Principles of Operation of Solid State Detectors 3Techniques for High Performance Operation.
May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.
Jaap Velthuis, University of Bristol SPiDeR SPiDeR (Silicon Pixel Detector Research) at EUDET Telescope Sensor overview with lab results –TPAC –FORTIS.
128 September, 2005 Silicon Sensor for the CMS Tracker The Silicon Sensors for the Inner Tracker of CMS CMS Tracker and it‘s Silicon Strip Sensors Radiation.
EE 230: Optical Fiber Communication Lecture 11 From the movie Warriors of the Net Detectors.
Department of Physics VERTEX 2002 – Hawaii, 3-7 Nov Outline: Introduction ISE simulation of non-irradiated and irradiated devices Non-homogeneous.
Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 9 Lecture 9: PN Junctions Prof. Niknejad.
Solid State Detectors-2
Test of Pixel Sensors for the CMS experiment Amitava Roy Purdue University.
Position sensing in a GEM from charge dispersion on a resistive anode Bob Carnegie, Madhu Dixit, Steve Kennedy, Jean-Pierre Martin, Hans Mes, Ernie Neuheimer,
Lecture 7: IC Resistors and Capacitors
Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 8 Lecture 8: Capacitors and PN Junctions Prof. Niknejad.
Hybrid Active Pixel Sensors and SOI-Inspired Option M. Baranski, W. Kucewicz, S. Kuta, W. Machowski, H. Niemiec, M. Sapor University of Mining and Metallurgy,
Patrick Spradlin, SCIPP trip to LLU, May 2, 2001 Detector Characteristics.
Sensors for CDF RunIIb silicon upgrade LayerR min (cm)1 MeV eq-n cm * * * * * *10.
Stephanie Majewski Stanford University
Silicon pad detector for an electromagnetic calorimeter at future linear collider experiments: characterisation and test beam results Antonio Bulgheroni.
Drift Chambers Drift Chambers are MWPCs where the time it takes for the ions to reach the sense wire is recorded. This time info gives position info:
SPiDeR  First beam test results of the FORTIS sensor FORTIS 4T MAPS Deep PWell Testbeam results CHERWELL Summary J.J. Velthuis.
Charge collection studies on heavily diodes from RD50 multiplication run G. Kramberger, V. Cindro, I. Mandić, M. Mikuž Ϯ, M. Milovanović, M. Zavrtanik.
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors: Small band gap (E g = 1.12 V)  good resolution in the deposited energy  3.6 eV of deposited.
1 Semiconductor Detectors  It may be that when this class is taught 10 years on, we may only study semiconductor detectors  In general, silicon provides.
Semiconductor detectors An introduction to semiconductor detector physics as applied to particle physics.
Semi-conductor Detectors HEP and Accelerators Geoffrey Taylor ARC Centre for Particle Physics at the Terascale (CoEPP) The University of Melbourne.
Medipix sensors included in MP wafers 2 To achieve good spatial resolution through efficient charge collection: Produced by Micron Semiconductor on n-in-p.
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Introduction Measurement of basic characteristics –Gain, Noise Rate, Cross-talk Measurement of uniformity.
1 Fundamentals of Microelectronics  CH1 Why Microelectronics?  CH2 Basic Physics of Semiconductors  CH3 Diode Circuits  CH4 Physics of Bipolar Transistors.
Chevron / Zigzag Pad Designs for Gas Trackers
SILICON DETECTORS PART I Characteristics on semiconductors.
Fully depleted MAPS: Pegasus and MIMOSA 33 Maciej Kachel, Wojciech Duliński PICSEL group, IPHC Strasbourg 1 For low energy X-ray applications.
Silicon detector processing and technology: Part II
Analysis of Edge and Surface TCTs for Irradiated 3D Silicon Strip Detectors Graeme Stewart a, R. Bates a, C. Corral b, M. Fantoba b, G. Kramberger c, G.
1 Device Simulations & Hardware Developments for CBM STS Sudeep Chatterji CBM Group GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research CBM Collaboration Meeting,
1 Nicolo Cartiglia, INFN, Torino - RD50 - Santander, 2015 Timing performance of LGAD-UFSD 1.New results from the last CNM LGAD runs 2.A proposal for LGAD.
p-on-n Strip Detectors: ATLAS & CMS
- Performance Studies & Production of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Stefan Koestner (University Zurich) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker Collaboration IT -
TCT measurements with SCP slim edge strip detectors Igor Mandić 1, Vladimir Cindro 1, Andrej Gorišek 1, Gregor Kramberger 1, Marko Milovanović 1, Marko.
Paul Dolejschi Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs SVD.
LHCb Vertex Detector and Beetle Chip
Particle Detectors for Colliders Semiconductor Tracking Detectors Robert S. Orr University of Toronto.
Development of radiation hard Sensors & Cables for the CBM Silicon Tracking System Sudeep Chatterji On behalf of CBM-STS Collaboration GSI Helmholtz Centre.
Paul Dolejschi Characterisation of DSSD interstrip parameters BELLE II SVD-PXD Meeting.
Simulation of new P-Type strip detectors 17th RD50 Workshop, CERN, Geneva 1/15 Centro Nacional de MicroelectrónicaInstituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona.
1 Updates on Punch-through Protection H. F.–W. Sadrozinski with C. Betancourt, A. Bielecki, Z. Butko, A. Deran, V. Fadeyev, S. Lindgren, C. Parker, N.
Claudio Piemonte Firenze, oct RESMDD 04 Simulation, design, and manufacturing tests of single-type column 3D silicon detectors Claudio Piemonte.
ADC values Number of hits Silicon detectors1196  6.2 × 6.2 cm  4.2 × 6.2 cm  2.2 × 6.2 cm 2 52 sectors/modules896 ladders~100 r/o channels1.835.
Comparison of the AC and DC coupled pixels sensors read out with FE-I4 electronics Gianluigi Casse*, Marko Milovanovic, Paul Dervan, Ilya Tsurin 22/06/20161.
QA Tests Tests for each sensor Tests for each strip Tests for structures Process stability tests Irradiation tests Bonding & Module assembly Si detectors1272.
0 Characterization studies of the detector modules for the CBM Silicon Tracking System J.Heuser 1, V.Kyva 2, H.Malygina 2,3, I.Panasenko 2 V.Pugatch 2,
Making Tracks at DØ Satish Desai – Fermilab. Making Tracks at D-Zero 2 What Does a Tracker Do? ● It finds tracks (well, duh!) ● Particle ID (e/ separation,
The Devices: MOS Transistor
Characterization and modelling of signal dynamics in 3D-DDTC detectors
I. Rashevskaya on behalf of the Slim5 Collaboration, Trieste Group
Charge collection studies with irradiated CMOS detectors
Graeme Stewarta, R. Batesa, G. Pellegrinib, G. Krambergerc, M
Position Sensitive TCT Measurements with 3D-stc detectors
SuperB SVT Silicon Sensor Requirements
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
SuperB SVT Update on Sensor and Fanout Design in Trieste/Como
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
Simulation of signal in irradiated silicon detectors
Lecture 22.
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
Enhanced Lateral Drift (ELAD) sensors
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors:
Presentation transcript:

Semiconductor detectors An introduction to semiconductor detector physics as applied to particle physics

Contents Introduction Fundamentals of operation 4 lectures – can’t cover much of a huge field Introduction Fundamentals of operation The micro-strip detector Radiation hardness issues

Lecture 3 – Microstrip detector Description of device Carrier diffusion Why is it (sometimes) good Charge sharing Cap coupling Floating strips Off line analysis Performance in magnetic field Details AC coupling Bias resistors Double sides devices

What is a microstrip detector? p-i-n diode Patterned implants as strips One or both sides Connect readout electronics to strips Radiation induced signal on a strip due to passage under/close to strip Determine position from strip hit info

What does it look like? HV Rb P+ contact on front of n- bulk Implants covered with thin thermal oxide (100nm) Forms capacitor ~ 10pF/cm Al strip on oxide overlapping implant Wirebond to amplifier Strips surrounded by a continuous p+ ring The guard ring Connected to ground Shields against surface currents Implants DC connected to bias rail Use polysilicon resistors MW Bias rail DC to ground HV Rb

AC coupled strip detector HV Rbias CAC Cfeedback

Capacitive coupling Strip detector is a RC network Cstrip to blackplace = 0.1 x Cinterstrip Csb || Cis  ignore Csb Fraction of charge on B due to track at A: B A C

Resolution Delta electrons Diffusion Strip pitch Incident Angle See lecture 2 Diffusion Strip pitch Capacitive coupling Read all strips Floating strips Incident Angle Lorentz force

Carrier collection Carriers created around track Φ  1mm Drift under E-field p+ strips on n- bulk p+ -ve bias Holes to p+ strips, electrons to n+ back-plane Typical bias conditions 100V, W=300mm E=3.3kVcm-1 Drift velocity: e= 4.45x106cms-1 & h=1.6x106cm-1 Collection time: e=7ns, h=19ns

Carrier diffusion Diffuse due to conc. gradient dN/dx Gaussian Diffusion coefficient: RMS of the distribution: Since D  m & tcoll  1/m Width of distribution is the same for e & h As charge created through depth of substrate Superposition of Gaussian distribution

Diffusion Example for electrons: Lower bias  wider distribution tcoll = 7ns; T=20oC s = 7mm Lower bias  wider distribution For given readout pitch wider distribution  more events over >1 strip Find centre of gravity of hits  better position resolution Want to fully deplete detector at low bias High Resistivity silicon required

Resolution as a f(V) Spatial resolution as a function of bias Vfd = 50V V<50V charge created in undeleted region lost, higher noise V>50V reduced drift time and diffusion width less charge sharing more single strips

Resolution due to detector design Strip pitch Very dense Share charge over many strips Reconstruct shape of charge and find CofG Signal over too many strips  lost signal (low S/N) BUT FWHM ~ 10mm Technology  limited to strip pitch 20mm Signal on 1 or 2 strips only for normal incident, no B-field

Two strip events Track between strips Find position from signal on 2 strips Use centre of gravity or Algorithm that takes into account shape of charge cloud (eta, ) Track midway between strip Q on both strips best accuracy Close to one strip Small signal on far strip Apply S/N cut to remove noise hits Signal lost in noise

Off line analysis Binary readout No information on the signal size Large pitch and high noise Get a signal on one strip only <x> = 0 P(x) -½ pitch ½ pitch

Floating strips Large Pitch (60mm) Intermediate strip Assume 20mm strip pitch  s = 2.2mm Large Pitch (60mm) Intermediate strip 1/3 tracks on both strips Assume s = 2.2mm 2/3 on single strips s = 40/12 = 11.5mm Overall: s = 1/3 x 2.2 + 2/3 x 11.5 = 8.4mm 60mm 20mm 20mm 20mm 20mm Capacitive charge coupling 2/3 tracks on both strips NO noise losses due to cap coupling 1/3 tracks on single strips s = 2/3 x 2.2 + 1/3 x 20/12 = 3.4mm

Centre of Gravity Have signal on each strip Assume linear charge sharing between strips PHL PHR Q on 2 strips & x = 0 at left strip P x e.g. PHL = 1/3PHR

Eta function Non linear charge sharing due to Gaussian charge cloud shape PHL PHR More signal on RH strip than predicted with uniform charge cloud shape Non-linear function to determine track position from relative pulse heights on strips P x

Measure Eta function Testbeam with straight tracks Reconstruct tracks through detector under test Measure deposited charge as a function of incident particle track position

Lorentz force Force on carriers due to magnetic force Perturbation in drift direction Charge cloud centre drifts from track position Asymmetric charge cloud No charge loss is observed Can correct for if thickness & B-field known vh E H qL ve

Details Modern detectors have integrated capacitors Thin 100nm oxide on top of implant Metallise over this Readout via second layer Integrated resistors Realise via polysilicon Complex Punch through biasing Not radiation hard Back to back diodes – depleted region has high R

Details Double sided detectors Surface charge build up on n-side Both p- and n-side pattern Surface charge build up on n-side Trapped +ve charge in SiO Attracts electrons in silicon near surface Shorts strips together p+ spray to increase inter-strip resistance