Colonoscopic surveillance for prevention of colorectal cancer in people with ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease or adenomas NICE CG 118 - March 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing NICE guidance
Advertisements

Diabetic Foot Problems
Implementing NICE guidance
CT COLONOGRAPHY. CRC TRENDS  Incidence decreased by 7%  Mortality decreased by 20%  Five year survival rates increased by 12%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance FDA Advisory Committee March, 2002 David Lieberman MD Chief, Division of Gastroenterology Oregon Health Sciences.
Surveillance colonoscopy after polypectomy – how frequent? Dr Chu Ming Leong Tuen Mun Hospital 1.
Update on Screening of Gastrointestinal Diseases Niraj Jani, M.D. Greater Baltimore Medical Center 1/30/15.
Screening for Colorectal Cancer Cancer Symposium: Measuring the Benefits of Screening and Treatment October 2007.
CCE 4: Bridging Clinical Expertise Using Predictive Computational Cancer Models CRC screening and follow-up – Semi-mechanistic model of CRC development.
DR Jameel Tariq Miro.  Lifetime incidence 5%  90% of cases occur after age 50  One-third of patients with colorectal cancer die from the disease 
CT COLONOSCOPY. Turki Alhazmi,MB.CHB, FRCPC, dABR Interventional Radiology-Body MRI Ass. Prof. Faculty of Medicine Umm Al Qura University Makkah-Saudi.
Colorectal cancer: How do we approach health disparities? Marta L. Davila, MD, FASGE University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Screening and Early Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer
Colon-Rectal Cancer Keith Bradley, MD National Alliance of Research Associates Programs NARAP.
Practice Guidelines and Consensus on Capsule Endoscopy
Joint Hospital Surgical Grand Round 19 June 2004.
Clinical Practice Screening for Colorectal Cancer David A. Lieberman, M.D. N Engl J Med Volume 361(12): September 17, 2009.
Update on Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests Source: Levin Bernard et al. Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous.
Asymptomatic UC patients on an immunomodulator with persistent moderate mucosal inflammation should either add a biologic or switch to a biologic William.
Geriatric Health Maintenance: Cancer Screening Linda DeCherrie, MD Geriatric Fellow Mount Sinai Hospital.
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Bowel Cancer Alex Hill. Why screen for bowel cancer?  Bowel cancer causes deaths per yr  It may be detected at asymptomatic stage by simple, safe.
General Medicine Subspecialty Conference Colon Cancer Screening General Medicine Subspecialty Conference Colon Cancer Screening Selim Krim, MD Assistant.
A Colonscope is used to remove or biopsy polyps  Night Prep.
Upper and Lower GI Investigation of Elderly Patients who are Iron Deficient American Journal of Medicine July 1999.
A CMH Community DocTalk with Robert Wayne, MD, FACS.
Better Health. No Hassles. Colon Cancer Cancer of the large intestine 112,000 people are diagnosed annually 41,000 new cases of rectal cancer annually.
D. M. Kruss MD Kill the Cancer Do Screening now! Daniel M. Kruss, M.D. Kill the Cancer Do Screening now! Daniel M. Kruss, M.D.
High risk population in GI field how we can find them? Ahmad Shavakhi MD Associate professor of gastroenterology.
Andreas Adler Charité Medical University of Berlin, Virchow Clinic Campus Central Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit Narrow Band versus Conventional Endoscopic.
Colonoscopy; Surveillance Indications
Colorectal carcinoma Dr.Mohammadzadeh.
Slides last updated: June 2015 CRC: CLINICAL FEATURES.
COMPARING YIELD AND COST OF FOBT AND FS IN AN AVERAGE RISK POPULATION: RESULTS AFTER 2 SCREENING ROUNDS N.Segnan MD, Ms Epi Center for Cancer Prevention.
1 Colorectal Cancer # 2 Cancer Killer # 2 Cancer Killer SCREENING SAVES LIVES.
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May Overview of Colorectal Cancer Maryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene Prevention and Health.
Colorectal Pathway North Bristol NHS Trust. Background Colorectal pathway introduced in 2006 Shorten patient pathway Straight to test Reduce routes into.
1 Colorectal Cancer # 2 Cancer Killer # 2 Cancer Killer SCREENING SAVES LIVES.
SETTING UP THE SERVICE BY LYNN TOBIN. HOW DID WE GET HERE? ABUNDENCE OF EVIDENCE PROVIDING JUSTIFICATION FOR BOWEL CANCER SCREENING.
Better Health. No Hassles. Colorectal Cancer Facts – The 2 nd leading cause cancer-related deaths in the Nation – Highly preventable – Caused 49,920 deaths.
Perspectives from the Waitemata Bowel Screening Pilot team -The Endoscopic view Paul Frankish Lead Endoscopist.
Which of the following is/are true regarding Ulcerative Colitis (UC)? A. Females are affected more then males. B. Surgery is curative. C. The most consistent.
Colorectal Cancer Screening Colorectal Cancer Screening VT SGNA Conference VT SGNA Conference October 24, 2015 October 24, 2015 Lynn Butterly, MD Lynn.
Colonic cancer screening in high risk groups
Flexible Sigmoidoscopy And Whole Colon Imaging In The Diagnosis Of Cancer In Patients With Colorectal Symptoms Peter O’Leary Journal Club 13/10/08.
CT Colonography vs Colonoscopy for the Detection of Advanced Neoplasia David H. Kim, M.D., Perry J. Pickhardt, M.D., Andrew J. Taylor, M.D., Winifred K.
High Quality Screening Colonoscopy Colonoscopy is a common endoscopic procedure, with more than 3 million examinations performed in the United States annually.
Towards Global Eminence K Y U N G H E E U N I V E R S I T Y Colonoscopy Surveillance After Colorectal Cancer Resection: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society.
(A) Surveillance colonoscopies for detecting dysplasia and preventing colorectal carcinoma. (B) Management of visible lesions at endoscopy. A visible lesion.
1 Yize R. Wang, MD, PhD, John R. Cangemi, MD, Edward V. Loftus Jr, MD and Michael F. Picco, MD, PhD Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:444–449 F1 김혁 / Prof. 김효종.
High frequency of early colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease M W M D Lutgens, F P Vleggaar, M E I Schipper, P C F Stokkers, C J van der Woude,
Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107:1213– June 2012 R3. 김동희 /prof. 이창균.
USPSTF Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines: What’s New?
Colon Cancer The Bottom Line
BOWEL SCOPE SCREENING Dorset BCSP
Colorectal Cancer: Risk Prevention and Diagnosis
27th Annual Winter CME Conference
Sessile Serrated Adenomas: An Evidence-Based Guide to Management
T Sammour C Lai G Roadley G Wilton AG Hill
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Postoperative Follow-Up
Colorectal Cancer Screening
Repeat Colonoscopy Recommendations
Module 4: Colorectal Cancer
Douglas K. Rex, Emely Eid  Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 
Surveillance of Dysplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Gastroenterologist- Pathologist Partnership  David T. Rubin, Jerrold R. Turner  Clinical Gastroenterology.
Polyps of the Colon and Rectum
VIRTUAL COLONOSCOPY DR DEEPIKA SOLANKI.
Colon Doctor San Antonio
Presentation transcript:

Colonoscopic surveillance for prevention of colorectal cancer in people with ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease or adenomas NICE CG 118 - March 2011

What this presentation covers Background Definitions Epidemiology Scope Recommendations Costs and savings Discussion Find out more NOTES FOR PRESENTERS: In this presentation we will start by providing some background to the guideline and why it is important. We will then present the recommendations. The NICE guideline contains 18 recommendations, which you can find in the full guideline. The recommendations cover the following areas: People with inflammatory bowel disease People with adenomas Providing information and support. Next, we will summarise the costs and savings that are likely to be incurred in implementing the guideline. Then we will open the meeting up with a list of questions to help prompt a discussion on local issues for incorporating the guidance into practice. Finally, we will end the presentation with further information about the support provided by NICE.

Background Adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or with adenomas have a higher risk of developing colorectal cancer than the general population. The recommendations are broadly consistent with those in the 2010 British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines. NOTES FOR PRESENTERS: Key points to raise: Adults with or with adenomas have a higher risk of developing colorectal cancer than the general population. Colonoscopic surveillance in people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD, which covers ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease) or adenomas can detect any problems early and potentially prevent progression to colorectal cancer. For people who are not in these high-risk groups, the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/bowel/publications/nhsbcsp-guidance-note-01.html) offers screening using faecal occult blood testing every 2 years to all men and women aged 60–74 years. People undergoing colonoscopic surveillance are not generally offered screening as part of the Bowel Cancer Screening programme. In 2010, the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) issued updated guidelines for colonoscopic surveillance in people who have had adenomas removed and for people with IBD (Cairns et al. 2010). However, because of variations in clinical practice, NICE has developed this short clinical guideline on the use of colonoscopic surveillance. The evidence-based recommendations are broadly consistent with those in the 2010 BSG guidelines. Additional information: Throughout this guideline, ‘adenomas’ is used to refer to precancerous or non-precancerous types of polyp or adenoma. However, other terms have been used in the clinical studies included in the evidence review, for example ‘polyps’ or ‘adenomatous polyps’. Polyps can be either precancerous (neoplastic adenomas) or nonprecancerous (non-neoplastic, including hyperplastic polyps). Strong evidence suggests that detecting and removing adenomas reduces the risk of cancer. Small polyps are rarely malignant and are unlikely to progress to invasive cancers.

Definitions Adenoma Baseline colonoscopy Bowel preparation Chromoscopy Crohn’s disease Colitis Colonoscopy Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) Inflammatory bowel disease Sigmoidoscopy NOTES FOR PRESENTERS: Adenoma A benign tumour of a glandular structure or of glandular origin. Baseline colonoscopy A colonoscopic examination in which measurements are taken (after a run-in period where applicable). The results of subsequent colonoscopies can be compared with the baseline colonoscopy. Bowel preparation The use of various laxatives to clear out the bowel in preparation for lower gastrointestinal surgery or other bowel investigations, for example colonoscopy or barium enema. Chromoscopy Application of dyes onto the surface of the mucosal lining to enhance mucosal irregularities. Crohn’s disease Chronic inflammation that typically involves the distal portion of the small intestine, often spreads to the colon, and is characterised by diarrhoea, cramping, loss of appetite and weight and local abscesses and scarring. Colitis Inflammation of the part of the large intestine (colon) that extends from the caecum to the rectum. Colonoscopy The endoscopic examination of the large intestine (colon) and the distal part of the small bowel. Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) A medical imaging procedure that uses X-rays and computers to produce two- and three-dimensional images of the large intestine (colon) from the lowest part, the rectum, all the way to the lower end of the small intestine. The procedure is used to diagnose colon and bowel disease, including polyps, diverticulosis and cancer. Inflammatory bowel disease A group of inflammatory conditions of the colon and small intestine. In this guideline, inflammatory bowel disease refers to Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Sigmoidoscopy A minimally invasive medical examination of the large intestine from the rectum through to the last part of the colon. There are two types of sigmoidoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, which uses a flexible endoscope, and rigid sigmoidoscopy, which uses a rigid device. Image of a polyp viewed using CT Colonograpy reproduced with kind permission of Dr Bruce Fox, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth. Image reproduced with kind permission of Dr. Bruce Fox, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth

Epidemiology The risk of developing colorectal cancer for people with ulcerative colitis is estimated as 2% after 10 years, 8% after 20 years and 18% after 30 years of disease. The risk of developing colorectal cancer for people with Crohn's disease is considered to be similar to that for people with ulcerative colitis with the same extent of colonic involvement. NOTES FOR PRESENTERS: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the UK, with approximately 32,300 new cases diagnosed and 14,000 deaths in England and Wales each year. Around half of the people diagnosed with colorectal cancer survive for at least 5 years after diagnosis. Expert opinion suggests that the annual incidence of adenomas is 1% of the adult population. For a population of 100,000, the number of adults in the age range 20–75 years is estimated to be 68,092. Therefore the annual incidence is estimated to be 681 per 100,000 per year.

Guideline recommendations The recommendations cover three key areas: Providing information and support people with IBD people with adenomas. NOTES FOR PRESENTERS: The NICE guideline contains 18 recommendations about how care can be improved and for this presentation we have divided the recommendations into three areas. We have chosen to cover providing information and support since it applies to both people with adenomas and people with IBD Image of inflammatory polyp reproduced with kind permission of Professor Marco Novelli, University College London. Image reproduced with kind permission of Professor Marco Novelli, University College London

Providing information and support What to discuss with people who are considering colonoscopic surveillance: potential benefits, limitations and risks particularly - early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer quality of life and psychological outcomes. Information about the procedure, including: bowel preparation impact on everyday activities sedation potential discomfort risk of perforation and bleeding. NOTES FOR PRESENTERS: Recommendation 1.1.14 in full: shown on slide **note to editor – please see comments box on slide**

People with inflammatory bowel disease Offer surveillance using colonoscopy with chromoscopy to people with IBD, based on risk: Low risk: offer at 5 years Intermediate risk: offer at 3 years High risk: offer at 1 year NOTES FOR PRESENTERS: Key points to raise: The Guideline Development Group recognised the significant inter-operator variability of colonoscopy. It recommended that if a colonoscopy is incomplete, a repeat colonoscopy should be undertaken, with a more experienced colonoscopist if appropriate. Recommendations in full: Offer colonoscopic surveillance to people with IBD as defined in 1.1.1 based on their risk of developing colorectal cancer (see table 1), determined at the last complete colonoscopy: Low risk: offer colonoscopy at 5 years. Intermediate risk: offer colonoscopy at 3 years. High risk: offer colonoscopy at 1 year.[1.1.3] For people with IBD who have been offered colonoscopic surveillance, continue to use colonoscopy with chromoscopy as the method of surveillance.[1.1.4] Offer a repeat colonoscopy with chromoscopy if any colonoscopy is incomplete. Consider whether a more experienced colonoscopist is needed. [1.1.5] Image of Dysplasia-associated mass or lesion (DALM) reproduced with kind permission of Professor Marco Novelli, University College London. Image reproduced with kind permission of Professor Marco Novelli, University College London

Click here Click here Click here Offer colonoscopic surveillance to people whose symptoms started 10 years ago and who have: ulcerative colitis (but not proctitis alone) or Crohn’s colitis involving more than one segment of colon Offer a baseline colonoscopy with chromoscopy and targeted biopsy of any abnormal areas to determine the risk of developing colorectal cancer High risk Extensive ulcerative or Crohn’s colitis with moderate or severe active inflammation (confirmed endoscopically or histologically) or Primary sclerosing cholangitis (including after liver transplant) or Colonic stricture in the past 5 years or Any grade of dysplasia in the past 5 years or Family history of colorectal cancer in a first-degree relative aged under 50 Low risk Extensive but quiescent ulcerative or Crohn’s colitis or Left-sided ulcerative colitis (but not proctitis alone) or Crohn’s colitis of a similar extent Intermediate risk Extensive ulcerative or Crohn’s colitis with mild active inflammation (confirmed endoscopically or histologically) or Post-inflammatory polyps or Family history of colorectal cancer in a first-degree relative aged 50 or over Click here Click here Click here

Click here to go back to slide 14 Low risk Left-sided ulcerative colitis (but not proctitis alone) or Crohn’s colitis of a similar extent or Extensive but quiescent ulcerative or Crohn’s colitis Follow-up Offer colonoscopy with chromoscopy at 5 years Offer a repeat colonoscopy with chromoscopy if incomplete. Consider whether a more experienced colonoscopist is needed Findings at follow-up Offer the next colonoscopy with chromoscopy based on the person’s risk at the last complete colonoscopy: low risk – offer at 5 years intermediate risk – offer at 3 years high risk – offer at 1 year Click here to go back to slide 14

Click here to go back to slide 14 Intermediate risk Extensive ulcerative or Crohn’s colitis with mild active inflammation (confirmed endoscopically or histologically) or Post-inflammatory polyps or Family history of colorectal cancer in a first-degree relative aged 50 or over Follow-up Offer colonoscopy with chromoscopy at 3 years Offer a repeat colonoscopy with chromoscopy if incomplete. Consider whether a more experienced colonoscopist is needed Findings at follow-up Offer the next colonoscopy with chromoscopy based on the person’s risk at the last complete colonoscopy: low risk – offer at 5 years intermediate risk – offer at 3 years high risk – offer at 1 year Click here to go back to slide 14

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (including after liver transplant) or High risk Extensive ulcerative or Crohn’s colitis with moderate or severe active inflammation (confirmed endoscopically or histologically) or Primary sclerosing cholangitis (including after liver transplant) or Colonic stricture in the past 5 years or Any grade of dysplasia in the past 5 years or Family history of colorectal cancer in a first-degree relative aged under 50 Follow-up Offer colonoscopy with chromoscopy at 1 year Offer a repeat colonoscopy with chromoscopy if incomplete. Consider whether a more experienced colonoscopist is needed Findings at follow-up Offer the next colonoscopy with chromoscopy based on the person’s risk at the last complete colonoscopy: low risk – offer at 5 years intermediate risk – offer at 3 years high risk – offer at 1 year Click here to go back to slide 14 Click here to move on to slide 18

People with adenomas Offer appropriate colonoscopic surveillance based on individual’s risk of developing colorectal cancer determined at initial adenoma removal. NOTES FOR PRESENTERS: Use the algorithm on slides (and in the QRG) to determine actions. Recommendation in full: Offer the appropriate colonoscopic surveillance strategy to people with adenomas based on their risk of developing colorectal cancer as determined at initial adenoma removal (see table 2). Low risk: consider colonoscopy at 5 years: if the colonoscopy is negative (that is, no adenomas are found) stop surveillance if low risk, consider the next colonoscopy at 5 years (with follow-up surveillance as for low risk) if intermediate risk, offer the next colonoscopy at 3 years (with follow-up surveillance as for intermediate risk) if high risk, offer the next colonoscopy at 1 year (with follow-up surveillance as for high risk).  Intermediate risk: offer colonoscopy at 3 years: if the colonoscopy is negative, offer the next colonoscopy at 3 years. Stop surveillance if there is a further negative result if low or intermediate risk, offer the next colonoscopy at 3 years (with follow-up surveillance as for intermediate risk) High risk: offer colonoscopy at 1 year. if the colonoscopy is negative, or low or intermediate risk, offer the next colonoscopy at 3 years (with follow-up surveillance as for intermediate risk) if high risk, offer the next colonoscopy at 1 year (with follow-up surveillance as for high risk). [1.1.9] Image of an adenoma reproduced with kind permission of Professor Marco Novelli, University College London. Image reproduced with kind permission of Professor Marco Novelli, University College London

Risk of developing colorectal cancer in people with adenomas Low risk: one or two adenomas smaller than 10 mm.   Intermediate risk: three or four adenomas smaller than 10 mm or one or two adenomas if one is 10 mm or larger. High risk: five or more adenomas smaller than 10 mm or three or more adenomas if one is 10 mm or larger. Table 2 14

Click here end algorithm and move on to next section (slide 26) For people who have had adenomas removed use the findings at removal to determine the risk of developing colorectal cancer Low risk One or two adenomas smaller than 10 mm Intermediate risk Three or four adenomas smaller than 10 mm or One or two adenomas if one is 10 mm or larger High risk Five or more adenomas smaller than 10 mm or Three or more adenomas if one is 10 mm or larger Click here Click here Click here Click here end algorithm and move on to next section (slide 26)

Click here to go back to slide 22 Low risk One or two adenomas smaller than 10 mm Follow-up Consider colonoscopy at 5 years Offer a repeat colonoscopy if incomplete. Consider whether a more experienced colonoscopist is needed. If colonoscopy is not clinically appropriate, consider CTC. If CTC is not available or appropriate consider double contrast barium enema. Discuss the risks and benefits with the person and their family or carers if these techniques are being considered for ongoing surveillance Findings at follow-up No adenomas – stop surveillance Low risk – consider the next colonoscopy at 5 years. Follow up as for low risk Intermediate risk – offer the next colonoscopy at 3 years. Follow up as for intermediate risk High risk – offer the next colonoscopy at 1 year. Follow up as for high risk Click here to go back to slide 22

Click here to go back to slide 22 Intermediate risk Three or four adenomas smaller than 10 mm or One or two adenomas if one is 10 mm or larger Follow-up Offer colonoscopy at 3 years Offer a repeat colonoscopy if incomplete. Consider whether a more experienced colonoscopist is needed. If colonoscopy is not clinically appropriate, consider CTC. If CTC is not available or appropriate consider double contrast barium enema. Discuss the risks and benefits with the person and their family or carers if these techniques are being considered for ongoing surveillance Findings at follow-up No adenomas – offer the next colonoscopy at 3 years. Stop surveillance if there is a further negative result Low or intermediate risk – offer the next colonoscopy at 3 years. Follow up as for intermediate risk High risk – offer the next colonoscopy at 1 year. Follow up as for high risk Click here to go back to slide 22

Five or more adenomas smaller than 10 mm or High risk Five or more adenomas smaller than 10 mm or Three or more adenomas if one is 10 mm or larger Follow-up Offer colonoscopy at 1 year Offer a repeat colonoscopy if incomplete. Consider whether a more experienced colonoscopist is needed If colonoscopy is not clinically appropriate, consider CTC. If CTC is not available or appropriate consider double contrast barium enema. Discuss the risks and benefits with the person and their family or carers if these techniques are being considered for ongoing surveillance. Findings at follow-up No adenomas, or low or intermediate risk – offer the next colonoscopy at 3 years. Follow up as for intermediate risk High risk – offer colonoscopy at 1 year. Follow up as for high risk Click here to go back to slide 22 Click here to move on to next section (slide 26)

Discussion How do easy is it to identify people who should be included in a surveillance programme? How easy is it to access information needed to put them in the correct risk group? Are the full range of tests (e.g. CTC) available? What are the problems we face trying to discuss potential benefits, limitations and risks with people who are considering colonoscopic surveillance? What are the local logistics for getting patients into a colonoscopic surveillance programme? NOTES FOR PRESENTERS: These questions are suggestions that have been developed to help provide a prompt for a discussion at the end of your presentation – please edit and adapt these to suit your local situation. Additional questions: How do we identify and access a more experienced colonoscopist when needed? – if this question is used it is important to emphasise that this is not about length of experience.