Page 1 Presentation title – file name – date From ATV to ATV Evolution February 2004 Hans-Jörg Heidmann Transportation for In-Orbit Infrastructure and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Larry Phillips MAY 13th-17th, 2002 Micro Arcsecond Xray Imaging Mission: Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Launch Vehicle Information Final Version.
Advertisements

Presented by Marco Christov at the 11th Mars Society Annual Convention, 14 – 17 August 2008, Boulder Colorado. A Mars Heavy Transport.
Prof. Paolo Gaudenzi - Aerospace Structures 1 Configuration of a satellite and of its structural system Prof. P. Gaudenzi Università di Roma La Sapienza,
NNJ09BH0123RAppendix L A-Crew, Robotics, Avionics, and Vehicle Equipment (CRAVE)- Unrestricted Data Attachment L-2-A-1.
SD2905 Human Spaceflight Lecture 5, part 2, Space vehicles for humans.
All rights reserved, 2007, Thales Alenia Space EXOMARS Industry Day Carrier Module Presentation Thales Alenia Space- Italia (Turin)
Secondary Payloads Overview
Orbital Operations – 2 Rendezvous & Proximity Operations
Solid Rocket Boosters Overview Two solid rocket boosters provide the main thrust to lift the Space Shuttle off the pad. They are the largest solid- propellant.
Aug.19, 1999 George T. Roach Integration Mission Design Center NASA- GSFC Code 543 Greenbelt, MD FAX
Babakin Space Center, Space Research Insitute, Makeev Rocket Design Bureau COSMOS ONE: THE FIRST SOLAR SAIL a project of The Planetary Society with Cosmos.
Vertical Launch UAV Project Plan. ∞ Construct an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with a camera payload ∞ UAV must autonomously navigate with real-time video.
Minimalist Human Mars Mission Surface infrastructure discussion July 26 th, 2008.
C2V2 Technical Requirements and Constraints
Design of a Piloted Spacecraft to Bridge the Gap between the Space Shuttle and Crew Exploration Vehicle Michael Seibert University of Colorado at Boulder.
International Space Station Origin: The international space station project began as a cooperative agreement to build and operate a large orbital station.
HALEY GAYDEN INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION. BACKGROUND The International Space Station took 10 years and over 30 missions to assemble. The space station.
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
Final Version Wes Ousley Dan Nguyen May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Thermal.
1 wp4 – Technical Issues for payload integration within the Nacelle for High Altitude flight Budapest 24/11/04 Marco Bobbio Pallavicini Carlo Gavazzi Space.
1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.
1 Head of Russian Federal Space Agency ISS Program International Cooperation Paris, June 17, 2009.
-- NRL Presentation -- Rendezvous, Proximity Operations & Capture for ATV and HTV Aeroscience and Flight Mechanics Division GN&C Design and Analysis Branch.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Integration and Test Joanne Baker GSFC Code 568 August 16-17, 2005.
Chapter 24 Space Vehicular Systems. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Identify.
Tielong Zhang On behalf of the CGS Team in the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Science Spacecraft System and Payload China Geomagnetism.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Transition to 6-person crew ASE conference, Praha Oct 8, 2009 Andreas Schön, ESA All dates used in this presentation are examples only, they do not necessarily.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
SPHERES ISS Flight Preparation & Hardware Status 08 July 2002 Steve Sell Stephanie Chen
Team PM8 Eventus Slide 1. Commercial spaceflight has seen increased activity as more privately owned companies invest in the venture. To avoid a catastrophic.
ATV Rendezvous Mission 1: Jules Verne Brian Rishikof Odyssey Space Research March 24, 2004.
FIRST/Planck 12 December 2000PT The FIRST Mission Implementation Status and Schedule T. Passvogel The Promise of FIRST.
Structures and Mechanisms Subsystems AERSP 401A. Introduction to Structural Estimation Primary Structure: load-bearing structure of the spacecraft Secondary.
1 WP4 – System Testbed Trial 2 preparation Barcelona 3/03/05 Marco Bobbio Pallavicini - Carlo Gavazzi Space SpA.
AAE 450- Propulsion LV Stephen Hanna Critical Design Review 02/27/01.
Mars Orbit Rendezvous Robert Dyck. Only land what you need Mars Direct ERV contains stuff not needed on Mars Food & life support for transit to Earth.
Space Shuttles By Frederick. Launching Space Shuttles To lift the 4.5 million pound (2.05 million kg) shuttle from the pad to orbit (115 to 400 miles/185.
Space Station Will it be accessible for You and Me?
Mars Today 1 An immediate and inexpensive program for manned Mars visitation.
Final Version Dick Bolt Code 302 May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mission Success.
Universal Chassis for Modular Ground Vehicles University of Michigan Mars Rover Team Presented by Eric Nytko August 6, 2005 The 2 nd Mars Expedition Planning.
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION LAVOCHKIN ASSOCIATION "PHOBOS-GRUNT" PROJECT MISSION CONCEPT & CURRENT STATUS OF DEVELOPMENT IKI, 13 October.
1 Weekly Summary Weekly Summary Formation Flight AEM4332 Spring Semester March 7,2007 Masao SHIMADA.
The final Space Shuttle has landed… Now what??. The Space Shuttle Since 1981, NASA space shuttles have been rocketing from the Florida coast into Earth.
Final Version Kequan Luu May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Flight Software.
Roadmap for Long Term Sustainable Space Exploration and Habitation Defining the Functional Requirements for Early Phase of Space Habitation AIAA 2015-????
Crew Mobility for Lunar Surface Exploration Dr. Rob Ambrose NASA-JSC May 2008.
Space Shuttle  Presentation by:  Adjunct Professor Walter Barry  Space Shuttle launch  Orbit  Re-entry  Private Enterprise.
Final Version Gary Davis Robert Estes Scott Glubke Propulsion May 13-17, 2002 Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
ERV Team 2 Final Report Alicia Cole-Quigley James Gilson Erin Hammond Domenic Marcello Matt Miller Jeff Rosenberger.
Spacecraft Systems Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB.
Recommendation to Cease NASA Crew Return Vehicle Development April 29, 2004 Amanda KellyBlake HajovskyAnthony Pittman Engineering Technical Communications.
Need for Commercial Cargo to ISS William Gerstenmaier NASA Associate Administrator for Space Operations FAA Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Council.
THEMIS MRRSystems - 1 GSFC, Jan 5, 2007 Systems Engineering.
1 MINUS EIGHTY DEGREE LABORATORY FREEZER FOR ISS (MELFI) MSFC Briefing February 2005 John Cornwell
Orbital Aggregation & Space Infrastructure Systems (OASIS) Background Develop robust and cost effective concepts in support of future space commercialization.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory EXPRESS Logisitics Carrier (ELC) Operations Overview POIWG #26, August.
Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mechanical George Roach Dave Peters 17 May 2002 “Technological progress is like an axe in the.
Flight Hardware. Flight Profile - STS Flight Profile - SLS Earth Mars 34,600,000 mi International Space Station 220 mi Near-Earth Asteroid ~3,100,000.
AAE 450 Spring 2010 AAE 450 2/11/2010 Kathy Brumbaugh Chris Spreen
Orbital Express: A New Chapter In Space
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Fault Tolerant Computer for the AUTOMATED TRANSFER VEHICLE
Technical Resource Allocations
The International Space Station (ISS)
Advance Exploration Programs, Thales Alenia Space in Italy
Key Benchmarks in a LEO Economy Robert L. Curbeam Jr.
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Presentation transcript:

Page 1 Presentation title – file name – date From ATV to ATV Evolution February 2004 Hans-Jörg Heidmann Transportation for In-Orbit Infrastructure and beyond

Page 2 Presentation title – file name – date ISS ATTITUDE CONTROL Major features of ATV mission GYRODYNES/CMG DESATURATION RETRIEVAL OF WASTE AND DESTRUCTION DURING REENTRY ISS REFUELING DRY CARGO WATER AND GAS ISS ORBIT CONTROL DEBRIS AVOIDANCE BY ISS

Page 3 Presentation title – file name – date General layout and characteristics Mass = 20.5 tons at launch dry mass : 11 tons gross cargo : 9.5 tons up to 8 tons of propellant at launch Sizes 10.3 m length 4.5 m diameter 22.3 m with deployed solar wings (4.8 kW) 22 m 3 pressurized module (16 m 3 for pressurized cargo)

Page 4 Presentation title – file name – date ATV subsystems Power supply : - 4 independent distribution chains with rotative solar panels (Si) and rechargeable batteries (NiCd) Data Management System : - 3 Failure Tolerant Computers running the main Flight Applicative Software Monitoring and Safety Chain : - 2 independent and autonomous chains for Rendezvous monitoring and Collision Avoidance Maneuver with specific means (data processor, category A software, primary power sources, thrusters…) Propulsion Subsystem : - 28 ACS thruster (240N) - 4 OCS thrusters (490 N) - 8 propellant tanks (8 tons of MON + MMH) Semi passive TCS : - 40 Variable Conductance Heat Pipes

Page 5 Presentation title – file name – date ATV subsystems (cont’d) External Rendezvous monitoring by the ISS : - Visual Video Target - RF Kurs navigation transponder - Visual Ranging Cues Navigation and Monitoring of RV : - Relative GPS - Laser sensors (2 Telegoniometer + 2 Videometers) General navigation equipment : - Star Tracker, Accelerometer, Gyrometer, Sun Sensor for survival Communication subsystem : - 2 chains compatible TDRSS/Artemis for ATV-CC - 2 chains (S-band) for proximity link with ISS

Page 6 Presentation title – file name – date ATV subsystems (cont’d) Pressurized Module : - 22 m 3 pressurized module - up to 8 Standard Racks - Environment and Control Life Support (fan, smoke detector, light) Unpressurized Cargo Tanks : - 3 water tanks - 3 Gas tanks - 2 refueling kits Russian Docking System : - Active Docking Unit featuring mechanical, fluidic, electrical and data interface Russian Equipment Control Set : - 2 redundant equipment chains to control interfaces with ISS

Page 7 Presentation title – file name – date ESA ATV Flight Segment Prime Contractorship. System engineering. Verification of ATV FS. Development of Flight Software. Development and Procurement of Propulsion and Reboost subsystem and of Avionics Chains. ATV assembly, integration and testing. Support to ESA for external interfaces. Cargo Carrier development and integration. Russian equipment set procurement Thermal control studies. Development of Spacecraft structure subsystem. Development of Solar Generation subsystem. EADS-ST (F+D) ATV INDUSTRIAL TEAM Development of Videometer and Star Tracker. Development of Telegoniometer ALENIA SPAZIO (I) CONTRAVES SPACE (CH) DUTCH SPACE (NL) EADS SODERN (F) DJO (D)

Page 8 Presentation title – file name – date 1 st ATV flight model at overall integration Equipped Avionics Bay Integrated Cargo Carrier Equipped Propulsion Bay Launcher adapter with separation system ATV sub-assemblies delivered at EADS-ST Bremen - Nov st ATV launch by Ariane 5 (Jules-Verne) scheduled May 2005

Page 9 Presentation title – file name – date Servicing of the US-Segment  The NASA Shuttle fleet will be retired from up to 2010, which could lead to a logistical gap for the ISS at least until 2014  This logistical gap could be overcome by ATV derived unmanned transportation vehicles such as: - ATV Download System - Cargo Capsule System - Unpressurized Logistic Carrier  For the logistic supply of the US-Segment by ATV could be developed a special docking mechanism called IBDM (International Docking and Berthing Mechanism).

Page 10 Presentation title – file name – date 2. Scenario Description (6) PTV Scenario Lift-off Separation of Ariane 5 EAPs Fairing jettisoning Separation of the EPC Ignition of the ESP Separation of the ESP Separation completed PTV attitude stabilized Solar panels deployed Antennas deployed Check-up by the PTV control centre Transfer to the phasing orbit Maneuver 1 Drift period 1 Maneuver 2 Phasing Drift period 2 Mid course correction Drift period 3 Transfer to the ISS vicinity – Interface with the RV scenario

Page 11 Presentation title – file name – date -V-bar Approach Scenario 2. Scenario Description (7) PTV Scenario

Page 12 Presentation title – file name – date 2. Scenario Description (8) ISS Attached and Return Phase  Connections  Repressurization of inter volume and tightness control  Hatch opening  PTV power down to stand by mode  Payload operations  PTV power up out of stand by mode  Check out  Hatch closing  Depressurization of inter volume  Unlatch  Separation  Distancing  Orbit correction  Drift  Reentry vehicle power-up (avionics / GNC)  Wetting of propulsion system of the reentry vehicle (pyro valve)  Pyros armed  Checkout prior to reentry  Transfer of the state vector and reentry information to GNC of reentry vehicle  Deorbit impulse  Separation of the ATV Propulsion part  Separation of the docking adapter Checkout prior to reentry Transfer of the state vector and reentry information to GNC of reentry vehicle Deorbit impulse Separation of the ATV Propulsion part Separation of the docking adapter Reentry Hypersonic flare Descent Back cover jettison Parachute sequence deployment (for instance, extractor, drogue chute, main chute) Heat shield jettison Landing Landing system deployment (airbag) Touch down Vehicle passivation and safing Beacon and post-landing systems deployment Arrival of ground crew Manual vehicle safing Hatch opening and express payload removal Hoisting on transport vehicle Transport

Page 13 Presentation title – file name – date 2. Scenario Description (9) CTV scenario Mission Scenario similar To PTV Safeguard Scenario during Launch phase Two-Failure Tolerance Required ATV S/C Modification Analysis led to the Result that it would be the design of a new Vehicle

Page 14 Presentation title – file name – date ULC Mission Scenario Launch by Ariane 5 ECA After nominal separation from AR5 upper stage jettisoning of ULC cover/cargo door ULC operates in a safe orbit below ISS orbit ULC conducts ISS approach similar to the ATV after ISS okay Final Approach differs from ATV due to different docking locations ULC approach is similar with PTV ULC will be docked at Node 2 Port Exchange of complete platform pallets or of single ORUs by SSRMS and/or Special Purpose Dexterous System Pallets attachment places are at the truss (starboard, port) via PAS, UCCAS or ULCAS De-docking Leaving approach ellipsoid Braking manoeuvres for initiating of de-orbiting 2. Scenario Description (10)

Page 15 Presentation title – file name – date Capsule adaptor module upper I/F close to capsule intermediate diameter,  CoG of capsule close to I/F plane  CoG of complete vehicle below I/F plane  I/F on a 20° cone structure  No separation interference  I/F as far as possible from nose (Reentry thermal aspect) Front docking module Capsule adapter module 4. PTV System Architect. & ATV S/C Modifications (2) Same configuration for CTV but with Additional redundancies

Page 16 Presentation title – file name – date 4. PTV System Architect. & ATV S/C Modifications (3)

Page 17 Presentation title – file name – date 4. CTV System Architect. & ATV S/C Modifications (1) Global architecture choice (1)  Capsule adaptor module slightly modified compared to PTV  Same Front Docking module  Emergency Escape module added  Modified Ariane5 fairing added Vehicle launch with Ariane5 ESC-B (23.0 tons capacity) US-port (V-bar as baseline, -R-bar as back-up treated by delta compared to V-bar) IBDM device Same reentry capsule as PTV configuration Autonomous reentry capsule (no power, thermal regulation, … deliveries) No refuel, no reboost No emergency detachment requirements 1 month docking phase

Page 18 Presentation title – file name – date  Blunt Biconic shape launched “nose-down”, 4.4 m ext. diameter, 5 crew member  PC internal volume of 25.8 m³  PC equipment volume 9.1 m³ (preliminary figure)  Considering 2 m³ per crew member of free volume, 6.7 m³ can be occupied by payload.  Considering:  20% volume margin to account for secondary structures and packaging factors  payload density of about 300 Kg per cubic meter the theoretical P/L occupying all the residual volume of about 6.7 m³ is 1600 Kg  Considering a Capsule mass of 13.1 tons:  The mass w/o P/L is tons  Potential P/L Mass is 2.78 tons  Also assuming a tilting of 30 deg for seats in landing configuration the biconic shape can easily accommodate a crew of 5 CTV Crew & P/L Accommodation Results (Crew of 5) 4. CTV System Architect. & ATV S/C Modifications (5)

Page 19 Presentation title – file name – date 6. ULC System Architect. & ATV S/C Modifications (1) ATV-ULC Layout and Configuration  Unpressurized cargo bay  Doors jettisoned before circularization  Cargo on 2 Express pallets (Boeing) or ICC pallets (EADS-ST)  Front cone with stan- dard RV equipment and Common Berthing Mech- anism (CBM)  SSRMS grapple on aft bay wall