Annual Review Information Session January 2014. Session outcomes What Annual Review is and what it is not The benefits of Annual Review How to prepare.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Induction Seminar 22 nd November 2007.
Advertisements

How to manage your supervisor Tennie Videler Vitae Programme Manager: researchers.
Career Development & Staff Appraisal Scheme Information Session.
Preparing for your first annual progress review FMS research student development workshop Monday 3 March 2014 Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies,
Head of Learning: Job description
Performance management guidance
The SEDA Teacher Accreditation Scheme James Wisdom Visiting Professor in Educational Development, Middlesex University
Northern Convening Butte College April 26, 2013 College Team Facilitators’ Presentation Student Support (Re)defined.
California State University, East Bay Human Resources Preparing and Presenting a Performance Review 2007.
Performance Assessment Process: The Employee’s Perspective May 2014.
Performance Development Online (PDO) Information Session 2009.
System Office Performance Management
Introducing the New College Scheme Seevic Performance Appraisal.
SRDS Reviewers Briefing Andrea Jackson, Jo Rowell & Andy Dougill March 2011.
Briefing Presentation for About the Yorkshire Accord Scheme Aims Our definition Expectations of those involved Management & quality standards Recruitment.
Annual Staff Review Information Session. ∂ Why have an Annual Staff Review Scheme? Opportunity to recognise staff for their hard work Opportunity to help.
System Office Performance Management
MANAGING STAFF PERFORMANCE #SBM15 Being Brilliant at…
Unit 2: Managing the development of self and others Life Science and Chemical Science Professionals Higher Apprenticeships Unit 2 Managing the development.
Making the most of your supervision meetings Alyson Williamson Education Services Manager.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
Performance Review and Staff Development (PRSD) The Role of Governors Governor Reviewer Training.
Performance Review and Staff Development Reviewing the Principal’s Performance A Conference for Governor Reviewers and Principals.
SESSION ONE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & APPRAISALS.
Seevic Performance Appraisal
Performance Appraisal Process November 2011 – Human Resources.
CaSE CAREERS ADVICE AND STUDENT EMPLOYABILITY (CASE) WHAT WE DO – For Students By Andrea Popeau Thomas –
A new approach to appraisals within the University of Kent Liz Shrives working with: Melissa Bradley and Helena Torres.
Performance Development at The Cathedral of the Incarnation A Supervisor’s Guide.
@sparqs_scotland Course Rep Training name of trainer associate trainer | sparqs.
The WICT mentoring program is designed to help bring awareness and development of professional and personal skills and talents. The mentor helps the mentee.
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
Introduction to orientation MOVES FOLIO Course. Introduction- Orientation A key role for supervisors is to provide orientation (also known as induction)
1. 2 The Induction of New Governors A Guide for Governing Bodies Governor Support Unit.
Introduction to PDRS Purpose of the Workshop  An overview of the PDRs in UL  The process involved – from a Reviewee perspective  Reviewer Sessions.
Performance and Development Teacher Librarian Network
1 Staff Review and Development (SRD): For those being reviewed Jessie Monck, PPD, Human Resources Division Personal and Professional Development.
Career Pathways for English Language Graduates Liz Whitaker York St John University 16 th July 2008.
General Staff Performance Reviews Campus Briefings
PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Helping to set goals and reach potential 1 The Lloyds Bank Foundation is committed to providing this information in a way.
1 An introductory workshop for new governors 2005 Becoming a governor.
Achieving Success Reviewee Workshop. Aims 2 main aims: To provide an understanding of the review process To introduce the SMART approach to objective.
1 Staff Review and Development (SRD): Practical for those reviewing others Jessie Monck, PPD, Human Resources Division Personal and Professional.
The value of professional development for technical staff Frances Grebenc HR/OD Partner (Learning and Development) University of Edinburgh.
© PeopleAdvantage 2013 All Rights Reserved We will Show You How to Easily Conduct Effective Performance Appraisals LCSA Conference 2013.
© 2015 ASPCA ®. All Rights Reserved. Succession Planning & People Development Practical Tools for Managers Cheryl Bucci - Vice President, Human Resources.
1 CAREER PATHWAYS Welcome to…. Module 6 Performance Management.
Methods of Training Starter Create your own definition of training. Give an example of training you have undertaken in your life so far. Did you have a.
Business Management - Intermediate 2Business Decision Areas © Copyright free to Business Education Network members 2007/2008B111/078 – BDA 1.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROCESS
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
Member Network Committee Induction
WELCOME TO EVENING FOR PARENTS OF APPLICANTS
Mentoring CPD Festival 2017.
The Academic Promotions Process
Personal Development Planning
NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar
Welcome to SSCC Structure and Roles (Workbook)
Staff Development Discussions 2016
Professional Certificate in Strategic Change Management
Performance Achievement a quick reference guide to
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Aurora Briefing for participants 2018 to 2019
Human Resources Division
The Individual Development Plan (IDP)
Professional Tutor Conference 20th September 2018
Staff Review and Development (SRD): for all staff
Annual Development Plan (ADP) Development 25th April 2018
Experts by Experience Group Observations.
Observer Standardisation Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Annual Review Information Session January 2014

Session outcomes What Annual Review is and what it is not The benefits of Annual Review How to prepare for Annual Review The Annual Review forms The Annual Review discussion How to get the most out of Annual Review

1.Reflect on achievements, challenges and progress made over the past 12 months 2.Consider career aspirations 3.Set objectives for the future and consider development needs 4.Receive feedback and provide upward feedback What is Annual Review? Annual Review Provide Upward Feedback Plan for Development Consider Aspirations Reflect

A disciplinary interview in disguise An opportunity to raise grievances A direct discussion about salary or promotion A one-way process where the reviewer does all the talking An event that happens in isolation – there should be an ongoing process for reviewing outcomes What Annual Review is not:

Why do we do Annual Review? To set objectives and ensure that work contributes to the achievement of both University and individual objectives To provide an opportunity for reflection on past achievements and challenges To help individuals identify and develop their potential To increase performance, morale and motivation To provide feedback to individuals and line managers

1. Reviewer sets the date/venue for the discussion 1. Reviewer sets the date/venue for the discussion 2. Reviewee completes the Annual Review form and sends to reviewer 7 days before the discussion 2. Reviewee completes the Annual Review form and sends to reviewer 7 days before the discussion 3. Annual Review takes place 3. Annual Review takes place 4. Reviewer provides comments following the discussion 4. Reviewer provides comments following the discussion 7. Reviewer completes a form summarising the discussion and returns to reviewee 7. Reviewer completes a form summarising the discussion and returns to reviewee 5. Reviewer & reviewee agree objectives for future 5. Reviewer & reviewee agree objectives for future 6. Reviewer & reviewee agree development needs 6. Reviewer & reviewee agree development needs The Annual Review process: overview Reviewer RevieweeReviewer & Reviewee 8. Closing the loop. Reviewee agrees the form and it is sent to the co- ordinator for the Annual Review exercise in your School/Section

Agree interview arrangements (21 days notice) Review previous objectives and any other relevant documentation (consider job description, FAE) Review the previous year’s work Think about successes and learning points from the whole year to avoid focussing on the most recent events Look ahead to the coming year’s work Think about career development Reviewers - think about feedback you’d like to give and remember to be constructive Preparation for Review

Reviewee Complete the form and return to reviewer 7 days ahead of the meeting Reviewer If relevant, talk to other managers (with the knowledge of the reviewee) Give a note of additional areas for discussion – no surprises Meeting is on a one-to-one basis and confidential Preparation for Review

Annual Review Form Personal Details Reflection Planning for Development Additional Points Upward Feedback Evaluation Form

The Annual Review Form: Grades 1 – 4 Pages 1 and 2 completed by the reviewee & submitted to reviewer 7 days ahead of the discussion Page 3 completed by the reviewer within 7 days of the discussion

Page 1: Details/Reflection

Page 1: New Objectives

Why set objectives? To ensure achievement of the University’s Strategic Objectives To set and/or raise standards of work To enhance motivation To develop individuals and broaden skills To develop a new area of work To achieve project/research milestones To change priorities To implement a new policy

Setting objectives Objectives should be: – A statement of what is required – SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timely) – Negotiated and agreed – Stretching but achievable – Give a sense of direction and purpose The “Golden Thread” helps individual consider their role in the institution and how their role fits in as a whole. University’s Strategic Plan College/ Administration Strategy School/Section strategy and objectives Team/Line manager’s objectives Staff member’s objectives

Please refer to the Guidance Notes Supervise 6 or more undergraduate dissertations in the next academic year. Provide secretarial support for the ‘x’ conference from March to November 2014 Present a synopsis of the course at the next quarterly full-team meeting Provide development support to a trainee administrator by mentoring for six months. Objectives - examples

Page 2: Development

Training and development Formal courses Conferences and seminars Induction On-the-job training and shadowing Coaching and mentoring University training providers: Centre for Academic Development: DIT Training & Development: HR Staff Training & Development Unit: Job exchange Attending meetings E-Learning Reading books and articles

Mentoring within the University Excellent and free developmental opportunity to be mentored/become mentors Contacts: –For academic staff in CLSM: Prof Miep Helfrich, supported by Mel McCann –For academic staff in CASS: Professor John Morrison, supported by Jo George –For academic staff in COPS: Prof Howard Chandler –For ALL academic-related and support staff in all 3 Colleges and University Office: Susan MacLennan, HR.

Page 2: Feedback

Page 5: Feedback I feel I could benefit from more regular catch up meetings with my line manager to discuss my work I require access to a particular computer programme in order to perform to the best of my ability in my role I am pleased with the support I have received from my line manager I would appreciate receiving minutes from department meetings which I am unable to attend

Page 3: Reviewer Form

The Annual Review Form: Grades 5 – 9 Pages completed by the reviewee & submitted to reviewer 7 days ahead of the discussion Page 6 completed by the reviewer within 7 days of the discussion

Page 1: Details/Reflection

Page 2: Previous Objectives & Contribution

Page 3: New Objectives

Page 4: Development

Page 5: Feedback

Page 6: Reviewer Form

EVALUATON

Getting the most from an Annual Review Prepare thoroughly Adopt a positive approach Contribute to the discussion Take the lead when appropriate Don’t agree objectives which you feel are not achievable Make sure all your points are covered Aim for mutual agreement Agree 6 monthly follow-up session to review progress and whether objectives are still relevant

Video here/appraisal-1602.php/

Joy Wootten: Any questions?