Pillar I: Teacher Teams and Small Learning Communities (Part 2) Creating shared expectations for students Tony Gerdes and Jacqui Thomas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

Instructional Leadership for the 21 st Century University of South Alabama in collaboration with Baldwin and Mobile County Public Schools.
A Guide to Implementation
USING THE INSTRUCTIONAL BLUEPRINT TO GUIDE TIER I WORK.
1 LAUSD Mathematics Periodic Benchmark Assessments Using Data to Inform Instruction.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
CREATING AND SUSTAINING A VISION FOR CLIMATE Diplomas Now Team.
Diplomas Now/TDS Background Overview for “Solving for X” Workgroup.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
1. PBIS Team: Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation – PBIS requires some.
1. What is it we want our students to learn?
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Collaborative Data Teams
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Cultivating CM/Teacher Relationships in a Teacher Team.
HQS 2 School Leadership Glenna Heinlein and Kathy Hypes October 1, 2013.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Professional Development through the Authentic Academic Achievement Project.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Early Warning Indicator Meetings Marissa Carter and Jennifer Wilmot, Philadelphia.
AWCPA PLC Facilitator’s Training AWCPA Leadership Team.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
PBIS Tier 1 Coaches Training
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
1 Principals’ Student Achievement Meeting April 15, 2009 Leadership for Assessment Literacy From Paper to Practice.
Professional Learning Communities Session 2 Tenino High School December 15, 2009.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
TOP TEN LIST OF COACHING BELIEFS CURRICULUM 511 DR. PECK BY: HALI PLUMMER.
2012 Summer Institute THE PIVOT FROM RECRUITMENT TO IMPLEMENTATION.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
A Mission of Restoration
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
© International Baccalaureate Organization 2011 Session 4 – Change School Effectiveness and Data.
LeaPS Learning in Physical Science November 13, 2009 Supported by University of Kentucky PIMSER Math and Science Outreach Welcome!
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
PBIS Team: Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Professional Learning Communities Session 1 Rainier Elementary November 10, 2009.
Parent Guide to School Based Planning DISCOVER THE EXCELLENCE There are only two lasting bequests we can hope to give our children. One of these is roots;
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Lanphier High School The Future of Our SIG Efforts.
Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation.
CAPS: COACHING TEACHERS Facilitator: Dr. Lynne Paradis BELIZE LITERACY PROGRAM June 2011.
Developing Structures for Teacher- Lead Learning Communities Jill Cabrera, Ph.D. Western Kentucky University.
Deepening Student Impact Via Instructional Practice Data Joe Schroeder, PhD Associate Executive Director, AWSA.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Professional Learning Communities
B Team Lead Orientation Strengthening Success Team Lead Capacity
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Using data for instructional decision-making
New Prospect Elementary School
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

Pillar I: Teacher Teams and Small Learning Communities (Part 2) Creating shared expectations for students Tony Gerdes and Jacqui Thomas

Objectives Understand the STF’s role in the big picture of teaming Examine how protocols produce effective teams Discuss and model practices to tool and guide teams toward productive outcomes

Prior Knowledge 1.Standards to provide order or manner of carrying out a process 2.Working together as one cell 3.Those forces that produce change in any field or system 4.Coordinator of a process 5.Assumed/assigned responsibility 6.Accountability for expectations 7.A group of people working together to achieve common goals 8. A guiding or directing head A.Collaboration B.Team C.Roles D. Responsibilities E.Leader F.Facilitator G.Norms H.Dynamics

Answers 1.Norms (G) 2.Collaboration (A) 3.Dynamics (H) 4.Facilitator (F) 5.Role (C) 6.Responsibilities (D) 7.Team (B) 8.Leader (E)

How do you feel? Do you find any of these concepts ambiguous in your role as STF? Discuss those feelings or concerns you have with a partner at your table.

STF & Team Engagement Collaboration Team Roles Responsibilities Leader Facilitator Norms Dynamics

STF in the Grand Scheme of things, is planning and organizing the team work of creating shared expectations for students. Provide deep awareness among administration and teachers why teaming is crucial to advance progress in the ABCs Introduce the teaming process Assist in planning and organizing for team work Initiate a strong start in teaming process Advance team progress in towards goals in all 4 pillars

Much of the planning, organizing, and communication is accomplished through the team leaders in embedded PDs. Characteristics of successful teams Characteristics of effective team members Agenda development Team Roles Active listening Providing resources Assistance in articulating school/team goals Team Building activities Getting Things Done Reflective Support as a critical friend

Pillar I Teams School Leadership Team Transformation Team Content Team Interdisciplinary Team

Teams Supporting Pillar I Initiatives School Leadership Team (ALT) The leadership team controls all matters having to do with the master schedule, budget, and physical plant. As a professional learning community, the leadership team facilitates the instructional and organizational model, supports for teaching staff, and the development of policies around school climate and student achievement. Transformation Team (DN Team) A school administrator, the TDS school transformation facilitator, TDS instructional facilitators, school-based instructional coaches, and community partners such as City Year or Communities in Schools are all members of this team. The transformation team should meet no less than once/week, but may meet daily. This team works to coordinate and align efforts with each other and with the school leadership team. In collaboration with school leadership, the transformation team develops and continuously monitors the school transformation plan. Transformation Manual, pp

Teams Supporting Pillar II Initiatives *Content Team (GLT) Content team members are teachers who teach the same course (all English I teachers or all Algebra II teachers) or teachers who share a discipline (all English teachers or all math teachers). *Note: STFs are highly engaged with the Freshman Seminar team as coach and facilitator of school climate/culture Transformation Manual, p 30

Team Supporting Pillars I, II, III, & IV Initiatives Interdisciplinary Team(GLT) This is the team that is at the very heart of the TDS model. Though structures vary, interdisciplinary teams in a TDS school are often made up of about eight teachers – two math, two English, two social studies and, usually, one physical education teacher and one science teacher. Transformation Manual, p 30-31

Interdisciplinary Teaming Looks/Sounds Like Peer observations (reinforces team initiatives, encourages critical friends, builds team support) Targeted activities that support school wide goals in ABCs (ex: tardy incentive) Team incentives/celebrations with a budget Shared discipline system Team building among students Sharing what works Document action items and hold each other accountable Needs assessment

Look at (Initial) Data Gates/CTBS Past Course performance in Reading/Math 8th grade attendance 8th grade Explore scores Holland Inventory (FS) Resiliency Assessment (SH) Look at (Ongoing) Data EWI Use the PRIM book, Toolbox, each other for intervention resources All partners have access to data collection systems City Year and CIS included in meetings Give time for interventions to work, monitor and document progress Benchmarks –bi monthly, 5th week, quarterly, end of semester Teams on task

PROTOCOLS, NORMS & ROLES “Planning the Work, Working the Plan”

Protocols (What teams need) Time to Meet Professional Development Space Action Plan Schedule conducive for teaming Review Teaming Protocols

WORK IN PROGRESS Effective Teaming

NORMS Shape group dynamics Hold individuals and team accountable

Norm Benefits Foster mutual respect & trust Sacred meeting time and space Attendance Promptness Tasks Etiquette Opportunities for everyone to share and shine Team member responsibility Democratic decision making Ensures everyone is given voice Redirects personal agendas

ROLES Roles Team Leader Assistant Team Leader Recorder Data Manager Encourager Researcher Responsibilities Plans meeting agenda, keeps team focused and goal oriented Assists team leader, Fills in for team leader when needed Takes note, organizes minutes, calendar, sends communications on behalf of team Collects, interprets, and shares team data Initiates recognition to team and student supports, shares successes of team and member accomplishments Researches and shares literature in best practices to enhance team goals and interests

Communication Plan 1.With your table partners, analyze the Team Communications Plan 2.Develop a plan to engage a team in an initiative that addresses attendance, behavior, or course performance. 3.The goal is for you, the STF to assist the team in a strong start in orchestrating the project, but refraining from being a physical participant.

Team Discipline Plan a) What types of discipline problems may be handled at the teacher and team level? b) How will Team Leaders and teams handle these problems? What specifically are Team Leaders expected to do? What time will they have to do these things? c) What types of discipline problems will be handled at the Academy Principal level? d) How will Academy Principals handle these problems? e) How will the Academy discipline approach/policies be communicated to teachers? To Students?

STF’S RESPONSIBILITY IS TO ENGAGE AND PURSUE WORK TO ACHIEVE THE VISION AND MISSION

Briefly distinguish the difference in the paired concepts, and explain how one impacts the other Collaboration vs. Team Roles vs. Responsibilities Facilitator vs. Leader Norms vs. Dynamics