Ranger Telerobotics Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Working for the future - today
Advertisements

Adaptive Ground Antenna Arrays for Low Earth Orbiting Satellites.
Autonomous Cargo Transport System for an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, using Visual Servoing Noah Kuntz and Paul Oh Drexel Autonomous Systems Laboratory Drexel.
Modular Crane Control System (MCCS)
Inner Guides=Text Boundary Outer Guides=Inner Boundary Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration Michele Gates Human Exploration and Operations Mission.
Introduction to Robotics In the name of Allah. Introduction to Robotics o Leila Sharif o o Lecture #2: The Big.
EE 396/496 Scout ROV by Chris McLeod & Autonomous Systems Lab.
Background S.A.U.V.I.M. Semi - Autonomous Underwater Vehicle for
The Next Step SPACE ROBOTICS INITIATIVE TIM Robotic Assembly and Maintenance of Space Solar Power Facilities Red Whittaker The Robotics Institute.
The Next Step SPACE ROBOTICS INITIATIVE Skyworker-TIM2 12/8/99-1 Skyworker Assembly, Inspection, and Maintenance of SSP Facilities Field Robotics Center.
EE 396/496 Scout ROV by Chris McLeod & Autonomous Systems Lab.
Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley
On-Orbit Assembly of Flexible Space Structures with SWARM Jacob Katz, Swati Mohan, and David W. Miler MIT Space Systems Laboratory AIAA
Aerospace Engineering By Patrick Ferrell. Aerospace Engineering is the main branch of engineering concerned with the research, design, development, construction,
March 2004 At A Glance ITOS is a highly configurable low-cost control and monitoring system. Benefits Extreme low cost Database driven - ITOS software.
Better Robots 1 The Goal: More Robots Enabling Fewer Soldiers Military “robots” today lack autonomy –Currently, many soldiers control one robot –Want few.
Remote manipulations / diagnostics in radioactive areas and handling of radioactive material Workshop, Geneva, Switzerland 6 th May 2013 THE REPLACEMENT.
Robotics in Education Challenges Developing an Adequate Curriculum Dr. Antonio Soares Florida A&M University Electronic Engineering Technology
Canadarm By: Matthew Ho
Dr. Jennifer Rochlis. Overview Build a technology testbed for future rover concepts Develop and demonstrate operations and mission concepts.
Mobile Distributed 3D Sensing Sandia National Laboratories Intelligent Sensors and Robotics POC: Chris Lewis
Modularly Adaptable Rover and Integrated Control System Mars Society International Conference 2003 – Eugene, Oregon.
Gardell G. Gefke, Craig R. Carignan, Brian J. Roberts, and J. Corde Lane University of Maryland Space Systems Laboratory Ranger.
1 Samara State Aerospace University (SSAU) Modern methods of analysis of the dynamics and motion control of space tether systems Practical lessons Yuryi.
1 Head of Russian Federal Space Agency ISS Program International Cooperation Paris, June 17, 2009.
Lecture 2: Introduction to Concepts in Robotics
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MADRAS Department of Engineering Design AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER ROBOTIC LABORATORY Researchers : Dr. Asokan Thondiyath, Mr.
27-Apr-2009K. Sembach 1 Servicing Mission 4 - Revisited Ken Sembach STScI Hubble Project Scientist April 27, 2009.
UNDERWATER GLIDERS.
Space Systems Laboratory University of Maryland test.col.pp4 HERA: Hubble End-of-life Robotic Augmentation – A Robotic Alternative for SM-4 David L. Akin.
Centre for Mechanical Technology and Automation Institute of Electronics Engineering and Telematics  TEMA  IEETA  Simulation.
NGB-CD Technology Consortium “Strength Through Cooperation” Major Michael L. Thomas Technical Projects Officer Major Michael L. Thomas Technical Projects.
Space Station Will it be accessible for You and Me?
SPHERES 0-G Autonomous Rendezvous and Docking Testbed Presented To DARPA Orbital Express December 2000 MIT Space Systems Laboratory David W. Miller (617)
03/11/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 03/11/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance.
1 Structure of Aalborg University Welcome to Aalborg University.
NASA/Air Force Cost Model presented by Keith Smith Science Applications International Corporation 2002 SCEA National Conference June
Adaptive Ground Antenna Arrays for Low Earth Orbiting Satellites Code 584 / Dan Mandl 2005 ISD Technology Workshop 1 Adaptive Ground Antenna Arrays for.
March 2004 At A Glance autoProducts is an automated flight dynamics product generation system. It provides a mission flight operations team with the capability.
Technologies for Mobile Manufacturing Sanjiv Singh/Reid Simmons Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University February 2008.
Anthony Beeman.  Since the project proposal submittal on 9/21/15 I began work on the Abaqus Kinematic model utilizing join, hinge, and beam elements.
Space Robotics Presented by Mahesh Babu.S IV-Btech Electronics and Communication Engineering,SVIST 123seminarsonly.com.
August 2003 At A Glance The IRC is a platform independent, extensible, and adaptive framework that provides robust, interactive, and distributed control.
Design of a Compliant and Force Sensing Hand for a Humanoid Robot Aaron Edsinger-Gonzales MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
End of Semester 1 Presentation: November 28, 2007.
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
03/20/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Air Force NASA NCSS FAA Industry University Etc.
Canadian Space Agency Achievements and Contributions of our Northern Neighbors.
1 MINUS EIGHTY DEGREE LABORATORY FREEZER FOR ISS (MELFI) MSFC Briefing February 2005 John Cornwell
1 Robonaut: A Humanoid Robotic Assistant for On-Orbit and Planetary Missions Nicolaus Radford Automation, Robotics and Simulation Division NASA/Johnson.
FOR NASA USE ONLY R2 Overview Ron Diftler Robonaut Project Manager NASA 2/3/2010.
Phil Dempsey ISS Vehicle Office July 15, 2014 Inspection Considerations from the ISS Program NASA In-Space Inspection Workshop 2014.
For Official NASA Use Only
NASA – MSFC, Huntsville, Alabama Muscle Atrophy Research and Exercise System (MARES) Operations Summary Part I/II Karen Somers EO20/ Operations Lead
KAASHIV INFOTECH – A SOFTWARE CUM RESEARCH COMPANY IN ELECTRONICS, ELECTRICAL, CIVIL AND MECHANICAL AREAS
Space Robotics Seminar On
Orbital Express: A New Chapter In Space
EDGE™ Preliminary Project Plan P09102 – METEOR Stage Separation System JJ Guerrette (ME)
NASA Satellite Servicing Evolution
NASA Satellite Servicing Evolution Human – Robot – Human
ROBOTICS.
Overview 3 2 Introduction Design Analysis Fabrication Testing
Automation as the Subject of Mechanical Engineer’s interest
Domo: Manipulation for Partner Robots Aaron Edsinger MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Humanoid Robotics Group
System Identification of a Nanosatellite Structure
7th International Conference on Astrodynamics, Tools and Techniques
SPDM Overview.
TMR4225 Marine Operations, ROV systems:
Domo: Manipulation for Partner Robots Aaron Edsinger MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Humanoid Robotics Group
uBot-4 Hardware: Firmware: Pricepoint: $15k
Presentation transcript:

Ranger Telerobotics Program Brian Roberts University of Maryland Space Systems Laboratory http://www.ssl.umd.edu/ On-Orbit Servicing Workshop 14 November 2001 1

Space Systems Laboratory 25 years of experience in space systems research Focus is to develop and test complete systems capable of performing complex space tasks end-to-end People 4 full time faculty 12 research and technical staff 18 graduate students 28 undergraduate students Facilities Neutral Buoyancy Research Facility (25 ft deep x 50 ft in diameter) About 150 tests a year Only neutral buoyancy facility dedicated to basic research and only one in world located on a university campus Fabrication capabilities include rapid prototype machine, CNC mill and lathe for prototype and flight hardware Class 100,000 controlled work area for flight integration Basic tenet is to maximize involvement of students in every level of research activities

SSL Assets for On-Orbit Servicing Development and testing of multiple complete robotic systems capable of performing complex space tasks end-to-end: Docking Assembly Inspection Maintenance Facility for evaluating systems in a simulated 6 degree-of-freedom (DOF) microgravity environment Expertise: Autonomous control of multiple robotic systems Design of dexterous robotic manipulators Adaptive control techniques for vehicle dynamics Use of interchangeable end effectors Investigation of satellite missions benefiting most from robotic servicing

What are the Unknowns in Space Robotics? Flexible Connections to Work Site? Capabilities and Limitations? Human Workload Issues? Multi-arm Control and Operations? Control Station Design? Interaction with Non-robot Compatible Interfaces? Manipulator Design? Hazard Detection and Avoidance? Utility of Interchangeable End Effectors? Development, Production, and Operating Costs? Ground-based Simulation Technologies? Effects and Mitigation of Time Delays? Ground Control?

Multimode Proximity Operations Device (MPOD) System to evaluate controls associated with robotic docking Full 6 DOF mobility base Full state feedback through an on-board sensor suite, including an acoustic-based sensor system Probe-drogue docking system Operational since 1986 Achievements: Autonomous approach and docking Maneuvering and berthing of large masses Application of nonlinear adaptive neural network control system

Supplemental Camera and Maneuvering Platform Supplemental Camera and Maneuvering Platform (SCAMP) is a free-flying camera platform 6 DOF mobility base Stereo video and close-up color cameras Originally used to observe neutral buoyancy operations Evolved to evaluate robotic inspection Operational since 1992 Achievements: Used routinely to observe robotic and non-robotic neutral buoyancy operations Demonstrated visual survey and inspection

SCAMP Space Simulation Vehicle (SSV) Continuation of SCAMP’s evolution into a high fidelity neutral buoyancy simulation of 6 DOF space flight dynamics Uses onboard sensors (3-axis gyros, accelerometers, magnetometers, and a 3-D acoustic positioning system) to accurately calculate its position, attitude, and translational and rotational velocities Robot is positioned to a specified location, determined by a mathematical computer simulation Operational since 1997 Achievements: Cancellation of water drag effects for flight dynamics Model-referenced vehicle flight control Adaptive control of unknown docked payloads Autonomous docking Different methods of trajectory planning are being investigated

Beam Assembly Teleoperator (BAT) Free-flying robotic system to demonstrate assembly of an existing space structure not robot friendly: 6 DOF mobility base 5 DOF dexterous assembly manipulator Two pairs of stereo monochrome video cameras Non-articulated grappling arm for grasping the structure under assembly Specialized manipulator for performing the coarse alignment task for the long struts of the truss assembly Operational since 1984 Achievements: Combination of simple 1 DOF arm with dexterous 5 DOF manipulator proved to be a useful approach for assembly of a tetrahedral structure Demonstrated utility of small dexterous manipulator to augment larger, less dexterous manipulator Assisted in the change out of spacecraft batteries of Hubble Space Telescope

“Ranger” Class Servicers Ranger Telerobotic Flight eXperiment (RTFX) Free-flight satellite servicer designed in 1993; neutral buoyancy vehicle operational since 1995 Robotic prototype testbed for satellite inspection, maintenance, refueling, and orbit adjustment Demonstrated robotic tasks in neutral buoyancy Robotic compatible ORU replacement Complete end-to-end connect and disconnect of electrical connector Adaptive control for free-flight operation and station keeping Two-arm coordinated motion Coordinated multi-location control Night operations With potential Shuttle launch opportunity, RTFX evolved into Ranger Telerobotic Shuttle eXperiment in 1996

Ranger Telerobotic Shuttle eXperiment (RTSX) Demonstration of dexterous robotic on-orbit satellite servicing Robot attached to a Spacelab pallet within the cargo bay of the orbiter Task ranging from simple calibration to complex dexterous operations not originally intended for robotic servicing Uses interchangeable end effectors designed for different tasks Controlled from orbiter and from the ground A joint project between NASA’s Office of Space Science (Code S) and the University of Maryland Space Systems Laboratory Key team members UMD - project management, robot, task elements, ground control station Payload Systems, Inc. - safety, payload integration, flight control station Veridian - system engineering and integration, environmental testing NASA/JSC - environmental testing 3

Ranger’s Place in Space Robotics How the Operator Interacts with the Robot How the Robot Interacts with the Worksite

Robot Characteristics Body Internal: main computers and power distribution External: end effector storage and anchor for launch restraints Head = 12 cube Four manipulators Two dexterous manipulators (5.5 in diameter; 48 long) 8 DOF (R-P-R-P-R-P-Y-R) 30 lb of force and 30 ft-lbf of torque at end point Video manipulator (55 long) 7 DOF (R-P-R-P-R-P-R) Stereo video camera at distal end Positioning leg (75 long) 6 DOF (R-P-R-P-R-P) 25 lb of force and 200 ft-lbf of torque; can withstand 250 lbf at full extension while braked ~1500 lbs weight; 14 length from base on SLP to outstretched arm tip

Task Suite Fiduciary tasks Robotic ORU task Robotic assistance of EVA Static force compliance task (spring plate) Dynamic force-compliant control over complex trajectory (contour task) High-precision endpoint control (peg-in-hole task) Robotic ORU task Remote Power Controller Module insertion/removal Robotic assistance of EVA Articulating Portable Foot Restraint setup/tear down Non-robotic ORU task HST Electronics Control Unit insertion/removal

Microconical End Effector End Effectors Microconical End Effector Bare Bolt Drive Right Angle Drive Tether Loop Gripper EVA Handrail Gripper SPAR Gripper

Operating Modalities Flight Control Station (FCS) Video Displays (3) Flight Control Station (FCS) Single console Selectable time delay No time delay Induced time delay Ground Control Station Multiple consoles Communication time delay for all operations Multiple user interfaces FCS equivalent interface Advanced control station interfaces (3-axis joysticks, 3-D position trackers, mechanical mini-masters, and force balls) Keyboard, Monitor, Graphics Display 2x3 DOF Hand Controllers CPU (Silicon Graphics O2)

Ranger Neutral Buoyancy Vehicles Neutral Buoyancy Vehicle I (RNBV I) Free-flight prototype vehicle operational since 1995 Used to simulate RTSX tasks and provide preliminary data until RNBVII becomes operational RNBV II is a fully-functional, powered engineering test unit for the RTSX flight robot. It is used for: Refining hardware Modifying control algorithms and developing advanced scripts Verifying boundary management and computer control of hazards Correlating space and neutral buoyancy operations Supporting development, verification, operational, and scientific objectives of the RTSX mission Flight crew training An articulated non-powered mock-up is used for hardware refinement and contingency EVA training

Graphical Simulation Task Simulation GUI Development Worksite Analysis

Simulation Correlation Strategy EVA/EVR Correlation All On-Orbit Operations Performed Pre/Post Flight with RTSX Neutral Buoyancy Vehicle for Flight/NB Simulation Correlation Simulation Correlation Simulation Correlation EVA/EVR Correlation

Arm Evolution Roboticus Dexterus Roboticus Videus Roboticus Grapplus BAT Dexterous Arm (5 DOF) BAT Tilt & Pan Unit (2 DOF) BAT Grapple Arm (0 DOF) ca. 1984 ca. 1984 ca. 1984 Ranger Dexterous Arm Mark 1 (7 DOF) Ranger Grapple Arm (7 DOF) ca. 1994 ca. 1996 Ranger Dexterous Arm Mark 2 (8 DOF) Ranger Video Arm (7 DOF) Ranger Positioning Leg (6 DOF) ca. 1996 ca. 1996 ca. 1998

Program Status 1995: RNBV I operations began at the NBRF 1996: Ranger TSX development began June 1999: Ranger TSX critical design review December 1999: Space Shuttle Program Phase 2 Payload Safety Review April 2000: Mock-up began operation (62 hours of underwater test time on 45 separate dives to date) October 2001: Prototype positioning leg pitch joint and Mark 2 dexterous arm wrist began testing Today: RNBV II is being integrated; 75% of the flight robot is procured January 2002: RNBV II operations planned to begin Ranger TSX is #1 cargo bay payload for NASA’s Office of Space Science and #2 on Space Shuttle Program’s cargo bay priority list

SSL Assets for On-Orbit Servicing Development and testing of multiple complete robotic systems capable of performing complex space tasks end-to-end: Docking: MPOD and Ranger TFX Assembly: BAT and Ranger Inspection: SCAMP Maintenance: Ranger Facility for evaluating systems in a simulated 6 DOF microgravity environment Expertise: Autonomous control of multiple robotic systems Design of dexterous robotic manipulators Adaptive control techniques for vehicle dynamics Use of interchangeable end effectors Investigation of satellite missions benefiting most from robotic servicing

Backup Slides

Robot Stowed Configuration 95

Computer Control of Hazards Human response is inadequate to respond to the robot’s speed, complex motions, and multiple degrees of freedom Onboard boundary management algorithms keep robot from exceeding safe operational envelope regardless of commanded input

Results of a Successful Ranger TSX Mission Demonstration of Dexterous Robotic Capabilities Understanding of Human Factors of Complex Telerobot Control Pathfinder for Flight Testing of Advanced Robotics Precursor for Low-Cost Free-Flying Servicing Vehicles Lead-in to Cooperative EVA/Robotic Work Sites Dexterous Robotics for Advanced Space Science