Phonological Theories Session 5 Prosodic Description in Linear and Non-linear Generative Phonology Version SS 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Immediate Constituents Theory
Advertisements

The Structure of Sentences Asian 401
Computational language: week 10 Lexical Knowledge Representation concluded Syntax-based computational language Sentence structure: syntax Context free.
MAIN NOTIONS OF MORPHOLOGY
Chapter 4 Syntax.
Phonological Theories Distinctive Features – SPE and Feature Geometry Session 3 (version SS2006)
Anders Holmberg CRiLLS.  The grammar of a language L: The set of categories, rules, and principles which relate sound to meaning in L  Speech sound.
Prosodic facilitation and interference in the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguity Kjelgaard & Speer 1999 Kent Lee Ψ 526b 16 March 2006.
Grammars, Languages and Parse Trees. Language Let V be an alphabet or vocabulary V* is set of all strings over V A language L is a subset of V*, i.e.,
Dr. Abdullah S. Al-Dobaian1 Ch. 2: Phrase Structure Syntactic Structure (basic concepts) Syntactic Structure (basic concepts)  A tree diagram marks constituents.
GRAMMAR & PARSING (Syntactic Analysis) NLP- WEEK 4.
MORPHOLOGY - morphemes are the building blocks that make up words.
1 Words and the Lexicon September 10th 2009 Lecture #3.
Syntax Lecture 4.
Syntax Nuha AlWadaani.
Three Generative grammars
Chapter 4 Syntax Part II.
CCSB354 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)
Prof. Erik Lu. MORPHOLOGY GRAMMAR MORPHOLOGY MORPHEMES BOUND FREE WORDS LEXICAL GRAMMATICAL NOUNS VERBS ADJECTIVES (ADVERBS) PRONOUNS ARTICLES ADVERBS.
1.Syntax: the rules of sentence formation; the component of the mental grammar that represent speakers’ knowledge of the structure of phrase and sentence.
GrammaticalHierarchy in Information Flow Translation Grammatical Hierarchy in Information Flow Translation CAO Zhixi School of Foreign Studies, Lingnan.
I am Dr. Abdulrahman Alqurashi
1 LIN 1310B Introduction to Linguistics Prof: Nikolay Slavkov TA: Qinghua Tang CLASS 12, Feb 13, 2007.
1 Prof.Roseline WEEK-4 LECTURE -4 SYNTAX. 2 Prof.Roseline Syntax Concentrate on the structure and ordering of components within a sentence Greater focus.
Linguistic Essentials
Culture , Language and Communication
Structural Levels of Language Lecture 1. Ferdinand de Saussure  "Language is a system sui generis “ = a system where everything holds together  The.
Artificial Intelligence: Natural Language
The Minimalist Program
Making it stick together…
November 16, 2004 Lexicon (An Interacting Subsystem in UG) Part-II Rajat Kumar Mohanty IIT Bombay.
© 2005 Hans Uszkoreit FLST WS 05/06 FLST Grammars and Parsing Hans Uszkoreit.
Natural Language Processing Chapter 2 : Morphology.
Syntax II “I really do not know that anything has ever been more exciting than diagramming sentences.” --Gertrude Stein.
Phonological Theories Autosegmental / Metrical Phonology Segmental description SS-2006: Session 4.
SYNTAX.
Levels of Linguistic Analysis
III. MORPHOLOGY. III. Morphology 1. Morphology The study of the internal structure of words and the rules by which words are formed. 1.1 Open classes.
3 Phonology: Speech Sounds as a System No language has all the speech sounds possible in human languages; each language contains a selection of the possible.
School Kids Investigating Language & Life in Society 3 February 2015 Lesson 4: Levels of Linguistic Structure, History of English Teaching Fellows Anna.
◦ Process of describing the structure of phrases and sentences Chapter 8 - Phrases and sentences: grammar1.
Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 2 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 3.
1 LIN 1310B Introduction to Linguistics Prof: Nikolay Slavkov TA: Qinghua Tang CLASS 11, Feb 9, 2007.
3.3 A More Detailed Look At Transformations Inversion (revised): Move Infl to C. Do Insertion: Insert interrogative do into an empty.
X-Bar Theory. The part of the grammar regulating the structure of phrases has come to be known as X'-theory (X’-bar theory'). X-bar theory brings out.
College of Science and Humanity Studies, Al-Kharj.
L3 THE LINGUISTIC COMPONENTS OF CA.
SYNTAX.
King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 1 King Faisal University.
Descriptive Grammar – 2S, 2016 Mrs. Belén Berríos
Introduction to Linguistics
عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد
Structure, Constituency & Movement
An Introduction to the Government and Binding Theory
Statistical NLP: Lecture 3
SYNTAX.
4.3 The Generative Approach
Natural Language Processing (NLP)
Chapter Eight Syntax.
Part I: Basics and Constituency
Structural relations Carnie 2013, chapter 4 Kofi K. Saah.
Chapter Eight Syntax.
Introduction to Linguistics
Levels of Linguistic Analysis
:.
Natural Language Processing (NLP)
Markedness Unmarked categories, language, and identities:
Fromkin's Utterance Generator
Natural Language Processing (NLP)
Presentation transcript:

Phonological Theories Session 5 Prosodic Description in Linear and Non-linear Generative Phonology Version SS 2006

Prosodic description in linear and non-linear phonology The Terms linear and non-linear were used for the segmental level of sound-structure description. The non-linear is is expressed in the different levels of the tree- structures while the linear segment string has no relation to any other level and each sound is an unstructured collection of features. Considering prosodic structuring to be a) the grouping of sound units into larger units (this can seen from the opposite side, i.e. separating groups of units from one another and be termed demarcation), b) the weighting of the units within the groups (stress or accent) c) the allocation of a communicative function to the larger units by means of melodic modulation (intonation) we can compare the SPE approach to prosody with later (AM) approaches.

Prosodic Categories in SPE The only phonologically treated prosodic category was stress (in a general sense of abstract weighting). However it was dependent for the specification of degree of stress on the morpho-syntactic demarcation structure of the sentence. - lexical formatives and grammatical morphemes (including articles, prepositions, which are considered to be clitics) are separated by a + boundary; - together, these form word units (problem: pronouns!) - word units are bounded by # (also elements of compounds) All boundaries correspond to nodes on the syntactic tree, which are also represented in the bracketed representation.

Structural basis of stress allocation Ich arbeite in der Eisenbahndirektion. S NP VP N V PP (proform)(stem) (pers./tense) prep NP Icharbeit + ein + art N der + Eisenbahndirektion (( Ich) ((arbeit(+e)) (in+(der+(((Eisen)(bahn))(direkt+ion))))))

Practice in stress allocation Draw the NP-trees, derive the bracketing and determine the stress pattern of the following words (phrases): Wettervorhersage Landesuniversitätsgesetz Donaudampfschifffahrtskapitän Mädchen handelsschule und Mädchenhandelsschule baseball bat; Kensington High Street; Tottenham Court Road

Problems with cyclical stress allocation This is the cat that killed the rat that stole the cheese. ( SPE p. 372 ) The prosodic phrasing for the sentence is: ( This is the cat) (that killed the rat) (that stole the cheese). The stress allocation for the sentence derived from the linear syntactic structure might be: ( This is) NP (the cat that killed NP (the rat that stole NP (the cheese) NP ) NP ) NP Creating rules for inserting prosodic phrase boundaries into the linear syntactic string cant work because the prosodic structure (although not unconnected to syntactic constituents) cannot be derived from the syntactic structure.

The Strict Layer Hypothesis The sort of recursive hierarchy that is seen in syntactic structures like: This is the cat that killed the rat that stole the cheese. are ruled out in prosody. A hierarchical structure has been postulated in post-linear phonology in which one or more lower order units are exhaustively contained within the bounds of the next higher unit and are co-extensive with them A second aspect of the prosodic structure is its relative indepen- dence of syntactic structure. This is not the same as saying that there is no link between them. The claim is that syntactic information can only be accessed indirectly and it is mediated by the phonological constituent structure. Any violations of the SLH and of the claim of morpho-syntactic independence can be shown to result from phonological adjustments made in the lexicon.

The SLH layers An utterance (U) can contain several intonation phrases (IPs), which can contain several phonological phrases ( s), which can contain several phonological words ( ) () U ()() IP ()()()()() ()()()()()()()()() Violation of SLH would be if ….. a was not dominated by a or was dominated by 2 s Violation types can be classified as a) non-exhaustivity, b) improper bracketing and c) recursivity. a) ()3 b)()3 c) ()2 ( )()2 ()1 ( x)()1( )(x y)()1 ( )(x)1

Some practice (or problems?) How are the following utterance divided into prosodic units (U, IP,,, F, ) according to the SLH? - When my grandmother was younger, she was quite a daredevil. - - All over the world, people are asking the reason why. - Es hat selten einen Menschen gegeben, der niemals unter seinem ge w issen gelitten hat. - Kaum hat sie die Tür zugemacht, stürmte es heftiger, als sie es jemals er lebt hatte.