A Quantitative Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbines

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Wind turbines generate electric power from clean renewable sources. They must be robust and.
Advertisements

OO Star Wind Floater A robust and flexible concept for floating wind
The first floating wind turbines Martin Jakubowski Technology Architect Blue H Technologies BV, The Netherlands Brindisi, Italia 23rd of May
Dynamic Response and Control of the Hywind Demo Floating Wind Turbine
Delft University of Technology Aeroelastic Modeling and Comparison of Advanced Active Flap Control Concepts for Load Reduction on the Upwind.
An Experimental Investigation on Loading, Performance, and Wake Interactions between Floating VAWTs ____________________________________________ Morteza.
A Comparison of Multi-Blade Coordinate Transformation and Direct Periodic Techniques for Wind Turbine Control Design Karl Stol Wind Energy Symposium AIAA.
Disturbance Accommodating Control of Floating Wind Turbines
Hazim Namik Department of Mechanical Engineering
Gireesh Ramachandran Amy Robertson Jason Jonkman Marco Masciola
A. L. Hopstad, K. Ronold, C. Sixtensson, J. Sandberg Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures EWEA 2013.
Performance Prediction and Design Optimization
Alan D. Wright Lee J. Fingersh National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Hydrodynamic Analysis and Optimal Design of Floating Wind Turbine and Ocean Wave Energy Systems Paul D. Sclavounos Professor of Mechanical Engineering.
Aeroelastic Stability and Control of Large Wind Turbines
17/04/2008Presentation name1Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark Technology developments and R&D landscape: Research overview from Risø Peter Hauge.
1.  Renewable energy is energy which comes from natural resources such as sunlight, wind, rain, tides, and geothermal heat, which are renewable.  Climate.
1 EWEC 2007: UpWind Workshop WP 4 Offshore Support Structures Martin Kühn, et al. Endowed Chair of Wind Energy University of Stuttgart Thanks to the co-authors.
Offshore Wind and the European Supergrid Joe Corbett, Head of Technical Services Mainstream Renewable Power Representing: Friends of the Supergrid.
Design Process Supporting LWST 1.Deeper understanding of technical terms and issues 2.Linkage to enabling research projects and 3.Impact on design optimization.
Wind Modeling Studies by Dr. Xu at Tennessee State University
2006 Wind Program Peer Review
Off-Shore Wind Energy Technologies
Erin Bachynski, PhD candidate at CeSOS May 15, 2013
Some effects of large blade deflections on aeroelastic stability Bjarne S. Kallesøe Morten H. Hansen.
NREL – Jason Jonkman MARINTEK – Ivar Fylling Risø-DTU – Torben Larsen
Accuracy of calculation procedures for offshore wind turbine support structures Pauline de Valk – 27 th of August 2013.
Review of IEA Wind Task 23 OC3 Project Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by the Alliance for.
Current Offshore Wind Energy Technology and Deployment Activities Robert Thresher National Renewable Energy Laboratory National Wind Technology Center,
Design Tools & Codes Technology Viability Jason Jonkman, Ph.D.
Smart Rotor Control of Wind Turbines Using Trailing Edge Flaps Matthew A. Lackner and Gijs van Kuik January 6, 2009 Technical University of Delft University.
Innovation for Our Energy FutureNational Renewable Energy Laboratory 1 Gunjit Bir National Renewable Energy Laboratory 47 th AIAA Aerospace Meetings Orlando,
Dave Corbus, Craig Hansen Presentation at Windpower 2005 Denver, CO May 15-18, 2005 Test Results from the Small Wind Research Turbine (SWRT) Test Project.
1  Renewable energy is energy which comes from natural resources such as sunlight, wind, rain, tides, and geothermal heat, which.
Jason JonkmanSandy ButterfieldNeil Kelley Marshall BuhlGunjit BirBonnie Jonkman Pat MoriartyAlan WrightDaniel Laird 2006 Wind Program Peer Review May 10,
Renewable Energy Research Laboratory University of Massachusetts Wind Energy: State-of-the Art and Future Trends Southwest Renewable Energy Conference.
Integrated Dynamic Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines EWEC2007 Milan, Italy 7-10 May 2007 B. Skaare 1, T. D. Hanson 1, F.G. Nielsen 1, R. Yttervik.
REDUCTION OF TEETER ANGLE EXCURSIONS FOR A TWO-BLADED DOWNWIND ROTOR USING CYCLIC PITCH CONTROL Torben Juul Larsen, Helge Aagaard Madsen, Kenneth Thomsen,
DOE Peer Review May 10, 2006 Golden, CO Walt Musial Leader-Offshore Projects National Renewable Energy Laboratory Offshore Wind.
FY 2006 DOE Wind and Hydropower Program Peer Review Denver Marriot West, Golden CO, USA May 9-11, 2006 Walt Musial Leader-Offshore Projects National Wind.
NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF WIND TURBINE AERODYNAMICS Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California Davis OUTLINE Challenges in Wind Turbine Flows The Analysis.
OC 3 : Benchmark Exercise of Aero-elastic Offshore Wind Turbine Codes J A Nichols and T R Camp, Garrad Hassan and Partners Ltd. J Jonkman and S Butterfield,
EWEC 2006, Athens1Jan Rispens Wind Energy Agency Bremerhaven/Bremen (Bild: Enron Wind) The WAB Industry Network in Northwest-Germany Profile and R&D-Activities.
EWEC 2007, MilanoMartin Geyler 1 Individual Blade Pitch Control Design for Load Reduction on Large Wind Turbines EWEC 2007 Milano, 7-10 May 2007 Martin.
HELICOIDAL VORTEX MODEL FOR WIND TURBINE AEROELASTIC SIMULATION Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California Davis OUTLINE Challenges in Wind Turbine.
Current Status of Phase VI Floating Design Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by the Alliance.
Floating Offshore Wind Turbines Floating Offshore Wind Turbines An Aeromechanic Study on the Performance, Loading, and the Near Wake Characteristics of.
1 National Wind Technology Center Wind Turbine Design According to IEC (Onshore) and -3 (Offshore) Standards Overview for NWTC November 8, 2005.
AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2009
ECOTECNIA 100: On-shore Multi Mega-Watt Windturbine Juan Mª Cámara 28th February 2006.
Sandy Butterfield 2006 Wind Program Peer Review May 10, 2006 Overview of the Technology & Opportunities.
Offshore Wind Farms An overview… UE VISION FOR % energetic efficiency -20 % greenhouse gas emissions 20 % of energy from renewable.
Challenges in Wind Turbine Flows
A Quantitative Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbines
WIND TURBINE CONTROL DESIGN TO REDUCE CAPITAL COSTS P. Jeff Darrow(Colorado School of Mines) Alan Wright(National Renewable Energy Laboratory) Kathryn.
Modal Dynamics of Wind Turbines with Anisotropic Rotors Peter F
Evan Gaertner University of Massachusetts, Amherst IGERT Seminar Series October 1st, 2015 Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Aerodynamics.
Advanced Controls Research Alan D. Wright Lee Fingersh Maureen Hand Jason Jonkman Gunjit Bir 2006 Wind Program Peer Review May 10, 2006.
WIND TURBINE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California Davis OUTLINE Challenges in Wind Turbine Flows The Analysis.
RANS-VOF Modelling of Floating Tidal Turbine Concepts Edward Ransley* and Scott Brown School of Marine Science and Engineering University of Plymouth
Date of download: 5/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Spar and Semisubmersible Floater Concepts of Offshore Wind Turbines.
Verification and Validation of Offshore Wind Modeling Tools through IEA Wind Tasks 23 and 30 IEA Wind TEM# 76: "Floating Offshore Wind Plants“ April 28,
ICOWEOE October 31, 2011 Beijing China Amy Robertson, Ph.D.
Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration, Continued (IEA Task 30): Phase II Results of a Floating Semisubmersible Wind System EWEA Offshore Conference November.
Structural design and dynamic analysis of a tension leg platform wind turbine, considering elasticity in the hull NTNU supervisor: Erin Bachynski TUD.
Breaking waves on the offshore wind turbine monopiles and the effects of boundary layer
INVESTIGATION OF IDLING INSTABILITIES IN WIND TURBINE SIMULATIONS
Wind observers and Advanced Controls for Innovative Turbines
Conceptual research of a downwind turbine, based on a Suzlon 2
Rasoul Shirzadeh and Martin Kühn
Presentation transcript:

A Quantitative Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbines NOWITECH Deep Sea Offshore Wind Power Seminar January 21-22, 2009 Jason Jonkman, Ph.D. Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle

Offshore Wind Technology Onshore Shallow Water 0m-30m Transitional Depth 30m-60m Deepwater 60m+

Floating Wind Turbine Pioneers Developer StatoilHydro, Norway Blue H, Netherlands Principle Power, USA SWAY, Norway Platform “Hywind” spar buoy with catenary moorings Tension-leg concept with gravity anchor “WindFloat” semi-submersible with catenary moorings Spar buoy with single taut tether Wind Turbine Siemens 2.3-MW upwind, 3-bladed Gamma 2-bladed, teetering, yaw-regulated Coordinating with suppliers for 5-MW+ units Swivels downwind Partnering with Multibrid Status $78M demonstration project in North Sea First PoC installed in Summer 2009 Plans to license technology Deployed PoC system with 80-kW turbine in Italy in summer 2007 Receiving funding from ETI for UK-based projects Extensive numerical modeling Tested in wave tank Planning demonstration projects

Floating Wind Turbine Concepts + relative advantage 0 neutral – relative disvantage TLP Spar Barge Pitch Stability Mooring Ballast Buoyancy Natural Periods + – Coupled Motion Wave Sensitivity Turbine Weight Moorings Anchors Construction & Installation O&M Design Challenges Low frequency modes: Influence on aerodynamic damping & stability Large platform motions: Coupling with turbine Complicated shape: Radiation & diffraction Moorings, cables, & anchors Construction, installation & O&M

Modeling Requirements Coupled aero-hydro-servo-elastic interaction Wind-inflow: Discrete events Turbulence Waves: Regular Irregular Aerodynamics: Induction Rotational augmentation Skewed wake Dynamic stall Hydrodynamics: Diffraction Radiation Hydrostatics Structural dynamics: Gravity / inertia Elasticity Foundations / moorings Control system: Yaw, torque, pitch

Coupled Aero-Hydro-Servo-Elastics

Floating Concept Analysis Process Use same NREL 5-MW turbine & environmental conditions for all Design floater: Platform Mooring system Modify tower (if needed) Modify baseline controller (if needed) Create FAST / AeroDyn / HydroDyn model Check model by comparing frequency & time domain: RAOs PDFs Run IEC-style load cases: Identify ultimate loads Identify fatigue loads Identify instabilities Compare concepts against each other & to onshore Iterate on design: Limit-state analysis MIMO state-space control Evaluate system economics Identify hybrid features that will potentially provide the best overall characteristics

Three Concepts Analyzed NREL 5-MW on OC3-Hywind Spar NREL 5-MW on ITI Energy Barge NREL 5-MW on MIT/NREL TLP

Sample MIT/NREL TLP Response

Summary of Selected Design Load Cases from IEC61400-1 & -3 Design Load Case Table Summary of Selected Design Load Cases from IEC61400-1 & -3

Normal Operation: DLC 1.1-1.5 Ultimate Loads Blade Root Bending Moment Low-Speed Shaft Bending Moment Yaw Bearing Bending Moment Tower Base Bending Moment

Floating Platform Analysis Summary MIT/NREL TLP Behaves essentially like a land-based turbine Only slight increase in ultimate & fatigue loads Expensive anchor system OC3-Hywind Spar Buoy Only slight increase in blade loads Moderate increase in tower loads; needs strengthening Difficult manufacturing & installation at many sites ITI Enery Barge High increase in loads; needs strengthening Likely applicable only at sheltered sites Simple & inexpensive installation

Ongoing Work & Future Plans Assess role of advanced control Resolve system instabilities Optimize system designs Evaluate system economics Analyze other floating concepts: Platform configuration Vary turbine size, weight, & configuration Verify under IEA OC3 Validate simulations with test data Improve simulation capabilities Develop design guidelines / standards Spar Concept by SWAY Semi-Submersible Concept

Model Verification through IEA OC3 The IEA “Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration” (OC3) is as an international forum for OWT dynamics model verification OC3 ran from 2005 to 2009: Phase I – Monopile + Rigid Foundation Phase II – Monopile + Flexible Foundation Phase III – Tripod Phase IV – Floating Spar Buoy Follow-on project to be started in April, 2010: Phase V – Jacket Phase VI – Floating semi submersible

OC3 Activities & Objectives Discussing modeling strategies Developing a suite of benchmark models & simulations Running the simulations & processing the results Comparing & discussing the results Assessing the accuracy & reliability of simulations to establish confidence in their predictive capabilities Training new analysts how to run & apply codes correctly Investigating the capabilities / limitations of implemented theories Refining applied analysis methodologies Identifying further R&D needs Activities Objectives

Thank You for Your Attention Jason Jonkman, Ph.D. +1 (303) 384 – 7026 jason.jonkman@nrel.gov Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle

Normal Operation: DLC 1.2 Fatigue Loads Side-to-Side Fore-Aft In-Plane Out-of-Plane Side-to-Side Fore-Aft 0° 90° Blade Root Bending Moments Low-Speed Shaft Bending Moments Yaw Bearing Bending Moments Tower Base Bending Moments

DLC 6.2a Side-to-Side Instability Idling: DLC 6.2a Side-to-Side Instability Aero-elastic interaction causes negative damping in a coupled blade-edge, tower-S-S, & platform-roll & -yaw mode Conditions: 50-yr wind event for TLP, spar, & land-based turbine Idling + loss of grid; all blades = 90º; nacelle yaw error = ±(20º to 40º) Instability diminished in barge by wave radiation Possible solutions: Modify airfoils to reduce energy absorption Allow slip of yaw drive Apply brake to keep rotor away from critical azimuths

Idling: DLC 2.1 & 7.1a Yaw Instability Aero-elastic interaction causes negative damping in a mode that couples rotor azimuth with platform yaw Conditions: Normal or 1-yr wind & wave events Idling + fault; blade pitch = 0º (seized), 90º, 90º Instability in TLP & barge, not in spar or land-based turbine Possible solutions: Reduce fully feathered pitch to allow slow roll while idling Apply brake to stop rotor