The Proof is in The Process: Data-Driven Program Implementation Rose Lee Felecia Johnson Tonya Johnson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Focusing an Evaluation Ben Silliman, Youth Development Specialist NC 4-H Youth Development.
Advertisements

No Child Left Behind Sub-grant Application Project Planning & Evaluation John Cradler Ruthmary Cradler Educational Support Systems
SDFSCA Coordinators Meeting March 17, 2005 How is SDFS connected to other top school priorities? No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Michigan Education Yes (MEY)
Campus Improvement Plans
Region 8 Education Service Center.  Develop an understanding of the characteristics and requirements of a CNA.  Develop an understanding of the CNA.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Title IVA-Safe and Drug Free Schools and Communities Act Fostering a safe and drug-free learning environment that supports academic achievement.
Risk and Protective Factors for Substance Use Steve Delaronde, MSW, MPH University of Connecticut Health Center The Governor’s Prevention Initiative for.
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) as reauthorized by The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) Benefits to Private School Students and Teachers.
Program Evaluation. Lecture Overview  Program evaluation and program development  Logic of program evaluation (Program theory)  Four-Step Model  Comprehensive.
Governor’s Prevention Initiative for Youth: Evaluation Jane A. Ungemack, Dr.P.H. Evaluator University of Connecticut Health Center.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
1 “Changing Performance” Nashville, Tennessee February 2, National Title I Conference M aximizing the I mpact of S choolwide P rograms on I mproving.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Community Planning Training 4- Community Planning Training 4-1.
“Tell me and I forget, teach me and I may remember, involve me and I learn.” ― Benjamin FranklinBenjamin Franklin.
Molly Chamberlin, Ph.D. Indiana Youth Institute
Steve Delaronde, MSW, MPH University of Connecticut Health Center The Governor’s Prevention Initiative for Youth July 16, 1999 Identifying Community Resources.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Suicide Prevention & School Response Linda C. Wolfe, RN Director, School Support Services September 2012.
Archived Information Is the SDFSCA State Grants Program effectively promoting safe and drug-free schools? Chris Ringwalt, DrPH Senior Research Scientist.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
TITLE IV: SAFE AND DRUG FREE SCHOOLS Year Strategic Plan and Title IV Application Dean Lee.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
Angelor Johnson, Training Coordinator Louisiana PROMISE Parent Information and Resource Centers What is PIRC?
OKLAHOMA QUALITY IMPROVEMENT COLLABORATIVE INTERIM TRAINING Marlene Mason MCPP Healthcare Consulting, Inc. October 28, 2010.
NJ - 1 Performance Measurement Reporting Development Services Group, Inc. Don Johnson For more information contact Development Services Group, Inc
SAFE & DRUG FREE SCHOOLS REPORT Presented by: Brandy Gardner Safe & Drug Free Schools Coordinator Dr. Peggy J. Rogers, Assistant Superintendent.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Safe & Drug-Free Schools & Communities Principles of Effectiveness Regional Meeting Spring, :00-3:00 p.m. Linda Miller, IA Dept. of Education Pam.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
Prevention: Interventions that occur prior to the onset of a disorder that are intended to prevent or reduce risk for the disorder. Preventing MEB Disorders,
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Strategic Prevention Framework Overview Paula Feathers, MA.
The Division of Student Services Ms. Deborah A. Montilla, Administrative Director.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Grade 9 Drug Education Programme For Cleveland District State High School By Alison Clark.
Program Evaluation NCLB. Training Objectives No Child Left Behind Program Series: Program Evaluation To provide consistency across the State regarding.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Strictly adhere to the FTC model and all of ACS’s requirements for General Preventive services Maintain caseload of 45 families Conduct 2 face-to-face.
Program Evaluation Dr. Ruth Buzi Mrs. Nettie Johnson Baylor College of Medicine Teen Health Clinic.
The Kansas Communities That Care Survey Survey Development.
Community Plan Implementation Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1-1 Community Plan Implementation Training 1-2.
PUTTING PREVENTION RESEARCH TO PRACTICE Prepared by: DMHAS Prevention, Intervention & Training Unit, 9/27/96 Karen Ohrenberger, Director Dianne Harnad,
Children grow up in a safe and supportive environment Families are stronger and healthier, leading to greater success and personal development for children.
Loudoun County Public Schools 2010 Communities That Care Survey.
Safe and Drug Free Schools and Communities Program Mrs. Patrice Harris Intervention Supervisor.
Grant Application Process Maternal, Infant & Early Childhood Home Visiting Programs.
School-Wide Plans Presented by: Marlon Cousin, Title I Coordinator East Baton Rouge Parish School System Cheryl Landry, Title I Coordinator Lafourche.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
1 Strategic Prevention Framework Overview Paula Feathers, MA Presented by Marcus Bouligny.
Evaluation: from Objectives to Outcomes Janet Myers, PhD MPH AIDS Education and Training Centers National Evaluation Center
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators To learn how to explain the Communities That Care process and the research.
School Development Goal Development “Building a Learning Community”
Discipline, Crime, and Violence Data Reporting. Purpose and Requirements  Prepare Virginia’s Annual Discipline, Crime, and Violence Report as required.
The purpose of evaluation is not to prove, but to improve.
Community Planning Training 2-1. Community Plan Implementation Training Community Planning Training.
INTRODUCING THE PSBA-GTO ACT FOR YOUTH CENTER OF EXCELLENCE IN CONSULTATION WITH HEALTHY TEEN NETWORK Planning for Evidence-Based Programming.
Training of Process Facilitators 1- Training of Process Facilitators 5-1.
1 Center Mission Statements SAMHSA ? CSAT Improving the Health of the Nation by Bringing Effective Alcohol and Drug Treatment to Every Community CMHS Caring.
Strategic Prevention Framework - Assessment Program Title Here date.
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
WVDE Office of Federal Programs
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Practical Considerations in Using Data
Presentation transcript:

The Proof is in The Process: Data-Driven Program Implementation Rose Lee Felecia Johnson Tonya Johnson

Presentation Goals & Objectives  As a result of this presentation, participants will be provided the opportunity to develop understanding in the following areas:  Increased knowledge of the Principles of Effectiveness for implementing the Title IV Program, as outlined by the No Child Left Behind Act  Effective analysis of available instruments used to collect objective data for a needs assessment

Presentation Goals & Objectives (cont’d)  As a result of this presentation, participants will be provided the opportunity to develop understanding in the following areas:  Identification of attainable performance measures based on data  Selection of "scientifically based" programs/ strategies based on needs  Design of evaluations to determine the "fidelity" of implementation and level of impact of programs  Ways to involve all stakeholders in implementing an effective Title IV Program

NCLB Title IV Program Principles of Effectiveness  Principle 1: Conducting a needs assessment  Principle 2: Setting measurable goals, objectives and performance indicators  Principle 3: Utilizing scientifically based research in program implementation  Principle 4: Evaluating program implementation  Principle 5: Ongoing consultation with and input from parents and others

Principle 1: Conducting A Needs Assessment  A grant recipient shall base its program on a thorough assessment of objective data about the drug and violence problems in the schools and communities served.  Risk factors  Protective factors  Buffers  Assets

Sample Data Sources  Louisiana Caring Youth Survey (formerly Communities That Care Survey)  Title IV Performance Measures  Incidence  Prevalence  Age at onset  Perceptions of health risks  Pre- and Post-Tests of Specific Programs

Sample Data Sources cont’d  Louisiana Student Information System (SIS)  Suspensions/Expulsions related to drugs or violence  Other disciplinary data  LA DOE Firearms Incidents Report  Standardized Testing Data  LEAP, iLEAP,  GEE 21, GEE

Sample Data Sources cont’d  School Improvement Plan Data Summary Report  School Analysis Model (SAM) Domains  Louisiana Needs Analysis (LANA)  Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Report  Self-Report Surveys  Students  Administrators & Faculty  Parents

Principle 2: Setting Measurable Goals & Objectives  A grant recipient shall, with the assistance of parents and community representatives, establish a set of measurable goals and objectives, and design its activities to meet those goals and objectives.

Title IV Goals, Objectives & Performance Indicators  Goals  Are broad statements of measurable long- term impact  Are developed at the federal and state levels

Title IV Goals, Objectives & Performance Indicators  NCLB Title IV Performance Goal  “All students will be educated in learning environments that are safe, drug-free, and conducive to learning.”  (State) Louisiana Title IV Goal  “To help ensure that all schools are drug- free/ safe and disciplined by promoting implementation of high quality alcohol, tobacco, and other drug/violence prevention programs”

Title IV Goals, Objectives & Performance Indicators  Objectives  Are developed by LEAs  Are aligned with federal and state goals and local needs assessments  Are specific, measurable, and time bound  Are an expression of a desired outcome  Are comprised of three components  Nature of change  Behavior, attitude, or factor addressed  Population served

Title IV Goals, Objectives & Performance Indicators  Performance Indicators  Are measures for which data is available to help quantify the achievement of a desired result  Are comprised of four components:  Time frame  Indicator(s)  Amount of change  Means for measuring change

Title IV Goals, Objectives & Performance Indicators  Sample Title IV Objective/Performance Indicator  By May 2007, the prevalence of first time drug use reported by students on the Louisiana Caring Youth Survey will be reduced by 5%.  By May 2007, disruptive student behavior will decrease by 15% from reported year 2006, as measured by discipline referrals to administration. This targeted decrease will result in no more than 170 referrals over the course of the school year. Note: Percent of change for indicators may be specified by grade levels.

Principle 3: Scientifically Based Research Programs  Based on scientifically based research demonstrating that the program to be used will reduce violence and illegal drug use.

Principle 4: Program Evaluation  Based on an analysis of the data reasonably available at the time, of the prevalence of risk factors, including high or increasing rates of reported cases of child abuse and domestic violence; protective factors, buffers, assets; or other variables identified through scientifically based research that occur in schools and communities

Program Evaluation (cont.)  Periodic Evaluations must be conducted.  Evaluation is the systematic collection and analysis of data needed to make decisions.  Pre- and Post-Test  Use results from evaluations to refine, improve, and strengthen the program, as well as to refine the performance measures.

Principle 5: Parent Consultation What role do parents play in implementing programs and activities with state grants program funds?

Questions/Concerns?