Michigan Department of Education Office of Field Services LEA Planning Cycle 101 v. 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

Michigan Department of Education School Improvement Plan SIP February 2011.
Migrant Education Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Module 1: IEP Overview – A Plan for Guiding Instruction and Service Provision.
™ Goals Management Overview For ISD/RESA Support Personnel and NCA Field Consultants February 11, 2011 Carrie Finke Professional Learning Division AdvancED.
System Safeguards and Campus Improvement
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) What is an IEP?  a summary of the student’s strengths, interests, and needs, and of the expectations for a student’s.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Planning Part II: Goal Setting
Michigan’s School Improvement Process Model Plan Study Gather Data Do Student Achievement.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement ISD/RESA Workshop February 26, 2008.
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module: Plan
LEA Planning Cycle March 4, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Study.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
Data Driven Continuous Improvement May 5, 2010
The LEA Planning Cycle Application
1 One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement MI- CSI.
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: Program Evaluation Toolkit August 9, 2012.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
11 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Gather: Getting Ready Module.
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement MI- CSI.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Field Services Consolidated Application Schedule.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Study.
1 DRAFT Monitoring/Evaluation Overview September 20, 2010 Title III Director’s Fall Meeting.
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 2
1 Technology Review NCA CASI / MDE Spring School Improvement Conference Apr. 8, 2008 Albert Mayo (AdvancED,
1 School Improvement Planning and your Title I, Part A Programs
Implementing School Plans in ePlan
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
One Common Voice One Plan February 11, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
One Common Voice One Plan March 31, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Study Stage Analyze Data.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Data Analysis Needs Assessment Improvement Plan Implement & Monitor ●Set annual goals ●Identify a strategy ●Set quarterly goals ●Determine interventions.
The Michigan Department of Education Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Lessons Learned & Support Documents.
Hudson Area Schools - Lincoln Elementary School Improvement Professional Development Friday, February 26, 2010.
Interrelationships: Plans + Funding = Student Proficiency Ingham ISD Curriculum Director’s Meeting November 4, 2015.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
The Nebraska Frameworks External Visitation Team Exit Report.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
School Improvement “Proper Prior Planning Prevents Poor Performance” February 2010 Detroit Public Schools Diane Fleming, Regional Superintendent Arveneda.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
Office of Service Quality
When Literacy, RTI and Continuous School Improvement Work in Concert Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Maureen Staskowski Carrie Wozniak June.
March  Third annual 2141 Club meeting  Recognizing new members  Introductions  Developing a support network.
Office of Title I & Section 31a Compliance Welcome! Title I, Part A (Title I) Program and Budget Planning March
1 REGION 3 Planning Workshop for the School Year Office of Field Services.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
LEA Planning Cycle March 31, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP)
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
End of Year Report and Renewal Process
GCEL Conference February 2016
Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard June 16, 2011
Office of Education Improvement and Innovation
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
KDE School Assurances Due October 24, 2018
Data Framework A Positive Impact.
LEA Planning Cycle.
Presentation transcript:

Michigan Department of Education Office of Field Services LEA Planning Cycle 101 v. 2

2 WARNING – Acronym Overuse is about to Occur LEALocal Education Agency LEAPCLEA Planning Cycle CNAComprehensive Needs Assessment DIPDistrict Improvement Plan SIPSchool Improvement Plan TISSTitle I School Selection

3 One Voice One Plan

4 One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement Stages and Steps Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Plan Develop Action Plan Student Achievement Gather Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice

5 A Vertically Aligned System for School Improvement MDE Plan ISD/RESA Plan District Plan School Plan Classroom

6 CNA  School Data Profile  School Process Profile  (90, 40, SA, SAR)  School Data Analysis  School Process Analysis  Summary Report

7 Setting the Context LEAPC DIP SIP CNA Goals Management SchoolDistrict SW Targeted

8 Continuous School Improvement NOV DECJANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNEJULYAUGSEPOCT School CNA School Improvement Plan District CNA Continuous School Improvement NCA Accreditation (6 mos-6 weeks) District Improvement Plan LEA Planning Cycle Consolidated App., TISS

9 Advanc-ed.org

10 Advanc-ed.org

11 District conducts a comprehensive needs assessment to identify strengths and challenges District determines Goals and Measurable Objectives for the identified need areas Enter the identified Goals and Measurable Objectives in Goals Management

12 Continue to complete each Goal. Districts will have to complete a minimum of 3 Goals After the Goals are completed, district personnel must “Approve” the Goals for inclusion in the District Improvement Plan and the LEAPC Exit Goals Management and re-enter through the District Improvement Plan to complete the other required components of the District Plan

13 Submit the District Improvement Plan for Approval to central office staff Make modifications, if requested by your district After modifications are completed, activate your LEAPC and select the Goals for inclusion in that document

14 Goals Management Student Goal Statement Gap & Cause for the Gap Measurable Objective Statement Strategy Statement Activities Fiscal Resources A district must approve goals/obj./strategies within Goals Management in order for them to be available for the LEAPC Important!

15 Goal Statement Example: All students will be proficient in reading. Goals Management – Goal

16 Goals Management Student Goal Statement Gap & Cause for the Gap Measurable Objective Statement Strategy Statement Activities Fiscal Resources

17 Gap/Cause for Gap Example: There is a 21% difference between all students and students with disabilities as measured by the MEAP; GLCE analysis identifies informational reading as the primary cause for gap. CONSIDER MULTIPLE DATA SOURCES FORMERLY “NEED” Goals Management – Gap/Cause for Gap

18 Neither the process nor the expectation has changed even though the language has changed: –Needs must always be established first using data –Goals must always be based on an identified Need (“Gap/Cause for Gap”) Goals Management – Goal

19 Student Goal Statement Gap & Cause for the Gap Measurable Objective Statement Strategy Statement Activities Fiscal Resources Important! A district must enter goals / objectives / strategies into Goals Management and approve them in order for them to be available for the LEAPC Goals Management

20  Specific  Measurable  Attainable  Realistic  Time-bound SMART Objective It is critical at this point in the process to discuss how you will monitor and measure your progress Goals Management – Objective

21 Measurable Objective Statement Example: The percentage of non-disabled students proficient on the MEAP will increase from 56% ( ) to 65%. The percentage of students with disabilities proficient on the MEAP will increase from 35% ( ) to 52% by the end of the school year. Goals Management – Objective

22 Student Goal Statement Gap & Cause for the Gap Measurable Objective Statement Strategy Statement Activities Fiscal Resources Important! A district must enter goals / objectives / strategies into Goals Management and approve them in order for them to be available for the LEAPC Goals Management

23 Strategy Statement Example: Begin each statement with “Teachers/Staff will...” Use an action verb for an observable behavior “…engage in…” Address the issue and connect back to the measurable objective “…professional development related to informational reading and differentiated instruction.” Goals Management – Strategy

24 Student Goal Statement Gap & Cause for the Gap Measurable Objective Statement Strategy Statement Activities Fiscal Resources Activities and Fiscal Resources are not included in the LEAPC Goals Management

25 Approval of the LEAPC is not approval of any Activities or Fiscal Resources within Goals Management Your federally-funded Activities and Fiscal resources are included in the Consolidated Application for approval Activities and Fiscal Resources

26 LEA Planning Cycle

27 LEA Planning Cycle – Selecting Goals

28 LEA Planning Cycle – Selecting Goals

29 Once an LEAPC is submitted and is under review by MDE, goals/objectives/ strategies cannot be edited When the application is back to the District, edits can be made as necessary Final approved application is archived in a PDF Editing Goals/Objectives/Strategies

30 All goals information edited within Goals Management will affect the LEAPC If you log-in later to amend your LEAPC, the system to alert you to which goals/ objectives/strategies have been edited; you will need to determine what exactly has been changed Editing Goals/Objectives/Strategies

31 Other Important Features

32 Questions??? Leah Breen