Clinical Use and New Developments Sally Boa Research Speech and Language Therapist University of Stirling Forth Valley NHS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Talking Mats Project Scottish Borders Council Enabling people with dementia to continue to communicate their views, needs and preferences as their condition.
Advertisements

Assistive Technology Definitions and the Law. Assistive Technology Devices Services Consideration.
I-CAN: Classification of Disability Support Needs ARC Linkage project partners: University of Sydney Royal Rehabilitation Centre & Centre Developmental.
Focus on Instructional Support
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Understanding the Three Child Outcomes.
Use, Non-Use, and Satisfaction with Assistive Technology Provided by a Reutilization Program Aimee Duplantis, OTS National AT Reuse Conference September.
Welcome to the Center Based Preschool Program Fayette County Exceptional Children’s Services.
Third-party disability in aphasia: Qualitative interviews with family members linked to the ICF Meghann Grawburg 1, Dr. Tami Howe 1, Professor Linda Worrall.
Cultural practices and Environment and Participation assessment Classification, Assessment, Surveys and Terminology (CAS/EIP) World Health Organization.
Identifying children´s everyday life situations using an ICF-CY perspective Social Work and Social Development 2012: Action and Impact conference Stockholm.
 PDHPE is the key to make a difference in children’s future health.  It provides children with the tools to lead a healthy, active and fulfilling life.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Refresher: Child Outcome Summary Form Child Outcome Summary Form.
ECSE Indicator Trainings Lunch & Learn Series Indicator 7: Gathering Functional Behavior Info for Speech & Language Children Ruth Chvojicek – Statewide.
Disability Statistics at NCHS: An Update
Talking Mats for Mental Capacity Act Assessments and Debriefing everyone has a personal best.
Seeking the views of children who do not use speech to communicate: cumulative experiences Bryony Beresford Social Policy Research Unit University of York,
Barbara Stuttle CBE National Clinical Lead (Nursing) NHS Connecting for Health Health Informatics and the Chronic Conditions.
Enfield Understanding how schools manage Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) 2 By the end of this session you will Understand what is meant.
Chapter 14 Assessment of Development Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition.
Chapter 10.  No single definition covers all conditions  IDEA defines multiple disabilities and severe disabilities in two definitions  Two characteristics.
Session 1: So What’s This All About? Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module.
FIM+FAM – OUTCOME MEASURES Presented by Caroline Ray On behalf of Queen Elizabeth’s Foundation Brain Injury Centre, Banstead, Surrey.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Christina Kasprzak Robin Rooney March 2008 The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center National Early Childhood Technical.
Related Services in Special Education National Association of Special Education Teachers.
Effective Support for Pupils with Speech & Language Difficulties Effective Support for Pupils with Speech & Language Difficulties Whitburn Church of England.
INTRODUCTION TO SELF CARE ACTIVITIES
Dr Sally Boa and Dr Joan Murphy Professor Pam Enderby Funded by NHS Education Scotland Conducted by Talking Mats Limited © Talking Mats Ltd 2014.
Special educational needs and/or disabilities Training toolkit Session 3 Materials for newly qualified teachers Removing barriers: moderate learning difficulties.
Power Point Library Related Services- Overview. Related Services Put simply, related services are any services that are necessary to help a student benefit.
Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.
Daniel Mont Disability and Development Team The World Bank
MLC Learning Model Reveal the Big Picture Immersion What do I need to Know and how will I find out? Create it Share Reflection Celebrate Brainstorm.
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG Christina Kasprzak, ECO at FPG Cornelia Taylor, ECO at SRI Lauren Barton, ECO at SRI National Picture.
LifeSpan. Function Natural, required, or expected activity of a person based on stage of development Ability to exist with in environment Related to a.
Presentation By: THE PARTICIPATION OF CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE Europe in Action Conference 2014 Patricia McNeilly and Teresa Stewart.
Talking Mats™ and Families living with Dementia Dr Joan Murphy Stirling, Scotland © Talking Mats Limited 2014.
Working group meeting January Time sheets Accounting Topic sheets Handouts Quality plan Anything else? Topics for consideration.
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
Development of a new self-report instrument on participation and environment With Ros Madden & Professor Anita Bundy Danielle Cheeseman.
UNDERSTANDING THE THREE CHILD OUTCOMES 1 Maryland State Department of Education - Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services.
DUAL DIAGNOSIS TRAINNING MODULES PORTUGUESE EXPERIENCE Maria João Gonçalves e Sónia Fontes.
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
R. Dawson Griffin University of South Carolina EDEX 726 Spring 2012.
The Short Child Occupational Profile (SCOPE) Lauren Stevenson and Brandy White.
1 Which outcome? Involves: Taking care of basic needs Getting from place to place Using tools (e.g., fork, toothbrush, crayon) In older children, contributing.
1 Task Force on Health Expectancies National Disability Survey and Sport and Physical Exercise Module Gerry Brady Central Statistics Office, Ireland Luxembourg.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation for New Outcomes Conference Participants Kathy Hebbeler Lynne Kahn The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Understanding the Three Child Outcomes.
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSITION PLANNING Youth & Young Adult Orientation Version /09/12.
1 Outcomes review and use of the 7-point scale. 2 Outcomes Jeopardy Jeopardy score sheet Jeopardy score sheet Pointing to the cabinet for cereal Reading.
Dr Joel Parker Clinical Psychologist.  What does it mean to say that someone has learning disabilities?  What are the challenges people with learning.
Promoting Participation through Communication Caroline Barden, Liz Dean and Luan Harrold Arden College.
Nature & Overview of Psychiatric Rehabilitation Program (PRP) Dr. Samson Omotosho, PhD, RN-BC (Executive Clinical Director) Optimum Health Systems, Inc.
Intro to Health Science Chapter 4 Section 3.3
Using Talking Mats with people with Dementia Dr Joan Murphy copyright Talking Mats Ltd 2014.
DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING (BASIC & INSTRUMENTAL) PERTAINING TO OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY PRACTICE. CAMS, MAJMAAH UNIVERSITY.
PT 142 – Assessment in Physical Therapy Prepared by: Almira A. Tagala-Manuel, PTRP Prepared by ATM for PT 142 students AY
ST MARY’S RC HIGH SCHOOL Communicating with Pupils A Whole School Approach to Improving Access, Participation and Achievement.
Talking Mats: Clinical Practice to Research to Knowledge Transfer to Social Enterprise Lois Cameron and Joan Murphy Directors Talking Mats
Application and Benefits of Using ICF Core Set in Vocational Rehabilitation Valentina Brecelj, University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia.
Ita Cunningham, John Kelly, Padraig O Haolain and
Talking Mats New Resources
Transition Education & Services for Students with Disabilities
Notes for helpers Supporting everyone to tell their story
Approaches to Health Care
Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center
Supporting people to say what is important-Talking Mats
Child Outcome Summary Form
S P E E C H A N D L A N G U A G E T H E R A P I S T
The Transition Planning Process
Presentation transcript:

Clinical Use and New Developments Sally Boa Research Speech and Language Therapist University of Stirling Forth Valley NHS

Talking Mats

Developed in 1998 University of Stirling Used both in applied and research contexts Used locally, nationally and internationally

Prerequisites Physical vision pointing method Cognitive Symbolic understanding Understand 2 key words in 1 sentence reliable confirmation

Examples of Client Groups Children with language disorders - expressing their views People with intellectual disability - life planning Frail older people Adults with acquired communication disability - goal planning Young offenders - communication difficulties Making decisions about non-oral eating and drinking

Adults with acquired communication disability Goal setting World Health Organisation (2001) ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Geneva: WHO

Goal Setting

WHO domains (Activities & Participation) Learning & applying Knowledge General tasks and demands Communication Mobility Self-care Domestic life Interpersonal interactions and relationships Major life areas (e.g. work, education) Community, social and civic life

Talking Mats -Topics  Applying knowledge  Emotional well being  Communication  Mobility /Transport  Self care  Domestic life  Relationships  Work and education  Leisure  Environment  Health

Sub categories  Washing  Having a bath  Showering  Getting dressed  Fastenings  Washing hair  Eating  Drinking  Cutting up food

Goal setting - general topics

Sub mat - Communication

Tracking changes

Quotes “So this kind of explains what the rehab team do and what rehabilitation is practically. I didn’t know, for example, that it [the service] was so wide. I didn’t know that A would be taking me out, for example, and getting me used to the train the shops and people………”

“I suppose it is like anything that you are asked to write or any question you asked is like a blank sheet of paper and for me with speech difficulties it is easier to work with ideas than come up with your own.”

Non-oral eating and drinking

Meetings

Why Talking Mats works Structured format to interaction Open questions Avoids direct confrontation Time Small chunks helps people process concepts reduces memory demands Multiple channels Ownership Gives people control Reduces physical demands Helps people to say “no”

New developments Training - general or targeted Talking Mats manual Symbol sets Further research

References Murphy J (2004) Enabling Frail Older People with a Communication Difficulty to Express their Views: the use of Talking Mats™ as an interview tool Health and Social Care in the Community 13 (2) Enabling Frail Older People with a Communication Difficulty to Express their Views: the use of Talking Mats™ as an interview tool Cameron L, Watson J and Murphy (2004) Talking Mats: A focus group tool for people with learning disability. Communication Matters 18 (1) Boa S and MacFadyen L (2003) Goal Setting for People with Communication Difficulites. Communication Matters 17 (3) Boa, S and Murphy, J (2003) Talking Mats™- An overview of current developments. Communicating with pictures and symbols - Augmentative Communication in Practice Study Day Murphy, J, McCallan S and Aitken J (2003) Helping People make decisions about PEG Feeding Bulletin of Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists No. 618 Cameron, L and Murphy, J (2002) Enabling young people with a learning disability to make choices at a time of transition, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30: World Health Organisation (2001) ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Geneva: WHO