Socrates - Minerva PEDAGOGICAL QUALITY OF ODL : criteria for assessment Joergen Bang, Aarhus University, Denmark.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Does a Nordic Baltic approach to e-learning exits? Joergen Bang Information and Media Studies Aarhus University, Denmark.
Advertisements

HOW TO EVALUATE A MOBILITY PROJECT Training Unit 11.1 Procedures, tools and roles for the evaluation of a mobility project.
European Universities Charter on Lifelong learning Bologna employability seminar Luxembourg, November Howard Davies, senior adviser, EUA.
ENQA’S CONSULTATIVE MEMBERSHIP IN THE BFUG - WHAT DOES IT ENTAIL
ENQA – QAA meeting 8-9 December 2005 Birmingham, UK 8 December, – Introductions to workshop themes.
Executive Director of the Danish Evaluation Institute (EVA)
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
Joint Degree Programmes: QA across national borders – ideas and strategies Nick Harris Quality Assurance Agency for HE UK.
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
An Overview of Quality Assurance in the EHEA by Prof. Andreas G. Orphanides President of EURASHE, Rector of European University Cyprus, and Ex-President.
COMPETENCIES ASSUMED AS A BASIS OF INITIAL AND IN SERVICE TEACHER TRAINING PORTUGAL School of Higher Education of Santarém – Cristina Novo –
MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education
Bologna Process and Quality Assurance
EUA Convention of European Higher Education Institutions Graz, May 2003 Theme I European higher education in a globalised world.
Quality Assurance in Prior Learning - Methods change but standards of quality endure Recognition of Prior Learning Bologna seminar, 11 December 2008 Emmi.
VALORISATION The aim of valorisation is to: promote innovation transfer results into national systems so that project outcomes find their way into mainstream.
Prof. Dr. Andrä Wolter Permeability between Vocational Training and Higher Education New Opportunities for Non-traditional Students and Lifelong Learners.
Improving Institutional Quality in Europe: The role of the European University Association Kate Geddie, EUA Brussels Tor Vergata, 27 November 2003.
EUA Convention of European Higher Education Institutions Graz, May 2003 Theme III Consolidating a Quality Culture in Europe’s Universities.
The challenge of accreditation in Europe Peter Cullen Head of research and policy analysis Higher education and training awards council IRELAND EFQM Education.
Education and Training 2010 Peer Learning Activity, Vilnius 2009 Policy approaches to Practical Classroom Training in ITE.
USING NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN STUDENT-CENTRED LEARNING STRATEGIES Trif Letiţia¹ Lector doctor, Universitatea 1 Decembrie 1918, Alba – Iulia, România,
The role of European standards and guidelines for the development of the national system of independent assessment of the quality of higher education Seidakhmetova.
National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.
Quality Assurance in the Bologna Process Fiona Crozier QAA
International Aspects of the European Research Agenda Lesley Wilson EUA Secretary General Monash University 15 November 2007.
1 ”Pathways in the Open Classroom” Copenhagen 2002 A Norwegian perspective and understanding of the Nordic pedagogy Ingeborg Bø Norwegian Association for.
Conference on the Bologna Process: European Higher Education Policies and Reform Baku, April 2005 The Social Dimension of Higher Education in Europe-Current.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
The Perspectives from Universities Regarding Implementation of Indonesia Qualification Framework Gerardus Polla Rector of BINUS University 29 April 2009.
Quality Assurance in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities Maria Helena Nazaré EUA President Former Rector Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal.
Higher education and professional work José-Ginés Mora Technical University of Valencia, Spain.
The European standards and guidelines for quality assurance Séamus Puirséil, Vice – President, ENQA.
Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area Tibor Szanto ENQA Rogaska Slatina, 30 November 2007.
Developing trust: Towards Mutual Recognition agreements MERCOSUR – RIACES María José Lemaitre Chile.
KNU - Bishkek (KS) 21 April 2015 DOQUP PROJECT FINAL DISSEMINATION CONFERENCE 1 Tempus Project n TEMPUS IT-SMGR Documentation for QA of.
Regional specific aspects WS 3 : Neighbourhood eastern countries & Russia EC Delegation.
Akkreditierungsrat The German System of Accreditation Franz Börsch Accreditation Council Office SYSTEM OBJECTIVES STANDARDS PROCEDURE.
Higher Education and Research Council of Europe September 2006.
Quality in mobility: how to measure and assess it Maria Sticchi Damiani.
Bologna Process Information Briefing Tbilisi, Georgia 22 July 2008  Cynthia Deane  Ireland (With thanks to Prof Andejs Rauhvergers, Chairman of Stocktaking.
Leonardo da Vinci Partnerships: an opportunity to work together Italian National Agency for LLP - Leonardo da Vinci Sectoral Programme.
ECTS Users’ Guide 2015 Approved at Yerevan Ministers’ Meeting May 2015.
Romanian VET following ECVET recommendation National Centre for TVET Development Romania.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 1 DoQuP Project WP.1 - Deliverable 1.3 The DoQuP Model: milestone of the DoQuP project Marina Cavallini CRUI.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
Glasgow, 17 May 2012 Mike Coles Developments in the validation of learning in the EU.
An overview in slides. A: the intergovernmental process Step 1: Sorbonne Declaration 1998 Step 2: Bologna Declaration 1999 Step 3: Prague Communiqué 2001.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF TEACHERS IN VOCATIONAL SUBJECTS Primošten, April 25, 2007 Ivan Šutalo.
University autonomy and governance Baku Bologna Seminar - Current issues in the Bologna process Bastian Baumann, Baku, 26 May 2008.
European Standards and Guidelines – ESG 2015 Helka Kekäläinen, PhD Head of Higher Education Evaluation Unit, FINEEC Former Vice-President of ENQA Vi flyttar.
Developments in Quality Assurance in Europe and its impact upon higher Education Institutions Dr. Padraig Walsh President, European Association for Quality.
The European Students’ Union REPRESENTING STUDENTS SINCE 1982 Cristi Popescu – Executive Committe Member European context of QA ESPAQ Training Yerevan,
RIGA-conference Summary ”Problems and possibilities for develoment of ODL in the BOLDIC Understanding within national and European contexts”
1 EAN CONFERENCE June 30 – July 2, 2008, Berlin. 2 „Challenges for Europe: European Higher Education in a Global Setting“ Barbara Weitgruber Austrian.
Implementing the LLL Charter Michael H örig EUA Programme Manager Nicosia, Cyprus 22 November 2010.
Role of Quality Assurance in the Establishment of the EHEA presentation given at the conference ”Bologna Process Implementation in Turkey after 10 Years”,
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Education and Culture Life Long Learning: Education and Training policies School Education and Higher education.
Implementing the European Standards and Guidelines on Quality Assurance in Higher Education Peter Williams President, ENQA.
Political Issues and Social Policy in the E.U. Professor John Wilton Lecture 6 Education and training policy.
Double degrees and joint degrees: international inter-university cooperation Lewis Purser, Director Academic Affairs.
European Higher Education Area: focus from structures to better learning Head of Higher Education Unit Helka Kekäläinen, PhD.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
Prof Mpine Makoe Institute for Open Distance Learning 8 July 2015 Nadeosa conference.
PUBLIC ACCREDITATION AGENCY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION “Key aspects of quality assessment for teaching and learning in HE” Niko Hyka Innovation and information.
European higher education in a globalised world
European Union Public Policy Lecture 10
TEEP II – A Pilot Evaluation of Joint Degrees
Involving students to promote employability of higher education
Presentation transcript:

Socrates - Minerva PEDAGOGICAL QUALITY OF ODL : criteria for assessment Joergen Bang, Aarhus University, Denmark

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang2 Presentation Quality assurance on the European agenda Focusing on the relation between quality and pedagogy Quality and the BOLDIC pedagogical model of blended learning

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang3 Why focus on quality assurance A goal in itself to provide good education A road to accreditation of courses, programmes, educations at other institutions and in other countries A basis for collaboration among institutions/universities

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang4 Bologna 1999 mobility; course and curriculum co-operation; international competitiveness and attractiveness; broad access to higher education and competence development in a context of lifelong learning. diversity of courses and programmes, responsive to the diversity of needs transparency, readable degrees and certificates, ECTS quality assurance international accreditation

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang5 Bergen 2005 Ministers call upon ENQA through its members, in co-operation with EUA, EURASHE and ESIB: –to develop an agreed set of standards, procedures and guidelines on quality assurance, –to explore ways of ensuring an adequate peer review system for quality assurance and/or accreditation agencies or bodies, –to report to Ministers of education in Bergen 2005.

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang6 National quality assurance A definition of the responsibilities of the bodies and institutions involved Evaluation of programmes and institutions, including internal assessment, external review, participation of students and the publication of results A system of accreditation, certification and comparable procedures Guidelines for international participation, co- operation and networking

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang7 EUA principles and goals PRINCIPLES : Mutual trust among the main stakeholders Respect of diversity of national contexts, subject areas and other factors Transparency: clear architecture and clear procedures

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang8 EUA principles and goals GOALS: To strengthen universities’ capacity to monitor their quality internally To promote institutional audits and good practice in programme evaluations To develop a European perspective, i.e. to create transparency for mutual recognition

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang9 Pedagogical focus "Technology alone does not deliver educational success. It only becomes valuable in education if learners and teachers can do something useful with it. (…) … just having the pipes in place with little or no educational software available generates disappointment and puts many teachers and learners off the online experiences altogether. (…) What is appropriate and works in one culture does not necessarily translate to another. (…) (…) educational content and e-learning services (…) need to be tailored to local needs and cultures.” ( E-Learning. The Partnership Challenge (2001), 24-25).

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang10 VET-report Nov “e-Learning clearly has the potential to stimulate learning networks and new forms of training organisation. The basic principle of good pedagogy remains that the design of the whole learning process (possible supported by e-learning) is the decisive factor for the learner’s success. Therefore, European countries’ e-learning related measures should not be limited to questions of hard- and software, but rather focus on the pedagogy and e-learning in work processes.” Achieving the Lisbon goal: The contribution of vocational education and training (VET), Executive Summary, November 4, 2004 (p. 17)

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang11 From technology to pedagogy Most people (…) think that the Internet, itself, is the key factor in the success of e-learning. However, a vast amount of research provides evidence for the proposition that it is not the medium (Internet), itself, which is accountable for the accomplishment of these promises, but the pedagogical design used in conjunction with the features of the medium. ( Rob Koper: Modeling units of study from az pedagogical perspektive. The pedagogical meta-model behind EML, 2001, p.3)

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang12 From learning objects to events (…) a lot of learning does not come from knowledge resources at all, but stems from the activities of learners solving problems, interacting with real devices, interacting in their social and work situation. A lot of research about learning processes provides evidence for this stance that learning doesn't come from the provision of knowledge solely, but that it is the activities of the learners into the learning environment which are accountable for the learning. (…) the smallest unit providing learning events for learners, satisfying one or more interrelated learning objectives. This means that a unit of study can not be broken down to its component parts without loosing its semantic and pragmatic meaning and its effectiveness towards the attainment of learning objectives. (Koper, 2001, p. 3)

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang13 BOLDIC pedagogical tradition The five central concepts: –student-centred approach –communication –group or teamwork –active participation –face-to-face. –a blended approach

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang14 Learning as construction DECODING (reception) KNOWLEDGE (reciever)

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang15 Knowledge vs. know-how DECODING (reception) KNOWLEDGE (reciever) KNOW HOW

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang16 Bloom’s Taxonomy 1) knowledge 2) understanding 3) application INSTRUCTIVISM 4) analysis 5) synthesis 6) evaluation CONSTRUCTIVISM

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang17 Dialogue and Learning Dialogue offers an opportunity for the learner to go beyond the boundaries of the learning material though discussions with fellow learners and with teachers/tutors. Dialogue enhances the learning process by stimulating the 'negotiation' with the learning material through the formulation of ideas and view points

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang18 Open discussion fora Discussion fora: –respect the close integration of education in everyday life –take advantages of these differences in local/national cultures –make the differences the starting point for exchange of ideas and discussion of viewpoints.

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang19 Acquiring knowledge through dialogue open dialogue is a challenge to chauvinism and narrowness the best of the old qualities from universitas litterarum is carried into the digital age. new technologies reanimate the old university tradition in which dialogue is the proper way to acquire knowledge.

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang20 Virtual learning environments the challenge is pedagogical rather than technological (economical) the potentials of ICT are especially their ability to support co-operation and collaborative learning via the Internet

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang21 Deployment of technology the closer ODL methodologies and new technology can mesh with standard mainstream teaching provision the greater their chance of success if new technologies are seen as a means of challenging rather than supporting existing arrangements then resistance will be the order of the day

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang22 Trans-national collaboration Communication among students and tutors via electronic technologies is an appropriate teaching/ learning strategy to deploy in trans-national exchange (Virtual mobility) Open discussion fora (CMC) enable students –to expose their knowledge and beliefs to those in other national/cultural groups, and to challenge one another, –to transform their understanding of the subject.

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang23 Qualities of virtual seminars The virtual seminar model is based on joint collaboration on equal terms among European academics and institutions, –rather than on export of already produced courses or course units. The autonomy of the institutions and the characteristics of national curricula are respected, –but also challenged in academic discussions

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang24 Qualities for the learner The real beneficiaries of the ODL integration in conventional teaching institutions are the learners. they will obtain a flexibility in the learning process, not previously known to them; they will get access to courses and educational materials outside their own institution, not previously within their reach; they will be presented for cross-cultural viewpoints and given possibilities to discuss these viewpoints with fellow learners from other countries. In short, they become part of a European learning environment.

BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang25 Joergen Bang Head of Department Department of Information and Media Studies Aarhus University Denmark Tel