Floodplain Management 2050 The 2 nd Gilbert F. White Flood Policy Forum Project Foresight Workshop September 18, 2008 Washington DC Doug Plasencia, P.E.,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

Gilbert F. White National Flood Policy Forum Reducing Flood Losses: Is the 1% chance flood standard sufficient? Lawrence W. Olinger, P.E., Dewberry Doug.
6 August 2009 Buffalo District Planning Conference Flood Plain Management 2050.
N AVIGATING THE T URN : F LOOD R ISK A SSOCIATED WITH L EVEES Sam Riley Medlock, J.D., CFM Association of State Floodplain Managers May 2011.
1 Floodplain Management 2050 Are Gilbert’s Adjustment Factors Sufficient? Larry A. Larson, P.E. CFM Association of State Floodplain Managers.
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Millions of uninsured Source: Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: United States Census Bureau,
TIG 2012 INFORMATION SESSION David Bonebrake, Glenn Rawdon, Jane Ribadeneyra Legal Services Corporation.
2010 Forum Flood Risk Management Gilbert F. White Flood Policy Forum March 9, 2010 George Washington University Washington, DC
Background Information on the Newspoets Total Number: 78 active newspoets. 26 (of the original 36) newspoets from returned this year.
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
Step Therapy State Legislation Update AK HI CA AZ NV OR MT MN NE SD ND ID WY OK KS CO UT TX NM SC FL GAALMS LA AR MO IA VA NC TN IN KY IL MI.
National Journal Presentation Credits Producers: Katharine Conlon Director: Jessica Guzik Senate Committee Maps Updated: January 15, 2015.
Setting the Stage for A Flood Risk and Resource Management Strategy What Do We Want to Accomplish? The Gilbert F. White National Flood Policy Forum Managing.
Challenges to Floodplain Management As We Move Towards 2050 Gerry Galloway Doug Plasencia.
2014 NASACT ANNUAL CONFERENCE Stan Czerwinski State Fiscal Pressures 1.
HRC Identity Text Questions to HRC Members & Supporters.
2003 Casualty Actuary Society State Regulatory Update Insurance Scoring.
CBO Projected Hurricane Economic Damage Report Assessing the Projected Economic Damage Caused By Hurricanes and Why It Will Increase June 6, 2016 Producer:
National Journal Presentation Credits Producers: Katharine Conlon Director: Afzal Bari House Committee Maps Updated: March 19, 2015.
Uninsured Non-Elderly Adult Rate Increased from 17. 8% to 20
Medicaid Eligibility for Working Parents by Income, January 2013
House Price
WA OR ID MT ND WY NV 23% CA UT AZ NM 28% KS NE MN MO WI TX 31% IA IL
Who does Medicaid cover? How are Medicaid funds spent?
House price index for AK
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Medicaid in 2007—A precursor to broader entitlement and healthcare reform? June Jon Blum.
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Share of Births Covered by Medicaid, 2006
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Who does Medicaid cover? How are Medicaid funds spent?
Percent Change in Average Nongroup Premium Following Implementation of a State Individual Mandate, 2019 WA –15.1% NH: –13.7% ME –10.7% MT –11.1% ND –15.4%
WY WI WV WA VA* VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WA –16.9% NH: –18.8% ME –14.1% MT –23.7% ND –22.0% VT: –12.6% OR
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
Percent of Women Ages 19 to 64 Uninsured by State,
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
(map is coded by CAE-CD region)
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Cathy Schoen Senior Vice President The Commonwealth Fund
Average annual growth rate
Market Share of Two Largest Health Plans, by State, 2006
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Post-Reform: Projected Percent of Adults Ages 19–64 Uninsured by State
United States: age distribution family households and family size
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Presentation transcript:

Floodplain Management 2050 The 2 nd Gilbert F. White Flood Policy Forum Project Foresight Workshop September 18, 2008 Washington DC Doug Plasencia, P.E., CFM ASFPM Foundation Events Chair

Association of State Floodplain Managers Chapters & Other State FPM Associations 11,000 members  27 Chapters Several State Associations & Pending Chapters WI MN IL MI NY IN OH VA NC SC FL MS AR LA TX OK NM AZ CO MO FMA NORFMA MT UT NE KS GA KY NJ MD RI AL

The ASFPM Foundation  Extension of ASFPM  Dedicated to raising funds and supporting education and research for flood loss reduction  Example Efforts  Flood Forums  Publications  CFM Seed Funding  NAI Initiatives

Floodplain Management 2050 Sponsors  AMEC Earth & Environmental  Black & Veatch  CDM  Dewberry  Greenhorne & O’Mara  H20 Partners  Michael Baker, Jr., Inc.  PBS&J  Reznick Group, P.C.  URS Corporation  Watershed Concepts  The Widgeon Foundation

The Gilbert F. White Flood Policy Forum  Foundation Signature Event  “…periodic gathering of experts...”  “…national discussion of important floodplain management issues…”  “…named after Gilbert F. White the most influential floodplain management policy expert of the 20 th century…”

The Gilbert F. White Flood Policy Forum  “The forums are not only a tribute to his work, but also a recognition of the success of his deliberative approach to policy analysis and research”

White described eight adjustments to flooding 1. Elevation 2. Flood Abatement (watershed mgt) 3. Flood Protection (levees, channels, etc) 4. Emergency Measures 5. Structural Alterations (floodproofing, codes) 6. Land Use (zoning) 7. Relief (public or private) 8. Insurance (indemnification) Human Adjustments to Floods (GFW 1942)

Forum Method- Background Papers  Participants wrote over 40 papers prior to Forum  Intro- Human Adjustments to Floods 2050  Flood Risk 2050  To Occupy or Not Occupy Land Use  To Occupy or Not Occupy Natural Resources  Flood Insurance and Economic Implications  Delineating/Communicating Flood Risk  Elevation, Standards, Flood Control  Vulnerability Reduction  Improvements to the Mix of Adjustments  Environmental Factors in 2050  Download at

Forum Assembly  92 Participants  Government  Academics  Private Sector  Floodplain  Insurance  Banking  Transportation  Environmental

Forum Method- Four Introductory Speakers  Human Factors in 2050: Population Trends, Growth, and Urbanization  Dr. Arthur “Chris” Nelson- Virginia Tech  Environmental Factors and Natural Resources in 2050: Climate Change, Ecosystem Degradation, Land Use  Bill Hooke- American Meteorological Society  Government and other Factors in 2050: Devolution Upwards and Downwards  G. Tracy Mehan III- The Cadmus Group  Scenario-based Planning to Guide Future Adjustments: The Foresight Flood and Coastal Defence Project of the United Kingdom  Colin Thorne, University of Nottingham

Method- Group Evaluation vs. Adjustments 1. Elevation 2. Flood Abatement (watershed mgt) 3. Flood Protection (levees, channels, etc) 4. Emergency Measures 5. Structural Alterations (floodproofing, codes) 6. Land Use (zoning) 7. Relief (public or private) 8. Insurance (indemnification) 1. What Challenges to FPM 2050 ? 2. What Adjustments will be used 2050? 3. What Shifts in Policy and Programs 2050? 4. An Action Plan for 2050

Demographic Drivers  More People (population increase of 80 to 100 million in U.S. by 2050)  A Pattern of Movement to South and Southwest and New Mega Urban Zones  A Different Character  Two class society  New cultures  Changing expectations  More retired as % of population  Opportunities  Development-40% of all building will be new Part I -The Drivers of Change

Life-Span of Building Space

Governance Drivers  Devolution to State/Local/Private Levels  Existing Structure, Laws and Entities Changing  Changing Relationship between People and their Government  People expect governments at all levels to do more, yet they shrink from personal responsibility

Governance Drivers  Governments have more to do, with less money  “The federal budget of the future could be almost entirely consumed by entitlements and payment on the national debt” — G. Tracy Mehan III, The Cadmus Group  “The planet is awash in private capital, but governments are fiscally challenged” — G. Tracy Mehan III, The Cadmus Group

The Drivers of Change  Natural Resources/Environmental Drivers  Loss of natural protective barriers  Water development in the past has occurred by trading off natural resources/environment-- tipping balance against environmental equilibrium  Climate change  Economic & Technological Drivers  Global economy  Technology/information overload Environmental, Economic, Technology Drivers

Added factors not in play 50 years ago  Aging and Failing Infrastructure  Recognition of the Need to Save Open Space  Interdependencies (e.g. on-time inventories)  Expectation of Services from Government  The “Pace of Change”  Climatic Shifts

Where Will We Be In 2050 If Business-As-Usual Prevails?  Forum concluded there is strong potential in the decades between now and 2050  Increased flood exposure due to increased population  more frequent (large) flood disasters  Ecosystem degradation and collapse will worsen  Quality of life will be diminished

Where We Could Be In A safe and stable future is within our grasp  Land and water (floodplains, wetlands and coastal areas) are restored and provide dual safety/resource functionality  The market favors sustainable development, so that floodprone construction rarely occurs.  Development is designed and built for no adverse impact  flood levels, sedimentation, erosion, riparian or coastal habitat, other community-designated values.

Additional Adjustment Factors 1. Elevation 2. Flood Abatement (watershed mgt) 3. Flood Protection (levees, channels, etc) 4. Emergency Measures 5. Structural Alterations (floodproofing, codes) 6. Land Use (zoning) 7. Relief (public or private) 8. Insurance (indemnification) 1. Room for rivers and oceans.

Additional Adjustment Factors 1. Elevation 2. Flood Abatement (watershed mgt) 3. Flood Protection (levees, channels, etc) 4. Emergency Measures 5. Structural Alterations (floodproofing, codes) 6. Land Use (zoning) 7. Relief (public or private) 8. Insurance (indemnification) 1. Room for rivers and oceans. 2. Personal responsibility

Additional Adjustment Factors 1. Elevation 2. Flood Abatement (watershed mgt) 3. Flood Protection (levees, channels, etc) 4. Emergency Measures 5. Structural Alterations (floodproofing, codes) 6. Land Use (zoning) 7. Relief (public or private) 8. Insurance (indemnification) 1. Room for rivers and oceans. 2. Personal responsibility 3. Geographic interdependencies

Additional Adjustment Factors 1. Elevation 2. Flood Abatement (watershed mgt) 3. Flood Protection (levees, channels, etc) 4. Emergency Measures 5. Structural Alterations (floodproofing, codes) 6. Land Use (zoning) 7. Relief (public or private) 8. Insurance (indemnification) 1. Room for rivers and oceans. 2. Personal responsibility 3. Geographic interdependencies 4. Awareness and education

Part IV.—An Agenda for Action  Make room for rivers, oceans, associated land areas.  Restore and enhance natural and beneficial functions of riverine and coastal areas.  Generate a renaissance in water resources governance.  Reverse perverse incentives in government programs.  Identify and communicate risk at public and individual levels.  Encourage personal and public responsibility.

Next Steps of Foundation  Finalize Forum report (completed )  Prepare policy oriented materials  Prepare videos and other outreach materials

Next GFW Forum proposed  Risk Management  Symposia 1- Defining Risk (2009)  Symposia 2- Mapping and Communicating Risk (2009)  Forum- Risk management policy (2010)

Floodplain Management 2050 The 2 nd Gilbert F. White Flood Policy Forum Planning Committee Doug Plasencia Larry Olinger Diane Brown Pam Pogue Gerry Galloway George Riedel Larry Larson Jackie Monday Dale Lehman Ed Thomas