Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London. Neil Bliss, Norbert Collomb, Alan Grant, STFC/DL, Daresbury. Costing Methodology and Status of the Neutrino Factory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Muon Front End Buncher, Phase Rotation, Cooling Schematics & CAD model based on MICE Cavities Alan Grant Daresbury (April 10, 2012)
Advertisements

Participants WP3total Imperial College CERN STFC University Warwick CRNS University Oxford6 6 Total Euro  - WP3.
1 Optimization of baseline front end for a neutrino factory David Neuffer FNAL (August 19, 2009)
Neutrino Factory Target Cryostat Review Van Graves Cale Caldwell IDS-NF Phone Meeting August 10, 2010.
Costing the Target Ajit Kurup May 17, Page 2 Costing the Target Ajit Kurup Costing of the target for the RDR needs to be done using the CERN costing.
Costing Workshop Summary Chris Rogers, RAL, 30 Mar 2010 Establish a common framework for costing of neutrino facilities Compare Beta Beam, Super beam and.
Costing Meeting Ajit Kurup 13 th June Page 2 Costing Meeting 13 th June 2011 Ajit Kurup Summary of CERN costing workshop. Proposed Level 3 breakdown.
Simulation Study Results Study: Replace LiH-based cooler with gas-filled transport and rf cavities Results: Beam Cooling is significantly improved. Final.
The Front End MAP Review Fermi National Accelerator Lab August 24-26, 2010 Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory.
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Optimization David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
Front End Technologies Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
IDS-NF Mercury System Overview Van Graves IDS-NF 5 th Plenary Meeting April 9, 2010.
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
UKNF OsC RAL – 21 & 22 June 2010 UKNF achievements & milestones J. Pozimski.
, WP1 Meeting, RAL J. Pasternak Status and Recent Progress in the Muon FFAG Designs for the NF J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL STFC.
Next generation of ν beams Challenges Ahead I. Efthymiopoulos - CERN LAGUNA Workshp Aussois, France, September 8,2010 what it takes to design and construct.
Institutional Logo Here Harold G. Kirk DOE Review of MAP (FNAL August 29-31, 2012)1 The Front End Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Lab August 30, 2012.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
The EMMA Project Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & Huddersfield University.
The EMMA Project Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & Huddersfield University *BNL, CERN, CI, FNAL, JAI, LPSC Grenoble, STFC, TRIUMF.
Ajit Kurup, C. Bontoiu, M. Aslaninejad, J. Pozimski, Imperial College London. A.Bogacz, V. S. Morozov, Y.R. Roblin Jefferson Laboratory K. B. Beard, Muons,
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
The ISIS strong focusing synchrotron also at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. Note that ISIS occupies the same hall as NIMROD used to and re- uses some.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London P. Bonnal, B. Daudin, J. De Jonghe, CERN An Accelerator Design Tool for the International Design Study for the Neutrino.
UKNF OsC RAL – 30 st January 2012 UKNF - Status, high lights, plans J. Pozimski.
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
, EUROnu Meeting, Strasbourg J. Pasternak Status and recent progress on muon IDS-FFAG J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL STFC Work.
Front-End Design Overview Diktys Stratakis Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014 D. Stratakis | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)1.
J. Pozimski UKNF WP1 meeting 10 March 2010 UKNF WP1 milestone table status.
Secondary Particle Production and Capture for Muon Accelerator Applications S.J. Brooks, RAL, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract Intense pulsed.
UKNF OsC RAL – 31 st January 2011 UKNF - Status, high lights, plans J. Pozimski.
Acceleration System Comparisons S. Machida ASTeC/RAL September, 2005, ISS meeting at CERN.
J. Pasternak First Ideas on the Design of the Beam Transport and the Final Focus for the NF Target J. Pasternak, Imperial College London / RAL STFC ,
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Gas-filled rf David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
Recent Progress Toward a Muon Recirculating Linear Accelerator S.A.Bogacz, V.S.Morozov, Y.R.Roblin 1, K.B.Beard 2, A. Kurup, M. Aslaninejad, C. Bonţoiu,
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
IDS-NF Accelerator Baseline The Neutrino Factory [1, 2] based on the muon storage ring will be a precision tool to study the neutrino oscillations.It may.
International Design Study for a Neutrino Factory in the 5 Year Plan A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009.
Muon Collider R&D Plans & New Initiative 1.Introduction 2.Muon Collider Schematic 3.Conceptual Breakthrough 4.Ongoing R&D 5.Muon Collider Task Force 6.Muon.
Acceleration Overview J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory January 8, 2014.
Institutional Logo Here July 11, 2012 Muon Accelerator Program Advisory Committee Review (FNAL July 11-13, 2012)1 The Front End.
Status of the SPL study R. Garoby – 25/11/2010 Fifth SPL Collaboration Meeting November 2010 / CERN.
Proton Driver / Project X Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab August 30, 2012.
Context of the Neutrino Factory Neutrino factory (2018) –4MW proton driver –p +   +   +  e + e  Linear e + e − collider (2014/5) –Leptons at 0.4.
Proton Driver Design Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab February 19, 2014.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
Muon Decay Ring Norbert Collomb STFC Technology 8 th December 2011.
February 28, 2011NF Report - Zisman1 Neutrino Factory Design Overview and IDS-NF Status Michael S. Zisman* Center for Beam Physics Accelerator & Fusion.
WP3: The Neutrino Factory Costing Status Ajit Kurup CERN Costing Workshop 8 th December 2011.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Neutrino Factory Target Cryostat Review (Update Aug 12) Van Graves Cale Caldwell IDS-NF Phone Meeting August 10, 2010.
A.Seryi, Jan 14, 2012, US-UK accelerator workshop Muon acceleration - potential synergies view from UK Input for discussion Andrei Seryi January 14, 2012.
EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Summary of WP3 J. Pozimski.
Final Results from IDS-NF Study NUFACT14 Workshop, Glasgow on behalf of the IDS-NF Collaboration Paul Soler, 26 August 2014.
PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Introduction Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab,
UK Neutrino Factory Conceptual Design
Accelerator R&D for Future Neutrino Projects
The Accelerator Complex from the International Design Study
Project X: Cryogenic Segmentation Issues
MOMENT Overview Jingyu Tang Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS
for the Neutrino Factory
Outline: Why now ? What ? How ?
Accelerator R&D for Future Neutrino Projects
Superbeams with SPL at CERN
Presentation transcript:

Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London. Neil Bliss, Norbert Collomb, Alan Grant, STFC/DL, Daresbury. Costing Methodology and Status of the Neutrino Factory. ABSTRACT The International Design Study for the Neutrino Factory will produce a reference design report in 2013 that will contain a detailed performance analysis of the Neutrino Factory and a cost estimate. In order to determine the cost a number of engineering features need to be included in the accelerator physics design, which can require the physics design to be re-optimised. The cost estimate is determined in such a way as to make efficient use of the engineering resources available and to simplify the process of modifying the physics design to include engineering features. This poster presents details of the methodology used to determine the cost estimate and the current status of each subsystem. Starting with the physics design, engineering features are added and schematic drawings and CAD layouts are produced. This could have an impact on the physics design  modifications. A cost model can then be constructed  cost performance analyses  potential modifications of the physics design. The Neutrino Factory utilises a variety of technologies so the cost model has to be tailored for each system. TARGET, CAPTURE AND DECAY Focus on costing the baseline option of the liquid mercury jet. The volume of mercury for the IDS-NF target is similar to that of SNS  the cost estimate based on the as-built cost of the SNS target module. Cost of the superconducting magnets = a normal conducting equivalent cost per kg + cost attributed to the volume of superconductor. Magnet shielding cost is based on an average cost per kg for tungsten. The civil engineering of the target hall and remote handling requirements are based upon recent design studies for future multi-megawatt proton target stations, e.g. LBNE. Costs have been estimated by scaling by length. General costing methodology for the IDS-NF. MUON FRONT-END Technology is similar to that used for the MICE experiment  buncher, phase rotator and cooling section module cost based on the MICE modules. Frequency of the cavities in the buncher through to the cooling section vary from 320 MHz to 201 MHz whereas the cavities in MICE are all 201 MHz. For the purposes of costing it is assumed that this variation in frequency will not significantly affect the cost. Other costs such as cryogenics and diagnostics have been scaled from the FFAG cost model. Schematic drawing of a buncher module. MUON ACCELERATION Engineering effort has focussed on the details of the FFAG. For the purposes of costing, the same technology as the J-PARC neutrino beam combined function superconducting magnets was chosen. This allows estimating the cost based on as-built costs. The technology for the producing high-gradient superconducting 201 MHz cavities is less well understood. In the past niobium sputtered onto copper cavities have been used but these have not been able to deliver the gradients required at 201 MHz. In the absence of a technological solution, a cost model was developed based upon engineered solutions for next-generation light sources. The civil engineering was also estimated based upon detailed engineering studies for a next-generation light source. The cost model for the linac and RLAs is based on the cost model for the FFAG. The linac and RLAs were originally vertically stacked, which may be more expensive from the perspective of distribution of RF and cryogenics  horizontal layout, which requires a small modification to the design of the injection chicanes of the RLAs. D MagnetF Magnet Cavity RF Input Coupler Cryostat Insulating vacuum chamber 4K He Chamber Thermal shield (40 – 60K) Location for BPM Location for beam screen, vacuum equipment Thermal transition 4K - 293K Beam vacuum chamber 2.5K He Pipes Schematic drawing of the FFAG cell. This will not affect the methodology used to cost the Neutrino Factory. Work is on-going to complete the cost estimate for the current baseline of the IDS- NF and this will be published in the EUROnu final report. Relative costs of the subsystems. PROTON DRIVER There are three options for the proton driver: a Project-X based option at Fermilab; an SPL based option at CERN; and an ISIS upgrade option at RAL. Each proton driver option will have parts that are specific to the NF and these will be costed for the IDS-NF. High-level breakdown of the three proton driver options for the IDS-NF. HVAC, He extraction Personnel enclosure Maintenance Access 36 degree inclination Crane on ceiling 4.5m Internal Diameter Conceptual drawing of the cross- section of the decay ring tunnel.