National Basin Delineation Project Team: Ken Howard Ami Arthur Gina Cox Dave Slayter Nathan Kuhnert Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delineating Basins with Coastal Data Because flash floods do not occur over the ocean, FFMP calculations should not include precipitation estimates over.
Advertisements

Hydrological Modeling. Overview Introduction Watershed delineation Automatic delineation Flow length.
Spatial Analysis with ArcView: 2-D. –Calculating viewshed –Calculating line of sight –Add x and y coordinates –Deriving slope from surface data –Deriving.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Action Plan for the Development of Watershed and Sub-Watershed Boundaries for northwestern Mississippi.
The Areal Mean Basin Estimated Rainfall (AMBER) Program A Tool to Assist in Flash Flood Forecasting Ami Arthur Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological.
The Influence of Basin Size on Effective Flash Flood Guidance
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: Perform raster based network delineation from digital elevation models Perform raster based.
Why clip basins with lakes and reservoirs?  Flash floods do not occur in lakes and reservoirs.  Similar to the situation in coastal areas, basins extending.
National Hydrography Data Use and Applications.
Hydrologic Analysis Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Srikanth Koka
DEM-Based Stream and Watershed Delineation
Concept Course on Spatial Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam Application of GIS in Watershed Analysis Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam Institute of Water and Flood.
Remote Sensing and GIS in Water Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam Hands on training on surface hydrologic analysis using GIS Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam.
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: List the essential data needed for water resource modeling Identify sources of water resources.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
From Topographic Maps to Digital Elevation Models Daniel Sheehan IS&T Academic Computing Anne Graham MIT Libraries.
Why calculate slope and Aspect? Study the flow of water Identify the habitats of plants Identify potential sites for urban growth Drainage patterns on.
“Flood monitoring and mapping for Emergency Response in San Antonio-Texas” Part I by Silvana Alcoz Source photo Term.
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
DEM’s, Watershed and Stream Network Delineation DEM Data Sources Study Area in West Austin with a USGS 30m DEM from a 1:24,000 scale map Eight direction.
A Cell to Cell Routing Model A Cell to Cell Routing Model By : Rajeev Raina CVEN 689 Civil Engineering Applications of GIS Instructor : Dr. Francisco Olivera.
Topographic Maps vs DEM. Topographic Map 1:24,000 Scale 20 ft contour 100 ft contour Stream Center Line.
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation Understanding How to use Reading
Delineation of the Texas Hill Country Watersheds with Named Streams Team Members: Justin McInnis: Project Manager Matt Anding: Assistant Project Manager.
Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELING GEOG 421: DR. SHUNFU HU, SIUE Project One Steve Klaas Fall 2013.
Flash Flood Monitoring and Prediction (FFMP) John Ferree Warning Decision Training Branch Norman, OK John Ferree Warning Decision Training Branch Norman,
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2009.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2011.
Esri UC 2014 | Technical Workshop | Creating Watersheds, Stream Networks and Hydrologically Conditioned DEMS Steve Kopp Dean Djokic.
National Basin Delineation Project Team: Ken Howard Ami Arthur Gina Cox Dave Slayter Nathan Kuhnert Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological.
National Elevation Dataset - Hydrologic Derivatives (NED-H) Kris Verdin EROS Data Center
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Processing ArcHydro Datasets with NHDPlus Version 2, Emphasizing StreamStats Data Development Webinar.
GIS in Water Resources Review for Midterm Exam. Latitude and Longitude in North America 90 W 120 W 60 W 30 N 0 N 60 N Austin: (30°N, 98°W) Logan: (42°N,
Processing Elevation Data. Limitations of DEMs for hydro work Dates Static, does not evolve Matching to linear line work due to scale Processing errors.
Stream and Watershed Delineation from DEM’s David Maidment, Ph.D. and Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas.
The Pfafstetter Coding System in Hydrological modeling TANG, Qiuhong.
GIS in Water Resources Review for Midterm Exam. Data Models A geographic data model is a structure for organizing geospatial data so that it can be easily.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G
Introduction to GIS in Water Resources David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin CRWR.
Characterization of Watersheds from DEMs using Spatial Analyst/ArcHydro Robert G. Burns, P.G. Engineering Geologist DWR – Division of Safety of Dams Watershed.
GISWR 2015 Midterm Review. Definition of Latitude,  (1) Take a point S on the surface of the ellipsoid and define there the tangent plane, mn (2) Define.
CRWR-PrePro Stream and Watershed Delineation Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Texas Department.
May 1, 2002 Streamflow and Water Availability Estimates in Ungaged Streams California’s North Coast Region GIS Layers Lorri Peltz-Lewis U.S. Bureau of.
Section 5. Chesapeake Bay Network Generation CB watershed –~ 64,000 square miles –~ 166,000 square kilometers Constructed 3 models Version I –ERF1, ~1300.
Using the NHDPlus for drainage area delineation and site matching Kirsten Cassingham, NC Water Science Center Silvia Terziotti, NC Water Science Center.
Introduction to GIS David R. Maidment
Definition In scientific literature there is no universal agreement about the usage of the terms: digital elevation model (DEM) digital terrain model (DTM)
National Hydro Data Programs
STREAM NETWORK DELINEATION USING ARC HYDRO AND TauDEM: A comparison of approaches using The Upper Sevier and the Little Bear River Basins Alphonce C. Guzha.
Watershed Analysis.
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Review for Midterm Exam
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Global Hydrologic Data Development
Streams and Watersheds
GIS FOR HYDROLOGIC DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE FACILITIES by Francisco Olivera and David Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources.
GISWR 2015 Midterm Review.
Hydrography for The Lower Rio Grande Valley A Comparison of Mapped versus Synthetic Streams By Jean Parcher GIS in Water Resources December 4, 2001.
Review for Midterm Exam
Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models (TauDEM)
May 18, 2016 Spring 2016 Institute of Space Technology
From GIS to HMS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center University of Texas at Austin Center for Research in Water Resources Francisco.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Development of a Hydrologic Model for the Wichita Falls District
Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks
Presentation transcript:

National Basin Delineation Project Team: Ken Howard Ami Arthur Gina Cox Dave Slayter Nathan Kuhnert Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies (CIMMS)/ National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL)

National Basin Delineation Project objective: To delineate flash flood basins using a minimum drainage area threshold of 2 mi 2 for use in the Flash Flood Monitoring and Prediction (FFMP) program.

FFMP Basin Data Set Shapefiles 1) ****_orig_basins A polygon shapefile of the original small basins (before aggregation). 2) ****_aggr_basins A polygon shapefile of the aggregated basins within the radar coverage area. These are the basins for which the FFMP average rainfall values are calculated. This is one of the two shapefiles required by FFMP. Any basin customization should ultimately result in a file named ****_aggr_basins with the specific attributes required by FFMP. 3) ****_str_gen A polyline shapefile of the synthetic stream lines generated from the DEM.

FFMP Basin Data Set Shapefiles 4) ****_bins A point shapefile of the radar bin centerpoints with the associated Pfafstetter basin IDs (aggregated). This is the second shapefile required by FFMP. 5) ****_nhd_rch A polyline shapefile of stream lines from the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD). 6) ****_reg_nhd A polygon shapefile of NHD waterbodies including lakes, reservoirs, ponds, and swamps.

FFMP Basin Data Set Shapefiles Attributes in ****_aggr_basins a) Pfaf_id 13-character Pfafstetter basin ID b) Streamname Stream name as available from the NHD c) Huc 8-digit HUC ID d) Huc_name Name of the 8-digit HUC

FFMP Basin Data Set Shapefiles Attributes in ****_aggr_basins e) X-outlet Longitude of the basin outlet f) Y_outlet Latitude of the basin outlet g) State Two-character state abbreviation (based on basin outlet) h) CWA Three-character county warning area ID (based on basin outlet)

FFMP Basin Data Set Shapefiles Attributes in ****_aggr_basins i) Countyname Name of the county j) FIPS Five-character FIPS ID k) RFC Five-character River Forecast Center ID (based on basin outlet) l) Modified Flag to indicate whether a basin has been merged with other basins. 0 indicates a basin in its original state, 1 indicates a merged basin.

FFMP Basin Data Set Shapefiles Attributes in ****_aggr_basins m) Reservoir Flag to indicate whether a basin intersects a lake or reservoir according to those water bodies included in the NHD. 0 indicates no intersection with a reservoir, 1 indicates an intersection. n) Area_sq_mi Basin area in square miles o) Flow_acc An approximate flow accumulation value (in thousands of grid cells).

FFMP Basin Data Set Shapefiles Attributes in ****_aggr_basins p) X_centroid Longitude of the basin centroid q) Y_centroid Latitude of the basin centroid

FFMP Basin Data Set Shapefiles Attributes in ****_orig_basins The ****_orig_basins shapefile contains the same attributes as the ****_aggr_basins shapefile, with one additional field: Pfaf_aggr Pfafstetter ID of this basin in the ****_aggr_basins shapefile In addition, the ****_orig_basins Pfafstetter ID field is named Pfaf_orig to distinguish it from the Pfaf_id field in ****_aggr_basins.

FFMP Basin Data Set Shapefiles Attributes in ****_bins a) Azimuth_dg Azimuth of the radar bin center point in degrees b) Range_km Range of the radar bin center point in kilometers c) X_coord Longitude of the radar bin center point d) Y_coord Latitude of the radar bin center point e) Pfaf_id Pfafstetter ID of the associated FFMP basin (aggregated)

FFMP Basin Data Set Shapefiles Projection Information Projection: Geographic (lat/lon) Datum: NAD83 Units: Decimal Degrees Spheroid: GRS80

FFMP Basin Data Set Shapefiles The ****_orig_basins shapefile contains all small basins in the HUCs covering the area. There is one stream reach per basin.

FFMP Basin Data Set Shapefiles The ****_aggr_basins shapefile contains aggregated basins within the radar coverage area. There may be multiple stream reaches per basin.

FFMP Basin Data Set Shapefiles The NHD reach and water body shapefiles are included for all HUCs covering the area. These are a good reference for "the real world".

Sites to Receive Updated FFMP Basin Data Sets The following sites were converted to Geographic coordinates using an incorrect datum. This will NOT affect their use in FFMP. However, if other GIS data sets are overlaid, the basin shapefiles will be offset by the length of a few grid cells. For the most accurate results, any basin customization should be done using the updated version with the correct datum. The updated FFMP data sets will be delivered by the end of June.

Sites to Receive Updated FFMP Basin Data Sets KENX,Albany,NY KFDR,Altus AFB,OK KAMA,Amarillo,TX KFFC,Atlanta,GA KBGM,Binghamton,NY KBMX,Birmingham,AL KBOX,Boston,MA KBUF,Buffalo,NY KCXX,Burlington,VT KCLX,Charleston,SC KCLE,Cleveland,OH KCAE,Columbia,SC KGWX,Columbus AFB,MS KFWS,Dallas-Ft. Worth,TX KDOX,Dover AFB,DE KDYX,Dyess AFB,TX KEVX,Eglin AFB,FL KFSX,Flagstaff,AZ KTYX,Fort Drum,NY KGRK,Fort Hood,TX KPOE,Fort Polk,LA KEOX,Fort Rucker,AL KSRX,Fort Smith,AR KPBZ,Pittsburgh,PA KGYX,Portland,ME KRAX,Raleigh-Durham,NC KFCX,Roanoke,VA KSHV,Shreveport,LA KSGF,Springfield,MO KCCX,State College,PA KLWX,Sterling,VA KTLH,Tallahassee,FL KTBW,Tampa,FL KEMX,Tucson,AZ KINX,Tulsa,OK KLTX,Wilmington,NC KGSP,Greer,SC KCBW,Houlton,ME KHTX,Huntsville,AL KJAN,Jackson,MS KJAX,Jacksonville,FL KEAX,Kansas City,MO KBYX,Key West,FL KMRX,Knoxville-Tri-Cities,TN KLCH,Lake Charles,LA KLZK,Little Rock,AR KLBB,Lubbock,TX KMXX,Maxwell AFB,AL KMLB,Melbourne,FL KAMX,Miami,FL KMOB,Mobile,AL KVAX,Moody AFB,GA KMHX,Morehead City,NC KOHX,Nashville,TN KLIX,New Orleans,LA KOKX,New York City,NY KAKQ,Norfolk-Richmond,VA KTLX,Oklahoma City,OK KDIX,Philadelphia,PA

Basic Basin Delineation Procedure Begin with a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) –A digital map of terrain –Gridded or "raster" format Rows & columns of elevations –Integer elevation values

How are DEMs created? Created from various scale maps.... 1: : :250000

A Bunch of Blocks to Represent the Earth

A DEM What the Computer Sees & What You See

Other Views

DEM (90-meter)

Basins Derived from the 90-meter DEM

DEM (30-meter)

Basins Derived from the 30-meter DEM

The National Elevation Dataset (NED) Produced at the USGS EROS Data Center A 30-meter resolution seamless mosaic of 7.5- minute DEMs for the U.S. Base DEMs have been edge-matched to ensure there are no gaps or missing data

Filtering techniques have been applied to minimize artifacts from the original DEM creation methods. The National Elevation Dataset (NED)

The NED is a dynamic dataset- updates are made when better quality or higher resolution DEMs are available.

NSSL’s Partnership with the USGS EROS Data Center NSSL assisted EROS with the “blind pass" processing for Stage 1 of their Elevation Derivatives for National Applications (EDNA) project. –This involved producing a hydrologically conditioned (filled) DEM, flow direction and flow accumulation grids, slope, contours, basins, and synthetic streams from the NED. Access to the NED and basin delineation scripts, along with the guidance and expertise of several EROS scientists ensured the highest quality basin delineation attainable from a blind pass process.

Begin with the USGS 8-Digit Hydrologic Cataloging Units of the U.S. Delineation Methodology

8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) basin with a meter buffer. NED tiles covering the buffered area are merged and clipped.

Delineation Methodology The DEM must be projected from Geographic coordinates to the Albers Equal Area projection with units in meters. Note: Basins should not be delineated in Geographic coordinates (lat/lon) because flow direction may be incorrectly derived.

Delineation Methodology Projection Information Projection: Albers Equal Area Datum: NAD 83 Units: Meters Spheroid: GRS1980 Parameters: -1st standard parallel nd standard parallel Central meridian latitude of projection’s origin false easting (meters) false northing (meters)

Filling the DEM  “Sinks” in the DEM are filled to remove small imperfections in the data.  A sink is a cell with undefined drainage direction (all neighboring cells are higher elevations).  Sinks are filled to a point where water will flow out of the cell.  The pour point is the boundary cell with the lowest elevation for the contributing area of a sink. Delineation Methodology

Flow Direction  Derived from the filled DEM  Each cell flows to a neighboring cell based on the steepest slope. Delineation Methodology

Delineation Methodology Flow Direction Grid

Note that each grid cell flows into another grid cell and so forth. One could tally or keep track of the total number of grid cells that flow into each “downstream” grid cell. This is generally known as a flow accumulation data set. Grid cells with high flow accumulation values are areas of concentrated flow and are identified as stream channels according to the specified flow accumulation threshold. Grid cells with flow accumulation values of zero are topographic highs or ridges. Delineation Methodology Flow Accumulation This grid cell has a flow accumulation value of 15.

Delineation Methodology Flow Accumulation Grid

Delineation Methodology Derived from the flow accumulation grid. Based on the specified minimum flow accumulation threshold. –Cells with flow accumulation greater than the threshold are designated as "stream channel" cells and will form the stream network. A minimum flow accumulation threshold of 5000 grid cells (~1.74 mi 2 ) was used to delineate the FFMP basins. Stream Network

Delineation Methodology

Outflow points are the cells with the maximum flow accumulation along a stream segment. Derived from the flow accumulation and stream link grids. Delineation Methodology Outflow Points

Basins are delineated to each outflow point. Derived from the flow direction and outflow point grids. Delineation Methodology Catchments

National Basin Delineation Project Related Websites National Basin Delineation Project National Elevation Dataset (NED) Elevation Derivatives for National Applications (EDNA) National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Pfafstetter Basin Codification System