Literacy and Numeracy. 2 Agenda Background Key Variables for Calculating Literacy and Numeracy Rate –Definition of a Youth –Out-of-School –Basic Literacy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TEGL Literacy and Numeracy Gains Quick Facts
Advertisements

Ability to Benefit (ATB) Program Integrity Final Rule.
January,  Title I – Workforce Development Activities ◦ Subtitle A: System Alignment ◦ Subtitle B: Workforce Activities and Providers  Title.
COMMON MEASURES Presented by: Phil Degon Workforce Administration September 2006.
COMMON MEASURES. Training Objectives Review Common Measures data sources Discuss Reports and Desk Aids.
$200 $300 $400 Final Jeopardy $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 Truth or LiesMixed Bag The Big ThreeNRS.
WIA YOUTH PROGRAM COMMON PERFORMANCE MEASURES 1. WHERE’S THE GUIDANCE TEGL : Common Measures Policy for ETA Performance Accountability System and.
Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education for NTI Conference November 12,
The Condition of Higher Education in Iowa. You can access the full report from our Higher Education Data Center
WIA GOTO MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 6 TH – 2012 TABE 101 – A Basic Review.
Achieving Successful Outcomes Literacy/Numeracy Gains.
U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration 1 Common Measures and Reporting BINGO!
PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY: WIA YOUTH PERFORMANCE MEASURES John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey.
Youth Common Performance Measures for YouthBuild
Implications of Reporting Change Program Management, Design and Delivery.
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
1 WIA Youth Common Measures Webinar Attainment of a Degree or Certificate January 19, :00 am – 11:00 am.
TRAINING SERIES Attainment of Credentials, Degrees and Certificates WIA Workforce Investment Act.
Common Measures for the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) An equal opportunity employer/program. Auxiliary aids and services are available upon request to.
Assessment Policy. Reporting Student Data in AERIS All student data must be entered into AERIS by the 15 th and approved by the 22 nd of each month for.
The National Reporting System: Foundations Technical College System of Georgia Office of Adult Education.
New Options and Opportunities Under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act.
1 Literacy and Numeracy Gains Webinar February 3, :00 am - 11:00 am.
Graduation Conversation Doug Kosty Assistant Superintendent, Office of Learning Derek Brown Manager, Assessment of Essential Skills Cristen McLean Operations.
Welcome to the Common Measures Webinar Press *6 to mute your telephone Please do not put your phone on HOLD In the ‘chat’ box, please enter and send us.
Performance Management Policy Highlights Workforce Innovations 2005 July 12 and 13, 2005.
FY07 COMMON MEASURES CHANGES FOR REPORTING AND MOSES TRACKING.
Understanding the NRS Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.
June 2006 FY 2007 Federal Performance for Staff1 Overview and Discussion of Performance Measures for FY07.
U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Keith Rowe ETA – Dallas Region Office Presenter ETA – PROTECH WISPR Quarterly Reports and.
December 2010 Performance Reporting and Analysis, Manager One-Stop and Program Support Florida Agency for Workforce Innovation 107 East Madison Street.
Performance Measurement Under Title 1-B of the Workforce Investment Act Regional Training Richard West Social Policy Research Associates.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA 1 Change in Reporting Requirements for the Workforce Investment Act Standardized Record.
COMMON PERFORMANCE MEASURES & REPORTING. New legislation requires the use of three outcome performance measures that are used in all ETA youth programs.
Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board WIOA’s Youth Services Provisions – An Overview Eric Wolf Workforce Program and Policy Analyst Workforce.
NRS and Data Collection Part 2. NRS and Data Collection Part 1 and 2  Why? Make sure all programs understand what needs to be collected and definitions.
The Value of Data The Vital Importance of Accountability American Institutes for Research February 2005.
FY2007 Federal Performance for Managers1June 2006 FY2007 Federal Performance for Managers Overview and Discussion of Performance Measures for FY07.
Welcome to the Youth Common Measures Webinar Press *6 to mute your telephone Please do not put your phone on HOLD In the ‘chat’ box, please enter and send.
The National Reporting System: Foundations Technical College System of Georgia Office of Adult Education.
Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions Revised May 2010 (Revisions indicated in red font)
NRS JEOPARDY! The Adult Education Community’s Favorite Quiz Show.
Trade Act Participant Report (TAPR) 2005 Revisions for Implementing Common Measures.
Changing Perspectives on Workforce System Performance Workforce Innovations Conference July 2004 Employment and Training Administration Performance and.
Performance Reporting Under WIA Title 1B Candice Graham-Young ETA Performance Accountability Team.
1 State Performance Plan (SPP) Indicator # Measurement 1Graduation 2Dropout 3Statewide Assessments 4Suspension and Expulsion 5Least Restrictive Environment.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA WIA Youth under the Recovery Act Guidance for Implementing and Reporting on DOL Youth Recovery.
Adult Education Assessment Policy Effective July 1 st, 2011.
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Common Measures. When did common measures become effective? Common measures became effective for W-P on 7/1/05.
Understanding the NRS Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.
Understanding the National Reporting System Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability NRS.
ADULT EDUCATION AND FAMILY LITERACY ACT (AEFL) 2014 Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) – Title II 1.
WIA YOUTH PROGRAM COMMON PERFORMANCE MEASURES 1. WHERE’S THE GUIDANCE TEGL : Common Measures Policy for ETA Performance Accountability System and.
Documenting California Program and Learner Outcomes to Federal and State Policymakers for the ACSA presentation on September 25, 2003 and for the California.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) 1990 What Teachers Should know about Title II – Public Educational Institutions. Presented by Janie Beverley.
WIOA Youth Guidance  TEGL published on March 26, 2015  Includes the following: ▪OSY Expenditure Requirement ▪Youth Committees ▪Transitioning ISY.
Common Performance Measures for Employment and Training Programs SC Workforce Development Partnership Conference October 26-29, 2003 Brad Sickles
Literacy/Numeracy Literacy/Numeracy Made Simple January 29 th, :00 - 5:30 PM EST 4:00 - 5:30 PM EST.
TOPSpro Special Topics V: Meeting Federal Accountability Requirements.
1 WIOA Review. Try This Cross your arms 2 Now cross your arms the other way. How does it feel? 3.
WIOA’s Goal Make Participants’ Skills Everyone’s Business
TEGL Literacy and Numeracy Gains Quick Facts
Attainment of Credentials, Degrees and Certificates
TOPSpro Special Topics
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Eligibility
Performance Accountability
Standards-based Individualized Education Program: Module Eight: Additional Components Specific to Secondary IEPs SBIEP Module Eight: Additional Components.
Technical Assistance Webinar
The Transition Planning Process
Presentation transcript:

Literacy and Numeracy

2 Agenda Background Key Variables for Calculating Literacy and Numeracy Rate –Definition of a Youth –Out-of-School –Basic Literacy Skills Deficiency –Educational Functioning Level –Program Years –Reasons For Exit –Participation Years Testing Requirements for Youth

3 Background Target Population – More than 40 million adults, or approximately 21 percent of the adult population of the United States, possess limited literacy capability—that is, they have not completed a high school diploma or equivalent.

4 Target Population Statistics 1 37 % (or about 8 % of the total adult population) have completed eight or fewer years of education 11.3 % - four or fewer years of schooling 33 % English is their second language. 1

5 Background TEGL 17-05, Common Performance Measures Policy for the Employment and Training Accountability System TEGL 3-04 New Strategic Vision for the Delivery of Youth Services under the Workforce Investment System National Reporting System (NRS) for Adult Education – U.S. Department of Education

6 ETA & NRS Implementation Notes ETA is using the NRS EFL Structure EFL Implementation –ETA allows for reporting on various EFL –NRS (Adult ED) reports on lowest EFL Calculations –ETA will use a different set of calculations Data Quality –Both ETA & NRS are focused on data integrity and reporting

7 Literacy or Numeracy Gains Of those out-of-school youth who are basic skills deficient: # of youth participants who increase one or more educational functioning levels # of youth participants who have completed a year in the program* plus the # of youth participants who exit before completing a year in the youth program *(i.e. one year from the date of first youth program service)

8 Key Variables for Calculating Literacy and Numeracy Rate

9 Definition of a Youth There are two WISARD layouts –OMB approved layout –ETA software layout Differences –Fields 306 & 307 have been changed ItemOMB ApprovedETA Software 306Youth (Local)Date of First Youth Service 307Youth [Statewide (15%) Activities] Youth (Statewide 15% Activities)

10 Definition of a Youth (cont.) ETA software uses WIASRD as the basis of its record layout. We are using the WIASRD that we expect to be approved by OMB for the October 2006 WIASRD submission.

11 Calculation of Age for Youth Date of First Youth Service minus Date of Birth –Item 306 – Item 102 = Age Age >= 14 and Age <= 21 There is no younger or older youth differentiation

12 Out-of-School Out-of-School is defined as: –An eligible youth who is a school dropout, or who has received a secondary school diploma or its equivalent but is basic skills deficient, unemployed, or underemployed (WIA section 101(33)). –For reporting purposes, this term includes all youth except: (i) those who are attending any school and have not received a secondary school diploma or its recognized equivalent, or (ii) those who are attending post-secondary school and are not basic skills deficient.

13 Understanding Out-of-School Youth For Reporting Purposes: 1.Not in school 2.In post-secondary education & basic skills deficient We could be looking potentially at anyone who is not in secondary school and is basic skills deficient

14 Basic Literacy Skills Deficient Is defined as: –The individual computes or solves problems, reads, writes, or speaks English at or below the eighth grade level or is unable to compute or solve problems, read, write, or speak English at a level necessary to function on the job, in the individual’s family, or in society.

15 Basic Literacy Skills Deficient For the WISARD – During Year 1 –Basic Literacy Skills Deficient, Item 130 = 1 –Initial Pre-test score, EFL and test date must be recorded For WISARD – During Subsequent Years –Based on EFL (Year #1, #2, etc.), Items 709, 712, etc. <= 4

16 Educational Functioning Levels Based on the National Reporting Systems EFL Table Educational Functioning Levels are based on skill sets – a measure of adult educational progress They are equal to approximately 2 grade levels

17 Educational Functioning Levels Educational Gain – –At post-test, participant completes or advances one or more educational functioning levels from the starting level measured on entry into the program (pre-test) – for Year 1. –At post-test, participant completes or advances one or more educational functioning levels from the post-test level measured from the previous year’s latest post-test – for Year 2 and beyond.

18 EFL Calculation To increase an EFL: EFL (based on test) during the current participation year minus the prior EFL (based on prior test) (either the pre-test or one of the post-tests) > 0. If EFL is either 0 or -1 then there is a no success. An increase of one EFL in any functional area during a participation year is considered a success for that participation year.

19 EFL Calculation Success for year one is – –Educational Functioning Level Item 709 > than original EFL Level, Item 706 –Date must be within or equal to 1 year anniversary of Date of First Youth Service Success for subsequent years –In the PRESENT year, the Educational Functioning Level > the EFL for the previous year

20 NO Literacy or Numeracy Gain – 1 st Yr. Has increased one EFL within 1 year of First Youth Service Date? NO YES Excluded YES Numerator Denominator 20 YES Is Out-of-School? YES Is Basic Skills Deficient? Is Youth? NO

21 First Year Notes Initial test must be given within 60 days of Date of First Youth Service. If a previous assessment was conducted (i.e. by a partner program) within six months prior to Date of First Youth Service, then that test score can be used. Participant is included in the measure even if they exit prior to end of the first year.

22 1 st Program Youth Program Post-test must be given 1 1 Exit can occur at anytime, but post-test must be given prior to exit 2 Post-test must be given prior to or on the anniversary date Date of Participation Anniversary Date 2 Date of First Youth Service Pre-test given within 6 months can be used* Pre-test must be given within 60 days 1 year First Year

23 First Year Notes (cont.) Post-test can be anytime within the first year, but must be given prior to anniversary date. Failure to test within first year or prior to exit will result in a negative outcome If a participant exits for an exclusion (i.e. global exclusion) and is not a success, the participant is excluded from the measure.

24 Basic Literacy Skills Deficient Revisited R = Reading/Writing Proficiency M = Math Proficiency BSP = Basic Skills Proficiency Not R OR Not M = Not BSP Not R AND Not M = Not BSP Not R = Not BSP Not M = Not BSP R AND M = BSP

25 NO Literacy or Numeracy Gain – 2 nd Yr. & Each Year Thereafter Has increased one EFL within last year based on latest post-test score? NO YES Excluded YES Numerator Denominator 25 YES Has completed another full year based on Anniversary Date*? Is Basic Skills Deficient? NO *Anniversary date is based on Date of First Youth Service and Exit Date >= Anniversary Date

26 Second Year and Beyond Notes Test can be given anytime between anniversary dates For subsequent years in the program, if the participant exits prior to the anniversary of the participation year, then the participant is excluded from the measure whether or not the participant completed the appropriate post-test.

27 Post-test must be given 1 1 If exit occurs prior to anniversary date, participant is excluded from the measure 2 Post-test must be given prior to or on the anniversary date Anniversary Date 2 Anniversary Date Second Year and Beyond

28 Two Methods for Calculations Option A – States who are implementing in first year –The participant is included in the measure the moment the individual has an outcome – a successful post-test, exit, or the anniversary of the participation year Option B – Used by States in all subsequent years –Includes the participant in the measure only on the anniversary of the individuals participation year

29 1 st Program Youth Program * Option A ** Option B Date of Participation Anniversary Dates Date of First Youth Service Year 1 * Two Methods for Calculations Year 2 ** Date of Exit Common Participation Period 90 calendar days of no service

30 Example Participant A enters the program on 10/01/2006 Pre-test given on 10/02/2006 Takes post-test and increases 1 EFL on 10/05/2006 Option A –Success as of 10/05/2006, the date of EFL increase Option B –Success on 10/01/2007, the anniversary date of the Date of the First Youth Service

31 Exclusions Social Security Number – –Can impact the ability of states to receive administrative records from partner programs Technical and community college that use SSN as primary identifier Exit due to exclusion causes all outcomes to be lost –Participant had a success in the 1 st year and then they were excluded in the 2 nd year Options 1.Positive or negative outcome would be lost 2.No impact to real-time outcomes More clarification to come

32 Test Requirements

33 Why Test? Test or assessment has three purposes 1 : –It provides diagnostic information (formative assessments) –Evaluates student progress (summative assessment) –Evaluates the overall performance of an entity (e.g., class, program, state). 1 Developing Performance Assessments

34 Testing Requirements Pre-test – A test used to assess a participant’s basic literacy skills, which is administered to a participant up to six months prior to the date of participation, if such pre-test scores are available, or within 60 days following the date of first youth service. Post-test – A test administered to a participant at regular intervals during the program.

35 Testing Requirements All assessment tests must crosswalk to the NRS Programs must use test outline in Attachment C – NRS EFL Table States, grantees, or contractors are not required to use the same assessment tool throughout their jurisdictions.

36 Testing Requirements Programs must adhere to the following in choosing an assessment tool: 1.The same assessment tool is administered to the participant for pre-testing and post-testing; 2.The assessment tool and its scores must crosswalk directly to the educational functioning levels so that educational gains can be reported in terms of increase in one or more ABE or ESL levels; and 3.Tests must be administered in a standardized manner throughout the jurisdiction (i.e., used consistently and reliably across programs and produce observable results).

37 Understanding NRS Table The NRS provides test benchmarks for EFL. Indicate how students functioning at each level would perform on the tests. Inclusion of tests does not imply that they are equivalent or the basis for assessment. Tests do not necessarily measure the same skills.

38 Testing Requirements Intervals –Participants must be post-tested at least once by the end of one year following the individual’s date of first youth program service. –If more than one assessment is administered after the initial test, the latest assessment should be used Individuals who remain basic skills deficient and continue to participate, must continue to receive basic skills remediation services.

39 Testing Youth with Disabilities When administering assessment tools, individuals with disabilities are to be provided with reasonable accommodations: –“[m]odifications or adjustments,” made on a case-by-case basis, “that enable a qualified individual with a disability... to receive aid, benefits, services, or training equal to that provided to qualified individuals without disabilities.”* *29 CFR 37.4

40 Testing Youth with Disabilities Reasonable Accommodations are to be provided in accordance with: –Section 188 of the WIA –Guidelines associated with the assessment test –State laws or policy Youth with disabilities are expected to achieve the same gains as other youth –Accommodations provide a “level playing field.”

41 Testing Youth with Disabilities For youth with one or more severe disabilities –The use of these testing instruments, even with appropriate accommodations, may not provide a valid or reliable evaluation of the literacy and numeracy skills Service providers and grant recipients may use alternate assessment tools to measure gains –State has deemed alternate assessments valid and reliable indicators of information –Comparable to the information provided through the educational functioning levels

42 Categories of Accommodations Presentation – Braille or oral reading of questions Response – having test taker point to response Setting – taken in small setting Timing/Schedule – extending testing times. State participation and accommodation policies for students with disabilities: 1999 update (Synthesis Report No. 33)

43 Documentation of Accommodation Diagnosis of the learning disability or disabilities or, diagnosis of ADHD Statement of how this disability substantially limits candidate’s activity Recommendation for accommodation(s) appropriate for the individual’s educational needs

44 Further Information ETA’s Performance and Results Website ETA’s Office of Workforce Investment – Youth Services National Reporting System for Adult Education Website

45 Further Information The Iowa Literacy Resource Center GED Testing Accommodations American Council on Education – GED Testing Accommodations &TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=12223 Synthesis Report No tml

46 Special Thanks Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. for their assistance in preparing technical documentation for this presentation.