BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

Using the Parkride2.mac Macro to Model Park and Ride Demand in the Puget Sound Region 22 nd International Emme Users Conference September 15-16, 2011,
Parsons Brinckerhoff Chicago, Illinois GIS Estimation of Transit Access Parameters for Mode Choice Models GIS in Transit Conference October 16-17, 2013.
Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING FOR THE OLYMPIC GAMES ATHENS 2004 ATTIKO METRO S.A. Anna Anastasaki.
Jeannie Wu, Planner Sep  Background  Model Review  Model Function  Model Structure  Transportation System  Model Interface  Model Output.
Regional Bicycle Demand Model: In Use Today in Portland Bill Stein, Metro TRB Transportation Applications Conference Reno, Nevada – May 9, 2011.
April 10, 2007 Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS TWO Denver Regional Council of Governments June 30, 2011.
USING SUMMIT FOR TRANSIT AND MODEL ANALYSIS AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP October 23, 2006.
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
A Toll Choice Probability Model Application to Examine Travel Demand at Express and Electronic Toll Lanes in Maryland.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
NCTCOG And “Next Generation” Modeling Ken Cervenka, P.E., AICP North Central Texas Council Of Governments For AMPO Travel Modeling Work Group Meeting Kansas.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
Transportation Planning Modeling with EMME/2. Interconnectedness.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
About this presentation Target audience: Prepared for Dr. Mitsuru Saito’s BYU graduate level class. Feb Please contact Mike Brown at
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW Denver Regional Council of Governments June 24, 2011.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Estimating Commuter Rail Station- Level Ridership Using American Community Survey Journey to Work.
1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FIVE Denver Regional Council of Governments July27, 2011.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG Presentation For IOWA TMIP Peer Review March 30 – April 1, 2004.
The Development of a Direct Demand Non-Home Based Model for Urban Rail Travel Rhett Fussell, PE –PB Americas Bill Davidson-PB Americas Joel Freedman-PB.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
Analysis of a Multimodal Light Rail Corridor using an Activity-Based Microsimulation Framework S. Ellie Volosin & Ram M. Pendyala, Arizona State University,
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
Modeling in the “Real World” John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council April 19, 2005.
Montgomery County Travel Forecasting Model Validation — Status Report — Status Report Presented To: TPB Travel Forecasting Subcommittee By: Montgomery.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
TO THE BLACK BOX AND BACK – The TRANS Model October 2008.
Travel Demand Modeling Experience Bellevue-Kirkland-Redmond Travel Demand Modeling Experience Jin Ren, P.E. City of Bellevue, Washington, USA October 19,
Tour-Based Model for a Small Area Presented at 11 th Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno, NV May 2011 William G. Allen, Jr., PE Consultant.
Income-Based Work Trip Stratification within the Puget Sound Regional Council Travel Model Framework 20 th International Emme Users’ Conference Montreal,
Analysis of Time of Day Models from Various Urban Areas William G. Allen, Jr. Transportation Planning Consultant Windsor, SC TRB Transportation Planning.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
February 8, 2008 SERPM65 vs. SERPM6-Corradino 1 SERPM-6.5 & SERPM-6: Differences & Future Directions Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
Summit in the Wasatch John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council.
FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Bill.
Comparison of an ABTM and a 4-Step Model as a Tool for Transportation Planning TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference May 8, 2007.
1 FSUTMS-Voyager: Transit Standards within Evolving FSUTMS Summary Presentation Florida Model Task Force Tampa, Florida December 13 th, slides.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Model Application.
December 12, 2006 Florida Model Task Force CORRADINO 1 Treasure Coast Southeast Florida Regional Planning Models In Cube Voyager.
11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, Validation of Speeds and Volumes in a Large Regional Model Southeast.
Presentation For Incorporation of Pricing in the Time-of-Day Model “Express Travel Choices Study” for the Southern California Association of Governments.
May 8, 2009 SERPM65 Subarea Model-Corradino 1 SERPM65 Highway-Only Subarea Modeling Process Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
Emme Modeller Applications Puget Sound Regional Council’s Model Conversion via Emme Modeller 22 nd International Emme Users’ Conference September 15-16,
INCORPORATING INCOME INTO TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING Brent Spence Bridge Case Study October 13, 2015.
Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Findings on Weekday Travel Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
Impact of Aging Population on Regional Travel Patterns: The San Diego Experience 14th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference, Columbus.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Generation CE331 Transportation Engineering.
The Current State-of-the-Practice in Modeling Road Pricing Bruce D. Spear Federal Highway Administration.
Transit Choices BaltimoreLink Ad-hoc Committee Meeting January 12, 2016.
May 9, th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference – Session 18 1 IMPROVING CONSISTENCY BETWEEN TRANSIT PATH- BUILDING AND MODE.
Use Survey to Improve the DFX Transit Model
AMPO Annual Conference October 22, 2014
Presentation transcript:

BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006

BMC Enhanced Model–Background Update to the Baltimore region travel demand model MTA provided funding Developed by William G. Allen with assistance from BMC staff Motivation/Goal Revised mode choice model to meet FTA technical analysis of user benefits utilizing SUMMIT Analysis of proposed Red Line to request New Starts funding Develop one regional model used for long/short range regional planning, regional conformity analysis, and FTA new starts analysis

BMC Modeling Area BMC Model Area MWCOG Jurisdictions in BMC Model

Baltimore Region Highway and Rail Transit Systems

BMC Enhanced Model–Objectives BMC Enhanced Model–Objectives User friendly – logical input file names Reduce off-model data preparation Reduce number of input files Incorporation of 2001 NHTS data Meet Requirements of FTA Remove “cliff” functions Use same coefficients for transit and auto time Eliminate geographic bias constants Produce input files for SUMMIT

BMC Enhanced Model–Status Draft functioning model as of February 2006 Conducting sensitivity test designed to evaluate estimated changes in demand BMC staff developing a further understanding of the model through application, documentation, and development of user guide/local training session Extensive quality control checking of all model aspects Model runs in 9 to 10 hours (previous model 6 to 7 hours)

Trip Generation Features Demographic models Households by size (5)/income (4) Urban Size (Baltimore City, DC, Montgomery, PG) Suburban Size (All Others) Urban Income (Baltimore City and DC) Suburban Income (All Others) Workers (4)/income (4) Workers for Washington region must be estimated based on household size and income from PUMS Income split is 10/15/20/55% of households (lowest to highest)

Trip Generation Features (Cont’d) 10 trip purposes Home-Based Work, Shop, Other, and School Non-Home-Based JTW, JAW, and OBO Truck CV, MTK, and HTK Nine area types based on household and employment density Trip productions by rates for different HH size/income and worker/income combinations Trip attractions by regression equation, adjusted by area type

Trip Generation Features (Cont’d) Home-based I-I trip attractions normalized to match productions Non-home based trip attractions normalized to productions, then productions set equal to attractions External trip generation based on counts/projections and distance between zone and closest external X-X trips based on base year trip table Attraction split model by income

2000 Density Codes

2030 Density Codes

Trip Distribution Features Composite Time Highway, transit (2 lowest income classes, HBW, HBS, HBO), toll Simulated congested time used for HBW, JTW, free-flow time for other purposes during first pass Two loops of speed feedback for HBW and JTW trips K-factors replace barrier penalties Truck deltas applied after distribution Truck deltas now additive, not multiplicative

K-Factor Map

Mode Choice Features New transit access pre-process TP+, ArcInfo, Microsoft Access Create up to 9 walk links per mode, unlimited drive links within 30 minutes Create ½ mile buffer around local transit lines and express bus and rail stops Identify walk access share of each zone within buffer Determine average walk time for bus, rail, commuter rail, peak and off-peak Select links from those actually used in pathbuilding limited in number and distance/time

Mode Choice Features New nested logit mode choice model Same structure for all non-school purposes Model for school trips includes a top-level school bus nest Parking cost model Three levels of auto occupancy Three transit modes Two access modes

Mode Choice Features (Continued) Peak and off-peak transit networks “Freeze-dry” Washington mode choice Dummy links for DC transit access/egress

Mode Choice Structure

Mode Choice Structure–School

Assignment Features Fixed weights based on future equilibrium assignment First two feedback loops assign AM peak trips (6:30-9:30 a.m.) Final assignment for four time periods AM peak (6:30-9:30 a.m.) Midday (9:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m.) PM peak (3:30-6:30 p.m.) Night (6:30 p.m.-6:30 a.m.

Assignment Features (Continued) Number of iterations AM peak = 14 Midday = 8 PM peak = 14 Night =6

Next Steps Test Alternatives Run SUMMIT Continue checking results Submit to FTA Document