Analysis of Student Performance on Assessments 2010-2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dudley-Charlton Regional School District 2009 MCAS Information October 2009.
Advertisements

PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Jefferson Township Public Schools Spring 2009 Testing Analysis Presented to: Jefferson Township Board of Education Presented by: Mary K. Thornton, Ph.D.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Mark J. Raivetz Superintendent Elizabeth Mennig Supervisor Teaching and Learning 21 October 2010 Assessment in the Haddon Township Public Schools 2010.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
Jefferson Township Public Schools Spring 2007 Testing Analysis Presented to: Jefferson Township Board of Education Presented by: Mary K. Thornton, Ph.D.
ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Washington Township 2007 Test Scores Washington Township Administrative Team October 23, 2007.
Tewksbury Township Schools “ Measuring Our 2012 Results ” District Testing Report NJ PASS Grades 1 and 2 NJ ASK Grades 3-8 Prepared for the Tewksbury.
Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.
State Assessment Results October 2014 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Dawn Moore Director of Curriculum and Instruction The Warren Hills Regional.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Facilitators: Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
North Arlington Public Schools NJASK Data Presented by: Dennis Kenny, Nicole C. Russo, Elaine Jaume, Marie Griggs & Jennifer Rodriguez.
PRESENTED BY THE DEMAREST ADMINISTRATIVE TEAM Annual State of the Schools Assessment Report.
School Improvement Plan Results & Next Steps December, 2009 Central Elementary School Home of the Eagles.
Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments Spring 2010 results Presented by: Richard Kirk Assistant Principal Manasquan Elementary School.
MATHEMATICS Support for Single Plan for Student Achievement.
JUNE 26, 2012 BOARD MEETING Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
Diverse Populations in Small Rural Schools Presented by: Amy Trujillo-Conway Amy Trujillo-Conway Madalena Barboa-Archuleta.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Common Core Implementation Update SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 CAMBRIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
1 State Testing March 2006 Grades 3-8 (NJASK and GEPA)
Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation January 24, 2011 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
RESULTS FOR ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOLS 2013 Statewide Test Data.
CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 TEST SCORE PRESENTATION.
WELCOME TO PARK VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL NECAP REPORT NIGHT.
PROGRESS MONITORING OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2nd Quarter Data.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW Raising Achievement and Improving Graduation Rates: How Nine HSTW Sites Are Doing It Gene Bottoms Southern Regional.
District Assessment Report Rory McCourt – District Testing Coordinator Westwood Regional School District December 16, 2010.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
APS Algebra Summit1 Algebra in APS Christina Fritz Franny Dever Mitchell Ross January 31,2008.
Jackson Elementary School Title I Information
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
District Assessment Report Westwood Regional School District February 18, 2010.
Michigan High School Reform Update and Discussion Oakland County Superintendents Association December 7, 2005.
Spring 2009 MCAS Results. Dedham Elementary Schools.
Aligning Literacy Curriculum Instruction Across the District Summit for Urban Education May 5, 2005 David Bible Helena Dameron Maya Marlowe.
School Report Card A Focus on Academic Performance West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Presentation June 17, 2014.
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.
Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation May 14, 2012 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team 1.
R IDGEFIELD P UBLIC S CHOOLS DATA PRESENTATION P ART I October 2015.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE HARDING TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DECEMBER 21, 2015.
MAP: Measured Academic Progress© Parent Coffee February 10, 2010.
Assessment: Results & Implications for Instruction Parent meeting – October 13, 2011.
Student Data Review Title VII Indian Education Parent Meeting March 4, 2013.
Elementary Math Work – Spring 2013 Des Moines Public Schools Mathematics Expectation: All students will demonstrate mastery of the rigorous Common Core.
PARCC Workshop February 29, Welcome! Presenters Mr. Baskerville Joann Abbate Kristen Gati Kelly Nickels Schedule Opening Break Out Sessions Q&A.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Curriculum Night Elementary. What do I as a parent need to know to support student assessments at CCAS? Essential Question.
NJASK 3-5 Report Sean Siet Director of Curriculum and Instruction October 20, 2011.
Loretta L. Radulic, Assistant Superintendent Roxbury Township Public Schools October State Assessment Results and Analysis.
Huntsville City Schools School Year School Instructional Targets October 3,
Granby Public Schools Annual Continuous Progress Review Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum September CMT Review.
Accountability Goals September 2014 Bristol Public Schools.
What is AYP? AYP stands for Adequate Yearly Progress
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Ridgefield Public Schools data presentation Part I
Ridgefield Public Schools data presentation Part II
Assessment of Student Performance for 2011 – 2012
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Measuring College and Career Readiness
District Assessment Report
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of Student Performance on Assessments

Elementary Schools NJPASS 2 NJPASS 2 NJASK 3 NJASK 3 NJASK 4 NJASK 4 NJASK 5 NJASK 5 Middle School NJASK 6 NJASK 6 NJASK 7 NJASK 7 NJASK 8 NJASK 8 High School HSPA HSPA NJPASS 9 NJPASS 9 NJPASS 10 NJPASS 10 AP Exams AP Exams SAT SAT

Percent of adults without a high school diploma Percent of adults with some college education Percent of adults with some college education Occupational status Occupational status Unemployment rate Unemployment rate Percent of individuals in poverty Percent of individuals in poverty Median family income Median family income

Monmouth County Eatontown Boro Eatontown Boro Howell Township Howell Township Ocean Township Ocean Township Red Bank Regional Red Bank Regional Spring Lake Heights Boro Spring Lake Heights Boro West Long Branch West Long Branch Other Counties Monroe Township Monroe Township Point Pleasant Boro Point Pleasant Boro Cinnaminson Township Cinnaminson Township Dunellen Boro Dunellen Boro North Brunswick North Brunswick Old Bridge Township Old Bridge Township Other FG Districts

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS NJPASS 2, NJASK 3, 4, and 5

INITIATIVES K-5 Curricular Improvements (K-5): Development and implementation of Units of Study for Writing based on Lucy Calkin’s Writer’s Workshop Framework for grades K-5; Infusion of Standards Solution instructional resources within the district writing curriculum for grades 2-5; Integration of NJASK prep instructional resources within the language arts curriculum for both reading and writing; Enhancement of Everyday Math unit assessments to reflect skills assessed on NJASK; Weekly assessment of student mastery of basic math facts. District-wide Benchmark Assessments: NWEA Assessment (grades 3-5); District-Wide Quarterly Curriculum Benchmarks in Reading, Writing and Math (grades K-5) – revision made to better align with the NJASK. Student Instruction: Language Arts Tutorial; Math Tutorial Professional Development: Literacy Coach provided in-class coaching of teachers (grades K-5); Literacy Coach provided before and after school professional development for teachers (grades K-5); Follow-up training for Everyday Math ; Training with Standards Solution on effective test- taking strategies for the reading portion of the NJASK (grades 2-5); Training on using data to guide instruction in the classroom. Building Level Data Teams: (Student Support Teams) analyzed district data and created improvement plans for students identified as being at-risk.

Language Arts: Reading - Working with the Passage Reading - Working with the Passage and Analyzing the Passage and Analyzing the Passage Listening – Working with the Listening – Working with the Passage and Analyzing the Passage Passage and Analyzing the Passage Writing – Content, Development, and Writing – Content, Development, and Language Conventions Language Conventions Math: Number Sense, Operations and Number Sense, Operations and Properties Properties Measurement Measurement Spatial Sense and Geometry Spatial Sense and Geometry Data Analysis, Probability, and Data Analysis, Probability, and Discrete Mathematics Discrete Mathematics Patterns and Algebra Patterns and Algebra

%PP%P%AP % Total Proficient MARSD – MARSD – CL – CL – RD – RD – ST – ST – Advanced ProficientPartially ProficientProficient

NJPASS 2 Math %PP%P%AP % Total Proficient MARSD – MARSD – CL – CL – RD – RD – ST – ST – Advanced ProficientPartially ProficientProficient

The Language Arts Literacy section of the NJASK 3, 4 and 5 measures students’ achievement in reading and writing. There are four cluster areas: Writing Task 1 – Speculative or Expository Writing Task 2 – Speculative or Expository Writing Task 2 – Speculative or Expository Working with Text Working with Text Analyzing Text Analyzing Text

The Mathematics section of NJASK 3, 4 and 5 measures students’ knowledge and their ability to solve problems by applying mathematical concepts. There are five cluster areas: Number Sense and Numerical Operations Geometry and Measurement Geometry and Measurement Problem Solving Problem Solving Data Analysis, Probability and Discrete Data Analysis, Probability and Discrete Mathematics Mathematics Patterns and Algebra Patterns and Algebra

The NJASK 4 Science assessment measures students’ knowledge as well as cognitive and process skills in four cluster areas: Life Science Physical Science Physical Science Earth Science Earth Science Application Application

Performance Levels Scale Score from Advanced Proficient: Advanced Proficient: Proficient: Proficient: Partially Proficient: Partially Proficient:

The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act requires each state to establish challenging content and performance standards and to implement assessments that measure students' performance against those standards in a manner that: results in continuous and substantial yearly improvement results in continuous and substantial yearly improvement of each school. of each school. is sufficiently rigorous to achieve the goal within an is sufficiently rigorous to achieve the goal within an appropriate timeframe. appropriate timeframe.

As a result of NCLB, each state has developed a plan for the minimum levels of improvement in measurable terms of student performance that schools must achieve within the given time frames specified by the NCLB legislation. This is otherwise known as Adequate Yearly Progress or AYP. A district must pass all 41 indicators to receive AYP status. A district must pass all 41 indicators to receive AYP status.

Content AreaGrade SpanStarting Point – – Language Arts Literacy Elementary (Grades 3-5) Middle School (Grades 6-8) High School (Grade 11) MathematicsElementary (Grades 3-5) Middle School (Grades 6-8) High School (Grade 11) Benchmark values indicate % of Total Student Proficiency. Benchmark values indicate % of Total Student Proficiency.

LAL%MATH%PPPAP TOTAL P PPPAP MARSD – MARSD – DFG – DFG – STATE – STATE – Advanced ProficientPartially ProficientProficient

LAL%MATH% PPPAP TOTAL P PPPAP CL – CL – DFG – DFG – STATE – STATE – Advanced ProficientPartially ProficientProficient NJASK 3

LALMATH CL DFG STATE Area of Strength Area of Concern Total Mean Score

NJASK 3 LAL Cluster Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern Writing Expository Task Speculative Task Reading Working with Text Analyzing Text CL DFG STATE Total Points

NJASK 3 Math Cluster Mean Scores Number & Numerical Operations Geometry & Measurement Patterns & Algebra Data Analysis, Probability & Discrete Math Problem Solving CL DFG STATE Total Points Area of Strength Area of Concern

NWEA SPRING TARGET PROJECTED PROFICIENCY ACCURACY OF PROJECTION LAL56.0%86.9% MA73.1%96.6% NWEA Predictability

% PP % P % AP LAL – After School (12 students) MATH – After School (12 students) Tutoring Results and NJASK 3

LAL%MATH% PPPAP TOTAL P PPPAP RD – RD– DFG – DFG – STATE – STATE – Advanced ProficientPartially ProficientProficient NJASK 3

LALMATH RD DFG STATE Area of Strength Area of Concern NJASK 3 Total Mean Scores

NJASK 3 LAL Cluster Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern Writing ExpositoryTaskSpeculativeTaskReading Working with Text Analyzing Text RD DFG STATE Total Points

NJASK 3 Math Cluster Mean Scores Number & Numerical Operations Geometry & Measurement Patterns & Algebra Data Analysis, Probability & Discrete Math Problem Solving RD DFG STATE Total Points Area of Strength Area of Concern

NWEA SPRING TARGET PROJECTED PROFICIENCY ACCURACY OF PROJECTION LAL64.3%92.6% MA81.0%97.1%

% PP % P % AP LAL – After School (14 students) MATH – Before School (5 students) Tutoring Results and NJASK 3

LAL % MATH % PPPAP TOTAL P PPPAP ST – ST – DFG – DFG – STATE – STATE – Advanced ProficientPartially ProficientProficient

LALMATH ST DFG STATE Area of Strength Area of Concern NJASK 3 Total Mean Scores

NJASK 3 LAL Cluster Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern Writing ExpositoryTaskSpeculativeTaskReading Working with Text Analyzing Text ST DFG STATE Total Points

NJASK 3 Math Cluster Mean Scores Number & Numerical Operations Geometry & Measurement Patterns & Algebra Data Analysis, Probability & Discrete Math Problem Solving ST DFG STATE Total Points Area of Strength Area of Concern

NWEA SPRING TARGET PROJECTED PROFICIENCY ACCURACY OF PROJECTION LAL78.4%93.8% MA87.2%99%

% PP % P % AP LAL – Before School (13 students) MATH – After School (11 students) Tutoring Results and NJASK 3

Lloyd Road Elementary School NJASK 4 and NJASK 5

LAL% MATH % PPPAP TOTAL P PPPAP LR – LR – DFG – DFG – STATE STATE – Partially Proficient ProficientAdvanced Proficient

SCIENCE % PPPAP TOTAL P LR – LR – DFG – DFG – STATE – STATE – Partially Proficient ProficientAdvanced Proficient

LALMATH SCIENCE Grade DFG STATE Area of Strength Area of Concern NJASK 4 Total Mean Scores

NJASK 4 LAL Cluster Mean Scores Area of Strength Area of Concern Writing Expository Task Speculative Task Reading Working with Text Analyzing Text LR DFG STATE Total Points

NJASK 4 Math Cluster Mean Scores Number & Numerical Operations Geometry & Measurement Patterns & Algebra Data Analysis, Probability & Discrete Math Problem Solving LR DFG STATE Total Points Area of Strength Area of Concern

Area of Strength Area of Concern Life Science Physical Science Earth Science KnowledgeApplication LR DFG STATE Total Points NJASK 4 Science Cluster Mean Scores

LAL % MATH % PPPAP TOTAL P PPPAP LR – LR – DFG – DFG – STATE – STATE – Partially ProficientProficientAdvanced Proficient

LALMATH Grade DFG STATE Area of Strength Area of Concern NJASK 5 Total Mean Scores

NJASK 5 LAL Cluster Mean Scores WritingSpeculativeTaskExpositoryTaskReadingWorking with Text AnalyzingText LR DFG STATE Total Points Area of Strength Area of Concern

NJASK 5 Math Cluster Mean Scores Number & Numerical Operations Geometry & Measurement Patterns & Algebra Data Analysis, Probability & Discrete Math Problem Solving LR DFG STATE Total Points Area of Strength Area of Concern

SUBJECT SUBJECT NWEA SPRING TARGET PROJECTED PROFICIENCY ACCURACY OF PROJECTION 4 th GRADE LA LA55%94% MA92%94% 5 th GRADE LA73%99% MA52%93% NWEA Predictability

NJASK Score Range %PP%P%AP Grade 4 LAL (14 students) Grade 4 Math (6 students) Grade 5 LAL (24 students) Tutoring Results and NJASK 4 & 5

Action Plan for (K-5) Reader’s Workshop Training for Teachers of Grades 3-5: Collaborating with Rutgers University Graduate School of Education to offer ongoing professional development on teaching Reading using Lucy Calkin’s Reader’s Workshop framework – (shared reading, word study, guided reading, independent reading, book clubs/literature circles, literacy centers, DRA-2). Literacy Coach: Ongoing professional development on teaching reading and writing for teachers of grades K-5. NJASK Prep and Standards Solution Resources: Integrating resources within the language arts curriculum. NWEA: Using the data to identify students’ projected performance on the NJASK and to develop individual Action Plans to target needs of Basic Skills students. Study Island (Grades 3-5) and Reading Eggs (Grades K-2): Parent resource and additional instructional tool targeting skills assessed on the NJASK in the area of language arts and mathematics (grades 3-5) and overall literacy (grades K-2). Supplemental Educational Services: Collaborating with Smart Start “Smarties” to provide Lloyd Road students meeting federal criteria additional instruction in the area of language arts.

Action Plan for (K-5) Additional State Aid: Purchased instructional resources for classrooms of grades 3-5 (classroom libraries; leveled readers for shared reading, guided reading, book clubs/literature circles; DRA-2); Hiring a Literacy Consultant to evaluate the language arts program. Summer STAR Program (Strategic Targeted Assistance in Reading): Program will target students exiting 1 st through 5 th grades who are reading below grade level as designated by district benchmarks. Quarterly Benchmark Measurements: Revised to reflect the NJASK. Tutorial Program: Targeting at-risk students in grades 3-5 in the area of language arts and mathematics. Everyday Math : Revised K-2 curriculum aligns with the Common Core State Standards; Revised Unit Assessments integrate skills assessed on the NJASK; Providing professional development for teachers of grades 3-5 on program changes as a result of the integration of the Common Core State Standards; Continue to monitor students’ mastery and automaticity of basic math facts (grades 1-5); Continue to monitor overall program.