LIN1180/LIN5082 Semantics Lecture 3

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Syntactic Complexity and Cohesion
Advertisements

Chapter Two The Scope of Semantics.
Kaplan’s Theory of Indexicals
The Cooperative Principle
Unit 6 Predicates, Referring Expressions, and Universe of Discourse Part 1: Practices 1-7.
1 LIN 1310B Introduction to Linguistics Prof: Nikolay Slavkov TA: Qinghua Tang CLASS 25, April 10, 2007.
Syntax Lecture 10: Auxiliaries. Types of auxiliary verb Modal auxiliaries belong to the category of inflection – They are in complementary distribution.
Albert Gatt LIN1180/LIN5082 Semantics Lecture 2. Goals of this lecture Semantics -- LIN 1180 To introduce some of the central concepts that semanticists.
Lecture Six Pragmatics.
Lecture 11: Binding and Reflexivity.  Pronouns differ from nouns in that their reference is determined in context  The reference of the word dog is.
Albert Gatt LIN3021 Formal Semantics Lecture 5. In this lecture Modification: How adjectives modify nouns The problem of vagueness Different types of.
Albert Gatt LIN1180 – Semantics Lecture 10. Part 1 (from last week) Theories of presupposition: the semantics- pragmatics interface.
Linguistic Theory Lecture 8 Meaning and Grammar. A brief history In classical and traditional grammar not much distinction was made between grammar and.
LIN1180/LIN5082 Semantics Lecture 1
The Square Root of 2, p, and the King of France: Ontological and Epistemological Issues Encountered (and Ignored) in Introductory Mathematics Courses Martin.
Reference and inference By: Esra’a Rawah
Speech Acts Lecture 8.
Syntax.
Linguistic Theory Lecture 3 Movement. A brief history of movement Movements as ‘special rules’ proposed to capture facts that phrase structure rules cannot.
Introduction to linguistics II
Pragmatics.
Albert Gatt LIN3021 Formal Semantics Lecture 6. In this lecture We focus on referring expressions How do definite descriptions work? What is the relationship.
Unit 3 Reference and Sense
PRAGMATICS A: I have a fourteen year old son B: Well that's all right
ASPECTS OF LINGUISTIC COMPETENCE 4 SEPT 09, 2013 – DAY 6 Brain & Language LING NSCI Harry Howard Tulane University.
Unit Five Semantics, Study of Meaning
Binding Theory Describing Relationships between Nouns.
Albert Gatt LIN1180 Semantics. In this lecture More on the concept of truth A priori / necessary / analytic Presupposition.
UNIT 7 DEIXIS AND DEFINITENESS
1 LIN 1310B Introduction to Linguistics Prof: Nikolay Slavkov TA: Qinghua Tang CLASS 24, April 3, 2007.
Levels of Language 6 Levels of Language. Levels of Language Aspect of language are often referred to as 'language levels'. To look carefully at language.
Albert Gatt LIN3021 Formal Semantics Lecture 4. In this lecture Compositionality in Natural Langauge revisited: The role of types The typed lambda calculus.
LECTURE 2: SEMANTICS IN LINGUISTICS
Rules, Movement, Ambiguity
SEMANTICS VS PRAGMATICS Semantics is the study of the relationships between linguistic forms and entities in the world; that is how words literally connect.
Unit 4: REFERRING EXPRESSIONS
Presentation about pragmatic concepts Implicatures Presuppositions
Introduction to SEMANTICS
UNIT 2 - IMPLICATURE.
GoBack definitions Level 1 Parts of Speech GoBack is a memorization game; the teacher asks students definitions, and when someone misses one, you go back.
Lecture 2 (Chapter 2) Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics.
What does ‘miscellany’ mean? What kind of ‘miscellany’ does this grammar unit involve?
Hullo Folks! How are you going? Let’s continue our adventure to the World of Language in Use With the Pragmatics Ranger E. Aminudin Aziz.
SEMANTICS Referring Expression.
Yule: “Words themselves do not refer to anything, people refer” Reference and inference Pragmatics: Reference and inference.
Lecture 1 Ling 442.
Lecture 10 (de re/de dicto) Ling 442. Exercises Translate the following into the logical language w/ restricted quantifiers. 1.Every dog that has a bone.
LEXICAL EMPHASIS Profª. Flávia Cunha. LEXICAL EMPHASIS It is achieved by means of special words or phrases. Certain words tend to be emphatic because.
Why languages differ: Variation in the conventionalization of constraints on inference By: Randy J. LaPolla City University of Hong Kong Presented by:
Syntax By WJQ. Syntax : Syntax is the study of the rules governing the way words are combined to form sentences in a language, or simply, the study of.
3/15/2016 Context Dependence (such as it is) Kent Bach Presenters: Zhiqi Gong & Lin Xiao University at Albany.
PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE Some topics and historical issues of the 20 th century.
Semantics Lecture 5. Semantics Language uses a system of linguistic signs, each of which is a combination of meaning and phonological and/or orthographic.
Unit 6 Predicates, Referring Expressions, and Universe of Discourse.
PRAGMATICS. SCHEDULE May 14: Yule ch. 1, 2 and 3 May 16: Yule ch. 4, 5 and 6 May 21: Yule ch. 7, 8 and 9 May 22: Seminar EXAM Thursday; May 31,
SYNTAX.
King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 1 King Faisal University.
Referents and referring expressions Reem Nasser Abdelwahed
Referring Expression unit 4.
COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLE:
Language, Logic, and Meaning
Philosophy of Language Seminar 3: Definite Descriptions (2)
How to Avoid Redundant Object-References
Walaa jehad abu saqer
Presented by M.A. Student Rana Sameer Abdulrahman
Introduction to Semantics
Pragmatics: Reference and inference
ALI JABBER KARAM Presented by :
Presentation on: Referents and referring expressions
Presentation transcript:

LIN1180/LIN5082 Semantics Lecture 3 Albert Gatt

Overview of last lecture We’ve introduced the notions of sense, reference and denotation. Sense = the “conceptual meaning” of an expression denotation = the set of things an expression can be predicated of, by virtue of its sense dog = the set of things in the world which are dogs reference is a speaker’s act Saying “the dog” involves identifying some specific dog so there’s an element of pragmatics Semantics -- LIN 1180

Today’s focus We discuss reference in more detail Specifically, we ask why should reference be viewed as a speaker’s act? We focus on these types of referring expressions: definite reference indefinite reference We then take a look at proper names Semantics -- LIN 1180

Part 1 Definite reference

Definite reference There are many types of definite reference: proper names Jake, Clare... deictic pronouns and determiners: this man, that girl... personal pronouns: he, she... definite descriptions the girl ... All seem to be used to uniquely identify things in the world. We shall focus first on definite descriptions, i.e. common noun phrases with a definite article. Semantics -- LIN 1180

Definite descriptions The man gave it to her. A man gave it to her. What is the difference between (1) and (2)? In (1), the intended referential target is a particular entity. A speaker uses (1) when s/he intends the hearer to be able to uniquely identify the entity. Semantics -- LIN 1180

Is definite reference purely semantic? Bertrand Russell (1905) analysed the meaning of definite descriptions as involving two necessary conditions: existence: a sentence of the form the X VP is true if X exists. uniqueness: a sentence of the form the X VP is true if there is one and only one X. Semantics -- LIN 1180

Problems with Russell (I) How should we analyse a sentence such as: The present king of France is bald. there is no king in France therefore, the subject NP violates the existence condition Does this imply that the sentence is false? (compare: France is a kingdom.) Rather than false, it simply seems to be an unsuccessful communicative act. Semantics -- LIN 1180

Problems with Russell (II) Example dialogue: A: The sculptor in the painting is Velazquez himself. B: It is indeed, but it’s not a sculptor, it’s a painter. Semantics -- LIN 1180

Problems with Russell (II) Sometimes you can refer to something incorrectly, and yet still succeed in identifying the referent for your interlocutor. Semantics -- LIN 1180

The pragmatic view Originates with philosophers such as P.F. Strawson (1950), and John Searle (1969). Argues that reference as such is not about truth-conditional semantics, but about what speakers do. I.e. reference the meaning of referential expressions involves a pragmatic component Semantics -- LIN 1180

Back to our original definition… the intended referential target is a particular entity NB: we are focussing on intention, in line with our view that reference is a speaker’s act it is of course constrained by the sense of what the speaker says the speaker intends the hearer to be able to uniquely identify the entity speaker assumes that the hearer understands the expression also that she understands the speaker’s intention This is essentially Searle’s view. Semantics -- LIN 1180

Some more on Searle’s view Searle (1969) argued that in using a definite description, the speaker also: signals to the hearer that they have enough info to identify the entity, given: the semantic content of what the speaker said the context (situational, linguistic etc) (If necessary, the speaker can supply additional info.) Semantics -- LIN 1180

Part II Indefinite reference

Our motivating example The man gave it to her. A man gave it to her. In (2), the identity of the man in question is not at issue. (Even if the man is known to the speaker and identifiable.) The indefinite description signals that the speaker isn’t interested in exactly who, but only that there was a man involved. Semantics -- LIN 1180

Indefinite expressions Prototypically, these are NPs with an indefinite article (“a”). But also: Come up and see me sometime. Some chappie called the other day. Certain people are just obnoxious. This driver she met was kind of cute. Semantics -- LIN 1180

Specific vs. non-specific To get the door to open, you have to say a word. Has at least 2 readings: …you have to say any word that comes to mind. (non-specific) …you have to say a special word that the speaker may or may not know. (specific) Semantics -- LIN 1180

Definites vs. specific indefinites Like definite NPs, specific indefinites carry the suggestion that the identity of the entity is relevant. …you have to say a word not any word, but a specific word will do the trick However, with a specific indefinite, the speaker is not signalling to the hearer that identification is essential for the communicative act to be successful. Semantics -- LIN 1180

Markers of specificity In English, a certain is often used to mark specific indefinites explicitly: A certain woman is said to have married him in secret. In Maltese, the determiner wieħed/waħda (“one”). Compare: Ġie wieħed raġel. came-3SgM one-MSg man A (certain) man came. wieħed used before the noun marks specificity Ġie raġel wieħed. came-3SgM man one.MSg One man came. wieħed after the noun is a numeral Semantics -- LIN 1180

Grammatical markers of specificity Evidence that specificity is linguistically relevant comes from languages where it is marked grammatically. French: Marie cherche un homme qui peut lui faire l’amour douze fois par jour. = Mary’s looking for a (specific) man who can make love to her a dozen times a day. Marie cherche un homme qui puisse lui faire l’amour douze fois par jour. = Mary’s looking for a (some/any) man who can make love to her a dozen times a day. Semantics -- LIN 1180

Grammatical markers of specificity Turkish signals specificity via the direct object marker on the noun: Bir kelime söyledi. = S/he said a word. (non-specific: s/he said any word) Bir kelimeyi söyledi. (specific: there is a particular word s/he said) Semantics -- LIN 1180

Questions ? Semantics -- LIN 1180