Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies 2008 Capital Budgeting Chapter Twenty

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Explain the strategic role of capital budgeting Describe how accountants can add value to the capital budgeting process Provide a general model for determining relevant cash flows for capital expenditure analysis Apply discounted cash flow (DCF) decision models for capital budgeting purposes Learning Objectives

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Conduct sensitivity analysis as part of the capital budgeting process Discuss and apply other capital budgeting decision models Identify behavioral factors associated with the capital budgeting process (Appendix): Discuss some complexities associated with using DCF decision models Learning Objectives (continued)

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Capital investment decisions: –Involve large amounts of capital outlays –Provide anticipated returns (cash flows) over an extended period of time Linkage of capital investment decisions to the organization’s chosen strategy: –Build strategy –Hold strategy –Harvest strategy Strategic Nature of Capital Budgeting Decisions

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Capital budgeting: –The process of identifying, evaluating, selecting, and controlling capital investments Capital investments: –Long-term investment opportunities involving substantial initial cash outlays followed by a series of future cash returns Capital budget: –Part of the organization’s master budget (Chap. 8) that deals with the current period’s planned capital investment outlays Introductory Definitions

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Discounted cash-flow (DCF) decision models: –Decision models (e. g., NPV and IRR) that explicitly incorporate the time-value-of-money Weighted-average cost of capital (WACC) –Under normal circumstances, the discount factor used in DCF capital budgeting decision models –A weighted average of the cost of obtaining capital from various sources (e.g., equity and debt) Non-discounted cash flow decision models: –Capital budgeting decision models that do not incorporate the time-value-of-money into the analysis of capital investment projects Introductory Definitions (continued)

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Linking capital budgeting to the master budgeting process (planning) Linking capital budgeting decisions to the organization’s Balanced Scorecard (control) Generation of relevant data for investment analysis purposes (decision making) Conducting post-audits (control) How Accounting Can Add Value to the Capital Budgeting Process

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Project initiation: –Required investment outlays, including installation costs –Includes incremental net working capital commitments Project operation: –Cash operating expenses, net of tax –Additional net working capital requirements –Operating cash inflows, net of tax Project disposal: – Net of tax investment disposal – Recapture of investment in net working capital Identifying Relevant Cash Flows for Capital Expenditure Analysis

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Decision Example Smith Company manufactures high-pressure pipe for deep-sea oil drilling. The firm is considering the purchase of a milling machine.

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Project Initiation: Net After-tax Cash Inflow, Disposal of Old Asset Net proceeds = Selling price – Disposal costs – For gain situation: Net cash inflow = Net proceeds – (Gain on disposal x t) – For loss situation: Net cash inflow = Net proceeds + (Loss on disposal x t)

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Smith Company Data: After-tax Cash Inflow, Disposal of Old Asset

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Project Initiation: Acquisition of New Machine

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Project Operation: After-tax Cash Operating Receipts/Savings TransactionEffect on Cash Flow Cash receiptsAmount received × (1 - t) Cash expendituresAmount paid × (1 - t) Depreciated initial costTax shield: Depreciation expense × t Allocated costsNo effect TransactionEffect on Cash Flow Cash receiptsAmount received × (1 - t) Cash expendituresAmount paid × (1 - t) Depreciated initial costTax shield: Depreciation expense × t Allocated costsNo effect The company expects its investment to bring in $1,000,000 in cash revenue from increases in production volume in each of the next four years. Cash operating expenses are expected to be $750,000/year.

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Smith Company: After-tax Cash Operating Receipts/Savings Thus, after-tax cash from operations increases by $194,000/year ($150,000 + $44,000)

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Determining the Annual Depreciation Tax Shield For simplicity, the preceding example calculated depreciation expense using the SL method. In most instances, however, companies use the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery (MACRS) method to determine depreciation expense for tax purposes.

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Smith Company: Project Disposal The company plans to sell the machine at the end of its useful life for $100,000 and incur removal and cleanup costs of $20,000 Return of net working ($200,000) originally invested in year 0 At the end of the project’s life, the company will incur an estimated cost of $150,000 in relocation costs for displaced workers. This amount is fully deductible for tax purposes. The company plans to sell the machine at the end of its useful life for $100,000 and incur removal and cleanup costs of $20,000 Return of net working ($200,000) originally invested in year 0 At the end of the project’s life, the company will incur an estimated cost of $150,000 in relocation costs for displaced workers. This amount is fully deductible for tax purposes.

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Smith Company: Project Disposal (continued)

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Smith Company: Project Disposal (continued)

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Smith Company: Projected Cash Flows--Summary Note--Not discussed previously: $50,000 (pre-tax) training costs estimated for Year 1

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Additional Measurement Issues Inflation? Opportunity costs? Sunk costs? Allocated overhead costs?

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Calculating the Discount Rate (WACC) The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is used in capital budgeting to discount future anticipated cash flows back to present-dollar equivalents Weights can be determined based on the target capital structure for the firm or based on the current market values of the various sources of funds

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Calculating the Discount Rate (WACC) (continued) The after-tax cost of debt = Effective interest rate on debt x (1 – t) Cost of common equity is equal to the expected/required market rate of return on the company’s stock (for listed companies, can be estimated using the CAPM)

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Example: Calculating the Discount Rate (WACC) A firm has a $100,000 bank loan with an effective interest rate of 12%; $500,000, 10%, 20-year mortgage bonds selling at 90% of face’ $200,000, 15%, $20 noncumulative, noncallable preferred stock with a total market value of $300,000; and 10,000 shares of $1 par common stock. The estimated required rate of return on the common stock, based on application of the CAPM, is 20%. The firm is subject to a 40% tax rate. Let’s calculate the weighted average cost of capital... A firm has a $100,000 bank loan with an effective interest rate of 12%; $500,000, 10%, 20-year mortgage bonds selling at 90% of face’ $200,000, 15%, $20 noncumulative, noncallable preferred stock with a total market value of $300,000; and 10,000 shares of $1 par common stock. The estimated required rate of return on the common stock, based on application of the CAPM, is 20%. The firm is subject to a 40% tax rate. Let’s calculate the weighted average cost of capital...

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Example: Calculating the Discount Rate (WACC) (continued) Note: the cost of preferred stock is equal to the current dividend yield on the stock, that is, current dividend per share of preferred stock  current market price per share.

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies NPV Decision Model Discount all future net-of-tax cash inflows to present value using the WACC as the discount rate Discount all future net-of-tax cash outflows to present value using the WACC as the discount rate If NPV > 0, accept the project (that is, the project adds to the value of the company) If NPV < 0, reject the project (that is, the project does not add value to the company)

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies NPV: Smith Company 10.0%) (1 + 10%) -1

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Internal Rate of Return (IRR) Model IRR represents an estimate of the “true” (i.e., “economic”) rate of return on a proposed investment project IRR is calculated as the rate of return that produces a NPV of zero If IRR > WACC, then the proposed project should be accepted (i.e., its anticipated rate of return > the cost of invested capital for the firm) If IRR < WACC, the proposed project should be rejected (i.e., its NPV will be < 0)

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Estimating the IRR of a Project General Solution: – Use built-in function in Excel When Future Cash Inflows are Uniform: – Use annuity table to identify, in the row corresponding to the life of the project, an amount = initial investment outlay  annual net-of-tax cash inflow When Future Cash Inflows are Uneven: – Use a “trial-and-error” approach (with interpolation)

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Sensitivity Analysis NPV and IRR models provide an investment recommendation—accept or reject a given project Sensitivity analysis refers to the sensitivity of the recommendation to estimated values for the variables in the decision model – “What-if” analysis – Scenario analysis – Monte Carlo simulation analysis

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies “What-if” Analysis Involves changing one variable (e.g., the discount rate) at a time; as part of this form of sensitivity analysis we might consider the: – Most optimistic case – Most pessimistic case – Break-even after-tax cash flow amount (use “Goal Seek” option in Excel)

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Other Capital Budgeting Decision Models: Payback Period Payback period = length of time (in years) needed to recover original net investment outlay When after-tax cash inflows are expected to be equal, the payback period is determined as: Total initial investment/Annual after-tax cash inflows

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Investment Decision Example A four-year project requires an initial investment of $555,000 in Year 0. The project is expected to produce $900,000 in cash revenues and require $660,000 in cash expenses each year. No additional working capital is required and the investment will have a salvage value of $60,000. At the end of the fourth year management expects to sell the investment for $200,000. Expected relocation costs are $240,000 and the company is subject to a 40% tax rate.

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Decision Example (continued)

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Investment Decision Example: Payback Calculation Payback Period = Total Original Investment Annual Net After-Tax Cash Inflow Payback Period = Payback Period = 2.87 years $555,000 $193,500

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Strengths of the Payback Decision Model Easy to compute Businesspeople have an intuitive understanding of “payback” periods Payback period can serve as a rough measure of risk—the longer the payback period, the higher the perceived risk

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Weaknesses of the Payback Decision Model The model fails to consider returns over the entire life of the investment In its unadjusted state, the model ignores the time value of money The decision rule for accepting/rejecting projects is ill-defined (ambiguous) Use of this model may encourage excessive investment in short-lived projects

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Present Value Payback Model Present value payback = the amount of time, in years, for the time-adjusted (i.e., discounted) future cash inflows to cover the original investment outlay Note: if the discounted payback period is less that the life of the project, then the project must have a positive NPV

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Present Value Payback Model (continued) Strength: – Takes into consideration the time value of money Weaknesses: – Can motivate excessive short-term investments – Returns beyond the payback period are ignored – Decision rule for project acceptance is ambiguous/subjective

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Example: Calculating the Present Value Payback Period Present Value Payback Period = 3 years + ($73,794 ÷ $132,163) = 3.56 years

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Accounting Rate of Return (ARR) ARR = Average annual accounting income  Average investment

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Example: Calculating ARR Accounting Rate of Return = $69,750 $307,500 = 22.68%

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Evaluation of ARR Decision Model Advantages: – Readily available data – Consistency between data for capital budgeting purposes and data for subsequent performance evaluation Disadvantages: – No adjustment for the time value of money (undiscounted data are used) – Decision rule for project acceptance is not well defined – The ARR measure relies on accounting numbers, not cash flows (which is what the market values)

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Behavioral Issues Cost escalation (escalating commitment)--decision makers may consider past costs or losses as relevant Incrementalism (the practice of choosing multiple, small investments) Uncertainty Intolerance (risk-averse managers may require excessively short payback periods) Goal congruence (i.e., the need to align DCF decision models with models used to subsequent financial performance)

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Appendix: DCF Models—Some Advanced Considerations In “go/no-go” situations for independent projects, the NPV and IRR methods generally lead to the same decision; however, there are some pitfalls in using the IRR method – The potential for multiple IRRs – Mutually exclusive projects – Capital rationing

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Appendix: DCF Models—Some Advanced Considerations (continued) Except for the capital rationing issue, the general rule is to base capital budget decision-making on project NPVs, not IRRs. Under capital rationing, the indicated approach is to make capital budgeting decisions on the basis of the “profitability index (PI)” associated with each proposed project: PI = NPV/Initial capital investment

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Chapter Summary We explained the nature of capital budgeting decisions and the strategic role of capital budgeting for organizational success We described out accountants can add value to the capital budgeting process: – Linking capital budgets to the master budget for the organization – Linking capital budgeting decisions to overall strategy, e.g., to the organization’s Balanced Scorecard (BSC) – Providing decision-makers with relevant data for capital budgeting decision models

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Chapter Summary (continued) We developed a general model for determining relevant cash flows for each stage of a project’s life: – Project initiation – Project operation – Project disposal We defined and learned how to apply the following two DCF capital budgeting decision models: – NPV – IRR

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Chapter Summary (continued) We discussed, applied, and learned the advantages and disadvantages of the following “other” capital budgeting decision models: – Non-DCF Models: Payback period Accounting (Book) rate of return (ARR) – Additional DCF model: Present value payback period

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Chapter Summary (continued) We discussed the need for, and methods that can be used to perform, “sensitivity analysis” in terms of capital budgeting decisions: – “What-if” analysis – Scenario analysis – Monte Carlo simulation analysis We identified several important behavioral factors associated with the capital budgeting process

Blocher,Stout,Cokins,Chen, Cost Management 4e ©The McGraw-Hill Companies Chapter Summary (continued) Finally, in the Appendix we dealt with the following complexities associated with the use of DCF capital budgeting decision models: – The case of multiple IRRs – The case of mutually exclusive projects – The case of capital rationing Except for the capital rationing situation, the indicated solution is to base capital budgeting decisions on project NPVs