NY BOCES 8/2002 1 Changes in NCLB That Will Require Either Action By School System Leaders or New School Board Policy Peg Portscheller CASE Fall, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delaware Statewide Title I Conference 1 School Improvement – The Ever-Changing Landscape – Part I June 29, 2010 Bill McGrady U. S. Department of Education.
Advertisements

Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
No Child Left Behind The New Age: No Child Left Behind.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
EDU 221.  Group Presentation Reflections due for 7 & 8  Quiz #2 (Tuesday, Nov. 16 th ) – Problem- based ◦ What makes an outstanding response? Referring.
Rules and Regulations.  Requirements (Title I and Title III)  Notices  Timeline  Schools on Improvement  Use of Funds.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Information Session Juliane Dow, Associate Commissioner Accountability & Targeted Assistance Massachusetts Department of.
Parents’ Right to Know Their Child’s and School’s Achievement.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County May 2011.
The Special Education Leadership Training Project January, 2003 Mary Lynn Boscardin, Ph.D. Associate Professor Preston C. Green, III, Ed.D., J.D., Associate.
The Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test Michele Hunter Supervisor of Curriculum and Instruction Mobile County Public Schools.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Title I Annual Meeting Presented by: SCHOOL NAME HERE.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities Presentation for OSEP Staff March 20, 2003 Stephanie Lee Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
The New Age: No Child Left Behind (NCLB) By Don Bertucci, Chaffey Unified School District ROP.
The Basics of Title I Florida Public School Choice Consortium's Annual Conference (FPSCC) Anke Toth November 18, 2009.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
Title I School Improvement Committee of Practitioners Bridgeport Conference Center June 9, 2008.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
May 25,  MSP scores are compared against a uniform bar.  The MSP scores compared against the uniform bar are not representative of individual.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Standards The Achievement Gap The Debate Continues.
Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.
SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.
Title I Faculty Presentation (Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation) 1 Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Testing & Accountability Update TAKS, EOC, & STAAR.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
WISCONSIN STATEWIDE TITLE I NETWORK CESA #2 AND THE WISCONSIN DPI Title I “Quick Start” Title I Quick-Start.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind  NCLB Overview  Assessment and Accountability Requirements  Educator Quality.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
From the Board Room To the Classroom PDK Panel Discussion September 19, 2002.
GUIDANCE ON SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT Region VII Comprehensive Center The University of Oklahoma 555 Constitution Street Norman, OK David.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents Highland Renaissance Academy.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
The Every Student Succeeds Act Highlights of Key Changes for States, Districts, and Schools.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
6/14/2016 “A Horse of a Different Color” No Child Left Behind and Accountability The State Testing Program Louisiana.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Implementation of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Highly Qualified Teacher & Paraprofessional Requirements December 2010.
Build Your Own ESSA Explainer
No Child Left Behind.
PHILLIPS PREPARATORY SCHOOL
Campus Improvement Planning
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

NY BOCES 8/ Changes in NCLB That Will Require Either Action By School System Leaders or New School Board Policy Peg Portscheller CASE Fall, 2002

NY BOCES 8/ School System Leaders Guide to Major NCLB Changes 1.Requires a single state wide accountability system based on federal specifications. 2.Requires specific Adequate Yearly Progress targets for every single public school and school district & new Penalties for schools and school districts that fail to hit AYP targets.

NY BOCES 8/ School System Leaders Guide to Major ESEA Changes 3. Requires hiring only “highly qualified” teachers in Title I schools starting and then in all schools by Requires all paraprofessionals in Title I schools starting January 8, 2002 be “highly qualified” with more limited duties. 5. Requires State and Local Report Cards, and specifies the minimum contents.

NY BOCES 8/ School System Leaders Guide to Major ESEA Changes 6. Requires use of instruction methods, curriculum and materials and staff development that are backed by “scientifically based research.” 7. Permits new flexibility for local use of funds. 8. Increases the percent of Title I funds allocated to larger, higher poverty school districts.

NY BOCES 8/ Accountability Requirements: What Is New? The State must within two years (possible 1 year waiver): Establish standards (or review and revise existing standards) for reading and math, Develop or select tests for grades 3-8 in reading and math and one test for high school, Set cut scores for basic, proficient and advanced, Set the number of years LEAs have to move 100% of students to proficiency, Choose method for setting adequate yearly progress, and Pick at least one other accountability factor beyond tests--for high school it must be drop out rate. Starting test every student three times in science (grades 3-5, 6-9, and 10-12).

NY BOCES 8/ Accountability Requirements: What Is New? Assessments must be aligned with state standards. Assessments must be “valid and reliable”. Assessments must provide diagnostic information for teachers and administrators to improve test scores. Results must be disaggregated by race/ethnicity, poverty status, disability, English proficiency, migrant status, and gender. Off the shelf Norm Referenced or home grown Criterion Referenced???? NCLB regulations are tilted toward home grown CRT’s because the test MUST be aligned to state standards– I have heard that ED officials do not believe this is possible for off-the-shelf NRT’s!

NY BOCES 8/ Accountability Requirements: What Is New? Local assessments can be used IF: States assure that the tests are valid and reliable for all subgroups. HOWEVER, if a state uses only local assessments--the results apply only to Title I schools –This area is to be settled right now, it seems that only Nebraska and Iowa could be involved with this decision.

NY BOCES 8/ Accountability Requirements: New Practices for LEA’s Starting in school year school districts and schools must: Disaggregate test results by: race, gender, language, income level, and disability. Test at least 95% of the students in each subgroup. No out of level testing (6 th grader cannot take a 3 rd grade test). Accommodations for disabled can include using different tests, but the results must permit comparisons. Work with the fact that the score of lowest scoring subgroup will be the score for each school and the whole school district.

NY BOCES 8/ My Recommendations on Accountability—Not AASA’s Work with your state department of education through your associations to: Establish a rich inclusive open environment for state decisions on accountability; Go for depth in standards not breadth. Recognize that schools cannot possibly teach everything in a discipline, and that there is essential information in each discipline that students must master before advanced knowledge is possible; Cooperatively develop or purchase state tests built on state standards, and on the standards of the Commission on Instructionally Supportive Assessment (see Set the cut scores for proficiency at a reasonable level so teachers and students have a fighting chance to build on success not staunch failure; and Establish early return of scores and maximum item analysis as standard operating procedures.

NY BOCES 8/ Adequate Yearly Progress What Is New? Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is the new measure of quality for ALL public schools and school districts. Previous accountability applied only to Title I schools, now school districts can be subject to penalties. Based Primarily on state assessments. Move 100% of students to Proficiency in reading, math and science within 12 years. Proficiency is determined by the state—a cut score on the state test. NCLB only requires penalties for schools and school districts receiving Title I funds.

NY BOCES 8/ Adequate Yearly Progress What Is New? Succeeding on AYP means: That the percent of students scoring at or above the cut score for proficiency grew by the required amount. Said conversely, not a single cell falls below the minimum percentage set for AYP growth, and 95% of students were tested in each cell (or has an n below the minimum). Considerations: Every secondary factor adds nine cells and nine opportunities to fail. Every new disaggregated group adds five cells and five opportunities to fail.

NY BOCES 8/ Minimum 45 Cell AYP Matrix for Schools and School Districts To be resolved in each state: (Smallest n = 30 or 20 or ?) English Math 2nd factorScience % All Students Black Hispanic Native American Asian White LEP Poverty IEP

NY BOCES 8/ NCLB Requirements for Test Use and Reports Must Disaggregate and Report for 11 Subgroups: Gender Poverty Migrant Status LEP IEP Race and Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian Native American Must Meet AYP for 9 groups: All Students IEP LEP Poverty Race/Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian Native American

NY BOCES 8/ Adequate Yearly Progress What Is New? Succeeding on AYP means: Not a single cell falls below the minimum set for AYP growth, and 95% of students were tested in each cell (or has an n below the minimum). Every secondary factor adds nine cells and nine opportunities to fail. Statistically every new opportunity to fail will result in additional failures.

NY BOCES 8/ Penalties for Schools Failing to Make Adequate Yearly Progress State Oversight Required Penalties for failure to hit AYP are more extensive. However NCLB penalties apply only to Title I schools either targeted assistance or school wide. Year one of failure to hit AYP targets: Unspecified

NY BOCES 8/ Penalties for Schools Failing to Make Adequate Yearly Progress Penalties 2 nd year of failure to hit AYP: Within 3 months develop a 2-year plan for improvement that is scientifically based. District must direct school to spend at least 5% percent of the Title I allocation on professional development. District must provide peer review within 45 days. District must offer students choice to go to “another” school in the district with free transportation—up to 10% of Title I allocation, district pays the remainder. Limitations on choice for: –Capacity –Boundaries –Interdistrict

NY BOCES 8/ Penalties: Public School Choice States must make the rules For every school identified for school improvement, the school district must, not later than the first day of the next school year, provide all students enrolled in the school with the option to transfer to another public school served by the local educational agency, which may include a public charter school, that has not been identified for school improvement, unless such an option is prohibited by state law. Priority must be given to the lowest achieving children from low-income families, as determined by the school district.

NY BOCES 8/ Penalties for Schools Failing to Make Adequate Yearly Progress Penalties 3 rd year of year of failure to hit AYP: Continue implementing plan. Continue school choice. District must offer supplemental services for low income children up to 5% of Title I allocation. –State develops the list of qualified providers, –Districts must notify parents at least annually, –Districts must help parents find service providers, –Providers contract with district, and –Districts must monitor and evaluate.

NY BOCES 8/ Penalties for Schools Failing to Make Adequate Yearly Progress Penalties 4 th year of year of failure to hit AYP: District must continue school choice, District must continue supplemental services to low income students, and District must take corrective action.

NY BOCES 8/ Corrective Actions: The school district must chose at least one. Replace the school staff who are relevant to the failure to make AYP. Institute and fully implement a new curriculum, providing appropriate professional development. Significantly decrease management authority at the school. Appoint an outside expert to advise the school based on its plan. Extend the school year or day. Restructure the internal organization of the school.

NY BOCES 8/ Penalties for Schools Failing to Make Adequate Yearly Progress Penalties 5 th year of year of failure to hit AYP: District must continue school choice, District must continue supplemental services to low income students, and District must take more drastic restructuring action. Beyond 5th year penalties unspecified but both school districts and states can take more drastic action.

NY BOCES 8/ Continued Failure: The District Must Choose at Least One Reopen the school as a public charter school. Replace all or most of the school staff (which may include the principal) who are relevant to the failure to make adequate yearly progress. Enter into a contract with an entity, such as a private management company, with a demonstrated record of effectiveness, to operate the public school. Turn the operation of the school over to the State educational agency, if permitted under State law and agreed to by the State. Choose any other major restructuring of the school's governance arrangement that makes fundamental reforms. In the case of a rural local educational agency with a total of less than 600 students in average daily attendance (all of whose schools have a School Locale Code of 7 or 8) the Secretary shall, at such agency's request, provide technical assistance to such agency for the purpose of implementing this clause.

NY BOCES 8/ My Recommendations to Avoid Penalties– Not CASE’s Focus your efforts and Title I funds in sufficient quantities to give teachers and principals a fighting chance to succeed. Avoid spreading Title I funds too thinly. Put good experienced teachers in schools with high need students. Use every incentive possible to get good teachers in hard to staff schools. Use proven interventions in instruction, curriculum, materials and staff development. There are many claims but few have a basis in science.

NY BOCES 8/ School District AYP School districts must make AYP in all cells of the AYP matrix !! Where students are not tested and the “n” in a cell is too small to report the school district must aggregate and report scores. Thus, a school may duck by not testing but then the whole district may be thrown into improvement or corrective action. There is a huge incentive to test all kids and report scores because it is better to have a school in improvement or corrective action than the whole district.

NY BOCES 8/ What Happens To School Districts That Fail to Make AYP? Deferring programmatic funds or reducing administrative funds. Instituting and fully implementing a new curriculum that is based on state and local academic content and achievement standards. Replacing the local educational agency personnel who are relevant to the failure. Removing particular schools from the jurisdiction of the local educational agency and establishing alternative arrangements for public governance and supervision of such schools. The State educational agency shall take at least one of the following corrective actions:

NY BOCES 8/ What Happens To School Districts That Fail to Make AYP? Appoint a receiver or trustee in place of the superintendent and school board. Abolish or restructure the local educational agency. Authorize students to transfer to a higher – performing public school operated by another school district and providing transportation (or the costs of transportation) to such schools. Continued

NY BOCES 8/ Teacher Qualifications: What Is New? Highly qualified means: Has at least a bachelors degree. Has an academic major in the subject (s) they are teaching or an elementary education degree for elementary teachers. A full certificate from the state in the subject (s) they teach or an elementary certificate for elementary teachers. Demonstrated competence through rigorous examination or performance in the subject (s) they teach. By the end of the school year every teacher must be highly qualified. Highly Qualified New Title I Teachers Starting

NY BOCES 8/ Paraprofessional Qualifications: What Is New? New paraprofessionals In Title I Schools must be highly qualified by Jan 8, All Title I paraprofessionals must be highly qualified within 4 years. ED is now using a “liberal” definition -- 4/28 letter Only Title I paraprofessionals with “instructional duties”, In school wide programs, only instructional paraprofessionals, and All Title I aides regardless of duties must be high school graduates. Highly qualified means: An AA degree, or Two years of college, or Passed a rigorous test demonstrating knowledge equivalent to two years of college.

NY BOCES 8/2002 Source: No State Left Behind: The Challenges & Opportunities of ESEA 2001, 3/2002, ECS 29 State and Local Report Cards: What is New? Aggregated achievement information. Disaggregated achievement information by subgroups. Percentage of students not tested, disaggregated. Most recent two-year trend data in achievement. Aggregated information on state indicators used to determine adequate yearly progress (AYP). Information about performance of districts making AYP. At a minimum, State & Local report cards are to include:

NY BOCES 8/2002 Source: No State Left Behind: The Challenges & Opportunities of ESEA 2001, 3/2002, ECS 30 State and Local Report Cards: What is New? The percentage of teachers with emergency or provisional credentials. The percentage of classes in the state not taught by “highly qualified” teachers. An explanation of what the school is doing to address low achievement. Reporting on teacher qualifications :

NY BOCES 8/2002 Source: No State Left Behind: The Challenges & Opportunities of ESEA 2001, 3/2002, ECS 31 Parental Notifications New State Requirements? Whether the teacher has met state qualification and licensing criteria for the grade levels and subject areas taught. Whether the teacher is teaching under emergency or other provisional status. The baccalaureate degree of the teacher and any other graduate certification or degree. States must provide guidance for parental notifications that meet the requirements of NCLB. School districts must notify parents of children attending Title I schools that they may request information about the professional qualifications of classroom teachers, including, at a minimum:

NY BOCES 8/ Parental Notifications What is New? A local educational agency shall promptly provide to parents (in an understandable and uniform format and, to the extent practicable, in a language the parents can understand) of each student enrolled in a school identified for school improvement, corrective action, or restructuring; An explanation of what the identification means, how the school compares in terms of academic achievement to other schools in the district and State; and the reasons for the identification.

NY BOCES 8/ Parental Notifications for Low Performing Schools: What is New? Parental notifications must contain an explanation of: What the school district or state department is doing to help the school; how the parents can become involved in addressing the academic issues; and the parents' option to transfer their child to another public school (with transportation provided by the LEA) or to obtain supplemental educational services for their child.

NY BOCES 8/ New Requirements Re: Teaching, Curriculum, Materials and Professional Development. Instructional methods, curriculum and materials and professional development must be based on scientific research. All Title I schools must allocate between 5 and 10% of their allocation to scientifically based professional development. In low performing schools at least 10% of Title I grant must be spent on professional development.

NY BOCES 8/2002 Source: No State Left Behind: The Challenges & Opportunities of ESEA 2001, 3/2002, ECS 35 Local Flexibility: What Is New? Teacher quality state grants, Educational technology, Innovative programs, Safe and drug-free schools, and 21 st Century Community Learning Centers. Funds may not be taken out of Title I, Part A, but can be put into Title I Part A. LEA may transfer up to 50% of the funds it receives among the following programs:

NY BOCES 8/2002 Source: No State Left Behind: The Challenges & Opportunities of ESEA 2001, 3/2002, ECS 36 Local Flexibility: What Is New? A district identified as in need of improvement under Title I may transfer up to 30% of its allocation among the following programs: teacher quality state grants, educational technology state grants, innovative programs, and safe and drug-free schools. The district, however, must transfer the funds to either supplement its school improvement allocation or carry out Title I district improvement activities.

NY BOCES 8/ FOR COPIES OF THIS PRESENTATION: You must have PowerPoint for or we can mail you a black & white hard copy