Mark Anstrom Structural option MAE/BAE AE Senior Thesis presentation Strathmore Park at Grosvenor Metro North Bethesda, MD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
8621 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, MD
Advertisements

ASHA National Office Building 2011 AE Senior Thesis Ryan Dalrymple 5 th year Structural Option BAE/MAE Advisor: Dr. Thomas Boothby Photo Courtesy of Boggs.
The Optimus Signature Boutique Offices, India AE Senior Thesis 2013 Punit G. Das | Structural Option Faculty Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan.
Riverview Heights Darren K. Howard Structural Option Architectural Engineering Spring Thesis 2005 Advisor: Dr. Ali Memari.
Fraser Centre State College, PA Tyler Strange Structural Option Consultant: Dr. Thomas Boothby April 13, 2011 Tyler StrangeStructural Option Fraser Centre.
Carl Hubben – Structural Option Ae senior thesis Office Building-G EASTERN UNITED STATES.
Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural.
A Medical Office Building For The Primary Health Network Daniel Goff I Structural Option Dr. Thomas Boothby l Faculty Advisor Sharon, Pennsylvania Source:
Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children’s Hospital Hershey, Pennsylvania Matthew Vandersall Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Dr. Richard Behr.
Feasibility and Consequences in Staggered Truss Construction
Daniel Bellay Lancaster County Bible Church Structural Option Lancaster County Bible Church.
Frank Burke Structural Option Sallie Mae HQ Reston, VA.
Structural Focus 2007 Senior Thesis Capstone Project Advisor: Prof. Kevin Parfitt University of Rochester Biomedical Engineering / Optics Building River.
Hershey Academic Support Center Structural Option Shawn Jones Building Analysis of the Hershey Academic Support Center Hershey, PA Shawn Jones Structural.
Courtesy of Holbert Apple Associates Georgia Avenue Building Introduction Statistics Gravity System Lateral System Problem Statement & Solution.
LOCKWOOD PLACE BALTIMORE, MARYLAND Monica Steckroth- Structural Option.
360 State Street New Haven  CT  Structural | Sabrina Duk | T. Boothby.
George Read Hall The University of Delaware
Rockville Metro Plaza II Rockville Pike John Vais | Structural Option PSU AE Senior Thesis 2014 Faculty Advisor – Dr. Hanagan Rockville, Maryland
Hershey Research Park Building One Jonathan Krepps Structural Option Senior Thesis 2013 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
Senior Thesis Structural Option Ryan Friis Spring Morgan St. Chicago, IL 111 Morgan St. Chicago, IL Ryan Friis Structural Option.
Introduction Connected to existing Benton Hall via skywalk Size: 103,154 SF above grade on 4 levels 82,661 SF below grade parking on 3 levels Cost: $23,651,159.
GARY NEWMAN STRUCTURES OPTION ADVISOR: DR. HANAGAN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION SPRING 2008.
Southeast View of IRMC West View of IRMC. Presentation Outline Introduction Existing Structure Thesis Goals Structural Depth Lighting Breadth Conclusion.
Mark Anstrom Structural option MAE/BAE AE Senior Thesis presentation Strathmore Park at Grosvenor Metro North Bethesda, MD.
BRYAN DARRIN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION MILLENNIUM HALL DREXEL CAMPUS PHILADELPHIA, PA.
Structural System Redesign Existing Conditions Proposal Gravity Design Lateral Design Cost Comparison Schedule Impact Conclusions.
Final Thesis Presentation Washingtonian Center Lee ResslerApril 15, 2008 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Memari.
The Odyssey Condominium Aaron Snyder Arlington, Virginia
SEAN BEVILLE STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: PROF. BOOTHBY APRIL 13, 2009 TEMECULA MEDICAL CENTER “STRUCTURAL SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION” THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL.
Lancaster, PA Courtyard by Marriott Danielle Shetler - Structural Option Senior Thesis - Spring 2005.
Gateway Plaza Wilmington, DE Elizabeth Hostutler Structural Option.
300 North La Salle Liam McNamara BAE / MAE Senior Thesis April 13 th, 2010.
Mathew Nirenberg AE Senior Thesis Structural Option.
URS – ARENA DISTRICT OFFICE BUILDING DAVID LEE STRUCTURAL OPTION.
Lexington II at Market Square North, Washington D.C. Alexis Pacella – Structural Option.
Third Avenue NY, New York Michelle L. Mentzer Structural Option.
Mountain Hotel Urban Virginia Senior Thesis 2013 Faculty Advisor: Professor Kevin Parfitt Benjamin Borden Structural Option.
Howard County General Hospital Patient Tower Addition Columbia, MD Kelly M. Dooley Penn State Architectural Engineering Structural Option.
Whiteland Village Mary Longenecker Structural Option Senior Thesis August 7, 2007.
Nicholas Reed Structural Option Seneca Allegany Casino Hotel Addition AE Senior Thesis 2013 Courtesy of Jim Boje, PE.
Welcome to Daniel Painter’s Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis Presentation of Two Freedom Square April 16, 2003 Pennsylvania State University.
Senior Thesis 2006 The Pennsylvania State University
Jonathan Goodroad Structural Option 2005 Thesis Penn State AE Delaware State University Administration and Student Services Building.
T IMOTHY H P ARK – S TRUCTURAL O PTION. Building Summary Current Systems Proposal Description Gravity Lateral Other Structural Factors Breadth Options.
Andrew Diehl The Pennsylvania State University Architectural Engineering Department Structural Option 5 th Year Senior Thesis Project “The Comparison of.
Brad Oliver – Structural Option Advisor – Professor Memari.
Oklahoma University Children’s Medical Office Building Oklahoma City, Oklahoma AE Senior Thesis Final Report April 14, 2014 Jonathan Ebersole Structural.
Fordham Place Bronx, NY Aric Heffelfinger Structural Option Spring 2006.
Justin Purcell Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions 151 First Side Pittsburgh, PA.
Computer Associates International, Regional Office
Park Potomac Office Building “E” Kyle Wagner l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring 2010 Faculty Consultant l Prof. Kevin Parfitt.
Discovery Communications Headquarters Silver Springs, MD Josh Woolcock Structural Option Architectural Engineering Pennsylvania State University.
Eastern USA University Academic Center Alexander AltemoseIStructural Option.
James C. Renick School of Education PSU AE Senior Thesis 2006 Mick Leso - Structural North Carolina A&T State University - Greensboro.
Chagrin Highlands Building One Beechwood, Ohio Branden J. Ellenberger - Structural Option Senior Thesis 2004.
THE NORTHBROOK CORPORATE CENTER Redesign of the Lateral Load Resisting System.
Hunter Woron Spring 2012 Structural Professor Parfitt.
Pearl Condominiums Philadelphia, PA
CONDOMINIUM TOWER & PARKING
Agricultural Hall and Annex Easting Lansing, MI
Introduction James W. & Frances G. McGlothlin Medical Education Center
Ryan Johnson - Structural Option
Acterna Headquarters John M Sekel Germantown, Maryland
TOWERS CRESCENT BUILDING B Mike Synnott Structural.
Rutgers University Law School Building Addition and Renovation Nathan E. Reynolds Advisor: M. Kevin Parfitt Structural Option The Pennsylvania State.
North Shore at Canton The Pennsylvania State University
Mitre III Building McLean VA Debra Schroeder Structural Option.
RiverView Condominiums II Chicago, IL
Presentation transcript:

Mark Anstrom Structural option MAE/BAE AE Senior Thesis presentation Strathmore Park at Grosvenor Metro North Bethesda, MD

Strathmore Park at Grosvenor Metro

Project Overview  Located in North Bethesda, MD. A Washington, D.C. suburb.  3 identical buildings – same design structurally  4 identical floors of luxury condominiums over a 1 story parking garage  2 hydraulic elevators  2 stair towers  Individual HVAC units per Condo  High end finishes, fixtures and appliances  Very spacious 2-3 bedroom units  Building has sprinkler system

Strathmore Park at Grosvenor Metro

Current Construction  Completed December, 2002  10” CIP concrete flat slab f’ c = 4 ksi  Punching shear reinforcement provided by steel studrails  Lateral forces resisted by centrally located shearwalls

Thesis Proposal  Redesign Strathmore Park using:  Wood construction  Steel construction  Why? – Many reasons, these were the most viable systems for the layout  Compare and contrast the three systems  What are the advantages and disadvantages?

Considerations  Maintain same architectural appearance as original design (such as ceiling height)  Preserve acoustical quality  Check trusses for vibration  Ensure proper fire ratings  Check ponding on flat roof

Presentation preview  Wood design summary  Steel design summary  Breadth – fire, acoustics, vibration, cost  Comparison – wood, steel, and concrete  Conclusion

Wood Design 16” Wood trusses with dimension lumber bearing walls

The design

The design floor system  16” deep single 2x4 top and bottom chord plate-connected floor trusses  Based on deflection, moment of inertia and span  Simple span condition throughout building  Topped with 23/32” T&G structural panels and ¾” cementitious topping (UL # L521)  12” transfer slab at first floor (From ADOSS)

The design bearing wall system  2x4 SPF #2 dimensional lumber  Designed for combined axial and wind load  Double top plate per code  Spacing ranges from (1) 24” o.c to studs at 12” o.c. doubled under trusses.

The design beams, headers, and columns  Built-up SPF #2 dimensional lumber members. (2)2x6 to (2)2x12  Structural composite lumber members used where required. 1.9E microllam (2)1 ¾” x 9 ½” LVL to (2)1 ¾ x 14” LVL  Columns are built-up 2x4s, worst case (6) studs

The design Lateral system  Bearing walls sheathed in Structural Panels or Gyp Board for lateral resistance  Wind loads distributed to walls by tributary area  Unit separation walls and corridor walls act as shear walls  Overturning not an issue

Architectural modifications  Columns can be eliminated  Floor depth increases to ~18”, but…  Dropped ceilings for MEP can be eliminated  Wall thickness changes (unnoticeable)

Advantages  Wood is less expensive  ~$109/sf vs. ~$165/sf total costs  Wood construction is faster  The design doesn’t require a great deal of skilled labor  No intrusive concrete or steel columns  No ceiling drops – plenum  No formwork – No stripping  Shorter lead time for trusses than steel

Disadvantages  Because these are high end condos, the owner chose concrete over this option because of the durability of concrete over wood  Direct relationship between architectural form and structural form  Transfer slab required at garage level

Composite steel Design w-shape Steel beams, girders and columns

The design

The design Floor system  Topping slab – 5” thick 4000 psi concrete slab on 1 ½” B- lok composite metal deck  ¾”x 4 ½” shear studs  50 ksi W-Shape beams, girders and columns  Beam and girder Sizes range from W8 to W16  Column sizes W8 or W10 in some cases

The design Lateral system  8” thick 4000 psi concrete shear walls reinforced with #4 o.c. each face, each way  No drift problems (< H/400)  Accidental eccentricity of 5% x width Stairwell elevator

The design Connections  Single angle welded-bolted or bolted-bolted connection  A36 steel L4x4x3/8 with (2) A325N bolts

The design Connections  Beam connected to concrete shearwalls using steel plate embed w/ anchor bolts  Uses same connection as beam – girder connection  Slab connected to shearwalls with #4 12” o.c.

Architectural modifications  16 columns eliminated  Floor depth Increases to ~22”, but…  Most dropped ceilings for MEP eliminated  Smaller columns

Advantages  Less columns = less steel  Drops are not always needed for MEP  No formwork – no stripping  Lighter – less base shear

Disadvantages  No money saved  Long lead time for steel shapes  Welding shear studs  pre-composite deflection  Must fireproof steel  Vibration must be addressed

Breadth study fire protection, acoustics, vibration, estimating

Breadth fire ratings BOCA Type 5A construction: 1hr for floors, unit sep. walls 2 hr for exits, garage slab Wood Design  Unit separation wall – UL#U301 1 hr  Floor assembly – UL#L521 1 hr Steel Design  Unit separation wall – UL#U420 1 hr  Floor assembly – UL#D902 1 hr

Breadth acoustics FHA: STC > 50, IIC > 52 Wood Design  Unit separation wall – STC 56  Floor assembly – STC 52, IIC 52 (72 at carpet) Steel Design  Unit Separation Wall – STC 56  Floor Assembly – STC 50, IIC 53

Breadth vibration Wood Design  Floor Truss frequency >15 Hz optimal  Actual worst case Frequency 14Hz Steel Design  According to Design Guide 11:  floor acceleration < 0.5%xG  Actual floor acceleration = 0.288%xG

Cost estimate Concrete  Actual cost including Land, Development, and construction - $33.8M  =$165/sf Steel  Using R.S. Means sq. ft est. for construction and including land and development  =$170/sf Wood  Using estimate from owner and including land and development  =$109/sf (These are estimates)

A Comparison Concrete, wood, and steel

concrete Advantages & disadvantages Pros  Durability and Strength  Inherent Fire Protection, Vibration control, Sound Transmission control Cons  No Plenum for MEP  Cost > Wood  Columns are necessary

Wood Advantages & disadvantages Pros  Least Expensive of the three  No columns necessary  Less lead time than steel  Plenum – No drops Cons  Transfer Slab necessary  Lacks permanence of Concrete, Steel  Close Architectural and Structural relationship

Steel Advantages & disadvantages Pros  Durability and strength  Fewer columns than concrete  Plenum space  Lighter – less base shear  not critical here Cons  No money saved  Long lead time for steel shapes  shear studs Welding  steel Must fireproofed

Conclusion Lessons learned

Is there a best option? After weighing all of the designs… Concrete is the best option Why?  Its advantages outweigh its disadvantages  It is traditional for this type of project  It is common for the area  Cost is not much of an issue  Durability is a greater requirement

a larger view This study only applies to a single project, but it shows that:  There is a multitude of different criteria for different projects  There is a very close relationship between architectural development and structural scheme  The least expensive design is not always the best

Wrap up Acknowledgements

Design team  Owner – Eakin Youngentob Associates, Inc.  General Contractor – Clark Construction  Architect – Torti Gallas and Partners CHK, Inc.  Structural Engineer – Cates Engineering, Ltd.  MEP Engineer – Schwartz Engineering, Inc.  Civil Engineer – Loiderman Associates, Inc.  Landscape Architect – Parker Rodriguez

Thank you Mike Stansbury, P.E. Dr. Boothby Dr. Hanagan Dr. Ling Any Questions?

The design

The design roof system  32” deep 2x6 single top and bottom chord metal plate- connected floor trusses  Based on deflection, moment of inertia, and span  Simple span condition throughout building  Rigid insulation on roof sloped to drain to avoid ponding  Bottom chord bearing

The design