Powering the main linac implications Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet 01.06.2010 OUTLINE : Cost impact of power converters, power consumption and powering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
11/27/2007ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop Mike Neubauer 1 RF Power and Cooling Requirements Overview from “Main Linac Power and Cooling Information”
Advertisements

Oct. 10th 2006NSLS II Accelerator System Advisory Meeting SR-PS 1 NSLS II Accelerator System Advisory Committee Meeting October 10 – NSLS II Storage.
CLIC Workshop 2009 Power Converters implications for CLIC machine protection 25/05/2015TE-EPC / S. Pittet1.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
Development of new power supplies for J-PARC MR upgrade Yoshi Kurimoto (KEK) for J-PARC accelerator group.
1 ILC ( International Linear Collider ) Asian Region Electrical Design H. Hashiguchi, Nikken Sekkei, Co. Ltd., A. Enomoto, KEK ILC Mechanical & Electrical.
Electricity, Electronics And Ham Radio “Kopertroniks” By Nick Guydosh 4/12/07.
Chapter 22 Alternating-Current Circuits and Machines.
Chapter 2 Transformers.
PSB Main Power Supply Serge Pittet Jean-Paul Burnet, Karsten Kahle, Fulvio Boattini, Max Chamiot-Clerc TE-EPC Serge PITTET LIU-2011 Event, 25/11/2011.
Power Electronics and Drives (Version ) Dr. Zainal Salam, UTM-JB 1 Chapter 3 DC to DC CONVERTER (CHOPPER) General Buck converter Boost converter.
First Considerations on CLIC Cooling System Ch. Martel, J. Inigo-Golfin TS/CV.
Preliminary Studies of the Electric Power Distribution for CLIC
DA-250F/DA-250FH TOA Corporation. Features DA Series Multi-channel Digital Amplifiers.
CV activities on LHC complex during the long shutdown Serge Deleval Thanks to M. Nonis, Y. Body, G. Peon, S. Moccia, M. Obrecht Chamonix 2011.
Power converters implications for Booster Energy Upgrade Jean-Paul Burnet, Serge Pittet LIU day, TEEPC.
RF Distribution Alternatives R.A.Yogi & FREIA group Uppsala University.
September 19/20, 2007 SIS 100 Magnet cooling and cryogenic distribution.
BDS Magnet-Power System-Facility Optimization1 ILC BDS Kickoff Meeting Basis for Magnet, Power System and Cooling Facility Optimization Discussion Paul.
Drive beam magnets powering strategy Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko CERN, Electronic Power Converter Group (TE-EPC) OUTLINE : Suggestion of.
06-November-2013 Thermo-Mechanical Tests BE-RF-PM Review of the CLIC Two-Beam Module Program Thermo-Mechanical Tests L. Kortelainen, I. Kossyvakis, R.
VENTILATION PRINCIPLE FOR THE DRIVE BEAM TUNNEL M Nonis – EN/CV – 28/7/2009 Already presented by C. Martel/ J Inigo Golfin on15 th October 2008 CLIC WORKSHOP.
Power Distribution Existing Systems Power in the trackers Power in the calorimeters Need for changes.
Understanding the                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
Global Design Effort1 September 20-22, 2006 MAC Review Power and Water breakout (mixed results) Marc Ross GDE.
CLIC cost & power consumption issues Philippe Lebrun on behalf of the C&S WG CLIC Meeting 11 December 2009.
Reliability and availability considerations for CLIC modulators Daniel Siemaszko OUTLINE : Give a specification on the availability of the powering.
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
Simulation results for powering serial connected magnets Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet OUTLINE : Serial configuration of full rated converters.
TE EPC Safe by Design CLIC Powering Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet, David Nisbet CERN, Technology Department (TE) Electrical Power Converter Group (EPC)
2 Davide Aguglia TE-EPC-FPC Sept. 23 rd rd PSB injection EPC powering rack space coordination meeting Stripping foil chicane BSW magnets powering.
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
Transport of the CLIC Modules and Elements CLIC Workshop October 2007 Two Beam Hardware and Integration Working Group Keith Kershaw (CERN)
CLIC09 Workshop October 2009Drive beam BPM’sLars Søby 1 Drive Beam BPM’s CLIC 09 work shop, CERN, of October 2009, Lars Søby.
COOLING & VENTILATION FOR THE DRIVE BEAM TUNNEL M Nonis – EN/CV – 16/9/2009 CLIC TWO BEAM MODULES REVIEW
CLIC Workshop th -17 th October 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC 1 CLIC Main Linac Quadrupoles Preliminary design of a quadrupole for the stabilization.
Updated Thermo-Mechanical Model of the CLIC Two-Beam Module Riku Raatikainen
Modulators for DB klystrons: requirements and plans for developments Serge Pittet, David Nisbet TE EPC.
Power Converters and DC cablesSlide 1/.. LHC - HC review Hugues THIESEN – AB/PO Thursday, 12 May 2005 Water cooled cables warm bus bars power converter.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Principle of the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
VENTILATION PRINCIPLE FOR THE DRIVE BEAM TUNNEL CERN TS/CV Wednesday 9 th July 2008 CLIC.
Power, Cooling, Cables, Simulations of Heat Dissipation Short overview of ongoing work on these points Technical Coordination (Rolf Lindner et al.) Cooling.
Powering the damping rings wigglers Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet OUTLINE : Powering superconductive magnets, Powering wigglers strategy, Existing.
S UPER B site status report S. Tomassini INFN-LNF On behalf of SuperB Collaboration SuperB general meeting– Frascati – December 1-5, 2009.
Design considerations for the FCC electrical network architecture FCC week 2016, Rome, April 2016 Davide Bozzini - CERN/EN/EL With the contribution.
The power supply for magnetic elements at CR D.Senkov IWAPT 2015, BINP, Novosibirsk The power supply for magnetic elements at CR D. Senkov/
COOLING & VENTILATION PLANTS M. Nonis – CERN EN Department / CV Group Annual Meeting of the FCC study – Rome 14 th April 2016.
ESS Linac Upgrade Dave McGinnis Chief Engineer / Accelerator Division May 27, 2014.
Pulsed Magnet Power Supply Feasibility Study
Presentation CERN SPAIN | ITALY | FRANCE | GERMANY | MEXICO | USA | BRAZIL | UAE | QATAR | OMAN | SAUDI ARABIA jema.es.
TDR Cryogenics Parameters Tom Peterson 28 September 2011.
Module layout and types Two-beam module review, September 2009 Module layout and types G. Riddone for the CMWG,
Areal RF Station A. Vardanyan
Update on the PSB Cooling and Ventilation Systems
ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop
The Survey of the Power Supply Reliability at SSRF
INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS/ELECTRICITY
CLIC Civil Engineering & Infrastructure Working Group Meeting
Tunnel Cross Section Studies
Thermal review of CLIC module
Radiation protection of Linac4 M. Silari Radiation Protection Group
BE/RF-IS Contribution to LIU C. Rossi and M. Paoluzzi
Hollow e- lens, Cryogenic aspects
Powering CLIC Strategies and Technical Issues
COOLING & VENTILATION INFRASTRUCTURE
Why are particle accelerators so inefficient?
Klystron Power Supplies for ILC
CEPC RF Power Sources System
BESIII EMC electronics
Electric Power Generation
Presentation transcript:

Powering the main linac implications Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet OUTLINE : Cost impact of power converters, power consumption and powering strategy, power losses, heat load, needs in space allocation. TE EPC

Cost impact of converters (1/2) CONVERTER COST  POWER · MTBF · 1/MTTR · EFFICIENCY · PRECISION · REVERSABILITY · 1/VOLUME Radiations have an impact on: MTBF: Mean Time Between Failure must be as high as possible considering the large number of power converters needed in the main linac. MTTR: High spare quantity needed to compensate faulty module cool-down time. EFFICIENCY: Sensitive switch mode supplies needed for high efficiency. PRECISION: complex digital system needed in the 100ppm range. REVERSABILITY: increased number of switching and control devices. VOLUME: More sensitive active devices needed to reduce converter volume. 01/06/20102 TE EPC Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet - EDMS

Cost impact of converters (2/2) MB and DB main converters: – POWER · MTBF · 1/MTTR · EFFICIENCY · PRECISION · REVERSABILITY · 1/VOLUME – Low radiation area needed. Correction dipoles: – POWER · MTBF · 1/MTTR · EFFICIENCY · PRECISION · REVERSABILITY · 1/VOLUME – Low radiation area needed. DB trims: – POWER · MTBF · 1/MTTR · EFFICIENCY · PRECISION · REVERSABILITY · 1/VOLUME – Radiation hard modules could be deployed. CriticalModerate impactReasonable 01/06/20103 TE EPC Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet - EDMS

Radiations in the tunnel Most of the radiations come from the drive beam (90%). The expected average dose after four hours cooling reaches 100mSv/h. A technician coming down on a monthly basis will be walking 1.5h in the tunnel. The technicians will be exposed to a collective dose of 120mSv/year. 01/06/20104 TE EPC Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet - EDMS

Power distribution High voltage cables (36kV) go through the tunnel to power each cavern. 36kV/400V transformers connect grid to distribution panels (Ref. C. Jach). 400V grid in the tunnel is impossible because of power dissipation and voltage drop. 01/06/20105 TE EPC Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet - EDMS

Power consumption The consumption of the main linac is about MW per accelerating sector (considering losses). Need for a distribution transformer of about 2.5MVA for each accelerating sector. Total power consumption for the main linac: 80MW (100MVA). 01/06/2010Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet - EDMS TE EPC Poweringfirst sectorlast sector DB decelerator420 kW MB converters500 kW200 kW Dipole correctors1.6 kW0.2 kW Transfer lines MB+DB (not yet specified)75 kW Turnarounds (possibly not through tunnel section)610 kW TOTAL (Load)1.6 MW1.3 MW TOTAL (Cable losses plus 85% converters efficiency)1.9 MW1.5 MW TOTAL (considering power factor cos  = 0.8)2.4 MVA1.9 MVA

EMI produced by cables 36kV grid produce 50Hz EMI on main beam transport. DC cables for powering magnets produce EMI on module. Magnetic field estimated for cables without shielding and arranged in compact pairs with very low distance between them. 01/06/20107 TE EPC EMI on MODULEPowering group of 60Powering group of 30Individual powering Main beam DC power 4.8  T9.5  T516  T Drive beam DC power 91  T182  T5409  T Trims/corr (MB and DB) 51  T50  T0.62  T TOTAL DC (Maximal value) 147  T241  T5926  T TOTAL AC (Maximal value)0.18  T EMI on TRANSPORTPowering group of 60Powering group of 30Individual powering Main beam DC power 0.14  T0.27  T15  T Drive beam DC power 2.6  T5.2  T155  T Trims/corr (MB and DB) 1.4  T2.9  T0.018  T TOTAL DC (Maximal value) 4.2  T8.5  T169  T TOTAL AC (Maximal value)6.6  T Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet - EDMS

Space allocation in caverns 01/06/20108 TE EPC The required space allocation includes power converters of different sizes, distribution panel and the distribution transformer. Power converters stacked in standard racks. Small racks containing trimmers can be placed in the tunnel. Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet - EDMS typeFirst sectorLast sector MB correctors5correctors/3U11 racks2 racks MB main converters4-7kW module164 racks22 racks DB trimmers5trimmers/3U26 racks DB main converters10kW module52 racks Transfer lines10kW module10 racks? Turn-arounds10-25kW module35 racks TOTAL272 racks + 26 trimmer racks121 racks + 26 trimmer racks

Cavern cross-section 01/06/20109 TE EPC Two stages of racks can be put in the middle of the cavern, leaving space for the cables and the technicians. 32m is needed for the converters in the first section cavern and 14m for the last. Another 4m is needed for the trimmers if they are not in the tunnel. Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet - EDMS

Cavern cross-section 01/06/ TE EPC Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet - EDMS

01/06/ Alternative trimmers control TE EPC Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet - EDMS RAD-HARD Trimmers placed close to the magnets with limited precision to 1% (still insuring a current precision of 100ppm in the magnet). FEAS (CLIC Front End Acq. Sys.) ensures DA and AD conversion. Need for 4 analog and 4 digital floating signals per CLIC module with a 100Hz rate. Reference current managed by control unit, distribution references between mains and trimmers. (Consistent saving in cabling cost 25MCHF).

Correctors alternative control 01/06/201012Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet - EDMS Correctors in the caverns using FEAS (CLIC Front End Acq. Sys.). Fast control loop in the corrector (10kHz/precision 1%). Slow control loop located over ground (1Hz), high precision (100ppm) allowed with temperature measurement and calibration parameters stored in database. Need for 1 analog input, 3 analog outputs and 2 digital signals for each corrector. FEAS with DA and AD converters and 100Hz read-out. TE EPC

Heat load in the caverns The converters in the caverns are water cooled but still, some heat dissipation to air is to be expected. The ventilation unit in the tunnel must sustain the whole heat load since the converters are in a confined space. The heat load is estimated with the following assumptions: Converters efficiency of 85%, water cooling efficiency of about 90% and dissipation to air of transformer is 1%. Heat load to air by transformer and converters: 52kW (down to 40kW). Heat load to water is about 260kW (down to 200kW), meaning a flow of 3.1l/s (11.2 m 3 /h) with  T=20° is considered, with a pressure of 6-9 bars. 01/06/ TE EPC Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet - EDMS

Heat load in the tunnel Each trimmer dissipates from 1 to 50W. Total power dissipated by the trimmers in one section: 18kW Grouped in strings, each of them would dissipate 780W in the tunnel. Grouping in small racks and water cooling of trimmers is compulsory. One might expect some 40W of dissipation to air every 30-60m, depending on the amount of strings. Power dissipation in power cables is about 15W/m for the drive beam and 20W/m for the main beam assuming 30 magnets strings. The value of 35W/m is an absolute maximum. This value goes down to 20W/m in the last sector. 01/06/ TE EPC Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet - EDMS

Needs in civil engineering Two types of caverns, one with an access lift (8 in total), one with access through tunnel only (40 in total). The length of the cavern should be enlarged. Dedicated shaft for cables have to be designed. Power converters in turnarounds would allow to save space in the caverns. However, we have good reasons to believe that radiation level will be too high because of neutron scattering. Radiation levels to be confirmed by simulations. 01/06/ TE EPC Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet - EDMS