LOFTI Training Brad Berens Kathy Mills Rob Monson Joel Price.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Creativity and Innovation 2. Communication and Collaboration
Advertisements

A Systems Approach To Training
School Improvement Through Capacity Building The PLC Process.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Athletic Program Leader Proposed Adaptations.
PUSD Site Administrator Evaluation SY 13/14 Governing Board Presentation May 23, 2013 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
Learning Objectives 1 Copyright © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning Qualitative Research CHAPTER five.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Chapter 3 The Qualitative Research Approach. WHAT IS THE INTERPRETIVE WAY OF THINKING? Multiple Realities Data vs. Information Subjects vs. Research Participants.
Implementation of Computer Simulation Software in Learning Low-Level Computer Language: A Case Study Johnny Chan Chi Hown.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
Objectives of Session Seven Complete in-class survey Discuss question formats and ordering Case study: face-to-face interviews v. self-administered questionnaires.
ETT 429 Spring 2007 Technology Standards. NETS-T Background International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) created National Educational Technology.
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 19
Objectives for Session Nine Observation Techniques Participatory Methods in Tanzania Hand back memos.
Evaluating Training Programs E-learning Assignment Bret (one-t) Painter.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
1 Service Learning Group D Mentors  Dr. M. N. Kaumal  Dr. H. R. Perera Cooperate Partner.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Data Collection and Triangulation
Why Educators need to be educated in technology By Diane Harris CEP 812 July
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Parliamentary Committees in Democracies: Unit 4 Research Services for Parliamentary Committees.
World Languages Portfolio. Student Growth Portfolio with Peer Review 2  THE GOAL: A holistic and meaningful picture of the value a teacher adds to students,
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
If you don’t know where you’re going, any road will take you there.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Alicia Currin-Moore Executive Director, TLE Oklahoma State Department of Education.
TRAINING EVALUATION WHAT? WHAT? WHY? WHY? HOW? HOW? SO WHAT? SO WHAT?
Understanding Meaning and Importance of Competency Based Assessment
EEX 3257 COOPERATIVE LEARNING. BENEFITS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING Academic Benefits Increased achievement and increased retention of knowledge Improved.
Jing Wan.  Introduction  Logic model  Evaluation methods(Design, data collection, analysis)  Communication & dissemination.
Assessment of an Arts-Based Education Program: Strategies and Considerations Noelle C. Griffin Loyola Marymount University and CRESST CRESST Annual Conference.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Deck 3 of 3.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Graduate Portfolio to Document Impact on Student Learning CEC-TED 2004 Albuquerque, New Mexico Deborah S. Wallace, Ph.D. Susan B. Brown, Ph.D.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Kindergarten Teacher Vanessa Arroyo. Degree/s Needed Bachelor’s Degree Licensure Sometimes a Master’s Degree.
“Assessment Made Easy” Workshop CCSC Eastern Conference October 15, 2004 Based on a presentation by Philip K. Way, University of Cincinnati Frances K.
Elements of a supportive work environment:
Summary of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) and NCATE's Educational Computing and Technology facilitation Standards for K-12.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
2003Maureen Morris1 Assessment as a Tool for Learning A Snapshot of a Work-in-Progress.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
Module 8: Monitoring and Evaluation Gap Analysis and Intervention Plans.
April 25 th Classrooms for the Future Facts 08’  358 High Schools in PA  12,100 Teachers  83,000 Laptops  101 Million Statewide Spent  3.75.
Educator Effectiveness Summit School District’s Recommendation for the School Year.
Data Driven Planning and Decision-making for Continuous School Improvement: Developing a Program Evaluation Plan Leadership for Innovative Omani Schools.
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION (seeing through the jargon and figuring out how to use the tools)
Conducting a Needs Analysis
Interviews, Questionnaires, and control flowcharts Chapter 19.
The Strategic Communications Plan March 22, 2011.
Assessment of Your Program Why is it Important? What are the Key Elements?
ASK STANDARDS Assessment and Accountability CNS 610 Written & Narrated by: Kelcie Dixon Western Kentucky University.
Action Research Proposal: Improving Confidence in the Workplace Rebecca Jackson EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Miller January 21, 2016.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Group Work Evaluation Issue Fairness in Group Work Evaluation Evaluation can be difficult enough when.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT Enhancing Creativity The purpose of this module is to develop participants’ facilitation and training skills to enable them to.
Enhancing Evaluation Stakeholder Responsiveness Through Collaborative Development of Data Collection Instruments Karen Kortecamp, PhD The George Washington.
Evaluation of Career Planning Services
نیازهای آموزشی بیماران و طبقه بندنی این نیازها کارگاه مدیریت آموزش بیمار فاطمه حشمتی نبوی دکتری پرستاری.
Inspection of social outcome in Norway?....
Project Title: (PEARS Action Plan-Step 1)
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 19
Writing Instructional Objectives
Presentation transcript:

LOFTI Training Brad Berens Kathy Mills Rob Monson Joel Price

Identify Training Program n Quantitative versus Qualitative –Components of program Teacher selection One day of introductory interview training Gathering of teacher interview data using testing instrument One day of collaborative evaluation techniques Inter-rater reliability Using ISTE Standards as a guide

Goals and Objectives n Identify teachers who are proficient in ISTE Standards n Interview of subjects n Collection of data n Submit data for analysis n Compile data n Analyze data n Provide feedback for teachers n Generate report to Federal Department of Education, LOFTI and DECA

Design Evaluation Process

Implementation Process n Implementation –Training –Interviewing –Data Collection –Data Compilation –Analysis Rubric –Dissemination of data to stakeholders n Sharing the Data –Federal Department of Education –DECA –LOFTI –Teachers –Boards of Education

Level 1 n Reaction –Smile sheet –Positive reaction to educational program –Understanding of LOFTI Goals –Understanding of Interview process

Level 2 n Learning –Leadership –Motivation –Communication –Specific Objectives –Attitudes are changed –Knowledge is increased –Skill is improved

Level 3 n Behavior –Desire to change –Knowledge and ability to affect change –Proper climate –Personal reward laptop computer

Level 4 n Results –Final results –Teacher expectations versus realities –Interviewer bias –Inter-rater reliability –Needs of LOFTI

That’s All Folks