PBIS and Dropout Prevention: The APEX II Project of the New Hampshire Department of Education 14th Annual Conference on Advancing School Mental Health.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome! We’re glad you are here!. PBIS: Promoting a positive & safe learning environment April 28, :30 pm.
Advertisements

SWPBIS and the Changing Role of the Clinician
Targeted & Individual Systems of Support Lori Newcomer, Ph.D. Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri – Columbia OSEP Center for Positive Behavior Interventions.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
Paul J. Pattavina, PhD Special Education Supervisor PBIS Implementation Report #3: Impact of PBIS training on discipline practices in GPS - Executive summary.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
AGENDA Welcome! 3:10 Meeting Expectations: Be Present Engage
Vermont Positive Behavior Support Services
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Preparing for End & Beginning SWPBS Year: Evaluation & Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
Response to Intervention in The Social Domain. Response to Intervention (RTI) Response to evidence-based interventions (Elliott, Witt, Kratchowill, &
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
PBIS POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION SUPPORT OCTOBER 2, 2014.
RENEW Implementing Tertiary Supports in Schools with PBIS Rachel Saladis Wisconsin PBIS Network/Wisconsin RtI Center Ami Flammini Illinois PBIS Network.
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
Collaborative Closing the Gap Action Plans: School Counselors, School Social Workers and School Psychologists Working to Close the Gaps.
The Role of Community Resource Mapping in the Mental Health and Schools Together-NH Initiative New Hampshire Center for Effective Behavioral Interventions.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
1 Achievement in Dropout Prevention and Excellence I and II (APEX II): A Comprehensive Approach to Dropout Prevention and Recovery May 2008 JoAnne M. Malloy,
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
RTI at the High School Level JoAnne Malloy, MSW Project Director Institute on Disability/UCED University of New Hampshire Maria Agorastou, MSW Research.
Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Celeste Rossetto Dickey PBIS/MTSS Coordinator
Rob Horner; National PBIS TA Center Greg Benner; UWT
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
V 2.1 Tier II Critical Features Building the Infrastructure to Support Tier 2.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
School-wide Positive Behavior Support Renee Bradley, Ph.D. U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs.
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
1 Achievement in Dropout Prevention and Excellence I and II (APEX II): A Comprehensive Approach to Dropout Prevention and Recovery.
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
RTI and NH RESPONDS Professional Development for Excellence in Education November 5,
Sustainability Training Series 2015 From Piloting to Sustaining Practices August 4, :00pm - 3:00pm The Essentials of Full Implementation Part II.
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
Dropout Prevention Using a 3-Tiered Model to Address the Needs of ALL Students August 11, 2010 McKenzie Harrington JoAnne Malloy, UNH 1.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support February 24, 2004 Rachel Freeman, University of Kansas Beth Robinett, Topeka 501 (
Connecting PBIS & SST to Address Student Needs
Student and Family Engagement within SWPBIS Rob Horner and Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon Slides available at as well as at.
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Administrator’s Role Donna Morelli Cynthia Zingler Education Specialists Positive Behavioral.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
NH RESPONDS High School Demonstration Site Application Information Session October 16, 2008.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
Data-Based Decision Making: Using Data to Improve Implementation Fidelity & Outcomes.
The School Counseling Program
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: District Coaches’ Meeting Donna Morelli Cynthia Zingler Education Specialists Positive Behavioral.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Tier Two Systems in High Schools Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network.
Review & Re-establish School-Wide PBIS: Tier 1 Cohort 10 August 2015 *
AUTISM: Methodologies and Recent research Ilene S. Schwartz University of Washington
Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports Family & Community Team Member Network Meeting Thank you for coming! Please make yourself comfortable.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
New Hampshire Mental Health TA Project IDEA Partnership National Community of Practice on Collaborative School Behavioral Health Share Fair Presentation.
Sustainability Training Series 2016 From Piloting to Sustaining Practices January 13, :00pm - 3:00pm The Essentials of Full Implementation Part II.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS)
RENEW Rehabilitation for Empowerment, Natural Supports, Education and Work
Dreams This is your chance to be creative and think about how you want your school or your agency to respond to youth with emotional or behavioral challenges.
Primary Prevention: Universal Approaches SYSTEMS 2. Communication
Tier 2/Tier 3 Refresher Small Group.
Presentation transcript:

PBIS and Dropout Prevention: The APEX II Project of the New Hampshire Department of Education 14th Annual Conference on Advancing School Mental Health Share fair November 1, 2009 JoAnne Malloy, MSW Maria Agorastou, MSW Jonathon Drake, MSW Institute on Disability/ University of New Hampshire

Thanks to APEX II Partners ► The NH Department of Education, Bureau of Special Education ► The Institute on Disability, UNH ► The NH Center for Effective Behavioral Interventions and Supports at SERESC ► Main Street Academix, Inc ► National Dropout Prevention Center ► 10 High schools throughout the state

AGENDA ► Introduction/Overview ► APEX II Model Elements:  PBIS  RENEW  Student Leadership ► PBIS in High School  School-wide (Universal) Tier 1  Secondary (Targeted) Tier 2  RENEW Intensive Model –Tier 3 ► Case Studies ► Lessons Learned

APEX II Model ► To address school-based systems/climate issues:  Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) (Bohanon, et. al., 2004; Sugai & Horner, 1999)  Student Leadership Development ► To address issues for students most at-risk:  Rehabilitation for Empowerment, Natural supports, Education and Work (RENEW) (Eber, Nelson & Miles, 1997; Cheney, Malloy & Hagner, 1998; Bullis & Cheney, 1999)  8 th to 9 th grade transition system and practices ► To impact school climate and foster change-  Student Leadership Development

APEX II GOALS 1. Reduce the annual event dropout rate in 10 NH high schools (Phase I) with the highest dropout rates and numbers of dropouts by no less than 50% from the baseline year ( ) to the end of the grant period, by providing intensive and structured training and technical assistance to schools using two evidence-based models; PBIS and RENEW, 2. Ensure that no less than 40% of students in the participating school districts identified as not attending (e.g., incarcerated, dropped out), re-engage with the district in a meaningful way annually during the life of the project.

APEX II GOALS (cont.) 1. Develop and support the work of student leadership teams in each school to ensure that student voice and participation are part of the school reform effort. 2. Work with sending middle schools to develop transition plans for at risk 8 th graders as they transition to high school

APEX II Annual Dropout Rates

8 PBIS is a comprehensive 3-tiered evidence-based systems approach to schoolwide discipline that can efficiently and effectively improve social, behavioral, and academic outcomes through the use positive, preventative, and function-based behavior support practices within the context of collaborative teaming and data-based decision- making. Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Defined Muscott & Mann (2006)

Implementation of Project Elements SchoolSW- PBIS Targeted (Tier 2) RENEWStudent Leadership 8 th -9 th Transition SET (2008) 1XXX48/10 2XXXXX95/70 3XX39/40 4XXXXX83/70 5XXX69/60 6X34/10 7XXXX61/50 8XXX55/40 942/20 10N/A

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: RENEW Intervention ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% APEX PBIS MODEL

SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Decision Making Supporting Student Behavior PBIS Support Systems

APEX Features: Universal Tier ► Systems:  Leadership Team & Processes  Student Leadership  Data-based decision making, decision rules  Universal expectations, response system ► Practices:  Classroom Management  Teach and recognize expected behavior  Responding to problem behavior ► Data:  Office Discipline Referrals Attendance, Progress Reports,  Universal screening

APEX Features- Tier 2 ► Systems:  Targeted Team  Early Identification, Decision Rules.  Communication with teacher, parents and students. ► Practices:  Check In/Check Out  Social Contracting  Other Targeted Group Interventions  Simple Functional Behavioral Assessment and Behavior Support Plans ► Data:  Weekly (Bi-weekly) ODRs, Attendance, Progress Reports.  Functional Behavioral Assessment, Competing Behavior Pathway

APEX Features -Tier 3 ► Systems  Systematic Screening for Intensive Supports  Teacher training and support through Targeted Team  Staff time and resources to provide individualized supports to youth ► Practices  Intensive FBA and Behavior Support Plans  Escalating Behavior Cycle/Conflict Cycle  RENEW Individualized Services  Referral to Community Resources  Wraparound

RENEW: The “Tier 3” Component of the APEX II Project  For the most “at risk” students (60 per high school):  Model components: ► Personal Futures Planning ► Individualized academic programming (creative solutions and “Real World Learning” opportunities). ► Naturally supported employment ► Interagency collaboration and braided funding ► School to Career transition articulation, including post-secondary education ► Mentoring

16 Data Driven Decision Making  Problem Behavior Incident Reports Office Discipline Referrals (SWIS) -- documents types, location, time and motivation of referral behaviors  In and Out of School Suspensions  Surveys on Bullying, Harassment, and School Safety,  Tardys and Absenteeism,  Staff Surveys,  Climate Surveys  OTHER

17 Outcome Data ► We use outcome data to measure how we did “after the fact”  SWIS DATA  DROPOUT RATES- Graduation Rates  COLLEGE ENTRANCE RATES  GRADES- REPORT CARDS  CREDITS EARNED  TEST SCORES

18 Case Example: Somersworth Implementation ► Staff wanted to improve behavior in school ► Staff recognized that inconsistency played a role in the behavior issues ► Staff wanted to improve academic success. ► Staff wanted to improve attendance ► Staff wanted to address the drop-out rate

19 Essential Components of Schoolwide PBIS ► Staff & Administration Buy-In ► Clearly Defined Expectations for Behavior  Put in student handbook, & school web page  Post throughout the school ► Clearly defined office referral behaviors, including consequences when feasible  Put in student handbook  Required all to review on the first day of school

20 Essential Components of Schoolwide PBIS ► Belief that behaviors can and have to be taught, even in high school ► Data Based Decision Making ► Teacher or student designed lessons called Roll- outs  Taught to Teachers  Teachers teach to ALL students  Growth Goal identified  Positive Affirmation of Success(short term)

21 The Data- Fall of 2007

22 Universal Tier: SHS & CTC ►  429 office discipline referrals for major problem behavior .75 per student on average ►  6% received 6 or more referrals ►  students who received 6 or more referrals increased to 11%  increase expected as behavior issues were always documented rather than relayed by ‘word of mouth’ ► Top problem behaviors were  Disrespect/defiance,  Disruption,  Inappropriate language, and  Skipping class

23 Did it make a difference?

24 School-wide: Major Office Discipline Referral per day per 100 students last 3 years

25 Somersworth HS Dropout Rates

26 Tier 2 at Somersworth HS: Evolution of Targeted Team ► Identified a team that already focused on at- risk students (Student Intervention Team) ► Consensus to re-structure the team (membership and procedures)- Winter 2006 ► Training: received formal training and weekly technical support ► Began using SWIS data to ID students ► Began using Functional Behavioral Assessment

27 Tier 2 Interventions ► Check In Check Out ► Mentoring ► Credit recovery ► Social skills ► Homework lab ► Home setting involvement ► Counseling ► Pass system ► RENEW ► Student Leadership Referral.

time line is two months before and after intervention 28 Rate per month of Office Discipline Referrals

29

30 Tier 3: RENEW Rehabilitation, Empowerment, Natural supports, Education and Work (RENEW), an intensive individualized school-to-career service for the most at risk students  APEX II grant provides facilitator and training for mentors  SHS & CTC has 15 trained mentors  Goal is to develop individualized, student- directed school-to-career plan for high risk students

Tier 3 In the High School: RENEW: Conceptual Framework INTERAGENCY COLLABORATION SCHOOL-TO CAREER SELF-DETERMINATION YOUTH, FAMILY, RENEW Education Disability Child Welfare

RENEW PRINCIPLES ► Self-Determination ► Unconditional Care ► Strengths-Based Supports ► Flexible Resources ► Natural Supports-Community Inclusion

RENEW IS…. ► A flexible, person-centered planning and support service ► Driven by the student’s expressed needs, interests, and goals ► A “manualized” practice (Malloy, Drake, & Couture, 2009) RENEW IS NOT…. ► A program ► A classroom or school

RENEW Goals ► High School Completion ► Employment ► Post-secondary Education ► Community Integration

35 RENEW Strategies 1. Person Centered Planning 2. Individualized Team Development and Wraparound services 3. Braided Funding (Individualized Resource Development) 4. Flexible Education Programming 5. Individualized School-to-Career planning 6. Naturally supported employment 7. Mentoring 8. Sustainable Community Connections

36 Office Discipline Referral Data: RENEW Intervention Cohort 1 Cohort 2

37 Skipping Data: Cohort 1 Cohort 2

38 Credit Data: Cohort 1 Cohort 2

39 Somersworth HS: Academic Impact

Implementation: SET* Scores- APEX II High Schools

APEX II OUTCOMES (2008) Indicator # 1: State Dropout Rates New Hampshire annual event dropout rates:

Indicator # 2: Reduced Office Discipline Referrals Annual changes (by percent) in office discipline referrals (ODRs) among APEX II high schools.

GPRA Indicator # 3: Yearly improvements in 10 th grade reading and math scores ► Year preparation and development. (no projection for this year) ► Year projected increase in scores at proficient & advanced………..05% Actual increase…. 17% ► Year projected increase in scores at proficient & advanced………..05% Type of test was changed in year…. Will compile for final report

GPRA Indicator # 4: Re-engage students who have dropped out or are at risk ► Baseline estimated for school year …20% ► Year 2 ( ) projected increase of 20% from baseline …………... Actual …11%

Lessons Learned ► 7 out of the 10 schools attempted to implement schoolwide PBIS- it is a comprehensive systems change model that requires the full support of leadership and faculty ► The change/transformation happens over years and is incremental ► PBIS creates “durable change” ► The typical, public high school CAN provide for all students’ needs

Contact Information McKenzie Harrington, Project Staff, NH Department of Education, APEX II us Institute on Disability, UCED University of New Hampshire