Vicki Childers, Daniel Winester, Mark Eckl, Dru Smith, Daniel Roman

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 5 – Earth’s Gravity Field GISC Schedule for next two weeks You are responsible for material in Chapters 1-4 in text as well as all lectures.
Advertisements

Measurements using Atom Free Fall
REAL TIME POSITIONING “ IT DEPENDS” REAL TIME POSITIONING PDOP MULTIPATH SATELLITES BASE ACCURACY BASE SECURITY REDUNDANCY, REDUNDANCY, REDUNDANCY PPM.
GRAV-D Gravity for the Re-definition of the American Vertical Datum
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting Tuesday, November 3, 2009 Juliana Blackwell Director,
NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES Updating the International Great Lakes Datum Plan Overview Center for Operational Oceanographic.
Modernizing the Geopotential Datum: Replacing NAVD 88 Daniel R. Roman, Ph.D.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update to Coordination Group Ronnie Taylor alternate Subcommittee Chair Deputy Director, National Geodetic Survey.
Environmental Geodesy Lecture 9 (March 22, 2011): observing gravity changes on the Earth's surface - Introduction - Relative gravimeters - Absolute gravimeters.
Vertical Datums and Heights
45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in.
Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA
Using Aerogravity to Produce a Refined Vertical Datum D.R. Roman and X. Li XXV FIG Congress June 2014 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Session TS01A, Paper.
DORIS - DAYS Toulouse May 2-3, 2000 DORIS Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite  Basic system concept  Main missions  Schedules.
Introduction to HYPER Measuring Lense-Thirring with Atom Interferometry P. BOUYER Laboratoire Charles Fabry de l’Institut d’Optique Orsay, France.
Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.
NGS HSRP Update Ronnie Taylor, Acting Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA October 13, 2010.
GRAV-D Project A Height Mod. Project September 9, 2009 Fairbanks, Alaska September 9, 2009 Mark C. Eckl (Presenter – Chief, Observation and Analysis Division)
Light Pulse Atom Interferometry for Precision Measurement
Advances and Best Practices in Airborne Gravimetry from the U.S. GRAV-D Project Theresa M. Damiani 1, Vicki Childers 1, Sandra Preaux 2, Simon Holmes 3,
LINK TO SLIDES: ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/dist/whenning/FWS2011/
SU 4100 GEODETIC POSITIONING Instructor: Indra Wijayratne.
GRAV-D Project Update Vicki Childers, Ph.D. GRAV-D Project Manager.
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.
Geoid Modeling at NOAA Dru A. Smith, Ph.D. National Geodetic Survey National Ocean Service, NOAA November 13, 2000.
The National Geodetic Survey 10 Year Plan Mission, Vision and Strategy
Geoid Height Models at NGS Dan Roman Research Geodesist.
Integrated and Collaborative Organizations Create Geospatial Solutions Geospatial Solutions by DBZ Achieving Great Heights: Toward a Better Vertical Reference.
Towards the unification of the vertical datums over the North American continent D Smith 1, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 1, J L Huang 2, YM Wang 1, M Sideris.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting Tuesday, November 3, 2009 Juliana Blackwell Director,
Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC February 2009.
Tide corrections from KGPS and a precise geoid John Brozena, Randy Herr, Vicki Childers.
20 FEB 2009 Salt Lake City, UTACSM-MARLS-UCLS-WFPS Conference 2009 Geoid Modeling, GRAV-D and Height Mod.
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.
Terrestrial Gravity Plans at NGS Dru Smith Mark Eckl Vicki Childers Workshop on North American Gravimetry10/18/20101.
National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,
The Austrian absolute gravity base net: 27 years of spatial and temporal acquisition of gravity data Ullrich Christian and Diethard Ruess, Federal Office.
The GRAV-D Project and The Future of NAD 83 and NAVD 88 A briefing for FEMA leadership Dru Smith, Chief Geodesist NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey.
The National Geodetic Survey Gravity Program Benefits and Opportunities Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey (NGS)
Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.
Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.
New Vertical Datum: plans, status, GRAV-D update FGCS San Diego, CA. July 11, 2011 Mark C. Eckl NGS Chief of Observation and Analysis Division, New Vertical.
GRAV-D Part II : Examining airborne gravity processing assumptions with an aim towards producing a better gravimetric geoid Theresa Diehl*, Sandra Preaux,
Establishing A Gravity Plan Ohio Department of Transportation October 14, 2011.
Use of High-Rate CORS for Airborne Positioning Theresa M. Damiani NOAA- National Geodetic Survey, Geosciences Research Division CGSIC 2013, Nashville 1b.
Vicki Childers National Geodetic Survey GRAV-D: The Gravity for the Re- definition of the American Vertical Datum ACSM 2009 Workshop.
MISSISSIPPI HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PROJECT JUNE 11, 2009 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Initial Results of the Geoid Slope Validation Survey of 2011 Dru Smith 1, Simon Holmes 1, Xiaopeng Li 1, Yan Wang 1, Malcolm Archer-Shee 1, Ajit Singh.
Lecture 21 – The Geoid 2 April 2009 GISC-3325.
A Brief Introduction to Gravity UT Intro to Geophysics Class March 10, 2009 Austin-Bergstrom Airport Theresa Diehl, Ph.D. Research Geodesist NOAA National.
Confirming 1 cm differential geoid accuracy: The Geoid Slope Validation Survey of 2011 Dru Smith 1, Simon Holmes 1, Xiaopeng Li 1, Sbastien Guillaume 2,
The Height Modernization Program in the United States and the Future of the National Vertical Reference Frame 1 Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey,
Height Modernization in the U.S.: Implementing a Vertical Datum Referenced to a Gravimetric Geoid Model Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey, U.S.A.
Gravity Lidar Study for 2006: A First Look D.R. Roman, V.A. Childers, D.L. Rabine, S.A. Martinka, Y.M. Wang, J.M. Brozena, S.B. Luthcke, and J.B. Blair.
Progress toward the Geopotential Reference Frame Dru Smith Dan Roman Vicki Childers 45 minutes April 13, Geospatial Summit1.
RIGTC, Geodetic Observatory Pecný The institute's mission is basic and applied research in geodesy and cadastre Designated institute of Czech Metrology.
GRAV-D G ravity for the R e-definition of the A merican V ertical D atum Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, State Advisor Branch 1315 East West Highway, RM 9557 Silver.
Geodetic Applications of GNSS within the United States Dr. Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey NOS/NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland USA Munich Satellite.
GEOID03 in Louisiana and Alaska Dr. Yan M Wang and Dr. Daniel R Roman Geodesist, NGS/NOAA ACSM Annual Conference and Technology Exhibition Orlando, FL.
Upcoming replacements for NAD83, NAVD88 and IGLD85 Dru Smith, NGS Richard Snay, NGS Thomas Landon, NGS.
New Datum: Vertical (Geopotential) FGCS Silver Spring, MD. July 24, 2011 Mark C. Eckl NGS Chief of Observation and Analysis Division, New Vertical Datum.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting 11 January 2011 Ronnie Taylor Acting Director,
Proposal for a comprehensive vertical datum for North America, Central America and the Caribbean Dru Smith, Dan Roman, Vicki Childers, Mark Eckl, Monica.
GRAV-D: NGS Gravity for the Re- definition of the American Vertical Datum Project V. A. Childers, D. R. Roman, D. A. Smith, and T. M. Diehl* U.S. National.
Integration of Gravity Data Into a Seamless Transnational Height Model for North America Daniel Roman, Marc Véronneau, David Avalos, Xiaopeng Li, Simon.
Initial Results of the Geoid Slope Validation Survey of 2011 Dru Smith 1, Simon Holmes 1, Xiaopeng Li 1, Yan Wang 1, Malcolm Archer-Shee 1, Ajit Singh.
1 Center for Measurement Standards(CMS)-National Measurement Laboratory(NML) 2 Department of Civil Engineering,
The ballistic free-fall absolute gravimeter FG5#202  Accuracy : g ( g = 9, 8xx xxx xX m/s²)  1 µgal [= 10 nm/s²]  Vertical displacement of 3.
Subsidence Monitoring and the GRAV-D project Dru Smith, Dan Roman, Daniel Winester, Mark Eckl NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey Subsidence Workshop -
Advances and Best Practices in Airborne Gravimetry from the U. S
Presentation transcript:

The Implications for Higher-Accuracy Absolute Gravity Measurements for NGS and its GRAV-D Project Vicki Childers, Daniel Winester, Mark Eckl, Dru Smith, Daniel Roman National Geodetic Survey

NGS Gravity Program (Pre-GRAV-D) 1976-77 vulcan.wr.usgs.gov 1980’s For determination of NAVD 88 orthometric heights on bench marks Maintain a national network of absolute gravity stations Establish and maintain the Table Mountain Geophysical Observatory and constrain drift in the superconducting gravimeter housed there Enter into cooperative projects with both domestic and international entities on topics involving temporal change in gravity or heights (e.g. hydrology, GIA, tectonics, subsidence) GRAV-D: to replace the current vertical datum with a gravimetric geoid etc.usf.edu For NAVD 88 Orthometric Heights

NGS Gravity Program (Pre-GRAV-D) 1995 to Present Superconducting Gravimeter & FG5 Absolute Gravimeter 1980’s to Present Table Mountain Geophysical Observatory Absolute Gravity Measurements

NGS GRAV-D Project GRAV-D: Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum -> New datum by 2022 Comprised of two parts: Gravity field “Snapshot” baseline: Airborne gravity survey of all US-held territories Temporal geoid change monitored for datum updates

Role of Terrestrial Gravity in GRAV-D New gravity tie for each airborne survey (absolute – A10) A10 Absolute Gravimeter NGS Gravity program has been recently revitalized by the GRAV-D project, a project designed to replace the national vertical datum by 2022. The primary aspect of the program is an airborne gravity survey over the entire country. Terrestrial gravimetry supports this program in several ways: Create a new absolute gravity tie for each airborne survey at the sensor location (use A10 now) Perform relative surveys in regions where airborne data indicate a problem surface data set or an area of temporal change in the gravity field (i.e. subsidence, tectonic motion, GIA). In support of a program to monitor long term change to the geoid. As part of a series of proof of concepts surveys for the GRAV-D Project called the Geoid Slope Validation Survey. Absolute gravimeter Intercomparisons held at NGS’ Table Mountain Geophysical Observatory in Longmont, CO.

Role of Terrestrial Gravity in GRAV-D New gravity tie for each airborne survey (absolute – A10) Re-survey problem areas identified by airborne data (relative, absolute – A10) Monitor long-term geoid change via periodic re-measurement (relative, abs - A10 & FG5) TMGO Intercomparisons for abs gravimeters Geoid Slope Validation Surveys: Proof of Concept (Gravity for ortho hgts) NGS Gravity program has been recently revitalized by the GRAV-D project, a project designed to replace the national vertical datum by 2022. The primary aspect of the program is an airborne gravity survey over the entire country. Terrestrial gravimetry supports this program in several ways: Create a new absolute gravity tie for each airborne survey at the sensor location (use A10 now) Perform relative surveys in regions where airborne data indicate a problem surface data set or an area of temporal change in the gravity field (i.e. subsidence, tectonic motion, GIA). In support of a program to monitor long term change to the geoid. As part of a series of proof of concepts surveys for the GRAV-D Project called the Geoid Slope Validation Survey. Absolute gravimeter Intercomparisons held at NGS’ Table Mountain Geophysical Observatory in Longmont, CO.

How Would NGS Use a More Accurate Gravimeter? Long-term monitoring of local or regional temporal geoid change Replace FG5 (better speed, more portability, indoor and outdoor deployment, more stations per time) and A10 in all work (relative meters too!) Deployment in less quiet and remote areas Improved accuracy assessment for FG5s through intercomparisons Assuming…. The New Atomic Interferometer sensor being developed promises increased accuracy while being field portable. How would we use this? Geoid change, particularly as deployed regionally in areas of tectonic or hydrologic change. Replace FG5 work above (better speed, more portability, indoor and outdoor deployment, more stations per time). If Caveat A is not met, then might as well continue with FG5. Deployment in remote areas (e.g. by helicopter or pack animal on mountain tops or canyons) either for filling in control or for temporal change. Will re-introduce cooperation with outside researchers. Coastlines work: sea level change, NGS Coastal, elevation changes at gauges or shorelines. Economical method to bring gravity control to islands. If Caveat B is met, then it can serve as validation for GRAV-D ala GSVS.

Assuming…. Significant improvement to tides and ocean-loading corrections code to have accurate measurements at time intervals of 4 hours or less. Total uncertainty ascribed to earth tide, ocean loading, and polar tide correctors is > 1 μGal (Technical Protocol for 8th ICAG-2009) An efficient method of determining vertical gravity gradient Caveat A: Requires major improvement in tides and ocean-loading corrections code, to have corrections to sub-microGal level of data collected over four hours or less. Otherwise we are left with a more portable version of A-10. Caveat B: Requires an efficient method of determining vertical gravity gradient; either from internal calculations or deploying g-meter in raised position.

The AOSense Atom Interferometric Absolute Gravimeter Mark Kasevich AOSense, Inc.

1991 Light-pulse atom interferometer

Kinematic model for sensor operation Falling rock Falling atom Determine trajectory curvature with three distance measurements (t1), (t2) and (t3) For curvature induced by acceleration a, a ~ [(t1) - 2(t2) + (t3)] Distances measured in terms of phases (t1), (t2) and (t3) of optical laser field at position where atom interacts with laser beam Atomic physics processes yield a ~ [(t1)-2(t2)+(t3)]

Why superb sensors? AOSense Atom = near perfect inertial reference. Laser/atom interactions register relative motion between atom and sensor case. Sensor accuracy derives from the exceptional stability of optical wavefronts. Atoms Gravimeter Laser Sensor Case AOSense 408-735-9500 AOSense.com Sunnyvale, CA

AOSense Commercial Compact Gravimeter Commercial cold atom gravimeter Noise < 0.7 mg/Hz1/2 10 mGal resolution > 12 Hz update rate Shipped 11/22/10 First commercial atom optic sensor AOSense 408-735-9500 AOSense.com Sunnyvale, CA

Sensor output AOSense (blue) Instrument output (red dashed) model Interferometer fringe AOSense 408-735-9500 AOSense.com Sunnyvale, CA

Next Generation Instrument (in development) Fieldable Improved noise performance Improved accuracy Improved vibration control AOSense 408-735-9500 AOSense.com Sunnyvale, CA

AOSense, Inc. Founded in 2004 to develop cold-atom sensors (Brent Young CEO). Core capability is design, fabrication and testing of navigation and gravimetric sensors based on cold-atom technologies. Staff of 40 20k sq. ft. R&D space (clean rooms, assembly, testing) AOSense 408-735-9500 AOSense.com Sunnyvale, CA 16