Detector Characterization in GEO 600 by Alicia M. Sintes-Olives on behalf of the GEO-DC team Universitat de les Illes Balears

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
Advertisements

For the Collaboration GWDAW 2005 Status of inspiral search in C6 and C7 Virgo data Frédérique MARION.
September 21, 2005Virgo Status – ESF Workshop1 Status of Virgo B. Mours.
GWDAW9 – Annecy December 15-18, 2004 A. Di Credico Syracuse University LIGO-G Z 1 Gravitational wave burst vetoes in the LIGO S2 and S3 data analyses.
Calibration of the gravitational wave signal in the LIGO detectors Gabriela Gonzalez (LSU), Mike Landry (LIGO-LHO), Patrick Sutton (PSU) with the calibration.
GWDAW-10 (December 14, 2005, University of Texas at Brownsville, U.S.A.) Data conditioning and veto for TAMA burst analysis Masaki Ando and Koji Ishidoshiro.
GWDAW-8 (December 17-20, 2003, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) Search for burst gravitational waves with TAMA data Masaki Ando Department of Physics, University.
Noise Floor Non-stationarity Monitor Roberto Grosso*, Soma Mukherjee + + University of Texas at Brownsville * University of Nuernburg, Germany Detector.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
Burst noise investigation for cryogenic GW detector TITECH NAOJ Daisuke TATSUMI 2nd Symposium ‐ New Development in Astrophysics through Multi-messenger.
Soma Mukherjee, GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02, LIGO-G Z1 Robust Detection of Noise Floor Drifts in Interferometric Data Soma Mukherjee Max Planck.
GEO-LIGO data analysis M.Alessandra Papa Max Planck Inst. f. Gravitationsphysik, Potsdam, Germany G Z VESF foundation meeting, Pisa, Dec
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Amaldi5 July 9, 2003 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory Monitoring LIGO Data During the S2 Science Run Michael.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
21 Feb 2002Soumya D. Mohanty, AEI1 DCR Plan of presentation Soumya Mohanty: Overview, aims & work done R. Balasubramanian: Details of Hardware, Database.
Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec '03 Interferometric Data Modeling: Issues in realistic data generation. Soma Mukherjee CGWA University of Texas.
Stefan Hild Ilias WG1 meeting, Hannover, September 2004 DATA TOOLS ‚how can data exchange work?‘ Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut)
Observing the Bursting Universe with LIGO: Status and Prospects Erik Katsavounidis LSC Burst Working Group 8 th GWDAW - UWM Dec 17-20, 2003.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
Data Characterization in Gravitational Waves Soma Mukherjee Max Planck Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik Golm, Germany. Talk at University of Texas, Brownsville.
Searching for gravitational radiation from Scorpius X-1: Limits from the second LIGO science run Alberto Vecchio on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
LIGO Z LIGO Scientific Collaboration -- UWM 1 LSC Data Analysis Alan G. Wiseman (LSC Software Coordinator) LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Analysis of nonstationarity in LIGO S5 data using the NoiseFloorMon output A proposal for a seismic Data Quality flag. R. Stone for the LSC The Center.
Martin Hewitson Overview of DC work. GEO DC workshop June DC work Noise characterisation Noise projections, noise sources, noise couplings Calibration.
1 Data quality and veto studies for the S4 burst search: Where do we stand? Alessandra Di Credico Syracuse University LSC Meeting, Ann Arbor (UM) June.
S.Klimenko, December 2003, GWDAW Performance of the WaveBurst algorithm on LIGO S2 playground data S.Klimenko (UF), I.Yakushin (LLO), G.Mitselmakher (UF),
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
Martin Hewitson Data access for GEO600. GEO DC workshop June Overview A variety of tools exist for on-line and off-line analyses Aux info.
18/01/01GEO data analysis meeting, Golm Issues in GW bursts Detection Soumya D. Mohanty AEI Outline of the talk Transient Tests (Transient=Burst) Establishing.
Veto Selection for Gravitational Wave Event Searches Erik Katsavounidis 1 and Peter Shawhan 2 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139,
Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW 11 Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW Dec 2006 Leone.
Dec 16, 2005GWDAW-10, Brownsville Population Study of Gamma Ray Bursts S. D. Mohanty The University of Texas at Brownsville.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G Z Status of MNFTmon Soma Mukherjee +, Roberto Grosso* + University of Texas at Brownsville * University of Nuernberg, Germany LSC Detector.
GEO++ Online Detector Characterization System. LIGO-G Z GEO++ working group GEO++ working group Cardiff University: Birmingham University Cardiff.
A Data/Detector Characterization Pipeline (What is it and why we need one) Soumya D. Mohanty AEI January 18, 2001 Outline of the talk Functions of a Pipeline.
The GEO Online Detector Characterization System David Churches Cardiff University 21 st August 2003 LSC meeting – Hannover – 18,21 August 2003 LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
GEO Online Detector Characterization System R. Balasubramanian Cardiff University LSC March 2003 LIGO-G Z.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida for.
Joshua Smith, Elba, Italy Elba, Italy Joshua Smith for the GEO 600 team Picture of GEO in stormy weather?? Or pics of tractors with.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
GWDAW10, UTB, Dec , Search for inspiraling neutron star binaries using TAMA300 data Hideyuki Tagoshi on behalf of the TAMA collaboration.
The 9th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis Workshop (December 15-18, 2004, Annecy, France) Results of the search for burst gravitational waves with the TAMA300.
Data Analysis Algorithm for GRB triggered Burst Search Soumya D. Mohanty Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville On.
S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.
Periodic Sources Session M. Alessandra Papa - Albert Einstein Institute - Golm, Germany The LSC UL group is using all (and only) of the codes that we (GEO)
ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Generating time domain strain data (h(t)) for the ALLEGRO resonant detector or calibration of ALLEGRO data.
Detector Characterisation and Optimisation David Robertson University of Glasgow.
Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, December'03 Interferometric Data Modeling: Issues in realistic data generation. Soma Mukherjee CGWA Dept. of Physics.
The first AURIGA-TAMA joint analysis proposal BAGGIO Lucio ICRR, University of Tokyo A Memorandum of Understanding between the AURIGA experiment and the.
MNFT : Robust detection of slow nonstationarity in LIGO Science data Soma Mukherjee Max Planck Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik Germany. LSC Meeting, Livingston,
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
LIGO-G05????-00-Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
GEO600 Data Analysis Status
SC03 failed results delayed FDS: parameter space searches
Bounding the strength of gravitational radiation from Sco-X1
Advanced Virgo Detector Monitoring and Data Quality
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Virgo Status Detector Status Computing Data Analysis status and Plans
Soma Mukherjee Centre for Gravitational Wave Astronomy
LIGO Scientific Collaboration meeting
S3 Glitch Updates Laura Cadonati
Broad-band CW searches in LIGO and GEO S2 and S3 data
Broad-band CW searches in LIGO and GEO S2 and S3 data
LIGO Scientific Collaboration, UW - Milwaukee
Broad-band CW searches in LIGO and GEO S2 and S3 data
Inspiral Waveform Consistency Tests
Performance of the WaveBurst algorithm on LIGO S2 playground data
Presentation transcript:

Detector Characterization in GEO 600 by Alicia M. Sintes-Olives on behalf of the GEO-DC team Universitat de les Illes Balears

A. M. Sintes GWDAW, kyoto (Japan), December 17-19, 2002 Detector Characterization in GEO600 Kick-off by January Since then regular telephone- conferences (~2 weeks) and several workshops have been organized (to which external observers have been invited). Today more than 40 scientists are on the GEODC mailing list from AEI, Hannover, Cardiff, Glasgow, Birmingham and UIB. GEODC brings together both experimentalists and theorists. This is very important since detailed knowledge of the detector and also expertise on data analysis are required. Members are involved in the LSC Upper Limit Working Groups. Information on the group activities: Who we are

A. M. Sintes GWDAW, kyoto (Japan), December 17-19, 2002 Detector Characterization in GEO600 Understand and characterize the GEO-detector: –identify noise sources and misbehaviors, so that experimentalists can improve the detector and bring it to the design sensitivity –study noise propagation Give support to the different astrophysical GW data analysis searches, e.g., –providing vetoes for data analysis Purpose

A. M. Sintes GWDAW, kyoto (Japan), December 17-19, 2002 Detector Characterization in GEO600 Members of GEODC group are involved in: Data acquisition, data transfer and storage. Development of software tools to facilitate data access and analysis, including online monitors. Development of new algorithms for data analysis. Analysis of data from the GEO detector and auxiliary channels. Data quality studies. Development of veto strategies. Scope

A. M. Sintes GWDAW, kyoto (Japan), December 17-19, 2002 Detector Characterization in GEO600 GEO is continuously taking data which is transferred to Hannover and converted into frame-format files, including also trend information. GEO has performed several engineering runs, some of them in coincidence with LIGO and TAMA: E7: 28 Dec Jan 2002 (duty cycle 75%) S1: 23 Aug Sep 2002 (>1 TB of data, duty cycle 97%) Data have been transferred to AEI and Cardiff either by network transfer or tapes. Currently data can be accessed from: Hannover (only about 3 most recent days), Cardiff and AEI where there is full S1 and E7 data, all trend data, and h(t). Frame-servers are running at these locations all time. Data access

A. M. Sintes GWDAW, kyoto (Japan), December 17-19, 2002 Detector Characterization in GEO600 To easy data access, data analysis and in order to have a more uniform software environment, several tools have been developed and are continuously updated: GEO-Tools [M. Hewitson]: it has plenty of utilities to deal with GEO data (data access, filter capabilities, and provided plenty of mex files as an interface to Matlab). Dataviewer [K. K ö tter]: to display GEO data on a browser that is available on any of the servers. It can display time domain data, trend information, and (amplitude) power spectral (density) using different frequency resolution. It has zooming capabilities and it can use different axis scales. It has some functionality: windows, calibration… Triana [developed at Cardiff]: to access data and data analysis products stored in MySQL databases [D. Churches], and to perform data analysis. Software tools I

A. M. Sintes GWDAW, kyoto (Japan), December 17-19, 2002 Detector Characterization in GEO600 GEO++ is a software centered around C++ classes. [R.Balasubramanian, S.Babak, D.Churches, S.Sathyaprakash, S.Mohanty, K.Kötter, S.Heng, A.Vecchio, R.Ingley,…] GEO++ provides an environment where a large quantity of data can be filtered through data analysis or detector characterization pipelines in real time. Functionality: –Frame File interface for GEO/LIGO data –Ability to distribute data over networked workstations using MPI –Record results in the form of database records, frame files, … –Power spectrum and power spectral density estimators –Time domain filters (IIR, FIR) –Resampling –Fourier transforms… GEO++

A. M. Sintes GWDAW, kyoto (Japan), December 17-19, 2002 Detector Characterization in GEO600 GODCS is based on GEO++. It facilitates online data analysis, handling a large data rate. It offers a flexible scheme to develop and integrate monitors into a pipeline and run several monitors at a time. It has the capacity to chain together monitors, each monitor analyzing data modified by the previous monitors. A flexible scheme to exchange numeric information between monitors developed by different people. Very useful when we want to develop monitors which act only when another monitor triggers an event. Monitors available: SaturationMon, PsdMon, PowerTrackerMon, LockStatusMon, InspiralMon, GlitchMon, GlitchInPowerLineMon, PQMon, FrameChannelSummaryMon, ExcessPowerMon, TFClusterMon… GODCS: G EO O nline D etector C haracterization S ystem

A. M. Sintes GWDAW, kyoto (Japan), December 17-19, 2002 Detector Characterization in GEO600 Detector Characterization Robot [S. Mohanty, S. Mukherjee] The aim is to construct a reliable and efficient automated system able to keep track of all change points in all relevant channels. See: Mohanty’s presentation: Controlling burst detection confidence in uncharecterized noise. Mukherjee’s presentation: Robust detection of noise floor drifts in interferometric data. DCR

A. M. Sintes GWDAW, kyoto (Japan), December 17-19, 2002 Detector Characterization in GEO600 Data analysis has been performed on E7, S1 data and, in particular, on 3 hours of playground data, under GODCS and Matlab + GEO-Tools Investigations: Analysis of GODCS results (running online during S1). Lock losses and their likely causes (laser spikes, sudden misalignment, van passing near a building, earthquake in Italy mag. 6.1…) Excess power and glitches in different channels and if they couple into h(t), in particular, laser spikes. Correlations between seismic channels and h(t). Calibration [ see M. Hewitson’s talk]. Automated Line detection. Sensitivity to binary inspirals. Analysis of inspiral injected signals using TFClusterMon and matched filtering. Data analysis

A. M. Sintes GWDAW, kyoto (Japan), December 17-19, 2002 Detector Characterization in GEO600 Many of the work has been carried out in the context of burst searches [chaired by K. Strain and S. Mukherjee] in S1 data, with the aim of identify well understood veto channels. Results: LSC_MID_EP-Q-HP should be very useful [see K.Kötter’s talk: PQMon: A powerful veto for burst events]. Most of the large frequency and amplitude spikes in the laser system were not coupling (linearly) into h(t). Several environmental monitors were not seen to give convincing vetoes for many fast glitches. LSC_MID_EP-P under investigation. In the context of pulsar searches [led by M.A. Papa] there have been also investigations on power, phase and phase derivative distribution of ‘short’ FT. Results are posted on the GEO-DC lab-book. Data analysis cont.