Soma Mukherjee, GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02, LIGO-G030166-00-Z1 Robust Detection of Noise Floor Drifts in Interferometric Data Soma Mukherjee Max Planck.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Hild S4 Data Workshop, Hannover, May 2005 Title 1 kHz Glitches in S4 Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut)
Advertisements

September 21, 2005Virgo Status – ESF Workshop1 Status of Virgo B. Mours.
MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR GRAVITATIONSPHYSIK ALBERT-EINSTEIN-INSTITUT Karsten Kötter1 DC Data Analysis SEI/SUS (Suspensions & Seismic Isolation)
MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR GRAVITATIONSPHYSIK ALBERT-EINSTEIN-INSTITUT Karsten Kötter1 GEO600 InfoServer DC.
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik - Albert-Einstein-Institut DC Meeting Golm - Karsten Kötter1 Current status of DAQ System
Median Based Line Tracker Soumya D. Mohanty Max Planck Insitut für Gravitationsphysik LIGO-G Z.
Fourier series With coefficients:. Complex Fourier series Fourier transform (transforms series from time to frequency domain) Discrete Fourier transform.
1 Status of Unbiased Search for Continuous-Wave Sources Dave Chin, Vladimir Dergachev, Keith Riles (University of Michigan) LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Noise Floor Non-stationarity Monitor Roberto Grosso*, Soma Mukherjee + + University of Texas at Brownsville * University of Nuernburg, Germany Detector.
Searching for pulsars using the Hough transform Badri Krishnan AEI, Golm (for the pulsar group) LSC meeting, Hanford November 2003 LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates Laura Cadonati Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Detector Characterization in GEO 600 by Alicia M. Sintes-Olives on behalf of the GEO-DC team Universitat de les Illes Balears
The “probability event horizon” and probing the astrophysical GW background School of Physics University of Western Australia Research is funded by the.
Data Processing Functions CSC508 Techniques in Signal/Data Processing.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
Calibration in the MBW of simulated GOCE gradients aided by ground data M. Veicherts, C. C. Tscherning, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen,
Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec '03 Interferometric Data Modeling: Issues in realistic data generation. Soma Mukherjee CGWA University of Texas.
New data analysis for AURIGA Lucio Baggio Italy, INFN and University of Trento AURIGA.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
Data Characterization in Gravitational Waves Soma Mukherjee Max Planck Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik Golm, Germany. Talk at University of Texas, Brownsville.
Optimized Search Strategies for Continuous Gravitational Waves Iraj Gholami Curt Cutler, Badri Krishnan Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut)
June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop Detector Characterization Robot (Progress Since January 2001) Design (Already exists) Algorithmic and Statistical studies (In.
Uncertainty in Uncertainty. Within a factor of 2.
The Role of Data Quality in S5 Burst Analyses Lindy Blackburn 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,
Experimental Results ■ Observations:  Overall detection accuracy increases as the length of observation window increases.  An observation window of 100.
LIGO-G Z The AURIGA-LIGO Joint Burst Search L. Cadonati, G. Prodi, L. Baggio, S. Heng, W. Johnson, A. Mion, S. Poggi, A. Ortolan, F. Salemi, P.
Analysis of nonstationarity in LIGO S5 data using the NoiseFloorMon output A proposal for a seismic Data Quality flag. R. Stone for the LSC The Center.
Multidimensional classification of burst triggers from the fifth science run of LIGO Soma Mukherjee CGWA, UTB GWDAW11, Potsdam, 12/18/06 LIGO-G
18/01/01GEO data analysis meeting, Golm Issues in GW bursts Detection Soumya D. Mohanty AEI Outline of the talk Transient Tests (Transient=Burst) Establishing.
Veto Selection for Gravitational Wave Event Searches Erik Katsavounidis 1 and Peter Shawhan 2 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139,
Dec 16, 2005GWDAW-10, Brownsville Population Study of Gamma Ray Bursts S. D. Mohanty The University of Texas at Brownsville.
Multidimensional classification of burst triggers from LIGO S5 run Soma Mukherjee for the LSC Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas.
LIGO-G Z Results of the LIGO-TAMA S2/DT8 Joint Bursts Search Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
A Waveform Consistency Test for Binary Inspirals using LIGO data LSC Inspiral Analysis Working Group LIGO-G Z LSC Meeting Andres C. Rodriguez.
S.Klimenko, December 16, 2007, GWDAW12, Boston, LIGO-G Z Coherent burst searches for gravitational waves from compact binary objects S.Klimenko,
21 Feb 2002Soumya D. Mohanty, AEI1 Detector/Data Characterization Robot Towards Data Mining Soumya D. Mohanty Max Planck Institut für Gravitationsphysik.
1 Computing the F-Statistic for Continuous Gravitational Waves using a network of detectors Iraj Gholami, Reinhard Prix and Curt Cutler Max-Planck-Institut.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G Z Status of MNFTmon Soma Mukherjee +, Roberto Grosso* + University of Texas at Brownsville * University of Nuernberg, Germany LSC Detector.
GEO++ Online Detector Characterization System. LIGO-G Z GEO++ working group GEO++ working group Cardiff University: Birmingham University Cardiff.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida for.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
Model Based Event Detection in Sensor Networks Jayant Gupchup, Andreas Terzis, Randal Burns, Alex Szalay.
Proposing a DMT monitor for studying micro- seismic noise and up-conversions S. Mukherjee & R. Grosso UTB & U. Erlangen, Germany LSC Det Char Telecon,
LIGO-G Z Confidence Test for Waveform Consistency of LIGO Burst Candidate Events Laura Cadonati LIGO Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Data Analysis Algorithm for GRB triggered Burst Search Soumya D. Mohanty Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville On.
Multidimensional classification analysis of kleine Welle triggers in LIGO S5 run Soma Mukherjee for the LSC University of Texas at Brownsville GWDAW12,
LIGO-G Z Results of the LIGO-TAMA S2/DT8 Joint Bursts Search Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 A Coherence Function Statistic to Identify Coincident Bursts Surjeet Rajendran, Caltech SURF Alan Weinstein,
Validation of realistically simulated non-stationary data. Soma Mukherjee Centre for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville. GWDAW9,
Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, December'03 Interferometric Data Modeling: Issues in realistic data generation. Soma Mukherjee CGWA Dept. of Physics.
Soma Mukherjee LSC, Hanford, Aug.19 '04 Generation of realistic data segments: production and application. Soma Mukherjee Centre for Gravitational Wave.
Igor Yakushin, December 2004, GWDAW-9 LIGO-G Z Status of the untriggered burst search in S3 LIGO data Igor Yakushin (LIGO Livingston Observatory)
Feature Matching and Signal Recognition using Wavelet Analysis Dr. Robert Barsanti, Edwin Spencer, James Cares, Lucas Parobek.
2 June 2003Soumya D. Mohanty et al, LIGO-G D1 LASER INTERFEROMETER GRAVITATIONAL WAVE OBSERVATORY - LIGO – CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.
LIGO- G Z Update on standalone power burst- detection code Patrick Brady University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
SEARCH FOR INSPIRALING BINARIES S. V. Dhurandhar IUCAA Pune, India.
MNFT : Robust detection of slow nonstationarity in LIGO Science data Soma Mukherjee Max Planck Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik Germany. LSC Meeting, Livingston,
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
LIGO-G05????-00-Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
S5 First Epoch BNS & BBH Inspiral Update
Soma Mukherjee Centre for Gravitational Wave Astronomy
Signal processing.
Robustness Evaluation of Perceptual Watermarks
Long-range capacitive sensors for indoor person location
Background estimation in searches for binary inspiral
Inspiral Waveform Consistency Tests
Optimal on-line time-domain calibration of the
Spatial Statistics A 15 minute Tour….
Presentation transcript:

Soma Mukherjee, GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02, LIGO-G Z1 Robust Detection of Noise Floor Drifts in Interferometric Data Soma Mukherjee Max Planck Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik Golm, Germany. GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02

Soma Mukherjee, GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02, LIGO-G Z2 Motivation : Interferometric data has three components : Lines, transients, noise floor. Study of a change in any one of these without elimination of the other two will cause interference. Lines dominate. Presence of transients change the central tendency. “SLOW” nonstationarity of noise floor interesting in the analysis of several astrophysical searches, e.g. Externally triggered search.

Soma Mukherjee, GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02, LIGO-G Z3 Methods : Running Median. Computation of : G(m)=V(Z t+m – Z t )/V(Z t+1 – Z t ) Z t : t th sample of a timeseries. m: Lag.

Soma Mukherjee, GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02, LIGO-G Z4 Sequence : Low pass and resample Estimate spectral noise floor using Running Median Design FIR Whitening filter. Whiten data. Clean lines. Highpass. Compute Running Median of the squared timeseries. Construct Variograms. Thresholds set by Simulation.

Soma Mukherjee, GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02, LIGO-G Z5

6

7

8

9

10

Soma Mukherjee, GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02, LIGO-G Z11

Soma Mukherjee, GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02, LIGO-G Z12

Soma Mukherjee, GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02, LIGO-G Z13

Soma Mukherjee, GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02, LIGO-G Z14

Soma Mukherjee, GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02, LIGO-G Z15

Soma Mukherjee, GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02, LIGO-G Z16

Soma Mukherjee, GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02, LIGO-G Z17

Soma Mukherjee, GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02, LIGO-G Z18

Soma Mukherjee, GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02, LIGO-G Z19 Future : `To be run on full S1 data (LIGO/GEO). More quantification of the Running Median and variogram. To be tested on bandlimited data. Automation and incorporation in the DCR underway.