J14 NHIC, Corp CAC Meeting The Price of Non-Engagement: When Pay for Performance Programs Develop Penalties Andy Finnegan Health Insurance Specialist Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Personal and Confidential HITECH ACT of 2009 Presented By: Mike Herbers Sales and Marketing Manager 4/6/10.
Advertisements

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Next Flow Chart to Help Eligible Professionals (EPs) Determine Eligibility for the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic.
Medicaid and Meaningful Use – The “Other” EHR Incentive Program: What Hospital Leaders Should Know About the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Wisconsin Hospital.
Denise B. Webb State Health IT Coordinator May 9, 2013.
2011 HealthBridge Meaningful Use and Health Care Transformation Conference Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs.
© Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. Electronic Health Records.
HIT “Ask the Experts” Roundtable: CMS Updates Thursday, April 25, ; Access Code #
1 Avoiding the Medicare e-Prescribing “Adjustment” (penalty)
Vermont Information Technology Leaders PQRS, eRx and Enrollment Revalidation Webinar September 13, 2011 Andy Finnegan Division of Medicare Financial Management.
1 Medicare Only EPs, Subsection (d) Hospitals and CAHs EHR Payment Adjustments & Hardship Exceptions.
Health IT Standards Committee Meeting Data Analytics Update January 27, 2015.
Physician Quality Reporting System & the Electronic Prescribing (eRx) Incentive Program 2011 Overview December 9,
Implementing the American Reinvestment & Recovery Act of 2009.
JOHN W BARCH, MHA SR. DIRECTOR OF CLINICAL OPERATIONS JANET M RIVERA MANAGER, PATIENT MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS OFFICE BRIANNE E PORCHE, BBA SUPERVISOR OF.
Series 1: “Meaningful Use” for Behavioral Health Providers 9/2013 From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 7: Meeting the PBHCI Grant.
TOPIC: All Gain, No Pain PQRS Reporting Dec. 19 th, 2012: 1:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. Presented by Jim Clifford, Senior Solutions Consultant at Wellcentive Moderator:
MO PC May 2011 This material was prepared by Primaris, the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization for Missouri, under contract with the Centers.
Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) and Physician Privileging
Conflict of Interest Disclosures
Slide 1 Regional Care Collaborative March 26, 2015.
Meaningful Use Jacqueline L. Candelaria ABQ Area Program Analyst April 25, 2012.
Bill Finerfrock Executive Director
CMS Proposals for Quality Reporting Programs Under the 2015 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule PQRS, EHR Incentive Program, Physician Compare,
Physician Value- Based Payment Modifier under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule 1 Physician Feedback and Value-Based Modifier Program American Medical.
1 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 2007 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) Module One.
PQRS NYeC Practice Quality Resources & Registry June 8, 2015.
Physician Quality Reporting Initiative CSNS Provider Update Affordable Care Act Task Force Dr. Justin Singer, MD Dr. Nicholas Bambakidis, MD.
1 Dinetia M. Newman Balch & Bingham LLP MEANINGFUL USE: HISTORY AND TIPS ON IMPLICATIONS FOR FORREST GENERAL HOSPITAL Presented.
Montana Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Program for Eligible Hospitals This presentation will focus on information related to your registration.
Nancy B. O’Connor Regional Administrator, CMS June 2, 2011
Provider Revalidation & Application Fees. Agenda Objectives Revalidation of Enrollment Overview Application Fees How to Complete the Process Session Review.
New Jersey Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Professionals Overview.
Health Insurance in New York Laura Dillon, Principal Examiner New York Insurance Department Consumer Services Bureau One Commerce Plaza Albany NY
INFLUENCE OF MEANINGFUL USE AMONG HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS Neely Duffey, Olivia Mire, Mallory Murphy, and Dana Sizemore.
HIT “Ask the Experts” Roundtable: CMS Payment Adjustments & ROI Andy Finnegan Thursday, November 14, Access Code #
HP Provider Relations October 2011 Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Robert Anthony HITPC
Meaningful Use Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC Update: 2015 Sponsored by.
NOSORH WHAT WILL MIPS MEAN? Bill Finerfrock President Capitol Associates, Inc.
EMR Remedies Electronic Health Record Solutions Copyright – EMR Remedies Corporate Overview and General Information on Federal.
Robert H. Roswell, M.D. Oklahoma Hospital Association September 1, 2009.
INTRODUCTION TO THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD CHAPTER 1.
MIPPA Update. MIPPA Incentives Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA)
AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act) Regina.
Medicare E-prescribing (eRx) Incentive Program: Getting the 2011 Incentive and Avoiding the 2012 Reduction Mary Patton Wheatley Senior Specialist Health.
Medicaid HIT Program Jon Barley, Ph.D., Chief Bureau of Health Services Research Office of Ohio Health Plans
Discussion with BEACON Council ODJFS/OHP Medicaid Provider Incentive Program.
Accounting for Electronic Health Record Payments July 25, 2012 Draffin & Tucker, LLP
Cap.org v. # 2014 PQRS and VBM Programs Jonathan L. Myles, MD FCAP Chair, CAP Economic Affairs Committee Pathology Advisor, AMA-RUC Diana Cardona, MD FCAP.
1 Health Care Reform: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) Impact on Medicaid John G. Folkemer Deputy Secretary Health Care Financing.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome HIT Standards Committee
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 NPRM Overview Robert Anthony March 7, 2012.
Meaningful Use and Merit Based Incentive Payment in 2019.
AAMC Contact: Mary Wheatley December Physician Fee Schedule Value Modifier.
MACRA Overview and RFI HIT Joint Committee October 6, 2015
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Updates eHealth Services and Support September 24, 2014 Today’s presenter: Nicole Bennett, Provider Enrollment and Verification.
Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification Flexibility for 2014 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Thomas Bennett, Client.
Procurement Sensitive Medicare’s 2009 ePrescribing Program Daniel Green, MD, FACOG Medical Officer, Quality Measurement Health Assessment Group Office.
By: Rebecca Cameron Amie Dennis Amy Everson Debborah Stokes.
Physician Payment After SGR Reform: An Overview © American Hospital Association.
The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) is a bipartisan legislation signed into law on April 16,  Repeals the flawed Sustainable.
Calendar Year 2015 Attestation Deadlines As of March 9, 2016.
MIPS Quality Component
Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Stage 3 and ACI’s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 Today’s presenters: Brendan Gallagher.
J14 NHIC, Corp CAC Meeting The Price of Non-Engagement: When Pay for Performance Programs Develop Penalties Andy Finnegan Health Insurance Specialist Division.
Praxis EMR Training Seminar
Meaningful use Financial Incentives for Eligible Professionals and Hospitals.
Presentation transcript:

J14 NHIC, Corp CAC Meeting The Price of Non-Engagement: When Pay for Performance Programs Develop Penalties Andy Finnegan Health Insurance Specialist Division of Medicare Financial Management

Value of Engagement – Combined Physician Quality Reporting/eRx Incentive Program Paid $662,531,035 in incentives 72% increase from 2009 ($384,704,248) – Over 64,000 individual eligible professionals (National Provider Identifiers or NPIs) and almost 13,000 practices (Tax ID Number or TIN) participated in both programs 52% of those individual eligible professionals participating in both programs were incentive eligible in both programs – 125,000 EPs and Hospitals have received more than $4 billion in HITECH incentive payments NHIC J14 CAC

Established in 2009, the eRx Incentive Program encourages the use of electronic prescribing by providing incentives and payment adjustments based on whether eligible professionals, or CMS-selected group practices participating in eRx Group Practice Reporting Option (GPRO) meet the criteria for being successful electronic prescribers The applicable eRx incentive amounts are as follows: 2.0 % , 2.0% % % % The applicable eRx payment adjustment amounts are: 1.0 % % % eRx Payment Incentive Schedule

Avoiding the 2013 eRx Payment Adjustment – Individual Eligible Professionals 2013 eRx Payment Adjustment – Overview (cont.) Reporting Period Reporting Mechanism Reporting Criteria 12-month (Jan 1, 2011-Dec 31, 2011)* Claims* Reports on the 2011 electronic prescribing measure’s numerator code at least 25 times for encounters associated with at least 1 of the denominator codes (CMS-1500 type claim form)* 12-month (Jan 1, 2011-Dec 31, 2011)* Qualified Registry* Reports on the 2011 electronic prescribing measure’s numerator code at least 25 times for encounters associated with at least 1 of the denominator codes* 12-month (Jan 1, 2011-Dec 31, 2011)* Qualified EHR* Reports on the 2011 electronic prescribing measure’s numerator code at least 25 times for encounters associated with at least 1 of the denominator codes* 6-month (Jan 1, 2012-Jun 30, 2012) Claims Report the electronic prescribing measure's numerator code at least 10 times on any payable Medicare PFS service eRx

2013 eRx Payment Adjustment Hardship Exemptions 2013 eRx payment adjustment hardship exemption requests, and lack of prescribing privileges, must be submitted on or before June 30, 2012 Unable to electronically prescribe due to local, state, or federal law, or regulation Has or will prescribe fewer than 100 prescriptions during the 6-month reporting period Practices in a rural area without sufficient high-speed Internet access (G8642) Practices in an area without sufficient available pharmacies for electronic prescribing (G8643) Does not have prescribing privileges during the 6-month reporting period (G8644 ) eRx

2010 Data eRx Incentive Program 113,074 participants 65,857 individual eligible professionals/NPIs and 18,713 practices/TINs earned incentive payments totaling $270,895,540 Total incentive payments increased 83% from 2009 ($148,007,816) Average incentive amount was $3,836 per eligible professional/NPI and $14,476 per practice/TIN eRx

Physician Quality Reporting System PQRS

2012 Physician Quality Reporting – Individual Measures The 2012 Physician Quality Reporting now consists of 210 quality measures. This includes 28 new measures for claims and registry. Nine measures from the 2011 program were retired for PQRS

2012 Physician Quality Reporting – Measures Groups For 2012, there are a total of 22 measures groups. Fourteen measures groups were retained from 2011 and 8 new measures groups were added for 2012 PQRS

The 6-month reporting period beginning (July 1, 2012 – December 31, 2012) is only available to those eligible professionals reporting measures groups via registry. PQRS

Physician Quality Reporting System – Medicare EHR Incentive Pilot For the 2012 program year, CMS implemented the Physician Quality Reporting System-Medicare EHR Incentive Pilot. Successful participation in the pilot will allow receipt of the 2012 Physician Quality Reporting Incentive and demonstrate meaningful use of the clinical quality measure (CQM) component of the EHR Incentive Program. 44 CQMs PQRS

2007 PQRS – 1.5% subject to a cap 2008 PQRS – 1.5% 2009 PQRS – 2.0% 2010 PQRS – 2.0% 2011 PQRS – 1.0% 2012 PQRS – 0.5% 2013 PQRS – 0.5% 2014 PQRS – 0.5% PQRS Incentive Payment Schedule

2015 – 1.5% (AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS ), 2 % PQRS Payment Adjustment Schedule

2012 Program Reporting Options 1. Claims-based reporting of individual measures (12 months) 2. Claims-based reporting of at least one measures group for 30 unique Medicare Part B FFS patients (12 months) 3. Claims-based reporting of at least one measures group for 50% or more of applicable Medicare Part B FFS patients of each eligible professional (with a minimum of 15 patients) (12 months) 4. Registry-based reporting of at least 3 individual Physician Quality Reporting measures for 80% or more of applicable Medicare Part B FFS patients of each eligible professional (12 months) 5. Registry-based reporting of at least one measures group for 30 unique Medicare Part B FFS patients (12 months) 6. Registry-based reporting of at least one measures group for 80% or more of applicable Medicare Part B FFS patients of each eligible professional (with a minimum of 15 patients) (12 months) 7. Registry-based reporting of at least one measures group for 80% or more of applicable Medicare Part B FFS patients of each eligible professional (with a minimum of 8 patients) (6 months) 8. Direct EHR-based reporting of at least 3 individual Physician Quality Reporting measures for 80% or more of applicable Medicare Part B FFS patients of each eligible professional (12 months) 9. Direct EHR-based reporting of a total of 3 HITECH core or alternate core measures AND at least 3 additional HITECH measures (12 months) 10. EHR Data Submission Vendor reporting of at least 3 individual Physician Quality Reporting measures for 80% or more of applicable Medicare Part B FFS patients of each eligible professional (12 months) 11. EHR Data Submission Vendor reporting of a total of 3 HITECH core or alternate core measures AND at least 3 additional HITECH measures (12 months) 12. GPRO-based reporting (25-99 eligible professionals) of all applicable measures included in the submission web interface provided by CMS for consecutive, confirmed, and completed patients for each disease module and preventive care measures (12 months) 13. GPRO-based reporting (100+ eligible professionals) of all applicable measures included in the submission web interface provided by CMS for consecutive, confirmed, and completed patients for each disease module and preventive care measures (12 months) PQRS Reporting Options

2010 Data Physician Quality Reporting 244,145 participants (compared to 100,000 in 2007) – 168,843 individual eligible professionals/NPIs, representing 19,232 practices/TINs, earned incentive payments totaling $391,635,495 Total incentive payments increased 65% from 2009 ($236,696,432) – Number of practices/TINs qualified for incentive (19,232) increased 50% from 2009 (12,781) – Average incentive amount $2,157 for individual eligible professionals/NPIs and $20,364 per practice/TIN Compared to $1,962 and $18,519, respectively, in 2009 Participation rate increased from 15% to 24% between Most common reporting option continued to be individual measures through claims PQRS

The Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs provide incentive payments to eligible professionals, eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals (CAHs) as they adopt, implement, upgrade or demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHR technology. Eligible professionals can receive up to $44,000 through the Medicare EHR Incentive Program and up to $63,750 through the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. HITECH

More than 120,000 eligible health care professionals and more than 3,300 hospitals have qualified to participate in the program and receive an incentive payment since it began in January That exceeds a 100,000 goal set earlier this year. Payments exceed $4 Billion. That includes more than half of all eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals and 1 out of every 5 eligible health care professionals. HITECH

Incentive Payments for Medicare EPs First Calendar Year (CY) for which the EP Receives an Incentive Payment CY 2011CY 2012CY 2013CY2014CY 2015 and later CY 2011$18,000 CY 2012$12,000$18,000 CY 2013$8,000$12,000$15,000 CY 2014$4,000$8,000$12,000 CY 2015$2,000$4,000$8,000 $0 CY 2016$2,000$4,000 $0 TOTAL$44,000 $39,000$24,000$0 18 Additional 10% Incentive Payment for Medicare EPs Practicing in HPSAs

Incentive Payments for Medicaid EPs CY 2011CY 2012CY 2013CY 2014CY 2015CY 2016 CY 2011$21,250 CY 2012$8,500$21,250 CY 2013$8,500 $21,250 CY 2014$8,500 $21,250 CY 2015$8,500 $21,250 CY 2016$8,500 $21,250 CY 2017$8,500 CY 2018$8,500 CY 2019$8,500 CY 2020$8,500 CY 2021$8,500 TOTAL$63, First Calendar Year (CY) for which the EP Receives an Incentive Payment

HITECH Payment Adjustments 2015 – 1% 2016 – 2% 2017 – 3% 2018 – 4% 2019 – 5% 20

Cost of Non-Engagement Program eRxTBD PQRS1.5%2% HITECH1%2%3%4%5% 2.5%4%5%6%7% 21

Lost Revenue Opportunities PQRSeRxEMR Medicare EMR Medicaid %1.%$12,000$8, % $8,000$8, %---- $4,000$8,500 22

Medicare Program Integrity 23

Medicare Overview Each Work DayMonthlyYearly  5.4 million claims processed  From 1.5 million providers  Worth $1.1 billion  19,000 Part A and Part B provider and 900 durable medical equipment enrollment applications received  Over $497 billion in claims paid  Over 47 million beneficiaries

Spectrum of Fraud and Abuse Results in improper payments Targeting causes of improper payments – From honest mistakes to intentional deception 3–10% of health care funds lost due to fraud Errors Waste AbuseFraud

When Fraud is Detected Administrative actions imposed include – Auto-denials, payment suspensions, prepayment edits, civil monetary penalties Improper payments must be paid back Providers/companies barred from program – Can’t bill Medicare, Medicaid or CHIP Fines are levied Law enforcement gets involved Arrests and convictions

 Prevention Screen providers and suppliers effectively Spot fraudulent practices before claims are paid Detection – Strategic use of tools and techniques to detect fraud, waste and abuse Recovery – Identify and recover overpayments Reporting – Share key information with internal and external stakeholders CMS Fraud and Abuse Strategies 27

Prevention  CMS Center for Program Integrity  Consolidates CMS anti-fraud components New authorities from the Affordable Care Act – More rigorous screenings for health care providers – Cross-termination among Federal and state health programs – Temporarily stop enrollment of new category of providers and suppliers – Temporarily stop payments in cases of suspected fraud

URLs

NHIC J14 CAC Questions