1 Effect of CHIP Expansion on Employer Health Plans May 12, 2009
Copyright Presenters Kenneth A. Mason, JD Partner Lawrence Jenab, JD MA Associate
Copyright History of CHIP Created by HIPAA in 1996, as State Children’s Health Insurance Program (or “SCHIP”) Designed to provide health coverage for children in families above Medicaid level, but too poor to purchase private health coverage (up to 200% of poverty level) Funded by state and federal governments Within federal guidelines, states determine eligibility, benefits, payment levels, etc.
Copyright Overview of CHIPRA Changes Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (“CHIPRA”): Signed into law on February 4, 2009 Dropped “State” from name of program Allows states to cover children in families with incomes up to 300% of poverty level Expected to add 4 million children to the 7 million currently covered under CHIP
Copyright Effects on Employer Plans States may now provide premium assistance under employer plans Two new “special enrollment” events New employer notice obligations Employer must respond to state CHIP agency requests for information Many provisions effective as of
Copyright Scope of CHIPRA Changes Apply to “employer group health plans” But do not apply to: Employee-pay all plans Employer must pay at least 40% of “any premium” Presumably, this refers to any premium for coverage that includes the child (see later examples) Flexible spending accounts Limited scope dental and vision benefits High deductible health plans
Copyright Premium Assistance States may now subsidize the cost of coverage for dependent children under employer group health plans State must determine that this would be cost-effective Generally, subsidy may cover only incremental cost of covering children
Copyright Example One Gross Premiums – Insurance company charges the following premiums: Employee-only coverage= $500 Family coverage = $1,000 Employer Subsidy – Employer pays full employee premium, plus 25% of any additional premium for family coverage So, the incremental cost of covering a child = $375 (75% of $500), which is thus the maximum CHIP subsidy
Copyright Question Is it sufficient that this employer pays at least 40% (actually, 62.5%) of the total premium, even though it pays only 25% of the dependent premium? Or would this plan not qualify for premium assistance? See Example Two
Copyright Example Two Insurance policy premiums are the same as in Example One But this employer pays 35% of premium for whatever level of coverage employee elects So the incremental cost of covering a child is only $325 (65% of $500), which is less than in Example One But because this employer pays less than 40% of any premium, the plan apparently doesn’t qualify for the CHIP premium subsidy
Copyright More on the Subsidy An employee and spouse may also qualify for premium assistance Depends on state CHIP guidelines Must be cost-effective for state State may choose to subsidize less than full premium (under cost-sharing provision) Child (or parent) may decline to enroll in employer plan, thereby retaining only CHIP coverage
Copyright Still More on the Subsidy Subsidy may be paid to employee or directly to sponsoring employer Employer may opt out of receiving direct payments Doing so may impose hardship on employees, who would have to wait for CHIP reimbursements Theoretically effective as of
Copyright Special Enrollment Events Group health plan must allow eligible child (and sometimes parent) to enroll in plan upon becoming eligible for CHIP premium assistance (or similar premium assistance under Medicaid) Group health plan must allow eligible child (and sometimes parent) to enroll upon loss of coverage under either CHIP or Medicaid Both provisions effective as of
Copyright Special Enrollment Issues Health plan must allow at least 60 days to request special enrollment Note: Existing HIPAA special enrollment events apply 30-day deadline Health plan documents must be amended to reflect new enrollment events, as well as 60-day deadline Special enrollment notices should be revised, as well
Copyright Coordination of Benefits CHIP may still pay claims that are not covered under employer plan In that event, employer plan must pay primary to CHIP (similar to current COB rule for Medicaid) Effective as of May require plan amendment
Copyright Cafeteria Plan Issues May want to allow mid-year election changes for new special enrollment events (though not required) Depending on terms of cafeteria plan document, amendment may (or may not) be required Any amendment should be adopted before election changes are allowed
Copyright More Cafeteria Plan Issues State’s reimbursement of premiums to employees may undermine pre-tax nature of cafeteria plan election CHIPRA requires that child be allowed to drop employer coverage as of any month; not clear how this will work in cafeteria plan context (i.e., not a permissible election-change event).
Copyright Notice to Employees Employer must notify employees of availability of CHIP premium assistance (depending upon state) Notice may be included in SPD Enrollment materials Separate notice of eligibility
Copyright Model Notices DOL and HHS are to issue model notices (including state-specific notices) by February 2010 Employers must provide these notices as of first day of plan year after they are issued Penalty for noncompliance = $100 per participant per violation
Copyright Disclosure to States Employer must respond to request for information from state CHIP agency DOL and HHS are to issue model response form Employers must use that form as of next plan year Penalty for noncompliance = $100 per participant per violation
Copyright Next Steps Amend group health plan documents to add CHIP special enrollment events Review and possibly amend cafeteria plan documents Review and revise existing special enrollment right notices Confirm that the insurers or third-party administrators will be able to comply with these new special enrollment requirements as of the April 1st deadline.
Copyright Presenters Kenneth A. Mason, JD Partner Lawrence Jenab, JD MA Associate