Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication in Paralysis: A Clinical Experimental Approach By Adil Mehmood Khan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Neural Networks
Advertisements

Thought Translation Device
TMS-evoked EEG responses in symptomatic and recovered patients with mild traumatic brain injury Jussi Tallus 1, Pantelis Lioumis 2, Heikki Hämäläinen 3,
All slides © S. J. Luck, except as indicated in the notes sections of individual slides Slides may be used for nonprofit educational purposes if this copyright.
Non-Invasive BCI.
IntroductionMethods Participants  7 adults with severe motor impairment.  9 adults with no motor impairment.  Each participant was asked to utilize.
Brain-computer interfaces: classifying imaginary movements and effects of tDCS Iulia Comşa MRes Computational Neuroscience and Cognitive Robotics Supervisors:
1 1 MPI for Biological Cybernetics 2 Stanford University 3 Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen Epidural.
Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication in Paralysis: A Clinical Experimental Approach By Adil Mehmood Khan.
All slides © S. J. Luck, except as indicated in the notes sections of individual slides Slides may be used for nonprofit educational purposes if this copyright.
Artifact (artefact) reduction in EEG – and a bit of ERP basics CNC, 19 November 2014 Jakob Heinzle Translational Neuromodeling Unit.
MEG Experiments Stimulation and Recording Setup Educational Seminar Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis February 8th, 2005.
Billy Vermillion. EEG  Electroencephalography A test to measure the electrical activity of the brain. ○ Brain cells communicate by producing tiny electrical.
Lunch Talk on Brain-Computer Interfacing Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen Pieter Laurens Baljon December 14, :30-13:00.
Standard electrode arrays for recording EEG are placed on the surface of the brain. Detection of High Frequency Oscillations Using Support Vector Machines:
1 High Transfer Rate, Real-time Brain-Computer Interface Machine-based learning techniques towards a practical spelling device for the completely paralyzed.
A commonly used feature to discriminate between hand and foot movements is the variance of the EEG signal at certain electrodes. To this end, one calculates.
Functional Brain mapping using ECoG (electrocorticography)
Discussion Section: Review, Viirre Lecture Adrienne Moore
BCI Systems Brendan Allison, Ph.D. Institute for Automation University of Bremen 6 November, 2008.
IV. BCI Software JO, INAH CH 20. BioSig
Closed and Open Electrical Fields
Brain Computer Interfaces
Papavasileiou-1 CSE 5810 Brain Computer Interface in BMI Ioannis Papavasileiou Computer Science & Engineering Department The University of Connecticut.
NeuroPhone : Brain-Mobile Phone Interface using a wireless EEG Headset Ilho nam.
Last lecture: Foundations of DSP Basic Operations: convolution Digital Filters: FIR and IIR Some Classification methods Biosignal Libraries and Applications.
CH 18. Adaptation in brain-computer interfaces. Introduction  Inherent nonstationarity of EEG  Why do we need ‘adaptation’ ? varies between BCI sessions.
Review, Hollan & Gorodnitsky Adrienne Moore, by
Brain-Computer Interface for VR control Christoph Guger.
Change blindness and time to consciousness Professor: Liu Student: Ruby.
Presenter : Jung-Ting Jin Adviser : Dr. Shih-Chung Chen Chairman : Dr. Hung-Chi Yang Date : December 31, 2014 BCI2000 : A General- Purpose Brain-Computer.
1. 2 Abstract - Two experimental paradigms : - EEG-based system that is able to detect high mental workload in drivers operating under real traffic condition.
Physiological sensors and EEG A short introduction to (neuro-)physiological measurements.
IntroductionMethods Participants  7 adults with severe motor impairment performed EEG recording sessions in their own homes.  9 adults with no motor.
Graz-Brain-Computer Interface: State of Research By Hyun Sang Suh.
ICRA2009 Evaluation of a robot as embodied interface for Brain Computer Interface systems E. Menegatti, L. Tonin Intelligent Autonomous System Laboratory.
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 4
Biomedical Sciences BI20B2 Sensory Systems Human Physiology - The basis of medicine Pocock & Richards,Chapter 8 Human Physiology - An integrated approach.
Operant Conditioning of Cortical Activity E Fetz, 1969.
Virtual Reality in Brain- Computer Interface Research F. Lee 1, R. Scherer 2, H. Bischof 1, G. Pfurtscheller 2 1) Institute for Computer Graphics and Vision.
1 The Low-Cost Implement of a Phase Coding SSVEP-Based BCI System Kuo-Kai Shyu, Po-Lei Lee, Ming-Huan Lee and Yun-Jen Chiu Department of Electrical Engineering.
The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface: Machine Learning-Based Detection of User Specific Brain States Umar Farooq Berlin Brain Computer Interface.
1 EEG-based Online Brain- Computer Interface System Chi-Ying Chen,Chang-Yu Tsai,Ya-Chun Tang Advisor:Yong-Sheng Chen.
EEG-Based Communication and Control: Short-Term Role Feedback Present by: Yu Yuan-Chu Dennis J. Mcfarland, Lynn M. McCane, and J. R. Wolpaw.
Classifying Event-Related Desynchronization in EEG, ECoG, and MEG Signals Kim Sang-Hyuk.
作者:Ali Bulent Usakli and Serkan Gurkan
Analysis of Movement Related EEG Signal by Time Dependent Fractal Dimension and Neural Network for Brain Computer Interface NI NI SOE (D3) Fractal and.
Motivation Increase bandwidth of BCI. Reduce training time Use non invasive technique.
Using Feed Forward NN for EEG Signal Classification Amin Fazel April 2006 Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering University of Missouri.
A High-Performance Brain- Computer Interface
Institute of Automation Christian Mandel Thorsten Lüth Tim Laue Thomas Röfer Axel Gräser Bernd Krieg-Brückner.
MVPD – Multivariate pattern decoding Christian Kaul MATLAB for Cognitive Neuroscience.
EE 4BD4 Lecture 11 The Brain and EEG 1. Brain Wave Recordings Recorded extra-cellularly from scalp (EEG) Recorded from extra-cellularly from surface of.
Brain Computer Interfaces: Digital Signal Processing of Steady-State Visually Evoked Potentials Ian Linsmeier & Ahmed Saif ECE630.
BRAIN GATE TECHNOLOGY.. Brain gate is a brain implant system developed by the bio-tech company Cyberkinetics in 2003 in conjunction with the Department.
B rain- C omputer I Luigi Bianchi Università di Roma “Tor Vergata” Luigi Bianchi Università di Roma “Tor Vergata”
Cortical Event-Realated Potentials to Auditory Stimuli 초고주파 및 항공전자통신 연구실 석사 2 차 : 임의선 (林宜宣) Lin Yixuan
Bongjae Choi, Sungho Jo Presented by: Yanrong Wo
BCI Keyboards: towards mind writing
Brain operated wheelchair
[Ran Manor and Amir B.Geva] Yehu Sapir Outlines Review
The Thought Translation device
Fabien LOTTE, Cuntai GUAN Brain-Computer Interfaces laboratory
Major Project Presentation Phase - I
Brain-computer communication: Self-regulation of slow cortical potentials for verbal communication  Andrea Kübler, PhD, Nicola Neumann, DiplPsych, Jochen.
IEEE Trans. Biomedical Eng. ( ) Presenter : Younghak Shin
Machine Learning for Visual Scene Classification with EEG Data
The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface: Machine Learning-Based Detection of User Specific Brain States Umar Farooq.
A Low-Cost EEG System-Based Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface for Humanoid Robot Navigation and Recognition Bongjae Choi, Sungho Jo Presented by Megan Fillion.
BCI Review paper Sections 8 & 9
Presentation transcript:

Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication in Paralysis: A Clinical Experimental Approach By Adil Mehmood Khan

Contents ● Introduction ● BCI for communication in paralysis ● BCI software ● Self-regulation of SCPs and training ● Spelling through brain-cmputer communication

Brain-Computer-Interface (BCI) ? “A system for controlling a device e.g. computer, wheelchair or a neuroprothesis by human intention which does not depend on the brain’s normal output pathways of peripheral nerves and muscles” [Wolpaw et al., 2002]. HCI – Human Computer Interface DBI – Direct Brain Interface (University of Michigan) TTD – Thought Translation Device (University of Tübingen)

BCI Some examples of BCI applications Leeb et al., Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2007 (doi:10.1155/2007/79642)

Brain Computer Interfaces ● Allow patients to control a computer by concious changes of brain activity ● Provide a means of communication to completeley paralysed patients: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), cerebral palsy, locked in syndrome ● Can be used to control a cursor, select symbols, control external devices like orthesis / prothesis (depending on type of BCI) ● Have a very low data rate, typical a few bit per second or less ● First results in the 1970ies (Vidal, visual evoked potentials, VEP-BCI)

Brain Computer Interfaces Principles of operation:

Brain Computer Interfaces – Electrophysilogical Activities used ● SCP Slow Cortical Potentials ● Mu Movement Imagination ● P300, SSVEP ERP-Analysis ● cortical neurons, direct brain interfaces The control information is extracted from the real time EEG-recording http://www.wired.com/news/images/full/thoughtlock1_f.jpg

Brain Computer Interfaces – SSVEP ● Steady State Visual Evoked Potentials derived from the visual (occipital) cortex ● focussing attention to visual stimuli of different frequency shows up in the EEG freqeuncy bands ● relibable and high transfer rate, but some prerequisites (eyes) http://www.iua.upf.es/activitats/ semirec/semi-Reilly/

Brain Computer Interfaces – SCP BCIs ● detection of slow cortical potentials (SCPs) ● needs DC EEG Amplifiers ● first successful device end 1990‘s: Niels Birbaumers Thought translation device intensive training was necessary to gain control over the SCP waves SCPs: DC-shifts, slow negativation of cortical areas Preparation of movement and cognitive tasks, Several hundert milliseconds before the task Patinet using TTD to write a letter http://www.heise.de/ct/06/18/088/bild1.jpg

Brain Computer Interfaces - μ-rhythm BCIs ● μ–rhythm is the idle-rhythm of the motor cortex ● frequencies around 10 and 18 Hz. ● ERD / ERS – event related desynchronisation / synchronisation movements or imagination of movements inhibit the μ–rhythm Berlin-BCI, http://www.fraunhofer.de/

Brain Computer Interfaces - P300 BCIs ● P300 wave – posivite component in the event related potential, 300ms after a stimulus ● natural response to events considered as important ● selection of a symbol: count the flashes, algorithm averages trails and finds a P300 P300 runtime user interface

Brain Computer Interfaces - μ / P300 comparison μ - BCIs P300 BCIs Require training do not require training 2d-control possible 1D control only movement imagination concentration / decision affected by movement affected by distraction

BCI for Communication in Paralysis An overview of different approaches to BCIs developed at Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology. Thought-Translation Device (TTD). Brain-Controlled Web Browser. Visual and Auditory feedback modes. Oscillatory Features based Classification.

SCPs: A Brief History An initial application: Epileptic Seizures Down regulation of brain potentials towards a positive amplitude. BCI for “locked-in syndrome” Communication through self-regulation of SCPs Also known as TTD

BCI Software Thought Translation Device: Components EEG Amplifier EEG8 system G.tec amplifiers BrainAmp system Two Monitors One for operator (supervise the training) One for patient (feedback) Sampling frequency: 256Hz Digitized with 16 bits/sample Amplitude range: +(-) 1mV Low frequency cutoff: 0.01 Hz High frequency cutoff:: 40-70 Hz

TTD Feedback and Communication System The current version of TTD software is derived from BCI2000 standard

TTD Feedback and Communication System

TTD Software Data acquisition and storage Online signal processing Classification Feedback and application interface

Brain Computer Interfaces - BCI2000 ● Research Platform for BCI Systems ● Written by Gerwin Schalk, Wadsworth Center, Albany (NY) ● Modular structure: Signal Aquisition, Signal Processing and User Application communicatie via TCP/IP ● Operator module used for configuration of the other modules ● various user tasks availbale: 1D/2D cursor, Speller, P300, SCP ● free for academic use ● driver for OpenEEG available http://www.bci2000.org/

BCI2000: Components Filters Spatial, temporal, and spectral Online artifact detection and correction Classification Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) Simple Threshold Classification Support Vector Machine (SVM) MATLAB interfaces.

Self-Regulation of SCPs ● Slow event-related direct-current shifts of the EEG. ● They last from 0.3 seconds up to several seconds. ● Occur as a result of external or internal events. ● Negative shift is related to excitability of neurons. ● Positive shifts are measured during the execution of cognitive tasks ● Healthy subjects as well as patients can learn to produce positive or negative SCPs ● Training requires feedback Visual Auditory

Self-Regulation of SCPs ● Recording site for feedback signal is usually Cz. ● EEG is usually recorded from 3-7 Ag/AgCI-electrodes placed at Cz, C3, C4, Fz, and Pz. ● vEOG is recorded using a bipolar channel for online and offline artifact correction. ● A fixed percentage of vEOG signal is subtracted from the SCP signal at Cz for EOG correction. ● SCPs are calculated by applying a 500ms moving average to EEG signal.

Self-Regulation of SCPs ● With the visual feedback modality: Subjects viewed the course of their SCPs as the vertical movement of feedback cursor. Vertical cursor movement corresponded to the SCP amplitude. Task was to move the cursor towards the modality indicated by a red rectangle.

Self-Regulation of SCPs: Training Process Target Presentation interval Selection interval Response interval

Self-Regulation of SCPs: Training Process Target Presentation interval Selection interval Response interval ● First 2-4 sec of the trial. ● Target is illuminated in red. ● Allows the subject to prepare for the corresponding SCP regulation.

Self-Regulation of SCPs: Training Process Target Presentation interval Selection interval Response interval ● Feedback is provided by the vertical position of the steady horizontally moving cursor. ● Cortical negativity moved the cursor up. ● Positivity moved the cursor down. ● Center of the screen corresponded to the baseline. ● Task is to move the cursor to the red area.

Self-Regulation of SCPs: Training Process Target Presentation interval Selection interval Response interval ● A response is classified as correct if: Average potential carried the correct polarity. Or is inside the target boundaries of the required goal. ● Classification methods, such as LDA or SVM can be used for improvement of the correct response rate.

Self-Regulation of SCPs: Performance 1st Trial: Target presentation , Selection, Response 2nd Trial: Target presentation , Selection, Response NthTrial: Target presentation , Selection, Response ● Performance Percentage of correct responses in valid trials. After a rate of 75% correct responses, subjects were trained to select letters and write messages ● Subjects typically reach this level after 1 to 5 months of training, with 1 to 2 training days per week. ● A training day comprises 7 to 12 runs, and a run comprises 70 to 100 trials.

Applications Spelling by Brain-Computer Communication: A program driven by “yes” or “no” responses, which serve as “select” or “reject” commands. Requires three intervals in one trial. Allows user to select letters from a language alphabet and to combine letters into words and sentences. Presentation Selection Response

Applications Spelling by Brain-Computer Communication: A program driven by “yes” or “no” responses, which serve as “select” or “reject” commands. Requires three intervals in one trial. Allows user to select letters from a language alphabet and to combine letters into words and sentences. Presentation Selection Response Presentation of the letter set. Displayed in target rectangles on the screen.

Applications Spelling by Brain-Computer Communication: A program driven by “yes” or “no” responses, which serve as “select” or “reject” commands. Requires three intervals in one trial. Allows user to select letters from a language alphabet and to combine letters into words and sentences. Presentation Selection Response Feedback is provided. Self regulation of SCP amplitudes is used to select or reject the letter set.

Applications Spelling by Brain-Computer Communication: A program driven by “yes” or “no” responses, which serve as “select” or “reject” commands. Requires three intervals in one trial. Allows user to select letters from a language alphabet and to combine letters into words and sentences. Presentation Selection Response Response interval indicating to user the result of the selection. Error correction is done using a “go-back” option.

Spelling by Brain-Computer Communication

Spelling by Brain-Computer Communication Performance: Writing the most conveniently situated letter , “E,” takes 5 trials. Writing the most remote sign requires 9 trials, i.e. 36 – 45 sec. Improvement A simple personal dictionary to make free spelling less time consuming. Contains words that are frequently used by patients. A complete word is suggested after at least two letters have been written. This word can then be chosen with a single selection response.