Milestone #4 Test Plan & Conceptual Design Review Group 4 Victoria Jefferson Reece Spencer Andy Jeanthenor Yanira Torres Kevin Miles Tadamitsu Byrne 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MDA Info Session General Meeting: Information & Recruitment Sept 19, 2011: 6-8p BA3008 Mechatronics Design Association General Info Session Sept 2011.
Advertisements

Voice Controlled Surgical Assistant ECE 7995 Dupindar ghotra, Muhammad Syed, Sam li, Sophia lei.
Outline quad-copter Abstract Quad-Copter Movement Hand movement
Final Presentation Group 18 Victoria Jefferson Reece Spencer Andy Jeanthenor Yanira Torres Kevin Miles Tadamitsu Byrne 1.
Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Sponsor: NAVSEA Keyport Mentor: Mike Kapus Ben Brand, Kendra Brower, Joe Langevin, Jeffrey Le To power our vehicle, we have.
Justin Akerman (CE) Chris Hoerbelt (ME) Hersh Anand (EE) Anthony Poli (ME) Greg Mucks (ME) Jon Notaro (EE) Eric Tripp (EE) Customer: Stan Rickel.
RED SAUC’ISSE SAUC’ Interval Super Submarine of ENSIETA The submarine robot of the ENSIETA.
Direction-Finding Sonar System for Autonomous Submarine Nicole Rennalls, Estee Amana, Frederick Ealick, Mitcham Costley ECE Department Georgia Institute.
A.U.V. Emeric Rochford Dale Williams Bryan Douse Ryan Gray.
Closing Summary Design Testing Abstract Monitoring crop heath via aerial photography is a proper technique used to maximize agricultural productivity.
Group 4 Rotationally Refreshed Display Patrick Boyd Daniel Hill.
Wireless Surveillance Vehicle Lance P. Riegert Rodrigo A. Urra Steve C. Wilson September 18, 2007Wireless Surveillance Vehicle1 of 20 Senior Design Project.
R I T Advisors: Dr. Wayne WalterMechanical Engineering Dept. Faculty Jeffrey WebbTeacher’s Assistant Team Members: Aman Verma EE - Electrical Craftsman.
Team GPS Rover Critical Design Review Alex Waskiewicz Andrew Bousky Baird McKevitt Dan Regelson Zach Hornback.
The Enforcer Laura Celentano Glenn Ramsey Michael Szalkowski.
Remote Surveillance Vehicle Design Review By: Bill Burgdorf Tom Fisher Eleni Binopolus-Rumayor.
Electronic Tagging and Tracking By Barbara Stickel SCM 330: Ocean Discovery through Technology.
Dynamic Traffic Light Timing Tony Faillaci John Gilroy Ben Hughes Justin Porter Zach Zientek.
Infosession UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO MECHATRONICS DESIGN ASSOCIATION.
David Rogers, Stu Andrzejewski, Kelly Desmond, Brad Garrod.
Design and Implementation of Metallic Waste Collection Robot
Milestone #1: Specifications and Requirements. Overview of Design Team Goals Education Design and construction process Competition Teamwork Communication.
Client: Space Systems & Controls Laboratory (SSCL) Advisor : Matthew Nelson Anders Nelson (EE) Mathew Wymore (CprE)
Jonathan Wong Chong 14.8V Polymer Li-Ion Batteries o Only powering thrusters 19v 4Ah Li-Ion External Laptop Battery o Powers main.
MICA: A Wireless Platform for Deeply Embedded Networks
Dynamic Traffic Light Timing Tony Faillaci John Gilroy Ben Hughes Justin Porter Zach Zientek.
Administrative Introduction Our goals for this project is for the two robots to work together intelligently using wireless communication Not only did.
Milestone #2 Project Proposal Group 4 Victoria Jefferson Reece Spencer Andy Jeanthanor Yanira Torres Kevin Miles Tadamitsu Byrne 1.
A.G.I.L.E Autonomously Guided Intelligent Lawn Equipment Team Members: Brad Ramsey Derek Rodriguez Dane Wielgopolan Project Advisors: Dr. Joel Schipper.
Autonomous Tracking Robot Andy Duong Chris Gurley Nate Klein Wink Barnes Georgia Institute of Technology School of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
RC CAR CONTROLLER BASED ON INTEL GALILEO SOC PLATFORM Nadav Shiloach Sagi Sabag Supervisor: Idan Shmuel Spring 2014 One Semester Project PROJECT’S ENDING.
MDA Info Session General Meeting: Information & Recruitment Sept 19, 2012: 7-8pm Mechatronics Design Association General Info Session Sept 2012.
DemoSat IV Critical Design Review Metropolitan State College of Denver April 21, 2006.
Kaitlin Peranski Spencer Wasilewski Kyle Jensen Kyle Lasher Jeremy Berke Chris Caporale.
Ruslan Masinjila Aida Militaru.  Nature of the Problem  Our Solution: The Roaming Security Robot  Functionalities  General System View  System Design.
Milestone #3 Design Review Group 4 Victoria Jefferson Reece Spencer Andy Jeanthanor Yanira Torres Kevin Miles Tadamitsu Byrne 1.
Centre for Mechanical Technology and Automation Institute of Electronics Engineering and Telematics  TEMA  IEETA  Sensors.
Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Proposal 10/27/2010.
Kurran Kelly – Lead Designer Silas Van Natter – Team Lead Josh Van Patten – Team Budget Manager Brandt Pedrow – Team Liaison and Recorder Branden Bakken.
Administrative Introduction Our goals for this project are for the three robots to work together intelligently to complete a maze faster than an individual.
Robotic Sensor Network: Wireless Sensor Platform for Autonomous Topology Formation Project: Sponsored By: Advisor: Dr. S. Jay Yang, CEManager: Steven.
Bianca Wood Chris Culver Shane Parker Yousef Al-Khalaf.
AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE Propulsion Vertical Thrust Controloverview The AUV Team Thrust Experiment Pool Testing The ultimate purpose of the AUV is.
Michael Lisoski Leblanc Meneses Jason Schaer Bryan Staton.
3D Environmental Mapping and Imaging for AUVSI RoboBoat David Bumpus, Daniel Kubik, & Juan Vazquez Advisor: Dr. José Sánchez Customer: Mr. Nick Schmidt.
Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Team Amaze Me. EE 296 Project (MicroMouse) Members –Brandon Gibu –Ah Ram Kim –John-Kalani Miyajima –Justin Ogata Website.
DemoSat IV: Metro Triple Threat Metropolitan State College of Denver Matt Hanley David Fifield Jason Igo Evan I Spitler Devlin Thyne Matt Hanley David.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 4  SPRING 2015 Matt Carpenter, Grant Gumina, Chris Holly, and Michael Pak.
Hybrid Power Controller (HPC) Final Presentation Senior Design II.
Path The purpose of this project is to design a universal data recording device to monitor the health of a Dresser-Rand compressor during operation. In.
MSU SeaMATE ROV Explorer Class
Dual-Use Wideband Microphone System
Mid-Semester Review Senior Design 2 October 8, 2013
MSU ROV Team Final Review Senior Design 2 November 19, 2013.
Smart Lens Robot William McCombie IMDL Spring 2007.
Maze Twinbots Group 28 Uyen Nguyen – EE Ly Nguyen – EE Luke Ireland - EE.
Phil Dempsey ISS Vehicle Office July 15, 2014 Inspection Considerations from the ISS Program NASA In-Space Inspection Workshop 2014.
Wireless Bluetooth Controller For DC Motor. Introduction Wireless becoming more and more available and widely used Bluetooth is one of the major players.
The entire system was tested in a small swimming pool. The fully constructed submarine is shown in Fig. 14. The only hardware that was not on the submarine.
P10203 LV1 MOTOR CONTROLLER FINAL REVIEW MAY 14, 2010 Electrical: Kory Williams, Adam Gillon, Oladipo Tokunboh Mechanical: Louis Shogry, Andrew Krall.
Four OTRs for ATF2 OTR History Current OTR setup New OTR design.
Inertial Measurement Unit. Project Advisor: Dr. Basart Client: Matt Nelson Team Members (491): Matt Ulrich Luis Garcia Amardeep Jawandha Julian Currie.
Components of Mechatronic Systems AUE 425 Week 2 Kerem ALTUN October 3, 2016.
SOAREX VII Mission Design, construct, test, and fly an ultralight (
Modular R.O.V for Sub-Sea Operations
‘SONAR’ using Arduino & ultrasonic distance sensor
Modular R.O.V for Sub-Sea Operations
Image Acquisition and Processing of Remotely Sensed Data
Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle ( )
AN INEXPENSIVE ROBOTIC KIT FOR CHILDREN EDUCATION
Presentation transcript:

Milestone #4 Test Plan & Conceptual Design Review Group 4 Victoria Jefferson Reece Spencer Andy Jeanthenor Yanira Torres Kevin Miles Tadamitsu Byrne 1

Project Overview Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Competition Competing in Camp Transdec, CA in July 2011 Competition Overview AUV will complete tasks underwater 15 minute time limit per run 6 underwater tasks Graded on completion of tasks as well as team design 2

Preliminary Rules Theme: RoboLove Tasks Validation gate Orange Path Marker Dropper PVC Recovery Acoustic Pinger Weight and size constraints Must weigh under 110 pounds Six-foot long, by three-foot wide, by three-foot high 3

4 1) Introduction 2) Major Components a.Frame/Hull/Body b.Power System c.Thruster d.Mechanical Grabber & Dropper e.Microcontroller f.Sensors 1.IMU 2.Cameras 1.Camera Housing 3.Hydrophones 3) Schedule 4) Budget

5

Frame Overview 80/20 Aluminum Allows for easy adjustability Mitigates vibration reduces hydrophone interference Hull placed within the frame 6

Hull Overview Hull consists of a watertight Pelican Box Purchasing Pelican Box is simpler than designing watertight housing and is also inexpensive Hull will house all onboard electronics Reduces the risk of water damage to electronics Exterior components will be connected via Fischer connectors 7

Body and Hull Tests Unit Test Determine if the Pelican Box is water tight at a depth of 15 feet with all modifications Integration Tests Pelican Box with Watertight Connectors 8

Vehicle Power System Batteries Two 14.8 V DC batteries combine for 29.6V DC output Built-in PCM maintains a voltage between 20.8 V and 33.6 V Motors Max Power: 150W(each motor) Motor Controller included 9 Switching Voltage Regulator (S.V.R.) for USB Power 15V-40V input Output 5.3V, 6A

10

Power System Tests Objective: Ensure sufficient AUV run time All components from previous slide will be connected as illustrated Test goals Desired run time: 1 hour Expected run time: 1.5 hours Minimum necessary run time: 15 minutes 11

Thruster Overview SeaBotix SBT150: Chosen for functional ability and water resistance as well it’s built-in motor controller, voltage regulator, and low power consumption Four thrusters will be placed on the AUV in a configuration that will allow for forward/reverse powertrain, left/right turning and depth control Similar to BTD150 but includes motor controller 12

Thruster Tests Unit Tests Testing from 0-100% power in 10% increments After submerged testing, test for water leakage around motor Integration Test Test all 4 motors in conjunction with AUV for location of placement among vehicle 13

Mechanical Grabber Used to complete the final task of the mission Grasp and release mechanism located at the bottom of the AUV Our design will depend on the size and orientation of the object The current design is to have a mechanical claw attached to a solenoid that will attach to an object in the water 14

Mechanical Grabber Tests 15 Integration Test Grab and Release mechanism Servo assembly

Marker Dropper Use to complete tasks in which a marker must be dropped Will be machined out of aluminum Utilize waterproof servomotor that will rotate marker dropper mechanism to release markers Traxxas servomotors will be used This method was chosen because it was the most cost efficient 16

Marker Dropper Tests 17 Unit Tests Capable of releasing both markers individually. It will initially be tested in air then again in water to ensure that there are no leaks present that will affect the performance. Ultimately the dropper will also be tested in the pool environment to ensure optimal performance.

Microcontrollers The BeagleBoard(CPU): USB/DC Powered “Brain” of AUV Inputs/Data Processing: Hydrophones Cameras IMU Outputs: PWM Motor Signal (via Arduino Board) 18

Microcontrollers Software: Operating system will be a Linux distribution Angstrom Open embedded Mission code will be written in a combination of C/C++ Output will be sent via PWMs from the Arduino Board to the motor controllers to drive the motors Program will be decision based using FSMs and will run real- time 19

Hardware Structure 20 BeagleBoard USB Hub IMU Camera A Camera B Camera C Arduino Board Motor Controllers Thrusters Servo Motors Marker Dropper Mechanical Grabber Hydrophone Board Hydrophone Array Voltage Regulator

Software Structure 21 Start Path Found? Detect Current Task Follow Path To Objective Objective Found? Search For Path Path Lost? Complete Objective Store Data and Increment Task Counter Have All Task Been Completed Finish Y Y Y Y N N N N

Risks Associated with… 22 The Microcontroller and Software Error in sensor-microcontroller communication Software not executing tasks properly Critical Scheduling issues

Microcontroller Tests Unit Tests: Component Communication Input Sensor Analysis MCU Hardware Tests Test Goals: MCU hardware works properly Full component communication is established Software works properly 23

Prioritization of Sensors Cameras Function: Eyes underwater Need: Critical (used in all tasks) IMU Function: Sense of Direction Underwater Need: Moderate Hydrophones Function: Ears Underwater Need: Low (used in only one task) 24

Software for Sensors Cameras OpenCV IMU RS-232 interface SmartIMU Sensor Evaluation Software Linux C Source Code Hydrophones In the process of finding a Linux software capable of processing and managing data 25

Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) Navigation/Stability Control PhidgetSpatial 3/3/3-9 Axis IMU Accelerometer: measure static and dynamic acceleration (5g) Compass: measures magnetic field (±4 Gauss) Gyroscope: Measures angular rotation (400°/sec) Chosen for low cost and because it contained a compass instead of magnetometer unlike other IMUs 26

IMU Tests 27 Unit Tests Perform on Windows OS to ensure the operational capabilities of device Perform on Linux to test for consistency with microprocessor platform

Cameras Cameras chosen: 3 Unibrain Fire I CCD webcams LogiTech C250 will be used for initial performance assessment of OpenCV Needed for light/color and shape recognition CCD camera chosen for ability to operate in low light conditions The cameras chosen for cost efficiency as well as compatibility with our software 28

Cameras Positioning Forward facing CCD camera for floating objects Downward facing CCD camera for objects on the pool floor Overhead camera for shape recognition Housed in watertight casing to protect from water damage 29

Risks Associated with… 30 The Cameras Failure of one or more cameras Damaged Malfunctioning Camera not compatible with microcontroller Camera power failure

Camera Tests Unit Tests Test to ensure proper configuration in OpenCV software environment Test for acceptable quality images Compatible with microprocessor Integration Tests Image quality under the camera housing and underwater 31

Camera Housing Analysis 32 Stress Tensor (Pa) Total Deflection (in) PVC piping Viewing lens Aluminum Plate

Risks Associated with… 33 The Camera Housing Leaks as a result of: Fracture Improper sealing

Camera Housing Tests Unit Test Determine if the housing is water tight at a depth of 15 feet Determine if analysis simulated was accurate Camera Housing can withstand pressure associated with being underwater Integration Test Camera housing will be tested the cameras in them as mentioned in the Camera Integration test 34

Hydrophones SensorTec SQ26-01 hydrophone Full audio-band signal detection and underwater mobile recording Operates at desired sound level Performs in desired frequency range (22-40 kHz) 35

Hydrophone Configuration 4 hydrophones will be utilized to determine the location of the pinger 2 hydrophones will be placed horizontally to determine direction The other two will be vertical in order to determine the depth 36

Risks Associated with… 37 The Hydrophones Failure of one or more hydrophones Damaged Malfunctioning Hydrophones not compatible with microcontroller

Hydrophone Tests Unit Tests: Hydrophone performance Hydrophone configuration 38

39

40

Risks Associated with… 41 The Schedule Temporary loss of team member Permanent loss of member Robosub damaged on way to competition Malfunctioning parts Parts are not compatible with each other Team is critically behind schedule

42

43 ItemQuantityPrice Main Battery2$ Voltage Regulator1$80.00 Motors/Thrusters4$3, Hydrophones4$ Microcontroller1$40.00 BeagleBoard1Free CCD Camera3$ Pelican Case1$ Wires/Electronic Kits/Cables & Connectors N/A$1, FrameN/A$ Aluminum Plate 14 in x 12 in x ¼ in1$70.00 Inertial Measurement Unit1$ Total ExpensesN/A$6,920.00

44 ItemPrice Transportation$6, Hotel Accommodations$4, Miscellaneous Expenses$2, Total Expenses$12,000.00

Risks Associated with… 45 The Budget Robosub damaged on way to competition Malfunctioning parts Parts are not compatible with each other Insufficient equipment funds Insufficient travel funds

References "Official Rules and Mission AUVSI & ONR's 13th Annual International Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Competition." AUVSI Foundation. Web. Sept.-Oct Barngrover, Chris. "Design of the 2010 Stingray Autonomous Underwater Vehicle." AUVSI Foundation. Office of Naval Research, 13 July Web. 09 Nov < anDiegoiBotics.2010JournalPaper.pdf 46