Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program Principal Evaluation System August 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
Assessment Assessment should be an integral part of a unit of work and should support student learning. Assessment is the process of identifying, gathering.
Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program Administrator Systems August 2002.
Teacher Evaluation Model
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Illinois Principal Preparation Program Internship Assessment Rubric
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Field Test of Psychologist/ Psychometrist Evaluation System July 2000 Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program.
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
The Academic Assessment Process
Assessing Student Learning
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
1 SESSION 1 using The New Performance Standards and New VDOE Requirements
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
Principles of Assessment
Student Growth Goals: How Principals can Support Teachers in the Process Jenny Ray PGES Consultant KDE/NKCES.
Differentiated Supervision
Portfolios.
The Quality Review A Reflection.
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION. Copyright Keith Morrison, 2004 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT... Concerns direct reality rather than disconnected.
Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program Field Test of Central Office System July 2000.
Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program Teacher
Slide 1 D2.TCS.CL5.04. Subject Elements This unit comprises five Elements: 1.Define the need for tourism product research 2.Develop the research to be.
Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program Field Test of Library/Media Specialist Evaluation System July 2000.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program Field Test of Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System July 2000.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program Field Test of Superintendent System July 2000.
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Teaching Today: An Introduction to Education 8th edition
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Specialty Area Educator
Field Test of Counselor System July 2000 Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program Field Test of Special Education II Teacher Evaluation System July 2000.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
Record Keeping and Using Data to Determine Report Card Markings.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
College of Education Graduate Programs
The Professional Development Plan for License Renewal in Wisconsin Goal Writing Workshop.
Alternative Assessment Chapter 8 David Goh. Factors Increasing Awareness and Development of Alternative Assessment Educational reform movement Goals 2000,
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program Field Test of Assistant Principal System July 2000.
The Nebraska Frameworks External Visitation Team Exit Report.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program Principal System July 2000.
© 2012, Community Training and Assistance Center © 2012, Teaching Learning Solutions Linking ISLLC and your Principal Rubrics to a Case.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Presentation transcript:

Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program Principal Evaluation System August 2002

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System 13 Knowledge/Skill Areas 1. Communication 2. Collaboration 3. Assessment/Evaluation 4. Organization 6. Laws/Policies 7. Problem Solving 8. Innovation 10. School Operations/Management 11. Fiscal Management/Leadership 9. Technology Management 13. Leadership of Human Resources 12. Professional Responsibilities 5. Planning

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System Scoring 4-point rating scale with rationale statements (rubrics) Holistic scoring cross-cutting 13 knowledge/skill areas Evaluators Trained in conducting evaluations Must meet reliability standards Principals Evaluation content varies with years of experience in position Evaluation process is same for all Principal Evaluation System

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System Instrumentation/Data Sources 1. Evaluation Summary Report (shows scores and score rationales by knowledge/skill area) 2. Professional Development Plan (becomes a data source in next cycle) 1. Portfolio developed by principal 2. Surveys of various stakeholder groups 3. Interviews (written or oral) 4. Supervisor’s Review Form 5. School observation Summary Report Sources Optional Instrumentation 1. Self-Assessment Form (completed by principal, but not considered in evaluation scoring) Principal Evaluation System

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System Principal Data: evidence of competence produced, assembled and submitted by the principal  Portfolio  Written interview  Interpretation of survey responses  Line of Evidence: all data/information supporting the score awarded in a knowledge/skill area, whether produced by the principal or the evaluator  Evaluator Data: evidence of principal competence developed by the evaluator  Oral Interview  School management observation  Supervisor's Review Form   Clarifying interview Principal Evaluation System

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System Self Assmnt Interview SRF Portfolio Mgt Obs Evaluation Summary Report Surveys Prof Devlpmnt Plan Knowledge/ Skills Lines of Evidence Scores How the Principal Evaluation System Works

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System Steps in Evaluation Process 1. Orientation (LEA responsibility) 2. Self-assessment (principal) 3. Prepare portfolio (principal) 4. Distribute and analyze surveys (principal) 5. Supervisor Review Form - (evaluator/supervisor) 6. Conduct observation (evaluator) Principal Evaluation System

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System Steps in Evaluation Process (cont.) 8. Conduct interviews (evaluator/principal ) 9. Prepare Evaluation Summary Report (evaluator) 10. Summary conference and PDP (evaluator/principal) 7. Review portfolio (evaluator) Principal Evaluation System

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System  Generates data for all areas of knowledge and skills  Optionally used by the principal and shared with evaluator only if principal agrees  Used by principal to: 1)Identify areas that need improvement 2)Compare the principal’s perceptions of performance with the results of the evaluation 3)Determine areas for professional growth activities to be included in a professional development plan. Self Assessment

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System  Two types of interviews:  A Structured Interview with 6 questions commonly asked of principals (can be oral or written response format)  A Clarifying Interview with probing questions focused on clarifying or bringing understanding to the portfolio and/or written interview (questions differ from principal to principal)  Conducted after the evaluator analyzes principal’s portfolio  Modified scripting is used to record responses  Responses can be banked for one year Interviews

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System  Oral Option: A discussion between the principal and the evaluator (or his/her designee) about particular areas of the principal’s knowledge, skills, and performance.  Generates data for seven areas of knowledge/skills:  Communication (oral)  Collaboration processes and skills  Assessment/measurement/evaluation  Organizing for results  Planning  Problem solving  Technology management Structured Interviews

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System  Each of the structured interview question sets is intended to cover one knowledge and skill area (although responses may cut across more than one area). Communication skills are considered as part of the oral presentation.  The structured interview itself is not scored, but responses are added to other evidence provided through other sources.  Written Option: Principal’s written responses to interview questions (will have clarifying discussion). Structured Interviews (cont.)

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System  Conducted after the structured interview is completed with a focus on the written interview and, optionally, the principal’s portfolio  No set number of questions, but key questions specific to the written interview and portfolio (optional) are developed by the evaluator to bring clarity and understanding of their contents  Responses are added to other evidence provided through other sources The Clarifying Interview

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System  Provides data where a supervisor should have objective, experiential information  Generates data for four areas of knowledge and skills:  Professional Responsibilities  Fiscal Leadership/Management  Laws/Policies  Leadership of Human Resources The Supervisor’s Review Form

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System  Principal is responsible for providing some evidence of his/her knowledge and skills  The totality of the evidential material (lines of evidence for all knowledge/skill areas) will constitute principal’s evaluation portfolio  Generates data for 11 areas of knowledge and skills:  Communication  Collaboration  Assessment/Evaluation  Organizing for Results  Planning  Laws and Policies  Problem Solving  Innovation  Operations/Management  Fiscal Leadership  Human Resources Leadership The Principal Portfolio

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System  There is no one specific form of packaging required for the portfolio, but there are organizational requirements  Each entry (piece of evidence) is accompanied by a Portfolio Entry Form  Total portfolio requires approximately 26 pieces of evidence  One piece of evidence might serve 2-3 purposes (e.g., Program Improvement Plan)  With multiple purposes, a portfolio may have entries (pieces of evidence) The Principal Portfolio

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System  Explicit guidelines for developing a line of evidence in each area are provided in the evaluation manual "Extra" entries will not be considered by the evaluator   Evaluated on the quality of materials rather than the quantity of materials in the portfolio The Principal Portfolio

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System Knowledge Skill AreaEvidence  Communication  3 pieces of written communication  Collaboration  3 artifacts (documents, tapes, etc.)  Assessment/Evaluation  2 teacher evaluation files  1 document/disk synthesizing and presenting student achievement results  1 document related to program evaluation  Organizing for Results 1  2 documents/artifacts representing marketing knowledge/skills, customer focus and/or change efforts The Principal Portfolio

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System  Planning  School improvement planning efforts  1 other document/artifact  Laws/Policies  2 artifacts/documents  Problem Solving  2 artifacts/documents  Innovation  2 artifacts/documents  School Operations/Management  2 artifacts/documents The Principal Portfolio Knowledge Skill AreaEvidence

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System  Leadership of Human Resources  2 artifacts/documents  Fiscal Management/Leadership  Budget and expenditures report (most recent)  1 other artifact/document The Principal Portfolio Knowledge Skill AreaEvidence

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System  Respondents are to remain anonymous and represent a cross-section within the group  Generates data for 12 areas of knowledge and skills:  Communication  Collaboration  Assessment/Evaluation  Organizing for Results  Laws and Policies (staff only)  Problem Solving  Innovation  Operations/Management  Fiscal Leadership  Technology Mgt.  Professional Responsibilities  Human Resources Leadership  Four groups of respondents (two groups every year):  Faculty/Staff (years 1 and 3)  Students in grades 4-6 and 7-12 (years 1 and 3)  Parents (years 2 and 4)  Community leaders (years 2 and 4) Surveys

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System  Analyses and reporting are responsibilities of principal:  Information/report will be used with other evidence from other sources  Procedures and methodologies used by the principal will in itself be used as part of evidence for assessing the knowledge/skill area of assessment/evaluation  Analyses and reporting:  Number of respondents by subgroup surveyed  Any problems with data  Conclusions by knowledge/skill area  Patterns and interpretation  Numbers for administration:  Total for groups: 20 or all for faculty/staff, 60 for students, 30 for parents, and 15 for community leaders Surveys (cont.)

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System  Generates data for five areas of knowledge and skills:  Communication  Organizing for Results  Innovation  Technology Management  School Operations/Management  At least 1 Management Observation required  Observer completes 4 major activities:  Observes "routines" of the school at active time of day  Walks through the school plant and facilities  Observes the pattern of the principal's activities  Observes the utilization and management of technology in the schools  Uses Modified Narrative Scripting  A Post-Observation conference will be held Management Observation

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System  Scores are not generated by instrument  There will be a total of 13 scores, one for each knowledge/skill area  At end of process, evaluator(s) will: 1.Organize evidence by knowledge/skill area 2.Read through all evidence for a knowledge/skill area 3.Award a score (1, 2, 3, 4) based on the patterns in the evidence in relation to the score level rationales for that particular knowledge/skill area 4.Place score with comments/justification on the Evaluation Summary Report 5.Use the scores and evidence for determining what should be addressed in the Professional Development Plan Scoring

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System  Used to present the scores developed from the lines of evidence for each of the 13 knowledge and skill areas  To complete the Evaluation Summary Report, the evaluator: 1.Completes demographic information requested 2.Records the scores developed from the lines of evidence for each knowledge and skill area 3.Writes any comments, explanations, or justifications in the space provided that support the score for the specific area 4.Identifies three areas for focus in planning professional development for the coming year(s) Evaluation Summary Report

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System  Activities focus on areas of improvement as identified in the Evaluation Summary Report  Activities focus on the improvement of student achievement and school improvement  Used to generate portfolio entry for Human Resources Leadership after first year of evaluation Professional Development Plan Professional Development Plan

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System Goals and objectives are statements of the outcomes desired, the ends to be accomplished Professional Development Plan – Goals/Objectives

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System Goals are time related; tend to be long-range, spanning a full academic year May include desired outcomes in cognitive, affective, and developmental areas Professional Development Plan – Goals/Objectives

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System Objectives tend to be of shorter duration, may be accomplished in varying time spans, depending upon nature and complexity Professional Development Plan – Goals/Objectives

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System Types of Objectives 1.Specific learning task, particular knowledge to be acquired or enhanced 2.Specific skill to be developed or enhanced 3.Product to be produced (a written plan for assessing progress – detailed program plans – activity chart, etc.) 4.Student achievement/program improvement progress targets 5.Professional service to be rendered to assist or improve the school system/faculty/school related organization, etc. Professional Development Plan – Goals/Objectives

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System Activities Activities are the means to accomplish goals/objectives identified or selected Professional Development Plan – Activities

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System Criteria: Assessment and Benefits Section 1. Evidence of degree of accomplishment of objective(s) A.Written statement B.Materials/products appended to PDP Form 2. Description of efforts/activities pursued in attempting to accomplish the stated objective(s) 3. Description of benefits accrued to the educator, students, faculty, school, and school system as appropriate Professional Development Plan – Benefits

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System Evaluator Comments Section 1. Statement of concurrence or non-concurrence with assertions of educator in assessment and benefits section 2. Reason for concurrence or non-concurrence 3. Commendation statement when appropriate 4. Next steps: Develop new PDP for ensuing year, amend and carry over present PDP,etc. Professional Development Plan – Comments

Alabama Department of EducationPrincipal Evaluation System Last Slide