What Works in DR Program Design NPCC Demand Response Workshop February 24, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Case Study of Demand Response: Con Edison Business Program by Eileen Egan-Annechino Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Advertisements

SmartPOWER Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) June 3, 2008.
Quick, But Not Risky Ken Nickolai. START HERE Much of your discussion will be about money. Think both about money that will be spent… And money that.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
The Power to Make a Difference PPL Electric Utilities April 2010.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
24 May 2007 PROGRESS & PROMISE ON DR/AMI Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
Keystone Energy Efficiency Conference 2011 September 20, 2011.
Automated Demand Response Pilot 2005/2004 Load Impact Results and Recommendations Final Report © 2005 Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) Research & Consulting.
SmartGridCity™: A blueprint for a connected, intelligent grid community Presented to the Utah Public Service Commission May 13, 2009.
Critical Peak Pricing Gulf Power’s Experience Dan Merilatt, V.P. Marketing Services GoodCents Solutions, Inc. Stone Mountain, GA September 9, 2002.
PECO Smart Ideas Energy Efficiency Programs
SMUD’s SmartPricing Options Marketing Strategy Jennifer Potter July 31, 2014 Powering forward. Together.
Smart Meters, Demand Response and Energy Efficiency GRIDSCHOOL 2010 MARCH 8-12, 2010  RICHMOND, VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC UTILITIES ARGONNE NATIONAL.
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
State Incentives for Energy Efficiency Commercial and Industrial New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Office of Clean Energy Mona L. Mosser Bureau of Energy.
SmartMeter Program Overview Jana Corey Director, Energy Information Network Pacific Gas & Electric Company.
ON IT 1 Con Edison Energy Efficiency Programs Sustaining our Future Rebecca Craft Director of Energy Efficiency.
CPUC Residential Rate Rulemaking Workshop July 31, 2014 Best Practices and Lessons Learned TVP Marketing, Education and Outreach.
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 14 Energy Efficiency Module 14: DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT.
The Efficiency of Energy Efficiency Program Tom Van Paris Vice President-Member Services & Communications October 18, 2012.
Herbert E. Hirschfeld, P.E. and Joseph S. Lopes Applied Energy Group, Inc. Metering America 2005 April 13, 2005 Submetering Case Studies with Load Management.
What Drives the Response in Demand Response? Craig Boice Boice Dunham Group Metering, Billing, CRM/CIS America 2005 Las Vegas, Nevada April 13, 2005 BOICE.
1 Demand Response Update April, Strategic Perspective Demand Response  Aligns with PGE’s Strategic Direction; helping to provide exceptional.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
1 SCE – Lessons Learned from Pricing Experiences July 31, 2014.
Overview of Residential Pricing/Advanced Metering Pilots Charles Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SMPPI Board Meeting August 3, 2005.
Demand Side Management The Natural Purview of Utilities The Customer Viewpoint Rates on the Rise in a Rough Economy - Responding to New Realities Marketing.
OPPD’s Sustainability Efforts Denise Kuehn. Omaha Public Power District Public Utility –336,000 Customers –2,200 Peak –Generation (2,550 MW) –Transmission.
Partnering with Our Customers in Demand Side Management Mark Wallenrod Director DSM Program Operations Southern California Edison Southern California Energy.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council 6 th Plan Conservation Resource Supply Curve Workshop on Data & Assumption Overview of Council Resource Analysis.
© 2009 IBM Corporation Smart Grid Research Consortium Customer Operations Transformation Global E&U Industry January 2011.
Reshaping Utility/ Consumer Relationships MEC October 5, 2010 Pinehurst, NC Penni McLean-Conner.
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
Load Management SMUD & Demand Response Jim Parks CEC Load Management Standards Scoping Workshop March 3, 2008.
Demand Response and the California Information Display Pilot 2005 AEIC Load Research Conference Myrtle Beach, South Carolina July 11, 2005 Mark S. Martinez,
Summer 2004 and Beyond Lon W. House, Ph.D ACWA/Edison Joint Presentation June 24, 2004.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
CEC 08-DR-1 Efficiency Committee Workshop 3/3/08.
BPA’s DR Experience Karen Meadows Bonneville Power Administration May 2, 2007.
Task XI Time of Use Pricing and Energy Use for Demand Management Delivery Task Status Report April 2006 Richard Formby.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
© 2004 San Diego Gas and Electric. All copyright and trademark rights reserved Demand Response Programs Backup Material.
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
1 Proposed Policies to Increase the level of Demand Response Energy Action Plan Update April 24 th, 2006, Sacramento, CA Mike Messenger, CEC.
Demand Response as a Distributed Energy Resource presented by: Mark S. Martinez Manager, Program Development PLMA Fall Conference September 2004.
Utility Benefits of Demand Response Trevor Lauer DTE Energy Marketing Executive Conference Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.
CEC Public Workshop Order Instituting Informational and Rulemaking Proceeding (08-DR-01) March 3, 2008.
CITY OF LEOMINSTER. Customer Charge The cost of providing customer related service such as metering, meter reading and billing. These fixed costs are.
PECO Smart Ideas for Your Business Greater Philadelphia Association of Energy Engineers Mike O’Leary, PECO April 20, 2016.
EmPower MD Act overview and Demand Response Training EmPower Maryland.
San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal.
PPL Electric Utilities Act 129 Phase 3 Non-Residential Programs April 20, 2016.
Portland State University Smart Grid Class Enabling active consumer participation 20 April 2009 Presentation: History Politics Economics Technology.
Matinee Pricing Opt-in Pilot Rate Proposal (R ) Commission Workshop February 24, 2016 Manager, Pricing Design.
1 City of Palo Alto Utilities Large Commercial Customer Pilot Demand Response Program Customer Meeting March 8, 2012.
SMECO Demand Response filing
MEPAV 2010 CONFERENCE. AMI MANASSAS Gregg S. Paulson, P. E
Introducing Smart Energy Pricing Cheryl Hindes
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
Partnering For Our Future
National Grid Rhode Island: Piloting Wireless Alternatives
Presentation transcript:

What Works in DR Program Design NPCC Demand Response Workshop February 24, 2006

2 Contents 1. PGE DR Capability 2. What Works 1. Level of Control 2. Customization vs. Mass Market design 3. Marketing & Education 3. RD&D for the Future of DR

3 Portland General’s Demand Response Capability Justification for implementation measured against total resource cost effectiveness, reliability, dispatchability, avoided supply side capacity costs, and environmental impact. Load Control Large Customers  Dispatchable Standby Generation - ~30 MW online, 10 MW under construction.  Custom peak load curtailment contracts available for large customers. Residential and Small Non-Residential Customers  Experience with direct control of space heat and water heat. Pricing Large Customers  Demand Exchange (DBB) for large customers - 30 MW enrolled, ~4 MW likely.  Large customer programs supported by Energy Information Services (EIS) - ~500 bills.  RTP pilot available for large customers. Residential and Small Non-Residential Customers  TOU for residential and small non-residential - ~1,800 customers. Active Demonstration Projects Fuel cells, microturbines, and combined heat & power (CHP).

4 1 - Degree of Utility Control Win-Win Dispatchable Standby Generation Number of controllable hours is specified contractually. It doesn’t interfere with customers’ schedule. Power marketers have put DSG on reserve frequently in last 6 months. So-So Demand Exchange (DBB) The range is broad, and is not firm resource. Reduction is based not only on price, but on the customers’ priorities at the time. Direct control of water heat. Customers reported they liked it. Timing of when water heater on may not coincide with system need. Who Knows Direct control of space heat. Not comparable to AC results; heat tolerances are narrower. First hour of reduction is more reliable than subsequent hours, due to overrides. TOU for residential and small non-residential Takes 1-2 years of history and data collection to determine amount of likely shift. Need large volume to realize large reductions. Results vary with pricing. I’m not going to have anyone telling me how to use electricity – l have to use it when I need it in order to keep my business running. It’s so convenient for me to not have to worry about when my water heater is on or not. I’m sure I’m saving energy and money!

5 What Works – Degree of Utility Control High Degree of Utility Control works WHEN: It doesn’t interfere with customers’ schedule, AND Number of controllable hours is specified contractually.

6 2 - Customer-by-Customer Negotiations and Mass Market Implementation Customary Approach - Pragmatic  Large customers require a customized approach.  Opened RFP for customized mandatory contract. Responding customers negotiated one-by-one.  Even with “mass market” approach, via rate design or tariffs, large customers tend to work one-on-one with the utility, e.g., DBB needs baseline per account.  Mass Market design is most cost effective with small and residential customers.  Need to show the benefit to varying customer groups, e.g. spectators/converts/teammates, purchase classifications such as country traditionals/young moderns, business SICs.

7 What Works – One-on-One vs. Mass Market Design Higher Customer Interest WHEN: It doesn’t interfere with customers’ schedule, AND Customers see an economic benefit.

8 3 - Marketing/Education – SDG&E Non-Participants offer the best insight  SDG&E learned customers shy away from programs that:  Are not a mainstream concept  Are complex and technical  They believe will result in higher bills  Don’t have an advantage for the customer Improved their response rate when:  Simplified the materials  Mailed direct mail, twice  Telephone follow up  Targeted likely customer group  4,000 letters, mailed twice = 744 responses Information from SPP CPP-V Track A Redeployment, JC Martin, June 9, 2004

9 3 - Marketing/Education SDG&E used a brief letter and simple brochure in recruiting for their residential thermostat program. They highlighted that customers receive a free thermostat, a $100 value in addition to cash incentives. They also recruit new customers where technology has already been installed: Information courtesy of Lela Manning, SDG&E. “ Get a new digital thermostat like this one installed in your home for free… And earn some cash back too!” “Dear Customer: “Did you know that the thermostat in your home can earn you up to $100 this year. Your home is equipped with a state of the art, programmable `smart thermostat’….”

Marketing/Education - LIPA LIPA is aggressive in recruiting and retaining customers in contracted C&I program and residential load control. 1. Community 2. Compensation 3. Communication Information courtesy Bill Jackson, April Community - Appealed to the sense of helping the sense of economic development for the community, alliance with McDonald’s through the school program. Contests and Prizes. 2. Compensation – Always provided a monetary incentive; absence of penalties helps. Customers’ business or lifestyle come first. Power Perks Loyalty Card for discount shopping. Tickets to Islanders’ hockey games. 3. Communication – Requires multiple means, e.g. brochures, direct mail, community events, school pizza parties, a mascot, pre-curtailment notification, post-curtailment follow up, status of impact made by customers/communities (helps with retention).

Marketing/Education – City of Anaheim City of Anaheim rewards customers with a high value credit for energy not used during peak hours.  A “rebate driven DR program” Education/Information/Incentive and Technology  Technology is a “key enabler in success of DR programs”. Information from Linda LeDuc presentation September Recruitment through Direct Mail = 150 Fact sheets, refrigerator magnet Reports sent to participants after each event Positive Incentive, not a pricing program, no rate reduction, no penalties $0.35/kWh rebate at end of season Measured against control baseline Regular rate is $0.11/kWh

12 What Works – Marketing/Education Higher Customer Interest WHEN messaging includes: It doesn’t interfere with customers’ schedule, AND Customers see an economic benefit. Tactics: Brief letters Clear Direct Mail brochures Telephone follow up Free technology Monetary benefit Appeal to community benefit No penalties Visual reminders – mascots and magnets Follow up reports help retention

13 Vision for the End State PGE’s Vision is for Market Transformation: DR and other Distributed Generation will reach critical mass. Smart Homes and Smart Businesses, with smart appliances, will become common.  Appliance manufacturers will find ways to build intelligence into their production line appliances or it will be driven by standards.