Fukushima Incident Preliminary Analysis, Consequences and Safety Status of Indian NPPs Part-1 Dr. S.K.Jain Chairman & Managing Director NPCIL & BHAVINI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NuScales Passive Safety Approach Update September 2011 Contact Information: Bruce Landrey Chief Marketing Officer Dr. Jose N.
Advertisements

Generic Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR): Safety Systems Overview
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr. Matthias Braun - 04 June p.1.
Nuclear Accident in Japan: A Summary
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
Nuclear Power Turkey Point Power Plant Process. Turkey Point Power Plant Built on 12, 700 acres in Homestead Opened in 1972 Cost to build both reactors.
Assessing the Challenges Resulting from the Events at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station A Preliminary Discussion March 25, 2011 Walter L. Kirchner.
Safety Implications of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Sheldon L. Trubatch, Ph.D., J.D. Vice-Chairman Arizona Section American Nuclear Society.
Issues Associated with the Development of Severe Accident Management Guidelines for CANDU Reactors Keith Dinnie Director, Risk Management Nuclear Safety.
Overview of Incident at Fukushima Daiich Nuclear Power Station (1F) (Informal personal observations) April 2011.
Safety Features at KKNPP Insight of. Location: The Kudankulam is located on the coast of the Gulf of Mannar, at 25 kM to the north- east from Kanyakumari,in.
Nuclear Energy. How does a nuclear reactor work? Is it a major energy source worldwide? Is it Green? Problems – Waste Disposal – Accidents Future – Research.
Sea Fukushima Dai-Ichi: Status before the Earthquake Units 1, 2, and 3 operate at full power. Steam produced by water boiling in the reactor vessel flows.
THE FUTURE OF FUKUSHIMA Can nuclear energy overcome its bad rap? CHAPTER 27 NUCLEAR FUTURE.
Nuclear Power.
Nuclear Plant Systems ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords
NUCLEAR SAFETY Barbora Svobodová Angličtina-odborná II.
Nuclear Power Station Lecture No 5. A generating station in which nuclear energy is converted into electrical energy is known as a Nuclear power station.
Nuclear Fission & Fusion Nuclear Fusion - Energy released when two light nuclei combine or fuse However, a large amount of energy is required to start.
THE FUTURE OF FUKUSHIMA CHAPTER 23 NUCLEAR POWER Can nuclear energy overcome its bad rep?
23.4 Nuclear energy NUCLEARNUCLEAR POWERPOWER Millstone Station.
1 OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE at JAPANESE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS in 2005 October 12, 2006 Shigeyuki Wada Safety Information Division Japan Nuclear Energy Safety.
How they work and what happened at Fukushima Daiichi Plant.
Chapter 4 Nuclear Energy. Objectives Describe how nuclear fuel is produced. List the environmental concerns associated with nuclear power. Analyze the.
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Containment Isolation, actuation logic, Description Supporting Material
Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Team 07: Belsheim Joshua Francis Travis He Jiayang Moehling Anthony Ziemkowski Micah 1.
Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP June 2, 2011 Embassy of Japan in Bulgaria.
Kevin Burgee Janiqua Melton Alexander Basterash
Worldwide Commercial Energy Production. Nuclear Power Countries.
Nuclear Power Generation In The United States. 103 Nuclear Power Reactors.
Nuclear Thermal Hydraulic System Experiment
Nuclear Power Plant Accidents Reporters: Uyangurin, Mareinne L. Suico, Monica Sharlyn L. Waresa, Daryl Mae B.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
Nuclear Power. Fission Uranium-235 Plutonium-239 Neutron 10n10n 10n10n 10n10n Strontium-90 Xenon-144.
March 11, 2011 to Present. Presentation Overview Reactor Design and FeaturesChronology of EventsCurrent Status of Each ReactorRecovery Actions Kashiwazaki-Kariwa.
Nuclear Power Indian Point Energy Center in Buchanan, NY.
Nuclear Power Plant Orientation
Chapter 12 Nuclear Energy.
Fukushima Power Plant – Japan Post March 11, 2011
Agenda Background Update on Fukushima Daini Update on Fukushima Dai-ichi – Summary of Events at Fukushima Dai-ichi Summary of Radiation and Reports.
The Curious Absence of New Nuclear Michael Hoeger Presented 02/06/2012.
Ta’Juan Dutrieuille November 4, 2009 Period 1
Nuclear Power Plant How A Nuclear Reactor Works.
Nuclear fission Nuclear fission: heavy nuclei split into two smaller parts in order to become more stable proton neutron Kr-90 nucleus U-235 nucleus energy.
A LTERNATIVE ENERGY : NUCLEAR Group 4 Bar Shida Keane.
MEHB 513 – INTRODUCTION TO NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY GROUP ASSIGNMENT TITLE: Impact Evaluation of Fukushima Nuclear Accident on Technology Development of New.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Occupational Radiation Protection during High Exposure Operations Lecture 2-2 Lessons Learnt from Occupational.
THE FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENT ON THE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT OF NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 1.IRSHAD NURHAKIM BIN NORAHIM (ME088151) 2.LEE SZE TENG (ME087909)
MEHB 513 Introduction on nuclear technology assignment GROUP MEMBERS:ID: SEEH CHONG CHIN ME YEE QIAN WAHME TING DING PINGME LIM JIA YINGME
Coal-Fired Plant Coal is conveyed to boiler In primary water loop, water is boiled into steam Steam is sent through turbine Turbine spins the generator,
LOW PRESSURE REACTORS. Muhammad Umair Bukhari
What do you know of Japan’s Nuclear crisis? How about any past nuclear issues? Do you feel that nuclear power is safe? Why or why not? Question of the.
INTRODUCTION TO NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY MEHB513 SEM 2,2014/2015 GROUP PROJECT : EVALUATE THE IMPACTS OF THE FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENT ON THE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.
Generator Operation. Video of Generator synchronizing.
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XV In-plant accident management Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared by.
Fukushima Daiichi Jourdan Robbins 12/6/ /16/16.
Approaches and measures aimed at ensuring safety, preventing severe accidents in new RF NPP designs Gutsalov N.A. 10/03/2016.
9.5 Nuclear Power Although nuclear power does not come from a fossil fuel, it is fueled by uranium, which is obtained from mining and is non-renewable.
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions
NRC Event Number – Event Date
Session Name: Lessons Learned from Mega Projects
Summary of the Earthquake and Situation of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr. Matthias Braun - 05 April p.1
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr. Matthias Braun - 22 April p.1
Approaches and measures aimed at ensuring safety, preventing severe accidents in new RF NPP designs Gutsalov N.A. 10/03/2016.
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr. Matthias Braun - 01 June p
New Regulatory Requirements in Japan
Presentation transcript:

Fukushima Incident Preliminary Analysis, Consequences and Safety Status of Indian NPPs Part-1 Dr. S.K.Jain Chairman & Managing Director NPCIL & BHAVINI

Contents Introduction Overview of the Incident Sequence of Events & Present Scenario Preliminary Analysis Safety Status of Indian NPPs Actions taken by Indian & International agencies Radiation & Emergency Preparedness aspects

Nuclear Power Reactors in Japan Total Reactors in Operation : 54 Under Construction : 02 Reactors in the zone of event : 13 Fukushima-Daiichi(6), Daiini(4), Onagawa (3) 318 March 2011

Location of NPPs in Japan In Operation :54, Construction:02

Reactors affected by Earthquake in Japan Fukushima Daiichi Unit -1- Automatic Shutdown Unit-2- Automatic Shutdown Unit-3 - Automatic Shutdown Unit-4 - Maintenance Outage Unit-5- Maintenance Outage Unit-6 - Maintenance Outage Fukushima Daiini Unit -1- Automatic Shutdown Unit-2- Automatic Shutdown Unit-3 - Automatic Shutdown Unit-4 – Automatic Shutdown Onagawa Unit -1- Automatic Shutdown Unit-2- Automatic Shutdown Unit-3 - Automatic Shutdown 6 1.Automatic reactor shutdown terminated the chain reaction- Nuclear fission stops within seconds 2.The only issue is to remove radioactive decay heat from fuel 18 March 2011

Units at Fukushima-Daiichi Unit Capacity (MWe) Construction Start Commercial Operation start Supplier No.1460 April, 1967March, 1971GE No.2784 Jan, 1969July, 1974GE/Toshiba No.3784 Aug, 1970March, 1976Toshiba No.4784 Sep, 1972Oct, 1978Hitachi No.5784 Dec, 1971April, 1978Toshiba No May, 1973Oct, 1979GE/Toshiba Total Power : 4696 MWe 7

Events at Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP  Earthquake of magnitude 9.0 on 11 March 2011 followed by Tsunami of 14 meter high waves - beyond the design basis.  All operating plants at the affected area automatically shutdown - Terminating chain reaction. Reactor core Cooling – Continued for one hour, got incapacitated after tsunami- caused fuel over heating-Metal Water Reaction - Hydrogen Generation- Explosion inside the outer Building..

Incident Overview

IAEA Information sources NISA, Japan JAIF

12

Events at Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP  No nuclear explosion.  Hydrogen generated led to explosion damaging the outer concrete building.  The reactor pressure vessels integrity unaffected.  No death on account of radiation exposure.

FUKUSHMIMA Daai-ichi - Before 14

FUKUSHMIMA Dai-ichi - After 15

Possible scenario of progression of events 16

Root Cause ~ 14 m

Developed scenario Both off site and on site electrical power supply was not available (SBO condition). In such case Two actions are needed: –Residual heat removal by cooling and depressurization –Emergency feed For lining up both the above systems valves are to be operated which are DC operated, but these were not available 18

Developed scenario Tsunami waves damaged –pump house equipment-the water overflowed the pumps for the cooling water system. –Suppression pool heat exchangers. –Cooling pumps that provide cooling water to DG sets-DG fuel oil tanks, located above ground, were carried away. –AC and DC switch gears - hampered operator response as all indications and plant lighting were lost 19

20

BWR Schematic (Mark-1 type)

Fukushima Daiichi, Unit-1 Cross Section Mark-1 containment 22 Spent Fuel Pool

Fukushima Daiichi-1, Unit-1 Cross Section 23

Developed scenario The insufficient cooling pressure inside RPV increases and relieves it to the suppression pool through auto blow down system through instrumented relief valves/ mechanical RVs. This steam gets quenched in the suppression pool partly (as per efficiency) and remaining steam and non condensable comes to drywell, the primary containment and results in pressure rise of drywell also. 24

Developed scenario Suppression pool recirculation pumps which are part of emergency cooling were not available so heat removal efficiency comes down and suppression pool temp increases, which further raises containment pressure. The pressure inside the reactor containment was allowed to increase as high as twice the design pressure in order to control the release the radioactivity. 25

Normal operation

STAGE-1 : Steam relief to Wetwell

STAGE-2 : Pressurisation of Wetwell & Opening of drywell

STAGE-3 : Steam carryover to Drywell

STAGE-4 : Drywell pressurisation

STAGE-5 : Leakage of steam, H 2 & non- condensables to secondary containment

STAGE-6 : Accumulation of H 2 gas in secondary containment and pressure build-up

STAGE-7 : Attainment of explosive H 2 concentration in secondary containment – BURSTING & release (Units 1&3)

Attainment of explosive H 2 concentration in Wetwell – BURSTING & release (Unit-2) 34

Fukushima-1 35

Possible area of explosion at Fukushima Daiichi 2 Spent Fuel Pool Status Unit- 3&4 :Low water level Unit- 3 :Fuel Rods Damaged Unit-5&6 : High Temperature Core and Fuel Damaged in Unit- 1,2&3 Updated on

Preliminary Analysis Source :IAEA

Earthquake Details

Earthquake details

Effects of Earthquake

Tsunami Cast

TSUNAMIGENIC LOCATIONS IN JAPAN BOUNDARY BETWEEN PACIFIC PLATE & ASIAN PLATE DISTANCE OF 8.9 EQ IS 130 KMS EAST FROM SENDAI MANY NEAR FIELD SOURCES 42

Design Basis