TITLE RP1.019 : Eliminating islands in high-pressure free- boundary stellarator magnetohydrodynamic equilibrium solutions. S.R.Hudson, D.A.Monticello,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
YQ Liu, Peking University, Feb 16-20, 2009 Active Control of RWM Yueqiang Liu UKAEA Culham Science Centre Abingdon, Oxon OX14 3DB, UK.
Advertisements

A new class of magnetic confinement device in the shape of a knot Abstract We describe a new class of magnetic confinement device, with the magnetic axis.
LPK NCSX Configuration Optimization Process Long-Poe Ku ARIES Meeting October 2-4, 2002 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ.
Overview of ARIES Compact Stellarator Power Plant Study: Initial Results from ARIES-CS Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego Japan/US Workshop.
January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 Plan for Engineering Study of ARIES-CS Presented by A. R. Raffray University of California, San Diego ARIES Meeting UCSD San.
Progress in Configuration Development for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries Project Meeting, June 16-17,
Physics Analysis for Equilibrium, Stability, and Divertors ARIES Power Plant Studies Charles Kessel, PPPL DOE Peer Review, UCSD August 17, 2000.
Physics of fusion power
MHD Behaviour of Low-Aspect-Ratio RFP Plasmas in RELAX S.Masamune, T.Onchi, A.Sanpei, R.Ikezoe, K.Oki, T.Yamashita, H.Shimazu, N.Nishino 1), R.Paccagnella.
LPK Recent Progress in Configuration Development for Compact Stellarator Reactors L. P. Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries E-Meeting,
Attractive 2- and 3-FP Plasma and Coil Configurations – Recent Configuration Development Results Long-Poe Ku 1 & Paul Garabedian 2 1 Princeton Plasma Physics.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8: Conserved quantities / mirror / tokamak.
Recent Development in Plasma and Coil Configurations L. P. Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES-CS Project Meeting, June 14, 2006 UCSD, San Diego,
Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.
Overview of ARIES Compact Stellarator Study Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego US/Japan Workshop on Power Plant Studies & Related Advanced.
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
ARIES-ACT1 preliminary plasma description C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, October 13, 2011.
Attractive QAS Configurations for Compact Stellarator Reactors – A Review of Progress and Status L. P. Ku 1 & P. R. Garabedian 2 1 Princeton Plasma Physics.
Recent Progress in Configuration Development for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku PPPL Aries Project Meeting, December 3, 2003 Princeton Plasma.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION UPDATE ON STELLARATOR  LIMITS: WHAT DO THEY MEAN? A.D. Turnbull ARIES-CS Project.
Recent Development of QHS and QAS Configurations Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Project Meeting, November 4-5, 2004 University of.
Attractive 2- and 3-FP Plasma and Coil Configurations – A Review of Progress and Status L. P. Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES-CS Project Meeting,
Optimization of Compact Stellarator Configuration as Fusion Devices Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego 47 th APS/DPP Annual Meeting
Recent Results of Configuration Studies L. P. Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES-CS Project Meeting, November 17, 2005 UCSD, San Diego, CA.
MCZ Equilibrium and Stability of High-  Plasmas in Wendelstein 7-AS M.C. Zarnstorff 1, A. Weller 2, J. Geiger 2, E. Fredrickson 1, S. Hudson.
Physics of Fusion power Lecture 7: Stellarator / Tokamak.
9/2004Strickler, et. al1 Reconstruction of Modular Coil Shape and Control of Vacuum Islands in NCSX D. Strickler, S. Hirshman, B. Nelson, D. Williamson,
1 Dimensional Control for the National Compact Stellarator Experiment R. Ellis, A. Brooks, T. Brown, W. Reiersen, S. Raftopoulos, B. Stratton Presented.
The toroidal current is consistent with numerical estimates of bootstrap current The measured magnetic diagnostic signals match predictions of V3FIT Comparisons.
12/03/2013, Praga 1 Plasma MHD Activity Observations via Magnetics Diagnostics: Magnetic island Analysis Magnetic island Analysis Frederik Ostyn (UGent)
Defining the Vacuum Vessel Geometry NCSX Project Meeting November 27, 2002 Art Brooks.
TITLE Presented by Stuart R. Hudson for the NCSX design team Suppression of Magnetic Islands In Stellarator equilibrium calculations By iterating the plasma.
QSH/SHAx states: towards the determination of an helical equilibrium L. Marrelli acknowledging fruitful discussions with S.Cappello, T.Bolzonella, D.Bonfiglio,
1 Modular Coil Design for the Ultra-Low Aspect Ratio Quasi-Axially Symmetric Stellarator MHH2 L. P. Ku and the ARIES Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
An examination of the chaotic edge of LHD blue: fieldlines outside last closed flux surface red: fieldlines inside last closed flux surface straight pseudo.
STUDIES OF NONLINEAR RESISTIVE AND EXTENDED MHD IN ADVANCED TOKAMAKS USING THE NIMROD CODE D. D. Schnack*, T. A. Gianakon**, S. E. Kruger*, and A. Tarditi*
Influence of pressure-gradient and average- shear on ballooning stability semi-analytic expression for ballooning growth rate S.R.Hudson 1, C.C.Hegna 2,
1 Stability Studies Plans (FY11) E. Fredrickson, For the NCSX Team NCSX Research Forum Dec. 7, 2006 NCSX.
Partially-relaxed, topologically-constrained MHD equilibria with chaotic fields. Stuart Hudson Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory R.L. Dewar, M.J. Hole.
TITLE Stuart R.Hudson, D.A.Monticello, A.H.Reiman, D.J.Strickler, S.P.Hirshman, L-P. Ku, E.Lazarus, A.Brooks, M.C.Zarnstorff, A.H.Boozer, G-Y. Fu and G.H.Neilson.
The influence of non-resonant perturbation fields: Modelling results and Proposals for TEXTOR experiments S. Günter, V. Igochine, K. Lackner, Q. Yu IPP.
QAS Design of the DEMO Reactor
MCZ Active MHD Control Needs in Helical Configurations M.C. Zarnstorff 1 Presented by E. Fredrickson 1 With thanks to A. Weller 2, J. Geiger 2,
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
AWB Dimensional Control Requirements for the Modular Coils and TF coils Field Period Assembly Peer Review October 11-12, 2006 Art Brooks.
Development of A New Class of QA Stellarator Reactor Configurations Long-Poe Ku PPPL Aries Project Meeting, March 8-9, 2004 University of California, San.
Evaluating Impact of TF Coil Deformations Under EM Load on Magnetic Field Quality Coil Deformations provided by Len Myatt’s ANSYS Structural Analysis of.
Development and Assessment of “X-point limiter” Plasmas M. Bell, R. Maingi, K-C. Lee Coping with both steady-state and transient (ELM) heat loads is a.
1 Recent Progress on QPS D. A. Spong, D.J. Strickler, J. F. Lyon, M. J. Cole, B. E. Nelson, A. S. Ware, D. E. Williamson Improved coil design (see recent.
Presented by Yuji NAKAMURA at US-Japan JIFT Workshop “Theory-Based Modeling and Integrated Simulation of Burning Plasmas” and 21COE Workshop “Plasma Theory”
51st Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November 2 - 6, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia ∆I BS = 170 Amps J BS e-root J BS i-root Multiple ambipolar.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION UPDATE ON  LIMITS FOR ARIES-CS A.D. Turnbull ARIES-CS Project Meeting January.
Stellarator-Related MHD Research H. Neilson MHD Science Focus Group meeting December 12, 2008 MHD Science Focus Group, Dec. 12, 2008.
Bootstrap current in quasi-symmetric stellarators Andrew Ware University of Montana Collaborators: D. A. Spong, L. A. Berry, S. P. Hirshman, J. F. Lyon,
54th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics, October 29 – November 2, 2012, Providence, Rhode Island 3-D Plasma Equilibrium Reconstruction.
PEER Review of Coil Tolerances and Trim Coil Requirements plus Magnetic Material in Test Cell April 19, 2004 Art Brooks.
Influence of pressure-gradient and average- shear on ballooning stability semi-analytic expression for ballooning growth rate S.R.Hudson 1, C.C.Hegna 2,
Unstructured Meshing Tools for Fusion Plasma Simulations
Equilibrium and Stability
Stellarator Divertor Design and Optimization with NCSX Examples
Finite difference code for 3D edge modelling
Three-Dimensional MHD Analysis of Heliotron Plasma with RMP
A.D. Turnbull, R. Buttery, M. Choi, L.L Lao, S. Smith, H. St John
UPDATE ON  LIMITS FOR ARIES-CS
Long-Poe Ku† and the ARIES Team † Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
New Results for Plasma and Coil Configuration Studies
New Development in Plasma and Coil Configurations
ARIES-CS Project Meeting Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, NJ
Stellarator Program Update: Status of NCSX & QPS
Presentation transcript:

TITLE RP1.019 : Eliminating islands in high-pressure free- boundary stellarator magnetohydrodynamic equilibrium solutions. S.R.Hudson, D.A.Monticello, A.H.Reiman, M.C.Zarnstorff, A.H.Boozer, D.J.Strickler, S.P.Hirshman Amercian Physical Society Division of Plasma Physics Meeting, 2003, 27 Oct - 31 Oct Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Motivation and Outline. 1)Stellarators will in general have islands and, unless avoided or suppressed, islands and associated regions of chaos lead to poor plasma confinement. 2)Islands in free-boundary NCSX equilibria were eliminated (coil-healing) as a final step in the coil design, after the coil-plasma optimization. 3)Details of the coil healing procedure are described. 4) Results for NCSX are presented showing a stable stellarator equilibrium, with build-able coils, with “good-flux-surfaces”.

Islands may be removed by boundary variation. 1)Equilibrium (including islands & resonant fields as calculated by PIES) is determined by plasma boundary.,... but PIES is too slow for optimization. Equilibrium before boundary variation Equilibrium after boundary variation to remove islands large m=5 island m=5 island suppressed

Coil healing is required because … 1)The plasma and coils are designed using optimization routines that shape plasma boundary to achieve desired physics, while satisfying engineering constraints on coil geometry. (see Strickler IAEA-CN-94/FT/P2-06) 2)All fast equilibrium codes (in particular VMEC) presuppose perfect nested magnetic surfaces  existence & size of magnetic islands cannot be addressed. 3)After the plasma and coil optimization, the coil geometry is modified to suppress the spectrum of B.n relevant to island formation  this procedure is called coil-healing. 4)Coil-healing must not degrade the optimized plasma properties (ideal stability, quasi-axisymmetry, aspect ratio,... ). 5)Coil-healing must not violate engineering constraints.

Coils are modified to remove islands. original equilibrium with islands and chaos `healed’ equilibrium with good surfaces coil adjustment to remove resonant fields (not to scale) 2cm

The equilibrium calculation and coil healing proceed simultaneously via an iterative approach. 1) B n = B P n + B C (  n ) 2)  p = J (n+1)  B n 3) J (n+1) =   B P 4) B P (n+1) =  B P n +(1-  )B P 5) B = B P (n+1) + B C (  n ) 6) –R i =  R Cij   n j 7)  j (n+1) =  j n +  j n At each iteration, the coil geometry is adjusted to cancel the resonant fields n iteration index ; B P plasma field ; B C coil field ;  coil geometry harmonics ;  =0.99 blending parameter ;  R Cij coupling matrix. A single PIES/healing iteration is shown coil geometry adjusted resonant fields function of  nearly integrable field total field = plasma + coil field calculate plasma current calculate plasma field blending for numerical stability Based on the PIES code

Rational surfaces are located. 1)Quadratic-flux minimizing surfaces may be thought of as rational rotational transform flux surfaces of a nearby field with good flux surfaces. Dewar, Hudson & Price.Physics Letters A, 194:49, 1994 Hudson & Dewar, Physics of Plasmas 6(5):1532, )Resonant normal fields at the rational surfaces form islands, and island overlap causes chaos. 3)Island suppression achieved by suppression of resonant fields. perturbationshear field + island chain

The field normal to the rational surface is calculated. Cross section (black line) passes through island Poincare plot on  =0 plane (red dots)  =0 plane For given B P, the resonant normal field is a function of coil geometry n B = B P + B C (  ) ee ee illustration of quadratic-flux-minimizing surface

Plasma stability is calculated. For given coil set,… free-boundary VMEC determines equilibrium, TERPSICHORE / COBRA give kink / ballooning stability Kink stability and ballooning stability expressed as functions of coil geometry

Engineering constraints are calculated. 1)To be “build-able”, the coils must satisfy engineering requirements. 2)Engineering constraints are calculated by the COILOPT code. 3)In this application, the coil-coil separation and coil minimum radius of curvature are considered. coil-coil separation : must exceed  iCC0 radius of curvature : must exceed  iR0 single filament description of coils Coil-coil separation and minimum radius of curvature expressed as functions of coil geometry

Resonant fields are cancelled by coil-adjustment; engineering constraints and plasma stability is preserved. 1)The coil-coil separation and coil minimum radius of curvature are functions of coil-geometry . 2)Ideal stability (kink, ballooning) are functions of free-boundary equilibrium, which in turn is a function of coil-geometry . 3)The desired solution is R = 0. coil/plasma resonant fields engineering constraints ideal stability initial values

Standard numerical methods find solution R=0. 1)First order expansion for small changes in  2)A multi-dimensional Newton method solves for the coil correction to cancel the resonant fields at the rational surface 3)The coil geometry is adjusted     . 4)At each PIES iteration, the coils are adjusted to remove resonant fields. 5)As the iterations proceed, the coil field and plasma field converge to an equilibrium with selected islands suppressed.

The NCSX modular coil geometry will be adjusted.

The healed configuration has good-flux-surfaces. 3/6 island suppressed high order islands not considered. VMEC initialization boundary Poincare plot on up-down symmetric  =2  /6 3/5 island suppressed reference state  = 4.1% I = 178kA  (0) = 0.40  (1) = 0.65

- plot shows coils on toroidal winding surface - coil change  2cm - coil change exceeds construction tolerances - does not impact machine design (diagnostic, NBI access still ok) * the resonant harmonics have been adjusted original healed The magnitude of the coil change is acceptable.

Healed PIES / VMEC comparison PIES healed VMEC original VMEC High order islands and ‘near-resonant’ deformation may explain discrepancy between the healed PIES and VMEC. Numerical convergence tests required to quantify agreement.

The healed coils support good vacuum states. The healed coils maintain good vacuum states first wall

Finite thickness coils show further improvement. Inner wall Single filament equilibrium Multi filament equilibrium The multi filament coils show further improvement

Robustness of healed coils 1)The discharge scenario is a sequence of equilibria, with increasing , that evolves the current profile in time self- consistently from the discharge initiation to the high  state. 2)The healed coils show improved configurations for this sequence. 3)NOTE : this sequence has in no way been optimized for surface quality. timeaI (A)  (%)axis  edge  e e e e e

Healed coils are improved for discharge seq. with trim coils original coils

Trim Coils are included in the NCSX design.

Trim Coils provide additional island control without trim coils: (n,m)=(3,6) island with trim coils: island suppressed discharge scenario t = 100ms  = 3.38% I = 81.6kA  (0) =  (1) = the same procedure determines the trim coil currents which suppress islands

Summary 1)The plasma and coils converge simultaneously to a free- boundary equilibrium with selected islands suppressed, while preserving engineering constraints and plasma stability. 2)Adjusting the coil geometry at every PIES iteration enables effective control of non-linearity of the plasma response to changes in the external field. 3)Coils support a variety of equilibria with good flux surface quality, and trim coils provide control of islands.