Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Interest in Topics Related to the Treatment of Patients with CML (Percent Responding 9 or 10)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr N M Butt Consultant Haematologist
Advertisements

Managing Side Effects of TKIs
The National CML Society 2012 CML UPDATE “What’s New? What’s Coming?” Luke Akard MD Co-Director Indiana Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program.
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Treatment Success and Milestones
Long Term Follow-Up After Imatinib Cessation for Patients in Deep Molecular Response: The Update Results of the STIM1 Study1 Preliminary Report of the.
Ponatinib in Patients (pts) with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ ALL) Resistant or.
DR Discontinuation of second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors CML and MPDs UK national meeting Newcastle, March 1 st, 2013 Dr Delphine Rea Service.
Michael J. Mauro MD Updates from ASH 2010: Second and Third Generation TKIs for CML Compound-Specific Toxicities of TKIs in CML.
Final Study Results of the Phase III Dasatinib versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Trial (DASISION, CA )1.
Part VIII – Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Tuesday, August 2, :30 PM – 8:30 PM ET RTP TV: An 8-Part Live CME Webcast Series.
Chronic myeloid leukaemia
Monitoring CML Treatment: Addressing the Issues for the Community Hematologist/Oncologist Hagop M. Kantarjian, MD Chairman; Professor, Department of Leukemia.
1 Rea D et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 811.
Please note, these are the actual video-recorded proceedings from the live CME event and may include the use of trade names and other raw, unedited content.
Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Interest in Topics Related to the Treatment of Patients with CLL (Percent Responding 9 or 10)
Comparison of Nilotinib and Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): ENESTnd Beyond One Year Larson.
Elias Jabbour, MD University of Texas – M. D. Anderson Cancer Center CML and Imatinib Resistance: Which TKI and When?
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
Treatment of CML Transplant or Imatinib? Mark B Juckett MD Section of Hematology/BMT University of Wisconsin.
Ponatinib as Initial Therapy for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Cortes JE et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 1483.
Discontinuation of Imatinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Maintained Complete Molecular Response: Updated Results of the STIM 1 Discontinuation.
CML in China Qian Jiang, MD Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology
SPIRIT3 support includes Biobanking: broadly as for SPIRIT2, but plus genomic DNA (mouth wash via kit) Correlative Science: Biomarkers LSC biology NGS:
What are the risks and benefits of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ? Wendy Osborne Consultant Haematologist Freeman Hospital, Newcastle.
ENESTnd Update: Nilotinib (NIL) vs Imatinib (IM) in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and the Impact.
Dose Interruption/Reduction of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the First 3 Months of Treatment of CML Is Associated with Inferior Early Molecular Responses.
David Marin, Imperial College London Early molecular prediction of response to TKI.
CML TKIs – where are we up to? Steve O’Brien
11 One vs Three Years of Adjuvant Imatinib for Operable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor A Randomized Trial Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al.
ENESTnd 24-Month Update: Continued Superiority of Nilotinib versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
An Ongoing Phase 3 Study of Bosutinib (SKI-606) versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Gambacorti-Passerini.
Incidence of Hypophosphatemia Phos (Low) Number of Subjects (%) Total N = 511 Grade (55) Grade 1 36 (7) Grade (20) Grade 3 80 (16) Grade 4.
Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. What Clinicians Want to Know A Live CME Event Addressing the Most Common Questions and Controversies.
Epic: A Phase 3 Trial of Ponatinib Compared with Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CP-CML) Lipton JH.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
Early Molecular and Cytogenic Response Is Predictive for Long-Term Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Hanfstein B.
Dasatinib Compared to Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Twelve- Month Efficacy and Safety.
Initial Findings from the PACE Trial: A Pivotal Phase 2 Study of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib,
Switching to Nilotinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase with Suboptimal Cytogenetic Response on Imatinib: Results from the LASOR.
A Pivotal Phase 2 Trial of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib, or with the T315I BCR ‐ ABL Mutation:
Nilotinib versus Imatinib in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP):
Dasatinib or Imatinib (IM) in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Two-Year Follow-Up from DASISION Kantarjian H et al.
Treatment Approaches in Relapsed CML Jorge Cortes, MD Professor of Medicine Deputy Chair, Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer.
Bosutinib as Therapy for Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Following Resistance or Intolerance to Imatinib: 36-Month Minimum Follow-Up Update Cortes.
Mok TS, Wu SL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: Gefitinib Superior.
Providing Optimal Care for Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Future of CML treatments – Are they getting us closer to cure? Andreas Hochhaus Universitätsklinikum Jena, Germany.
Working Groups in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia: Choice of First-line Therapy This program is supported by an educational grant from.
Michael J. Mauro, MD Associate Professor Knight Cancer Institute, Center for Hematologic Malignancies Oregon Health and Science University Portland, Oregon.
Kantarjian HM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Long-Term Follow-Up of Ongoing Patients in 2 Studies of Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate for Chronic Myeloid.
Update on Approved TKIs Jorge Cortes, MD Chief, CML and AML Sections Department of Leukemia MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas.
Phase III EURO-SKI: Cessation of TKI Therapy Safe, Feasible for Pts Who Achieve Deep Molecular Response New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference.
CML Shejal Patel DO.
Shah N et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 206.
Multiple Myeloma in the Non-transplant Setting
Early Molecular and Cytogenetic Response Predict for Better Outcomes in Untreated Patients with CML-CP — Comparison of 4 TKI Modalities (Standard- and.
Jointly sponsored by Postgraduate Institute for Medicine and Clinical Care Options, LLC Clinical Focus: Options for Treatment-Resistant or Treatment-Intolerant.
Ellen K. Ritchie Clinical Director, Richard T. Silver MPN Center
Cortes JE et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6502.
Monitoring Milestones in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Great Debates and Updates in Hematologic Malignancies 2014
Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Diagnosis and Treatment
Best Practices in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia by Multidisciplinary Teams
Long-term outcome with dasatinib after imatinib failure in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: follow-up of a phase 3 study by Neil P. Shah, François.
Great Debates-CML Omacetaxine succinate
Crossover for pts meeting ELN 2013 failure criteria
1Kantarjian HM et al. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:
Branford S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 254.
Leber B et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 94.
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Interest in Topics Related to the Treatment of Patients with CML (Percent Responding 9 or 10) 36% 38% 39% 42% 32%34%36%38%40%42%44% Resistance mutations in BCR-ABL Monitoring patients during therapy New agents/regimens Sequencing of TKIs TKI-refractory CML Efficacy and tolerability of TKIs* *Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Susan M O’Brien, MD

IRIS 8-Year Update: Outcome After Imatinib 37% Deininger M et al; Blood 2009;114(22):462.

Nilotinib vs Imatinib in Newly Dx CML (ENESTnd) Primary endpoint: MMR at 12 months Key secondary endpoint: Durable MMR at 24 months Other endpoints: CCyR by 12 months, time to MMR and CCyR, EFS, PFS, time to AP/BC on study treatment, OS including follow-up *Stratification by Sokal risk score Imatinib 400 mg QD (n = 283) Nilotinib 300 mg BID (n = 282) RANDOMIZED*RANDOMIZED* Nilotinib 400 mg BID (n = 281) N = centers 35 countries Follow-up 5 years Hughes et al. ASH 2010; abst #207

Nilotinib vs Imatinib in Newly Dx CML-CP (ENESTnd). Primary Endpoint - MMR Rate at 12 Months (ITT Population) P <.0001 Patients with MMR (%) Larson RA et al. J Clin Oncol 2010;28; Abstract Saglio G et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362; Abstract 2251.

IRIS 8-Year Results: Annual Rate of Events on Imatinib EFS = 81% Freedom from progression to AP/BC = 92% - 1 progression to AP/BC and 2 non-CML related deaths in year 8 Deininger et al. ASH Abs # AP/BC

% With CCyR

Dasatinib versus Imatinib Study in Treatment-Naïve CML: DASISION (CA ) Study Design ● Primary endpoint: Confirmed CCyR by 12 months ● Secondary/other endpoints: Rates of CCyR and MMR; times to confirmed CCyR, CCyR and MMR; time in confirmed CCyR and CCyR; PFS; overall survival Follow-up 5 years Randomized* Imatinib 400 mg QD (n = 260) Dasatinib 100 mg QD (n = 259) N = centers 26 countries *Stratified by Hasford risk score Shah et al. ASH 2010; abst #206.

DASISION: First-Line Dasatinib vs Imatinib in CML-CP CCyR Rate by 12 Months (ITT) CCyR (%) Confirmed CCyR by 12 months CCyR by 12 months P = P = Kantarjian. N Engl J Med 362: 2260, 2010.

DASISION: Progression to AP-BP (ITT) No patient who achieved MMR progressed to AP/BP CML 5 patients who achieved a CCyR progressed to AP/BP CML (2 dasatinib, 3 imatinib) Rates of progression-free survival at 18 mos: 94.9% for dasatinib and 93.7% for imatinib n/N 6/259 9/260 Shah N et al. Blood 2010;116: Abstract

DASISION: Confirmed CCyR (ITT) Shah N et al. Blood 2010;116: Abstract 206. P = P =

Definitions of PFS-EFS in CML Definitions of EFS/PFS vary in different studies Definitions applied to 435 pts treated with frontline TKI Occurrence EFS- IRIS TWP- ENEST PFS- DASISION EFS- MDACC AP-BP on TKI ++++ off TKI Death on TKI + CML-related <30 d off TKI Any cause + off TKI - CML-related <30 d off TKI <60 d off TKI + Loss of CHR/MCyR (also ↑WBC) + EFS-MDACC accounts for any event off TKI and any death on/off TKI Kantarjian et al. Blood 2010:116; Abst #672.

Outcome According to Different Definitions of EFS/PFS Kantarjian et al. Blood 2010:116;Abst #672. DefinitionsEvent5-yr (%) ENEST-TWP1596 IRIS-EFS4090 DASISION-PFS 4389 MDACC-EFS Because EFS and PFS are important in determining whether new TKIs are better than imatinib in front-line therapy, precise and common definitions of these endpoints are needed.

Data cut-off: 20Aug2010 Hughes TP, et al. ASH Abstract 207.

DASISION: Grade 3/4 Cytopenia 100 Grade 3/4 bleeding occurred in 2 patients on dasatinib and 3 patients on imatinib 6 patients on dasatinib and 3 patients on imatinib D/C Rx due to cytopenia Shah N et al. Blood 2010;116: Abstract 206.

Common Nonhematologic Drug-Related AEs (≥10%) AE, % Dasatinib 100 mg QD N = 258 Imatinib 400 mg QD N = 258 All GradesGrade 3/4All GradesGrade 3/4 Fluid retention Superficial edema*10036<1 Pleural effusion12<100 Myalgia † Nausea90210 Vomiting50100 Diarrhea18<1191 Fatigue8<1110 Headache Rash * Includes 11 MedDRA preferred terms † Includes myalgia, muscle inflammation and musculoskeletal pain

Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. What Clinicians Want to Know A Live CME Event Addressing the Most Common Questions and Controversies in the Current Clinical Management of Select Hematologic Cancers Sunday, June 5, :00 PM – 9:30 PM Chicago, Illinois Faculty Sergio Giralt, MD John P Leonard, MD Lauren C Pinter-Brown, MD Moderator Neil Love, MD Antonio Palumbo, MD Susan M O’Brien, MD Professor Michael Hallek

Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. What is your preferred initial systemic treatment for chronic-phase CML?

Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Have you discontinued imatinib, dasatinib or nilotinib for patients responding with sustained molecular CR?

Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. What Clinicians Want to Know A Live CME Event Addressing the Most Common Questions and Controversies in the Current Clinical Management of Select Hematologic Cancers Sunday, June 5, :00 PM – 9:30 PM Chicago, Illinois Faculty Sergio Giralt, MD John P Leonard, MD Lauren C Pinter-Brown, MD Moderator Neil Love, MD Antonio Palumbo, MD Susan M O’Brien, MD Professor Michael Hallek